Skip to content
  • About
  • Contact
  • Contribute
  • Book
  • Careers
  • Podcast
  • Recommended
  • Speaking
  • All
  • Physician
  • Practice
  • Policy
  • Finance
  • Conditions
  • .edu
  • Patient
  • Meds
  • Tech
  • Social
  • Video
    • All
    • Physician
    • Practice
    • Policy
    • Finance
    • Conditions
    • .edu
    • Patient
    • Meds
    • Tech
    • Social
    • Video
    • About
    • Contact
    • Contribute
    • Book
    • Careers
    • Podcast
    • Recommended
    • Speaking

Here’s why we need evidence-based pediatrics

Chad Hayes, MD
Physician
January 25, 2015
Share
Tweet
Share

There have been countless instances in which the traditional practice of medicine has been disproved when someone actually took the time to perform a study. But who cares if a treatment doesn’t work — why does it really matter? Let me walk you through why it’s important, starting with the Hippocratic oath.

As physicians, our top priority is to “do no harm.”

But this priority often clashes with the patient’s reason for coming to see us. Patients never come into the office so that we can avoid harming them — they come to be helped. And honestly, none of us got up this morning thinking about all the patients that we are not going to harm today. There is a delicate balance between minimizing the potential for harm to a patient while still attempting to provide the therapeutic benefit that the patient seeks.

Everything that we do has potential to cause harm.

This harm can come in a number of ways: medication side effects, complications of surgery, or unnecessary hospitalizations. Patients can be harmed by diagnostic tests like x-rays or CT scans. Even scheduling a follow-up appointment carries the risk of injury or death in a car accident on the way to the office. And, while it probably wasn’t what Hippocrates had in mind, we can do a massive amount of financial harm by practicing medicine irresponsibly — the thousands of dollars in medical bills can literally bankrupt a family (or a country).

Every intervention we use should have an expected benefit.

In some cases, the benefits are difficult to measure, as with improvements in quality of life or changes in a patient’s mood. But often, the benefits are relatively clear-cut: avoiding hospitalization, preventing death, treating an infection, etc. The key point is that we should never do anything to a patient without the goal of doing something for the patient.

We should intervene only when the benefits outweigh the risks.

It’s a well-known fact that physicians do many things to harm patients. We prescribe known poisons to patients with cancer, subject our patients to harmful radiation, and intentionally slice open their bodies. We do harm. Because of the nature of our work, our mandate to “do no harm” is generally interpreted, “do more good than harm.” The expected benefits of our treatments should always outweigh their anticipated risks. Thus, for any intervention with no proven benefit, the only acceptable level of risk is none. And we don’t have any risk-free treatments.

Without knowing if an intervention has a real benefit, we don’t know if we should use it or not.

Common sense is not good enough. Without using proper scientific studies to test a treatment’s benefits, doctors are really bad at deciding which ones are beneficial and which ones are not. Time and again, we’ve failed our patients by doing things that seem to make sense without bothering to test whether or not they actually work. And when someone eventually decides to do the study (as I’ll show you multiple times in my book), we are often surprised by the notion that the treatments we’ve been using for years don’t work. Of course, most of us refuse to accept that and keep using them anyway, claiming that the study didn’t include enough participants. Or that the patient population they tested was somehow different from ours. Or that it was funded by a pharmaceutical company. All of these are potentially valid reasons to reject a study’s conclusions, but they are also convenient excuses to prevent us from having to accept inconvenient facts.

Most pediatric diseases get better on their own.

One of my favorite quotes about medicine is by Voltaire: “The art of medicine consists in amusing the patient while nature cures the disease.” For a guy with no medical training, he certainly understood the game. And nowhere in medicine is this so true as in pediatrics.

ADVERTISEMENT

The vast majority of our patients will get better, whether we do anything or not. While this fact is comforting, in a way, it also minimizes our value in another. But egos aside, it has important implications for our practice. For one, any benefit gained by treating patients that would have gotten better on their own will be minimal at best — perhaps decreasing the severity or duration of an illness, but not eliminating it altogether. And in those cases with minimal potential for benefit from a treatment, we must refuse to accept even moderate levels of risk. Additionally, the fact that most of our patients would get better without our assistance makes it difficult to know whether our interventions actually help — which makes identifying and implementing evidence-based treatments all the more important.

Chad Hayes is a pediatrician who blogs at his self-titled site, Chad Hayes, MD.

Prev

Stop yelling at your kids. Here's how to do it.

January 24, 2015 Kevin 4
…
Next

What are doctors thinking when you're talking in the exam room?

January 25, 2015 Kevin 7
…

Tagged as: Pediatrics

Post navigation

< Previous Post
Stop yelling at your kids. Here's how to do it.
Next Post >
What are doctors thinking when you're talking in the exam room?

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

More by Chad Hayes, MD

  • No, the HPV vaccine isn’t optional

    Chad Hayes, MD
  • On vaccines: 1 pediatrician vs. 13 celebrity opinions

    Chad Hayes, MD
  • Patients made this doctor care about politics

    Chad Hayes, MD

More in Physician

  • When a doctor becomes the narrator of a patient’s final chapter

    Ryan McCarthy, MD
  • Gaslighting and professional licensing: a call for reform

    Donald J. Murphy, MD
  • When service doesn’t mean another certification

    Maureen Gibbons, MD
  • Why so many physicians struggle to feel proud—even when they should

    Jessie Mahoney, MD
  • If I had to choose: Choosing the patient over the protocol

    Patrick Hudson, MD
  • How a TV drama exposed the hidden grief of doctors

    Lauren Weintraub, MD
  • Most Popular

  • Past Week

    • Physician patriots: the forgotten founders who lit the torch of liberty

      Muhamad Aly Rifai, MD | Physician
    • Why medical students are trading empathy for publications

      Vijay Rajput, MD | Education
    • The hidden cost of becoming a doctor: a South Asian perspective

      Momeina Aslam | Education
    • Why fixing health care’s data quality is crucial for AI success [PODCAST]

      Jay Anders, MD | Podcast
    • When a doctor becomes the narrator of a patient’s final chapter

      Ryan McCarthy, MD | Physician
    • When errors of nature are treated as medical negligence

      Howard Smith, MD | Physician
  • Past 6 Months

    • What’s driving medical students away from primary care?

      ​​Vineeth Amba, MPH, Archita Goyal, and Wayne Altman, MD | Education
    • A faster path to becoming a doctor is possible—here’s how

      Ankit Jain | Education
    • How dismantling DEI endangers the future of medical care

      Shashank Madhu and Christian Tallo | Education
    • Make cognitive testing as routine as a blood pressure check

      Joshua Baker and James Jackson, PsyD | Conditions
    • How scales of justice saved a doctor-patient relationship

      Neil Baum, MD | Physician
    • The broken health care system doesn’t have to break you

      Jessie Mahoney, MD | Physician
  • Recent Posts

    • When a doctor becomes the narrator of a patient’s final chapter

      Ryan McCarthy, MD | Physician
    • Why innovation in health care starts with bold thinking

      Miguel Villagra, MD | Tech
    • Navigating fair market value as an independent or locum tenens physician [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • Gaslighting and professional licensing: a call for reform

      Donald J. Murphy, MD | Physician
    • How self-improving AI systems are redefining intelligence and what it means for health care

      Harvey Castro, MD, MBA | Tech
    • How blockchain could rescue nursing home patients from deadly miscommunication

      Adwait Chafale | Tech

Subscribe to KevinMD and never miss a story!

Get free updates delivered free to your inbox.


Find jobs at
Careers by KevinMD.com

Search thousands of physician, PA, NP, and CRNA jobs now.

Learn more

View 3 Comments >

Founded in 2004 by Kevin Pho, MD, KevinMD.com is the web’s leading platform where physicians, advanced practitioners, nurses, medical students, and patients share their insight and tell their stories.

Social

  • Like on Facebook
  • Follow on Twitter
  • Connect on Linkedin
  • Subscribe on Youtube
  • Instagram

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Most Popular

  • Past Week

    • Physician patriots: the forgotten founders who lit the torch of liberty

      Muhamad Aly Rifai, MD | Physician
    • Why medical students are trading empathy for publications

      Vijay Rajput, MD | Education
    • The hidden cost of becoming a doctor: a South Asian perspective

      Momeina Aslam | Education
    • Why fixing health care’s data quality is crucial for AI success [PODCAST]

      Jay Anders, MD | Podcast
    • When a doctor becomes the narrator of a patient’s final chapter

      Ryan McCarthy, MD | Physician
    • When errors of nature are treated as medical negligence

      Howard Smith, MD | Physician
  • Past 6 Months

    • What’s driving medical students away from primary care?

      ​​Vineeth Amba, MPH, Archita Goyal, and Wayne Altman, MD | Education
    • A faster path to becoming a doctor is possible—here’s how

      Ankit Jain | Education
    • How dismantling DEI endangers the future of medical care

      Shashank Madhu and Christian Tallo | Education
    • Make cognitive testing as routine as a blood pressure check

      Joshua Baker and James Jackson, PsyD | Conditions
    • How scales of justice saved a doctor-patient relationship

      Neil Baum, MD | Physician
    • The broken health care system doesn’t have to break you

      Jessie Mahoney, MD | Physician
  • Recent Posts

    • When a doctor becomes the narrator of a patient’s final chapter

      Ryan McCarthy, MD | Physician
    • Why innovation in health care starts with bold thinking

      Miguel Villagra, MD | Tech
    • Navigating fair market value as an independent or locum tenens physician [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • Gaslighting and professional licensing: a call for reform

      Donald J. Murphy, MD | Physician
    • How self-improving AI systems are redefining intelligence and what it means for health care

      Harvey Castro, MD, MBA | Tech
    • How blockchain could rescue nursing home patients from deadly miscommunication

      Adwait Chafale | Tech

MedPage Today Professional

An Everyday Health Property Medpage Today
  • Terms of Use | Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • DMCA Policy
All Content © KevinMD, LLC
Site by Outthink Group

Here’s why we need evidence-based pediatrics
3 comments

Comments are moderated before they are published. Please read the comment policy.

Loading Comments...