Skip to content
  • About
  • Contact
  • Contribute
  • Book
  • Careers
  • Podcast
  • Recommended
  • Speaking
  • All
  • Physician
  • Practice
  • Policy
  • Finance
  • Conditions
  • .edu
  • Patient
  • Meds
  • Tech
  • Social
  • Video
    • All
    • Physician
    • Practice
    • Policy
    • Finance
    • Conditions
    • .edu
    • Patient
    • Meds
    • Tech
    • Social
    • Video
    • About
    • Contact
    • Contribute
    • Book
    • Careers
    • Podcast
    • Recommended
    • Speaking

Online eye exams spark legal battle over health care access

Joshua Windham, JD and Daryl James
Policy
July 11, 2025
Share
Tweet
Share

Brick-and-mortar stores must deal with online competition. Even health clinics face disruption from telemedicine. Yet optometrists have special protection in South Carolina.

When a telehealth company invented a safe and effective way for doctors to renew vision prescriptions remotely, political insiders rallied in Columbia to ban the service in South Carolina. Now, nine years later, the state-sponsored favoritism could end.

The South Carolina Supreme Court, which already rejected an attempt to dismiss the case in 2022, will finally decide whether the protectionist ban is unconstitutional.

Oral arguments—available online like just about everything else in the modern economy—occurred on June 3, 2025. The case started much earlier in 2016, when established providers got fed up with Chicago-based Visibly operating in their market.

The startup, then called Opternative, had been safely operating in South Carolina for nearly two years. Even today, nobody can point to any problems. Visibly is FDA cleared, and doctors safely use it to expand access to care in dozens of states.

The South Carolina Optometric Physicians Association (SCOPA) did not care. The trade group, whose members make much of their money selling glasses in their shops, wanted the economic threat removed. So it drafted a bill, recruited legislative sponsors, and celebrated when a supermajority of state lawmakers overrode then-Gov. Nikki Haley’s veto.

“Take that Opternative!!!!!!,” SCOPA wrote in an email to its members.

It pays to have friends in high places. If booksellers had the same clout, they could have stopped Amazon in 1994. Travel agencies could have stopped Expedia in 1996. And video rental chains could have stopped Netflix in 1997.

Consumers would have suffered in terms of convenience, quality, and cost. But established providers have different priorities. Adapting to innovation can be a hassle when they already have familiar ways of doing things.

South Carolina optometrists have an especially comfortable arrangement. Most states allow two-year prescriptions for corrective lenses. The duration is three years in North Dakota and five years in Florida. But optometrists convinced lawmakers to adopt annual expirations in South Carolina.

This short window maximizes visits to eye specialists, which is great for business if you happen to sell lenses and frames. Online renewals could cut into this racket, which is why the backlash against Visibly was so visceral.

What the company’s opponents overlooked was that the South Carolina Constitution guarantees due process and equal protection, which means laws must meaningfully benefit the public. Reducing access to care does not benefit the public—it merely protects an outdated business model from competition.

Visibly made this argument when it filed its lawsuit. Our public interest law firm, the Institute for Justice, represents the company. A key fact we pointed out, and that state Supreme Court will now have to grapple with, is that South Carolina broadly embraces telemedicine.

ADVERTISEMENT

State law trusts and empowers doctors to use online tools just like Visibly to prescribe nearly anything—eye drops, skin creams, antibiotics, and anything else doctors conclude would benefit a patient—except lenses. The only other prescriptions treated as harshly as lenses are opioids-inducing drugs. Needless to say, eyeglasses are not like opioids.

South Carolina does not treat lenses differently because they are uniquely dangerous. Indeed, about two-thirds of U.S. adults use prescription eyewear, and most renewals are routine. Instead, lenses are being treated differently because a trade group wrote a law to protect its bottom line and managed to scare the Legislature into adopting it.

That is unconstitutional. SCOPA can pretend that the internet does not exist. The group can live in the 1980s if it wants. But the South Carolina Constitution does not require courts to play along. The state trusts doctors to treat patients online and should not single out eyeglasses just because some people fear competition.

Political insiders must deal with reality, just like everyone else.

Joshua Windham is an attorney. Daryl James is a writer.

Prev

FDA delays could end vital treatment for rare disease patients

July 11, 2025 Kevin 1
…
Next

Facing terminal cancer as a doctor and mother

July 11, 2025 Kevin 0
…

Tagged as: Ophthalmology

Post navigation

< Previous Post
FDA delays could end vital treatment for rare disease patients
Next Post >
Facing terminal cancer as a doctor and mother

ADVERTISEMENT

More by Joshua Windham, JD and Daryl James

  • How South Carolina’s eye care laws are blocking telemedicine innovation

    Joshua Windham, JD and Daryl James

Related Posts

  • Ensuring universal access and quality care: the advantages of a mixed health care system in Canada

    Jean Paul Brutus, MD
  • Health care reform requires better access and quality: dialysis as an example

    David W. Moskowitz, MD
  • The hidden cost of health care: How rising debt threatens your access to care

    Allan Dobzyniak, MD
  • Third-party litigation funding threatens access to health care

    The Doctors Company
  • Expanding health care access and equity through telehealth

    Gjanje L. Smith, MD, MPH, Wanneh A. Dixon, and Maria Phillips, JD
  • Why the health care industry must prioritize health equity

    George T. Mathew, MD, MBA

More in Policy

  • How the One Big Beautiful Bill could reshape your medical career

    Kara Pepper, MD
  • Why the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force is essential to saving lives

    J. Leonard Lichtenfeld, MD
  • Brooklyn hepatitis C cluster reveals hidden dangers in outpatient clinics

    Don Weiss, MD, MPH
  • Why nearly 800 U.S. hospitals are at risk of shutting down

    Harry Severance, MD
  • Innovation is moving too fast for health care workers to catch up

    Tiffiny Black, DM, MPA, MBA
  • How pediatricians can address the health problems raised in the MAHA child health report

    Joseph Barrocas, MD
  • Most Popular

  • Past Week

    • Love, birds, and fries: a story of innocence and connection

      Dr. Damane Zehra | Physician
    • How a doctor defied a hurricane to save a life

      Dharam Persaud-Sharma, MD, PhD | Physician
    • Why primary care needs better dermatology training

      Alex Siauw | Conditions
    • Why physician strikes are a form of hospice

      Patrick Hudson, MD | Physician
    • Private practice employment agreements: What happens if private equity swoops in?

      Dennis Hursh, Esq | Conditions
    • An ER nurse explains why the system is collapsing [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
  • Past 6 Months

    • Why transgender health care needs urgent reform and inclusive practices

      Angela Rodriguez, MD | Conditions
    • COVID-19 was real: a doctor’s frontline account

      Randall S. Fong, MD | Conditions
    • Why primary care doctors are drowning in debt despite saving lives

      John Wei, MD | Physician
    • Confessions of a lipidologist in recovery: the infection we’ve ignored for 40 years

      Larry Kaskel, MD | Conditions
    • Why taxing remittances harms families and global health care

      Dalia Saha, MD | Finance
    • mRNA post vaccination syndrome: Is it real?

      Harry Oken, MD | Conditions
  • Recent Posts

    • An ER nurse explains why the system is collapsing [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • Why reforming medical boards is critical to saving patient care

      Kayvan Haddadan, MD | Physician
    • How denial of hypertension endangers lives and what doctors can do

      Dr. Aminat O. Akintola | Conditions
    • AI in health care is moving too fast for the human heart

      Tiffiny Black, DM, MPA, MBA | Tech
    • How physicians can reclaim resilience through better sleep, nutrition, and exercise

      Kim Downey, PT & Shirish Sachdeva, PT, DPT & Ziya Altug, PT, DPT | Conditions
    • This isn’t burnout, it’s moral injury [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast

Subscribe to KevinMD and never miss a story!

Get free updates delivered free to your inbox.


Find jobs at
Careers by KevinMD.com

Search thousands of physician, PA, NP, and CRNA jobs now.

Learn more

Leave a Comment

Founded in 2004 by Kevin Pho, MD, KevinMD.com is the web’s leading platform where physicians, advanced practitioners, nurses, medical students, and patients share their insight and tell their stories.

Social

  • Like on Facebook
  • Follow on Twitter
  • Connect on Linkedin
  • Subscribe on Youtube
  • Instagram

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Most Popular

  • Past Week

    • Love, birds, and fries: a story of innocence and connection

      Dr. Damane Zehra | Physician
    • How a doctor defied a hurricane to save a life

      Dharam Persaud-Sharma, MD, PhD | Physician
    • Why primary care needs better dermatology training

      Alex Siauw | Conditions
    • Why physician strikes are a form of hospice

      Patrick Hudson, MD | Physician
    • Private practice employment agreements: What happens if private equity swoops in?

      Dennis Hursh, Esq | Conditions
    • An ER nurse explains why the system is collapsing [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
  • Past 6 Months

    • Why transgender health care needs urgent reform and inclusive practices

      Angela Rodriguez, MD | Conditions
    • COVID-19 was real: a doctor’s frontline account

      Randall S. Fong, MD | Conditions
    • Why primary care doctors are drowning in debt despite saving lives

      John Wei, MD | Physician
    • Confessions of a lipidologist in recovery: the infection we’ve ignored for 40 years

      Larry Kaskel, MD | Conditions
    • Why taxing remittances harms families and global health care

      Dalia Saha, MD | Finance
    • mRNA post vaccination syndrome: Is it real?

      Harry Oken, MD | Conditions
  • Recent Posts

    • An ER nurse explains why the system is collapsing [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • Why reforming medical boards is critical to saving patient care

      Kayvan Haddadan, MD | Physician
    • How denial of hypertension endangers lives and what doctors can do

      Dr. Aminat O. Akintola | Conditions
    • AI in health care is moving too fast for the human heart

      Tiffiny Black, DM, MPA, MBA | Tech
    • How physicians can reclaim resilience through better sleep, nutrition, and exercise

      Kim Downey, PT & Shirish Sachdeva, PT, DPT & Ziya Altug, PT, DPT | Conditions
    • This isn’t burnout, it’s moral injury [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast

MedPage Today Professional

An Everyday Health Property Medpage Today
  • Terms of Use | Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • DMCA Policy
All Content © KevinMD, LLC
Site by Outthink Group

Leave a Comment

Comments are moderated before they are published. Please read the comment policy.

Loading Comments...