Skip to content
  • About
  • Contact
  • Contribute
  • Book
  • Careers
  • Podcast
  • Recommended
  • Speaking
  • All
  • Physician
  • Practice
  • Policy
  • Finance
  • Conditions
  • .edu
  • Patient
  • Meds
  • Tech
  • Social
  • Video
    • All
    • Physician
    • Practice
    • Policy
    • Finance
    • Conditions
    • .edu
    • Patient
    • Meds
    • Tech
    • Social
    • Video
    • About
    • Contact
    • Contribute
    • Book
    • Careers
    • Podcast
    • Recommended
    • Speaking

Doctors should not blindly extrapolate data from research studies

Robert G. Dorfman
Conditions
October 9, 2016
Share
Tweet
Share

It is common practice in health care today for physicians to read articles published in leading journals within their fields and extract what they think is important for their patients. Though in most cases it is to the patient’s benefit that their physician stays up to date with the latest scientific advances, it is nonetheless important that doctors pay particular attention to research methodology and how generalizable these studies are to their patients, and not simply extrapolate without proper due diligence. Physicians must remain cautious in terms of what they deduce from such studies, for history has shown that even the most popular and widely accepted research methodologies on which these studies are based can sometimes be flawed. Let us take the classical twin method as an example.

Twins have captured public attention for centuries, and the scientific study of the twin phenomenon is richly documented in the literature. Sir Francis Galton is often credited with initiating the field of twin study as a means of investigating questions regarding the influence of “genetics” vs. “environment” on the human condition.  However, he did not account for zygosity in his studies, and it was not until Hermann Werner Siemens published “Zwillingspathologie” in 1924 that the true value of studying twins to answer basic scientific questions was first realized.  Siemens thereby launched the “classical twin method” by utilizing the study of differences between monozygotic twins (MZ) who share 100 percent of the same genes and dizygotic twins (DZ) who share an average of 50 percent of the same genetic code. This realization has allowed twin studies to bring understanding to many areas of life, from common traits to variation in IQ.  Many questions, however, still remain unanswered. Consequently, it has been presumed that such answers remain illusive due to the complexity of environmental influences.

If MZ twins share 100 percent identical DNA, then members of that pair should theoretically be indistinguishable from one another. However, this is clearly not the case.  While on casual inspection close friends or even parents commonly confuse twins, careful inspection often allows for visual distinction. For example, anatomic evaluation suggests MZ twins rarely demonstrate 100 percent anatomic concordance, pointing to the role environment plays in anatomic expression. Studies have estimated a 50 percent genetic and 50 percent environmental influence on the human condition, and efforts have been made to distinguish their roles.

Nonetheless, a critical issue can be raised regarding what constitutes as “environment.” For example, identical twins not only share the same genetics, but also share the same chorion, which is the outermost membrane surrounding the fetus during prenatal development, and this may make them more similar than non-identical twins who never share the same chorion. Thus, is a 500-fold increase in risk for autism in identical twins due to the same genetics, or due to another form of environment, namely, the “prenatal environment”? This problem of definition thereby presents a major challenge to twin research. Even if the “equal environments assumption” were true, any study that demonstrates more concordance with identical twins cannot claim genetics as the cause since these identical twins share the same “prenatal environment” as well.

Although the simplicity of the twin method has contributed to its popularity through the years, more recently, other doubts have been raised regarding its validity and the analysis of results derived from it. Important questions have been raised, such as whether twins can be considered as representative of the general population. For example, some researchers claim that adverse intra-uterine environments caused by sharing a womb suggests twins cannot be representative of the non-twin population. More importantly, the fundamental “equal environments assumption” has come under question, and there exists the possibility that identical twins share more similar experiences and environments after they are born than due non-identical twins.

As such, it can be argued that the entire twin method, which serves as the basis for many heredity vs. environment studies, is flawed, and monozygotic twins cannot be viewed as truly identical. Further supporting this claim, identical twins have been found to be discordant for hand preference, and important differences have been found to exist in dentition among identical twins. Until future research provides a more accurate description of what constitutes “environment” as well as accounts for the issue of prenatal factors and chorionicity, the classical twin method remains imperfect.

As William Osler suggests, “medicine is a science of uncertainty and an art of probability.” History has demonstrated time and time again that even the most widely accepted ideas and research methodologies can have flaws (the classical twin method being just one example). It is likely, if not probable, that in 100 years time, much of what we hold true from research studies today will be proven wrong. New research methodologies with improved validity will almost certainly be developed. It is, therefore, imperative that doctors not blindly extrapolate data from research studies published in scientific journals. It is the duty of the physician to think critically, paying close attention to the methods section and ensuring the patient cohort included in the study is also representative of the physician’s own patient population.

Robert Dorfman is a medical student.

Image credit: Shutterstock.com

Prev

Money and virtue: An odd tension in health care

October 8, 2016 Kevin 4
…
Next

My anger isn't the poison. Racism is.

October 9, 2016 Kevin 7
…

Tagged as: Primary Care

Post navigation

< Previous Post
Money and virtue: An odd tension in health care
Next Post >
My anger isn't the poison. Racism is.

ADVERTISEMENT

More by Robert G. Dorfman

  • Physician parents, physician children. Why?

    Robert G. Dorfman
  • a desk with keyboard and ipad with the kevinmd logo

    The day I saw the humanity in medicine

    Robert G. Dorfman
  • a desk with keyboard and ipad with the kevinmd logo

    We need health care instead of disease management

    Robert G. Dorfman

Related Posts

  • Doctors now must provide patients their health data, online and on demand

    Sarah Kwon
  • Why do doctors who hate being doctors still practice?

    Kristin Puhl, MD
  • Doctors: It’s time to unionize

    Thomas D. Guastavino, MD
  • When doctors are right

    Sophia Zilber
  • Where’s the big COVID data?

    Anuradha Kolluru, MD and Rakesh Lattupalli, MD
  • We’re doctors. We signed the book.

    Jonathan Peters, MD

More in Conditions

  • Facing terminal cancer as a doctor and mother

    Kelly Curtin-Hallinan, DO
  • Why doctors must stop ignoring unintentional weight loss in patients with obesity

    Samantha Malley, FNP-C
  • Why hospitals are quietly capping top doctors’ pay

    Dennis Hursh, Esq
  • Why point-of-care ultrasound belongs in emergency department triage

    Resa E. Lewiss, MD and Courtney M. Smalley, MD
  • Why PSA levels alone shouldn’t define your prostate cancer risk

    Martina Ambardjieva, MD, PhD
  • Reframing chronic pain and dignity: What a pain clinic teaches us about MAiD and chronic suffering

    Olumuyiwa Bamgbade, MD
  • Most Popular

  • Past Week

    • Forced voicemail and diagnosis codes are endangering patient access to medications

      Arthur Lazarus, MD, MBA | Meds
    • How President Biden’s cognitive health shapes political and legal trust

      Muhamad Aly Rifai, MD | Conditions
    • The One Big Beautiful Bill and the fragile heart of rural health care

      Holland Haynie, MD | Policy
    • America’s ER crisis: Why the system is collapsing from within

      Kristen Cline, BSN, RN | Conditions
    • Why timing, not surgery, determines patient survival

      Michael Karch, MD | Conditions
    • How early meetings and after-hours events penalize physician-mothers

      Samira Jeimy, MD, PhD and Menaka Pai, MD | Physician
  • Past 6 Months

    • Forced voicemail and diagnosis codes are endangering patient access to medications

      Arthur Lazarus, MD, MBA | Meds
    • How President Biden’s cognitive health shapes political and legal trust

      Muhamad Aly Rifai, MD | Conditions
    • Why are medical students turning away from primary care? [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • The One Big Beautiful Bill and the fragile heart of rural health care

      Holland Haynie, MD | Policy
    • Why “do no harm” might be harming modern medicine

      Sabooh S. Mubbashar, MD | Physician
    • The hidden health risks in the One Big Beautiful Bill Act

      Trevor Lyford, MPH | Policy
  • Recent Posts

    • Beyond burnout: Understanding the triangle of exhaustion [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • Facing terminal cancer as a doctor and mother

      Kelly Curtin-Hallinan, DO | Conditions
    • Online eye exams spark legal battle over health care access

      Joshua Windham, JD and Daryl James | Policy
    • FDA delays could end vital treatment for rare disease patients

      G. van Londen, MD | Meds
    • Pharmacists are key to expanding Medicaid access to digital therapeutics

      Amanda Matter | Meds
    • Why ADHD in women requires a new approach [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast

Subscribe to KevinMD and never miss a story!

Get free updates delivered free to your inbox.


Find jobs at
Careers by KevinMD.com

Search thousands of physician, PA, NP, and CRNA jobs now.

Learn more

Leave a Comment

Founded in 2004 by Kevin Pho, MD, KevinMD.com is the web’s leading platform where physicians, advanced practitioners, nurses, medical students, and patients share their insight and tell their stories.

Social

  • Like on Facebook
  • Follow on Twitter
  • Connect on Linkedin
  • Subscribe on Youtube
  • Instagram

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Most Popular

  • Past Week

    • Forced voicemail and diagnosis codes are endangering patient access to medications

      Arthur Lazarus, MD, MBA | Meds
    • How President Biden’s cognitive health shapes political and legal trust

      Muhamad Aly Rifai, MD | Conditions
    • The One Big Beautiful Bill and the fragile heart of rural health care

      Holland Haynie, MD | Policy
    • America’s ER crisis: Why the system is collapsing from within

      Kristen Cline, BSN, RN | Conditions
    • Why timing, not surgery, determines patient survival

      Michael Karch, MD | Conditions
    • How early meetings and after-hours events penalize physician-mothers

      Samira Jeimy, MD, PhD and Menaka Pai, MD | Physician
  • Past 6 Months

    • Forced voicemail and diagnosis codes are endangering patient access to medications

      Arthur Lazarus, MD, MBA | Meds
    • How President Biden’s cognitive health shapes political and legal trust

      Muhamad Aly Rifai, MD | Conditions
    • Why are medical students turning away from primary care? [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • The One Big Beautiful Bill and the fragile heart of rural health care

      Holland Haynie, MD | Policy
    • Why “do no harm” might be harming modern medicine

      Sabooh S. Mubbashar, MD | Physician
    • The hidden health risks in the One Big Beautiful Bill Act

      Trevor Lyford, MPH | Policy
  • Recent Posts

    • Beyond burnout: Understanding the triangle of exhaustion [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • Facing terminal cancer as a doctor and mother

      Kelly Curtin-Hallinan, DO | Conditions
    • Online eye exams spark legal battle over health care access

      Joshua Windham, JD and Daryl James | Policy
    • FDA delays could end vital treatment for rare disease patients

      G. van Londen, MD | Meds
    • Pharmacists are key to expanding Medicaid access to digital therapeutics

      Amanda Matter | Meds
    • Why ADHD in women requires a new approach [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast

MedPage Today Professional

An Everyday Health Property Medpage Today
  • Terms of Use | Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • DMCA Policy
All Content © KevinMD, LLC
Site by Outthink Group

Leave a Comment

Comments are moderated before they are published. Please read the comment policy.

Loading Comments...