Skip to content
  • About
  • Contact
  • Contribute
  • Book
  • Careers
  • Podcast
  • Recommended
  • Speaking
  • All
  • Physician
  • Practice
  • Policy
  • Finance
  • Conditions
  • .edu
  • Patient
  • Meds
  • Tech
  • Social
  • Video
    • All
    • Physician
    • Practice
    • Policy
    • Finance
    • Conditions
    • .edu
    • Patient
    • Meds
    • Tech
    • Social
    • Video
    • About
    • Contact
    • Contribute
    • Book
    • Careers
    • Podcast
    • Recommended
    • Speaking

Did the government get it right on EHR certification?

Glenn Laffel, MD, PhD
Tech
January 22, 2010
Share
Tweet
Share

Last week, the Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology (ONC) released criteria that will be used to certify EHRs as appropriate support tools for providers who want to qualify for Bonanza Days.

The criteria are subject to a 60-day comment period before being finalized.

I congratulate ONC on its elegant piece of rule making. Its so-called Interim Final Rule (IFR) provides a foundation that can support years of progress in health care IT. Someday, it will probably be recognized as the most important quality-enhancing, cost-reducing initiative ever launched by the Feds in health care.

Certainly its agenda is more transformational than the hodgepodge, incremental approach being used to “reform” our nation’s health care system.

ONC’s Interim Final Rule is deftly articulated with existing legislation, which is no small feat since health care is so heavily regulated. In its own jurisdiction, the IFR sets direction clearly and aggressively. It reconciles cultural, bureaucratic and legal issues to get Medicare and Medicaid more or less aligned and supportive of the rule making, and it works well with the CMS companion document, a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking that outlines Meaningful Use.

The IFR is also appropriately incremental in its approach: its 3-stage implementation scheme correctly anticipates a decade of work to enhance the interoperability, functionality, utility, and security of health information technology in this country.

For those who believe the implementation timeframes—even for Stage 1 criteria—are too aggressive, it is well to remember that these were set by the HITECH legislation, not by ONC. ONC had no choice but to make those timeframes work.

But the thing I most admire about ONC’s IFR is that it manages to create a marketplace that both gives the Big Iron EHR vendors a chance to survive and clears a path for innovators in the space.

To do this, ONC riffed on HITECH verbiage which featured the joined phrase, “EHR Technology,” rather than the single phrase, “EHR.” ONC interpreted Congress’ intent in this regard to mean that it expected providers to implement several technological components, or “EHR Modules,” rather than a complete, all-in-one solution when it came time to demonstrate Meaningful Use.

This interpretation has already proved prescient. Beth Israel Deaconess Hospital’s CIO, John Halamka, who doubles as the Vice Chair of ONC’s HIT Standards Committee, recently confided that his hospital’s system will require partnerships with approximately six 3rd party vendors in order to qualify for HHS certification, for example.

ONC defines the term “EHR Module” to mean any service, component, or combination thereof that can meet the requirements of at least one certification criterion. Examples include:

– software or interfaces that enable the electronic exchange of health information
– software that lets individuals access health information contained in EHRs
– clinical decision support rules engines
– software that enables quality reporting.

EHR Modules are a godsend for legacy vendors to the extent that their systems cannot accommodate certain certification criteria. In such instances, the legacy vendor can simply contract with a third party to offer the service, or better, acquire the vendor.

ADVERTISEMENT

But ONC also envisions EHR Modules as central to its strategy for accelerating the pace innovation in the EHR marketplace, a strategy that was first proposed by Mandl and Kohane and that is being actualized by David Kibbe and colleagues at the Clinical Groupware Collaborative.

The idea is that future-state EHRs will evolve into open platforms, like the iPhone or Facebook, a phenomenon that would allow enterprising companies to develop “apps” that plug into the platform. This accelerates innovation by letting niche vendors focus on the things they do best, and creating an open market in which the swappable apps compete on price and performance.

Essentially, ONC wants the HIT marketplace to look like the one for consumer electronics, in which those interested in installing a home theater can buy a flat-panel TV, a DVD player and a stereo system from 3 different vendors, or one, whatever they prefer. The pace of innovation in that space has been remarkable in the last decade.

It’s all pretty impressive to me. Yes, I remain worried that there isn’t going to be enough time for interested providers to acquire, learn and meaningfully use their EHRs in time for Bonanza Days. Yes, I would prefer to see ONC specify all 3 stages of the EHR certification now because that would help my company make better decisions for the long-term. But all that’s for another day.

Right now, my hat is off to ONC.

Glenn Laffel is Sr. VP, Clinical Affairs at Practice Fusion.

Submit a guest post and be heard.

Prev

Obese college students are reading health related spam e-mails

January 22, 2010 Kevin 0
…
Next

iPhone medical apps for your iPod Touch

January 22, 2010 Kevin 1
…

Tagged as: Health IT, Public Health & Policy

Post navigation

< Previous Post
Obese college students are reading health related spam e-mails
Next Post >
iPhone medical apps for your iPod Touch

ADVERTISEMENT

More by Glenn Laffel, MD, PhD

  • a desk with keyboard and ipad with the kevinmd logo

    Explaining human motivation towards unhealthy behavior

    Glenn Laffel, MD, PhD
  • a desk with keyboard and ipad with the kevinmd logo

    A surge in demand for physicians from newly insured patients

    Glenn Laffel, MD, PhD
  • a desk with keyboard and ipad with the kevinmd logo

    Physicians should establish rules with their patients before using a PHR

    Glenn Laffel, MD, PhD

More in Tech

  • Why voicemail in outpatient care is failing patients and staff

    Dan Ouellet
  • Building a clinical simulation app without an MD: a developer’s guide

    Helena Kaso, MPA
  • AI-enabled clinical data abstraction: a nurse’s perspective

    Pamela Ashenfelter, RN
  • Agentic AI in medicine: the danger of automating the doctor

    Shiv K. Goel, MD
  • Will AI replace primary care physicians?

    P. Dileep Kumar, MD, MBA
  • AI in medicine: Why it won’t replace doctors but will redefine them

    Tod Stillson, MD
  • Most Popular

  • Past Week

    • My wife’s story: How DEA and CDC guidelines destroyed our golden years

      Monty Goddard & Richard A. Lawhern, PhD | Conditions
    • The hidden costs of the physician non-clinical career transition

      Carlos N. Hernandez-Torres, MD | Physician
    • The gastroenterologist shortage: Why supply is falling behind demand

      Brian Hudes, MD | Physician
    • Health care as a human right vs. commodity: Resolving the paradox

      Timothy Lesaca, MD | Physician
    • Why private equity is betting on employer DPC over retail

      Dana Y. Lujan, MBA | Policy
    • Why voicemail in outpatient care is failing patients and staff

      Dan Ouellet | Tech
  • Past 6 Months

    • Physician on-call compensation: the unpaid labor driving burnout

      Corinne Sundar Rao, MD | Physician
    • How environmental justice and health disparities connect to climate change

      Kaitlynn Esemaya, Alexis Thompson, Annique McLune, and Anamaria Ancheta | Policy
    • Will AI replace primary care physicians?

      P. Dileep Kumar, MD, MBA | Tech
    • A physician father on the Dobbs decision and reproductive rights

      Travis Walker, MD, MPH | Physician
    • What is the minority tax in medicine?

      Tharini Nagarkar and Maranda C. Ward, EdD, MPH | Education
    • Why the U.S. health care system is failing patients and physicians

      John C. Hagan III, MD | Policy
  • Recent Posts

    • Remote second opinions bridge the gap in rural cancer survival [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • High-protein diet risks: Why more isn’t always better

      Farid Sabet-Sharghi, MD | Conditions
    • Breaking the silence: mental health and racism in medical school

      Michael F. Myers, MD | Physician
    • My wife’s story: How DEA and CDC guidelines destroyed our golden years

      Monty Goddard & Richard A. Lawhern, PhD | Conditions
    • Why AI in health care is the only fix for physician shortages

      John C. Hagan III, MD | Physician
    • Health insurance waste: Why eliminating the middleman saves billions

      Edward Anselm, MD | Policy

Subscribe to KevinMD and never miss a story!

Get free updates delivered free to your inbox.


Find jobs at
Careers by KevinMD.com

Search thousands of physician, PA, NP, and CRNA jobs now.

Learn more

View 1 Comments >

Founded in 2004 by Kevin Pho, MD, KevinMD.com is the web’s leading platform where physicians, advanced practitioners, nurses, medical students, and patients share their insight and tell their stories.

Social

  • Like on Facebook
  • Follow on Twitter
  • Connect on Linkedin
  • Subscribe on Youtube
  • Instagram

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Most Popular

  • Past Week

    • My wife’s story: How DEA and CDC guidelines destroyed our golden years

      Monty Goddard & Richard A. Lawhern, PhD | Conditions
    • The hidden costs of the physician non-clinical career transition

      Carlos N. Hernandez-Torres, MD | Physician
    • The gastroenterologist shortage: Why supply is falling behind demand

      Brian Hudes, MD | Physician
    • Health care as a human right vs. commodity: Resolving the paradox

      Timothy Lesaca, MD | Physician
    • Why private equity is betting on employer DPC over retail

      Dana Y. Lujan, MBA | Policy
    • Why voicemail in outpatient care is failing patients and staff

      Dan Ouellet | Tech
  • Past 6 Months

    • Physician on-call compensation: the unpaid labor driving burnout

      Corinne Sundar Rao, MD | Physician
    • How environmental justice and health disparities connect to climate change

      Kaitlynn Esemaya, Alexis Thompson, Annique McLune, and Anamaria Ancheta | Policy
    • Will AI replace primary care physicians?

      P. Dileep Kumar, MD, MBA | Tech
    • A physician father on the Dobbs decision and reproductive rights

      Travis Walker, MD, MPH | Physician
    • What is the minority tax in medicine?

      Tharini Nagarkar and Maranda C. Ward, EdD, MPH | Education
    • Why the U.S. health care system is failing patients and physicians

      John C. Hagan III, MD | Policy
  • Recent Posts

    • Remote second opinions bridge the gap in rural cancer survival [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • High-protein diet risks: Why more isn’t always better

      Farid Sabet-Sharghi, MD | Conditions
    • Breaking the silence: mental health and racism in medical school

      Michael F. Myers, MD | Physician
    • My wife’s story: How DEA and CDC guidelines destroyed our golden years

      Monty Goddard & Richard A. Lawhern, PhD | Conditions
    • Why AI in health care is the only fix for physician shortages

      John C. Hagan III, MD | Physician
    • Health insurance waste: Why eliminating the middleman saves billions

      Edward Anselm, MD | Policy

MedPage Today Professional

An Everyday Health Property Medpage Today
  • Terms of Use | Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • DMCA Policy
All Content © KevinMD, LLC
Site by Outthink Group

Did the government get it right on EHR certification?
1 comments

Comments are moderated before they are published. Please read the comment policy.

Loading Comments...