Skip to content
  • About
  • Contact
  • Contribute
  • Book
  • Careers
  • Podcast
  • Recommended
  • Speaking
  • All
  • Physician
  • Practice
  • Policy
  • Finance
  • Conditions
  • .edu
  • Patient
  • Meds
  • Tech
  • Social
  • Video
    • All
    • Physician
    • Practice
    • Policy
    • Finance
    • Conditions
    • .edu
    • Patient
    • Meds
    • Tech
    • Social
    • Video
    • About
    • Contact
    • Contribute
    • Book
    • Careers
    • Podcast
    • Recommended
    • Speaking

Did the CDC just dismantle vaccine safety clarity?

Ronald L. Lindsay, MD
Policy
November 22, 2025
Share
Tweet
Share

“Vaccines do not cause autism.” That statement once anchored public health. The CDC just dismantled it, quietly, strategically, and dangerously.

Presumption reversed, justice subverted

Attorney Lindsey Halligan didn’t misspeak when she claimed James Comey must prove his innocence beyond a reasonable doubt to a Virginia grand jury. She exposed the new doctrine: guilt by accusation, innocence by loyalty. Then she staged a procedural ambush. She bypassed the full grand jury entirely. She secured a “true bill” with signatures from only the foreperson and one juror, a maneuver that violates the integrity of the indictment process. The original grand jury rejected one of the proposed charges. Halligan revised the indictment and sidestepped deliberation. She didn’t seek consensus. She engineered compliance. This wasn’t legal strategy; it was ideological choreography. The grand jury, once a bulwark against arbitrary prosecution, now functions as a prop in political theater. Prosecutors no longer pursue justice. They target enemies. Indictments arrive not through deliberation, but through loyalty-driven shortcuts.

CDC’s language: a masterclass in doubt and conspiracy

On November 19, the CDC revised its vaccine safety page. They replaced clarity with ambiguity. They wrote: “The claim ‘vaccines do not cause autism’ is not an evidence-based claim because studies have not ruled out the possibility.” This isn’t science. It’s sabotage. The CDC didn’t cite new data. They adopted the language of Bobby Kennedy Jr., whose campaign thrives on unreasonable doubt. They didn’t clarify; they capitulated. They didn’t inform; they confused. They handed conspiracy theorists a gift-wrapped soundbite and told pediatricians to fend for themselves.

Unreasonable doubt: the new protocol

Bobby Jr. doesn’t rely on evidence. He relies on strategic ambiguity. He doesn’t need to prove causation. He only needs to seed suspicion. The CDC’s new phrasing gives him cover.

  • It tells families: “We’re not sure anymore.”
  • It tells clinicians: “You’re on your own.”
  • It tells the public: “Truth is negotiable.”

The children pay the price of inaction: Measles elimination status is on the brink.

The U.S. is poised to lose its measles elimination status, just as Canada did last week. The outbreak that began in Texas in January shows no signs of slowing. If it continues into January 2026, the CDC will have to reclassify measles as endemic.

This year alone:

  • Over 1,700 measles cases have been confirmed
  • 45 outbreaks have been documented
  • 211 hospitalizations, including 100 children under age five
  • Three deaths (the first measles fatalities in the U.S. in over a decade)

Whooping cough cases are also surging. This isn’t just a public health failure. It’s a collapse of coordinated care, fueled by rhetorical sabotage and institutional retreat.

Weimar echoes in Washington

Carl von Ossietzky warned the world about German rearmament. He exposed the military buildup that violated the 1919 Peace Treaty of Versailles. He paid with imprisonment and torture. The Nobel Committee awarded him the Peace Prize posthumously. His warning was clear: When law becomes loyalty, truth becomes treason.

Today, the U.S. echoes Weimar’s collapse.

  • Institutions surrender integrity.
  • Judges equivocate.
  • Scientists retreat.
  • Journalists sanitize.

The slide into proto-dictatorship doesn’t arrive with tanks. It arrives with procedural sabotage.

ADVERTISEMENT

Political prosecutions and the theater of loyalty

Indictments now serve as political theater. Opponents face charges not for crimes, but for disobedience. Allies receive immunity, not through law, but through loyalty oaths. The DOJ no longer defends the Constitution. It defends the regime.

The courtroom becomes a stage. The grand jury becomes a prop. Justice becomes a slogan.

Public health as collateral damage

As a developmental pediatrician, I’ve watched families unravel under the weight of misinformation. I’ve seen children denied care because protocol replaced presence. I’ve watched clinicians silenced by fear, and researchers buried under bureaucracy. Now, the CDC tells us: “We haven’t ruled it out.” That’s not science. That’s surrender.

Even the parks are not safe.

Even our national parks now echo the propaganda playbook. Interpretive signs no longer honor indigenous stewardship or ecological truth. They sanitize history, glorify conquest, and mirror the language of Goebbels, where repetition replaces reason, and spectacle replaces substance. The wilderness, once a refuge, now serves as a billboard for state-sponsored distortion.

The cost of cowardice

We must not allow unreasonable doubt to become the new standard. We must not allow science to be rewritten by sentiment, or law to be inverted by loyalty. We must not allow protocol to become propaganda. Carl von Ossietzky warned us. We ignored him once. We must not ignore the warning again.

Ronald L. Lindsay is a retired developmental-behavioral pediatrician whose career spanned military service, academic leadership, and public health reform. His professional trajectory, detailed on LinkedIn, reflects a lifelong commitment to advancing neurodevelopmental science and equitable systems of care.

Dr. Lindsay’s research has appeared in leading journals, including The New England Journal of Medicine, The American Journal of Psychiatry, Archives of General Psychiatry, The Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychopharmacology, and Clinical Pediatrics. His NIH-funded work with the Research Units on Pediatric Psychopharmacology (RUPP) Network helped define evidence-based approaches to autism and related developmental disorders.

As medical director of the Nisonger Center at The Ohio State University, he led the Leadership Education in Neurodevelopmental and Related Disabilities (LEND) Program, training future leaders in interdisciplinary care. His Ohio Rural DBP Clinic Initiative earned national recognition for expanding access in underserved counties, and at Madigan Army Medical Center, he founded Joint Base Lewis-McChord (JBLM) CARES, a $10 million autism resource center for military families.

Dr. Lindsay’s scholarship, profiled on ResearchGate and Doximity, extends across seventeen peer-reviewed articles, eleven book chapters, and forty-five invited lectures, as well as contributions to major academic publishers such as Oxford University Press and McGraw-Hill. His memoir-in-progress, The Quiet Architect, threads testimony, resistance, and civic duty into a reckoning with systems retreat.

Prev

New autism treatment guidelines expand options for families

November 22, 2025 Kevin 0
…
Next

Glioblastoma immunotherapy trial: a new breakthrough

November 22, 2025 Kevin 0
…

Tagged as: Public Health & Policy

Post navigation

< Previous Post
New autism treatment guidelines expand options for families
Next Post >
Glioblastoma immunotherapy trial: a new breakthrough

ADVERTISEMENT

More by Ronald L. Lindsay, MD

  • Why scale of effort matters more than ego in health care

    Ronald L. Lindsay, MD
  • A blueprint for pediatric residency training reform

    Ronald L. Lindsay, MD
  • Why I chose disruption over conformity in medicine

    Ronald L. Lindsay, MD

Related Posts

  • Take politics out of science and medicine

    Anonymous
  • A view from Canada: Defending vaccine passports

    Bryan Thomas and Colleen M. Flood
  • America’s health care safety net is in danger

    Donna Grande
  • Communication with insurers: a pandemic problem the vaccine won’t fix

    Anupama Balasubramanian
  • Let teens self-consent to vaccines

    Cady Chen
  • The Federal SAVE Act: a beacon of hope for health care worker safety

    Scott Ellner, DO, MPH

More in Policy

  • Health insurance waste: Why eliminating the middleman saves billions

    Edward Anselm, MD
  • Why AAP funding cuts threaten the future of pediatric health care

    Umayr R. Shaikh, MPH
  • Why private equity is betting on employer DPC over retail

    Dana Y. Lujan, MBA
  • Why PBM transparency rules aren’t enough to lower drug prices

    Armin Pazooki
  • Emergency department metrics vs. reality: Why the numbers lie

    Marilyn McCullum, RN
  • Black women’s health resilience: the hidden cost of “pushing through”

    Latesha K. Harris, PhD, RN
  • Most Popular

  • Past Week

    • My wife’s story: How DEA and CDC guidelines destroyed our golden years

      Monty Goddard & Richard A. Lawhern, PhD | Conditions
    • The gastroenterologist shortage: Why supply is falling behind demand

      Brian Hudes, MD | Physician
    • Health care as a human right vs. commodity: Resolving the paradox

      Timothy Lesaca, MD | Physician
    • Why voicemail in outpatient care is failing patients and staff

      Dan Ouellet | Tech
    • Alex Pretti’s death: Why politics belongs in emergency medicine

      Marilyn McCullum, RN | Conditions
    • U.S. opioid policy history: How politics replaced science in pain care

      Richard A. Lawhern, PhD & Stephen E. Nadeau, MD | Meds
  • Past 6 Months

    • How environmental justice and health disparities connect to climate change

      Kaitlynn Esemaya, Alexis Thompson, Annique McLune, and Anamaria Ancheta | Policy
    • Will AI replace primary care physicians?

      P. Dileep Kumar, MD, MBA | Tech
    • A physician father on the Dobbs decision and reproductive rights

      Travis Walker, MD, MPH | Physician
    • What is the minority tax in medicine?

      Tharini Nagarkar and Maranda C. Ward, EdD, MPH | Education
    • Why the U.S. health care system is failing patients and physicians

      John C. Hagan III, MD | Policy
    • Alex Pretti: a physician’s open letter defending his legacy

      Mousson Berrouet, DO | Physician
  • Recent Posts

    • AI censorship threatens the lifeline of caregiver support [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • Demedicalize dying: Why end-of-life care needs a spiritual reset

      Kevin Haselhorst, MD | Physician
    • Physician due process: Surviving the court of public opinion

      Muhamad Aly Rifai, MD | Physician
    • Spaced repetition in medicine: Why current apps fail clinicians

      Dr. Sunakshi Bhatia | Physician
    • When the doctor becomes the patient: a breast cancer diagnosis

      Sue Hwang, MD | Conditions
    • My journey with fibroids and hysterectomy: a patient’s perspective

      Sonya Linda Bynum | Conditions

Subscribe to KevinMD and never miss a story!

Get free updates delivered free to your inbox.


Find jobs at
Careers by KevinMD.com

Search thousands of physician, PA, NP, and CRNA jobs now.

Learn more

Leave a Comment

Founded in 2004 by Kevin Pho, MD, KevinMD.com is the web’s leading platform where physicians, advanced practitioners, nurses, medical students, and patients share their insight and tell their stories.

Social

  • Like on Facebook
  • Follow on Twitter
  • Connect on Linkedin
  • Subscribe on Youtube
  • Instagram

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Most Popular

  • Past Week

    • My wife’s story: How DEA and CDC guidelines destroyed our golden years

      Monty Goddard & Richard A. Lawhern, PhD | Conditions
    • The gastroenterologist shortage: Why supply is falling behind demand

      Brian Hudes, MD | Physician
    • Health care as a human right vs. commodity: Resolving the paradox

      Timothy Lesaca, MD | Physician
    • Why voicemail in outpatient care is failing patients and staff

      Dan Ouellet | Tech
    • Alex Pretti’s death: Why politics belongs in emergency medicine

      Marilyn McCullum, RN | Conditions
    • U.S. opioid policy history: How politics replaced science in pain care

      Richard A. Lawhern, PhD & Stephen E. Nadeau, MD | Meds
  • Past 6 Months

    • How environmental justice and health disparities connect to climate change

      Kaitlynn Esemaya, Alexis Thompson, Annique McLune, and Anamaria Ancheta | Policy
    • Will AI replace primary care physicians?

      P. Dileep Kumar, MD, MBA | Tech
    • A physician father on the Dobbs decision and reproductive rights

      Travis Walker, MD, MPH | Physician
    • What is the minority tax in medicine?

      Tharini Nagarkar and Maranda C. Ward, EdD, MPH | Education
    • Why the U.S. health care system is failing patients and physicians

      John C. Hagan III, MD | Policy
    • Alex Pretti: a physician’s open letter defending his legacy

      Mousson Berrouet, DO | Physician
  • Recent Posts

    • AI censorship threatens the lifeline of caregiver support [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • Demedicalize dying: Why end-of-life care needs a spiritual reset

      Kevin Haselhorst, MD | Physician
    • Physician due process: Surviving the court of public opinion

      Muhamad Aly Rifai, MD | Physician
    • Spaced repetition in medicine: Why current apps fail clinicians

      Dr. Sunakshi Bhatia | Physician
    • When the doctor becomes the patient: a breast cancer diagnosis

      Sue Hwang, MD | Conditions
    • My journey with fibroids and hysterectomy: a patient’s perspective

      Sonya Linda Bynum | Conditions

MedPage Today Professional

An Everyday Health Property Medpage Today
  • Terms of Use | Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • DMCA Policy
All Content © KevinMD, LLC
Site by Outthink Group

Leave a Comment

Comments are moderated before they are published. Please read the comment policy.

Loading Comments...