Skip to content
  • About
  • Contact
  • Contribute
  • Book
  • Careers
  • Podcast
  • Recommended
  • Speaking
  • All
  • Physician
  • Practice
  • Policy
  • Finance
  • Conditions
  • .edu
  • Patient
  • Meds
  • Tech
  • Social
  • Video
    • All
    • Physician
    • Practice
    • Policy
    • Finance
    • Conditions
    • .edu
    • Patient
    • Meds
    • Tech
    • Social
    • Video
    • About
    • Contact
    • Contribute
    • Book
    • Careers
    • Podcast
    • Recommended
    • Speaking

Quality doesn’t always equal success for doctors

James C. Salwitz, MD
Physician
October 24, 2016
Share
Tweet
Share

I recently spent an evening with a group of medical oncology fellows as part of a small panel discussing career alternatives. There were doctors who worked for pharma, academic medical centers, hospitals and a couple of us representing private practice. The questions and comments taught me more than I could contribute. I was surprised to learn not just about jobs and personal futures, but about something basic: the difficulty in defining what is a quality physician.

To set the stage, let me remind readers how an oncologist is trained. After college, the trainee must complete four years of medical school, then three years of an internal medicine residency, at the end of which they must pass the board exam. At this point, if they wish, they can hang out a shingle and practice general internal medicine. However, if they want to practice oncology, and most will also practice hematology, they must take at least three more years of formal training as a fellow. After taking the hematology and oncology boards, they can treat patients with cancer and blood disorders.

When you complete this competitive, rigorous, 100-hours-a-week-for-10-years path, then you apply for work at age 32 — actually getting and keeping a job is of vital importance. Therefore, the desire to succeed lay at the base of the question asked by the fellows of the panel. The question was, “What is the most common reason a fully-trained, board-certified oncologist and hematologist, loses their job?”

After a moment of quiet, the members of the panel answered:

  • The doctor who was there to talk about jobs for oncologists in the pharmaceutical industry, to develop and manufacture new cures said, “The company decides that the drug, chemical or ‘molecule’ on which the doctor is working will not be financially successful, at least for that company, and shuts down the project.”
  • The doctor who was there to talk about jobs for an oncologist in the academic environment to teach and do scientific research said, “The doctor is not publishing enough or is not able to see enough patients in clinics to support his position.”
  • The doctor who was there to talk about jobs for an oncologist working for a hospital said, “The hospital has a shift in corporate planning or the doctor does not have enough patient volume.”
  • And finally, as the doctor who was there to talk about jobs for oncologists in private practice, I said, ”The doctor does not get along with his or her colleagues and/or is not willing to work hard.

Look again at those honest, real-world answers. No one said the most common cause or even a reason at all, to lose your job was that “the doctor does not practice quality medicine.” Can we assume that each of the answers that were given is a quality surrogate? Do we believe that if the drug company doc’s project does not have financial value, it is a problem of quality? Is publishing key to developing quality medicine so that when one’s job perishes from lack of writing it is deserved? If a doctor is giving quality care in the hospital clinic, will patients automatically flock? Will the hospital always be happy? Do doctors get on well with other doctors because physicians only like high-quality caregivers? I think we can agree that such conclusions stretch things more than a little.

My point is, many of these “keys to success” do not automatically mean the doctor produces quality medical care. I am sure most of us can think of an example of failed quality. Maybe we know a successful doctor whose mediocre care proves that survival does guarantee good outcomes. This flaw in how we judge and select physicians emphasizes the need to press for more accurate quality measures outside of simply holding onto one’s job.

I believe organized medicine, as a whole, understands these lessons but has been slow to implement answers. We depend on a system of boards and tests, as well as requirements for basic continued training, to assure excellence. True quality, the best possible results, with the least errors, given to the largest number of people, at the least cost, cannot be assumed by these passive and disconnected measures if we are going to continue the maturation of medical care.

Quality requires continuous monitoring and feedback, implementing expert physician and scientist-developed standards, fully integrated by robust real-time top-to-bottom information systems, available in every exam room and at every bedside for every patient. It is hard, complex work and for many physicians and patients a threatening revolution. Nonetheless, it is a vital and exciting tomorrow, which begins now and is only a short time away.

James C. Salwitz is an oncologist who blogs at Sunrise Rounds.

Image credit: Shutterstock.com

Prev

A physician quits and practices medicine her way

October 24, 2016 Kevin 21
…
Next

Why physicians face a serious credibility problem

October 24, 2016 Kevin 1
…

Tagged as: Primary Care

Post navigation

< Previous Post
A physician quits and practices medicine her way
Next Post >
Why physicians face a serious credibility problem

ADVERTISEMENT

More by James C. Salwitz, MD

  • Each line on the radiology list is a patient’s line in the sand

    James C. Salwitz, MD
  • The broader mission for hospice care

    James C. Salwitz, MD
  • Is the medical profession at its end?

    James C. Salwitz, MD

Related Posts

  • Should doctors take more responsibility for quality metrics?

    Sarah Gebauer, MD
  • Why quality reports for hospitals and doctors are interesting but flawed

    Mark Kelley, MD
  • Quality measures have gotten ahead of the science of quality measurement

    Peter Ubel, MD
  • 3 ways physician-pharma partnerships are improving quality of care

    Jack Pinney, MD
  • Why do doctors who hate being doctors still practice?

    Kristin Puhl, MD
  • Doctors die. But the good ones leave a legacy.

    Jaime B. Gerber, MD

More in Physician

  • Life’s detours may be blessings in disguise

    Osmund Agbo, MD
  • Inside the heart of internal medicine: Why we stay

    Ryan Nadelson, MD
  • The quiet grief behind hospital walls

    Aaron Grubner, MD
  • a desk with keyboard and ipad with the kevinmd logo

    How to advance workforce development through research mentorship and evidence-based management

    Olumuyiwa Bamgbade, MD
  • The truth about perfection and identity in health care

    Ryan Nadelson, MD
  • Civil discourse as a leadership competency: the case for curiosity in medicine

    All Levels Leadership
  • Most Popular

  • Past Week

    • Forced voicemail and diagnosis codes are endangering patient access to medications

      Arthur Lazarus, MD, MBA | Meds
    • Why specialist pain clinics and addiction treatment services require strong primary care

      Olumuyiwa Bamgbade, MD | Conditions
    • Who gets to be well in America: Immigrant health is on the line

      Joshua Vasquez, MD | Policy
    • When a medical office sublease turns into a legal nightmare

      Ralph Messo, DO | Physician
    • America’s ER crisis: Why the system is collapsing from within

      Kristen Cline, BSN, RN | Conditions
    • FDA delays could end vital treatment for rare disease patients

      GJ van Londen, MD | Meds
  • Past 6 Months

    • Forced voicemail and diagnosis codes are endangering patient access to medications

      Arthur Lazarus, MD, MBA | Meds
    • How President Biden’s cognitive health shapes political and legal trust

      Muhamad Aly Rifai, MD | Conditions
    • Why are medical students turning away from primary care? [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • The One Big Beautiful Bill and the fragile heart of rural health care

      Holland Haynie, MD | Policy
    • Why “do no harm” might be harming modern medicine

      Sabooh S. Mubbashar, MD | Physician
    • Here’s what providers really need in a modern EHR

      Laura Kohlhagen, MD, MBA | Tech
  • Recent Posts

    • Life’s detours may be blessings in disguise

      Osmund Agbo, MD | Physician
    • Inside the heart of internal medicine: Why we stay

      Ryan Nadelson, MD | Physician
    • The quiet grief behind hospital walls

      Aaron Grubner, MD | Physician
    • Why peer support can save lives in high-pressure medical careers

      Maire Daugharty, MD | Conditions
    • Bundled payments in Medicare: Will fixed pricing reshape surgery costs?

      AMA Committee on Economics and Quality in Medicine, Medical Student Section | Policy
    • How Project ECHO is fighting physician isolation and transforming medical education [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast

Subscribe to KevinMD and never miss a story!

Get free updates delivered free to your inbox.


Find jobs at
Careers by KevinMD.com

Search thousands of physician, PA, NP, and CRNA jobs now.

Learn more

Leave a Comment

Founded in 2004 by Kevin Pho, MD, KevinMD.com is the web’s leading platform where physicians, advanced practitioners, nurses, medical students, and patients share their insight and tell their stories.

Social

  • Like on Facebook
  • Follow on Twitter
  • Connect on Linkedin
  • Subscribe on Youtube
  • Instagram

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Most Popular

  • Past Week

    • Forced voicemail and diagnosis codes are endangering patient access to medications

      Arthur Lazarus, MD, MBA | Meds
    • Why specialist pain clinics and addiction treatment services require strong primary care

      Olumuyiwa Bamgbade, MD | Conditions
    • Who gets to be well in America: Immigrant health is on the line

      Joshua Vasquez, MD | Policy
    • When a medical office sublease turns into a legal nightmare

      Ralph Messo, DO | Physician
    • America’s ER crisis: Why the system is collapsing from within

      Kristen Cline, BSN, RN | Conditions
    • FDA delays could end vital treatment for rare disease patients

      GJ van Londen, MD | Meds
  • Past 6 Months

    • Forced voicemail and diagnosis codes are endangering patient access to medications

      Arthur Lazarus, MD, MBA | Meds
    • How President Biden’s cognitive health shapes political and legal trust

      Muhamad Aly Rifai, MD | Conditions
    • Why are medical students turning away from primary care? [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • The One Big Beautiful Bill and the fragile heart of rural health care

      Holland Haynie, MD | Policy
    • Why “do no harm” might be harming modern medicine

      Sabooh S. Mubbashar, MD | Physician
    • Here’s what providers really need in a modern EHR

      Laura Kohlhagen, MD, MBA | Tech
  • Recent Posts

    • Life’s detours may be blessings in disguise

      Osmund Agbo, MD | Physician
    • Inside the heart of internal medicine: Why we stay

      Ryan Nadelson, MD | Physician
    • The quiet grief behind hospital walls

      Aaron Grubner, MD | Physician
    • Why peer support can save lives in high-pressure medical careers

      Maire Daugharty, MD | Conditions
    • Bundled payments in Medicare: Will fixed pricing reshape surgery costs?

      AMA Committee on Economics and Quality in Medicine, Medical Student Section | Policy
    • How Project ECHO is fighting physician isolation and transforming medical education [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast

MedPage Today Professional

An Everyday Health Property Medpage Today
  • Terms of Use | Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • DMCA Policy
All Content © KevinMD, LLC
Site by Outthink Group

Leave a Comment

Comments are moderated before they are published. Please read the comment policy.

Loading Comments...