Skip to content
  • About
  • Contact
  • Contribute
  • Book
  • Careers
  • Podcast
  • Recommended
  • Speaking
  • All
  • Physician
  • Practice
  • Policy
  • Finance
  • Conditions
  • .edu
  • Patient
  • Meds
  • Tech
  • Social
  • Video
    • All
    • Physician
    • Practice
    • Policy
    • Finance
    • Conditions
    • .edu
    • Patient
    • Meds
    • Tech
    • Social
    • Video
    • About
    • Contact
    • Contribute
    • Book
    • Careers
    • Podcast
    • Recommended
    • Speaking

The British approach to cholesterol: A reason for lower health costs

Richard Young, MD
Meds
November 27, 2013
Share
Tweet
Share

The American Heart Association and American College of Cardiology recently published new guidelines for screening and treating cholesterol.

In some ways these guidelines are more like the British guidelines. Instead of setting up doctors and patients to fail by calling for certain cholesterol number targets as in the old U.S. guidelines (i.e. LDL level below 100), they instead focus on putting higher risk patients on drugs called statins and then not worrying about the new cholesterol number under treatment. It’s more simply: high risk, take statin; low risk, don’t take statin.

Of course these guidelines don’t come without controversy. Some estimate the number of adults recommended to take statins will double. Others criticize the spreadsheet that comes with the guidelines as exaggerating the true risk of developing heart disease by 75% to 150%.

The other factor that has gotten less press is the definition of high risk, even if the heart disease calculator is accurate. The AHA/ACC definition of high risk is a greater than 7.5% of developing symptomatic heart disease (not death) in 10 years. The British define high risk as a 20% chance in 10 years.

This is clearly a huge difference and it speaks to the underlying cultures of the two countries. The U.S. doctors and the large foundation that supports them err on the side of assuming more is better, and any theoretical benefit — no matter how high the cost — is worth it.

The British err on the side of being sure that the benefits of drug therapy is clearly greater than the risks of adverse events, and they take costs into consideration. Some people are simply at too low a risk to justify the expense and hassle of a lifetime of drugs.

I wrote earlier about explaining why screening and treating people for high cholesterol does not save money, even in the long run.

The British people and their government are willing to tell its healthcare industry that it can’t have everything it wants, and that other societal goods improve health as well. This is one of the many reasons the British people enjoy better health at less than half the cost of the U.S.

Richard Young is a physician who blogs at American Health Scare.

Prev

Will a personalized DNA report ever be commonly ordered?

November 27, 2013 Kevin 4
…
Next

Who do you want reading your EKG?

November 27, 2013 Kevin 19
…

Tagged as: Cardiology, Medications

Post navigation

< Previous Post
Will a personalized DNA report ever be commonly ordered?
Next Post >
Who do you want reading your EKG?

ADVERTISEMENT

More by Richard Young, MD

  • When medical protocol meets family concerns

    Richard Young, MD
  • Patients in Sweden received fewer post-op opioids. Why is that?

    Richard Young, MD
  • Medicine is too complex for computers to keep up with or understand

    Richard Young, MD

More in Meds

  • L-theanine for stress and cognition

    Kamren Hall
  • The AI innovation-access gap in medicine

    Tiffiny Black, DM, MPA, MBA
  • How deprescribing in psychiatry offers a path to safer care

    Muhamad Aly Rifai, MD
  • The economics of medical weight loss

    Howard Smith, MD
  • Why the cannabis ethics debate is really about human suffering

    Gerald Kuo
  • Testosterone cardiovascular risk: FDA update 2025

    Martina Ambardjieva, MD, PhD
  • Most Popular

  • Past Week

    • Is primary care becoming a triage station?

      J. Leonard Lichtenfeld, MD | Physician
    • Psychiatrists are physicians: a key distinction

      Farid Sabet-Sharghi, MD | Physician
    • The blind men and the elephant: a parable for modern pain management

      Richard A. Lawhern, PhD | Conditions
    • Gender bias in medicine: Who deserves to be saved?

      Anonymous | Conditions
    • How to handle medical gaslighting

      Alan P. Feren, MD | Conditions
    • Catching type 1 diabetes before it becomes life-threatening [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
  • Past 6 Months

    • Is primary care becoming a triage station?

      J. Leonard Lichtenfeld, MD | Physician
    • Psychiatrists are physicians: a key distinction

      Farid Sabet-Sharghi, MD | Physician
    • Why feeling unlike yourself is a sign of physician emotional overload

      Stephanie Wellington, MD | Physician
    • The U.S. gastroenterologist shortage explained

      Brian Hudes, MD | Physician
    • California’s opioid policy hypocrisy

      Kayvan Haddadan, MD | Conditions
    • A lesson in empathy from a young patient

      Dr. Arshad Ashraf | Physician
  • Recent Posts

    • Catching type 1 diabetes before it becomes life-threatening [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • The consequences of adopting AI in medicine

      Jordan Liz, PhD | Tech
    • Pediatrician vs. grandmother: Choosing love over medical advice

      Jessie Mahoney, MD | Physician
    • How I got Dr. Luis Torres Díaz on Wikipedia: a grandson’s journey

      Francisco M. Torres, MD | Physician
    • Direct primary care vs psychotherapy models: Why they aren’t interchangeable

      Arthur Lazarus, MD, MBA | Physician
    • The hidden depth of the rural primary care shortage

      Esther Yu Smith, MD | Physician

Subscribe to KevinMD and never miss a story!

Get free updates delivered free to your inbox.


Find jobs at
Careers by KevinMD.com

Search thousands of physician, PA, NP, and CRNA jobs now.

Learn more

View 5 Comments >

Founded in 2004 by Kevin Pho, MD, KevinMD.com is the web’s leading platform where physicians, advanced practitioners, nurses, medical students, and patients share their insight and tell their stories.

Social

  • Like on Facebook
  • Follow on Twitter
  • Connect on Linkedin
  • Subscribe on Youtube
  • Instagram

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Most Popular

  • Past Week

    • Is primary care becoming a triage station?

      J. Leonard Lichtenfeld, MD | Physician
    • Psychiatrists are physicians: a key distinction

      Farid Sabet-Sharghi, MD | Physician
    • The blind men and the elephant: a parable for modern pain management

      Richard A. Lawhern, PhD | Conditions
    • Gender bias in medicine: Who deserves to be saved?

      Anonymous | Conditions
    • How to handle medical gaslighting

      Alan P. Feren, MD | Conditions
    • Catching type 1 diabetes before it becomes life-threatening [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
  • Past 6 Months

    • Is primary care becoming a triage station?

      J. Leonard Lichtenfeld, MD | Physician
    • Psychiatrists are physicians: a key distinction

      Farid Sabet-Sharghi, MD | Physician
    • Why feeling unlike yourself is a sign of physician emotional overload

      Stephanie Wellington, MD | Physician
    • The U.S. gastroenterologist shortage explained

      Brian Hudes, MD | Physician
    • California’s opioid policy hypocrisy

      Kayvan Haddadan, MD | Conditions
    • A lesson in empathy from a young patient

      Dr. Arshad Ashraf | Physician
  • Recent Posts

    • Catching type 1 diabetes before it becomes life-threatening [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • The consequences of adopting AI in medicine

      Jordan Liz, PhD | Tech
    • Pediatrician vs. grandmother: Choosing love over medical advice

      Jessie Mahoney, MD | Physician
    • How I got Dr. Luis Torres Díaz on Wikipedia: a grandson’s journey

      Francisco M. Torres, MD | Physician
    • Direct primary care vs psychotherapy models: Why they aren’t interchangeable

      Arthur Lazarus, MD, MBA | Physician
    • The hidden depth of the rural primary care shortage

      Esther Yu Smith, MD | Physician

MedPage Today Professional

An Everyday Health Property Medpage Today
  • Terms of Use | Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • DMCA Policy
All Content © KevinMD, LLC
Site by Outthink Group

The British approach to cholesterol: A reason for lower health costs
5 comments

Comments are moderated before they are published. Please read the comment policy.

Loading Comments...