Skip to content
  • About
  • Contact
  • Contribute
  • Book
  • Careers
  • Podcast
  • Recommended
  • Speaking
  • All
  • Physician
  • Practice
  • Policy
  • Finance
  • Conditions
  • .edu
  • Patient
  • Meds
  • Tech
  • Social
  • Video
    • All
    • Physician
    • Practice
    • Policy
    • Finance
    • Conditions
    • .edu
    • Patient
    • Meds
    • Tech
    • Social
    • Video
    • About
    • Contact
    • Contribute
    • Book
    • Careers
    • Podcast
    • Recommended
    • Speaking

We want a federal budget where the trade-offs support life, not death

Edward C. Halperin, MD
Physician
April 5, 2017
Share
Tweet
Share

When I entered college, I took a course in introductory economics. Human wants are unlimited, I learned, but resources are limited. Therefore, we have to make choices about what we spend money on. That, I was told, was what economics was all about — how we make choices and allocate resources.

My economics textbook illustrated the point by quoting from Nazi Germany’s Propaganda Minister Joseph Goebbels who said: “We can do without butter, but, despite all our love of peace, not without arms. One cannot shoot with butter, but with guns.” It was about trade-offs, my professor taught us. There is a trade-off between a nation’s investment in military and civilian goods. In simplistic terms, a nation has to choose between buying guns (invest in the military) or butter (invest in civilian goods). It is, of course, not that simple but as a 17- year-old, I got the point. A government budget has to balance priorities.

President Trump’s budget request to the Congress calls for about a 20 percent reduction in the budget of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and similar deep cuts to the research budgets of the Department of Energy’s Office of Science, the Environmental Protection Agency(EPA), and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. President Trump proposes $54 billion in cuts for domestic spending such as research and spending $54 billion more for the military. Incidentally, there are no proposed cuts in the hundreds of millions of federal dollars spent on security for the President’s Manhattan apartment or his Florida golf resort. The President’s budget is not about a trade-off of guns v butter. It’s about guns v life. If we cut the budget for biomedical research, then people will die unnecessarily. We’re not talking about a guns v butter trade-off in President Trump’s budget. We’re talking about an immoral assault on American lives and American values.

Mick Mulvaney, the president’s budget director, says that government-funded health research had suffered “mission creep” and, as far as climate change research was concerned, “We’re not spending money on that anymore. We consider that a waste of money …”

“Mission creep”? There is a reason the institution is called the National Institutes of Health. It is because the NIH represents a shared societal commitment to making the health of our children and grandchildren better than ours. It is because the NIH exemplifies our shared belief that the best way to predict the future of biomedical science is to invent it ourselves. It is because we know that methodical and rationale scientific inquiry cures some diseases and ameliorates others. It’s because the NIH represents 75 percent of federal funding for biomedical research. It’s called “Institutes,” plural, instead of Institute, singular, because it made up of 27 different institutes and centers including the National Cancer Institute, the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, the National Eye Institute, the National Institute of Neurological Diseases and Stroke, and the National Institute of Mental Health. It takes a formidable line-up of institutes to tackle a formidable set of diseases.

“Mission creep”? At New York Medical College NIH-funded research allows our faculty members to find improved treatments for cancer, high blood pressure, and infectious disease. NIH training grants help us educate the next generation of physician-scientists and dental-scientists. Also, to be prosaic, biomedical research is a powerful economic driver of our Westchester and state economy. New York State benefits from over 31,000 jobs and a total economic impact of over $4.6 billion from government-funded biomedical research.

“Waste of money” to do environmental research? Research funded by the EPA helps identify environmental toxins affecting our health and the influence of environmental toxins upon our ability to have children.

In my lifetime biomedical research funded by the NIH has vastly improved the survival probability for premature babies, rendered many forms of cancer treatable and others curable, identified the cause and treatment of HIV/AIDS, reduced the death rate from cardiovascular disease, created organ transplantation, and improved the therapy of diabetes. Which members of Congress will stand before the voters and say they favor a budget designed to prevent the identification of new treatments for these diseases?

“It’s all about trade-offs,” my economics professor taught me. Let’s tell our elected officials that we want a federal budget where the trade-offs support life, not death.

Edward C. Halperin is chancellor, New York Medical College.

Image credit: Shutterstock.com 

Prev

The metric, the dialectic, and the chart electric

April 4, 2017 Kevin 1
…
Next

Will we solve health care by blaming doctors?

April 5, 2017 Kevin 37
…

Tagged as: Public Health & Policy

Post navigation

< Previous Post
The metric, the dialectic, and the chart electric
Next Post >
Will we solve health care by blaming doctors?

ADVERTISEMENT

More by Edward C. Halperin, MD

  • Getting caught in the crossfire of the hearing aid wars

    Edward C. Halperin, MD

Related Posts

  • My grandfather’s death: What I’ve learned about life

    Munera Ahmed
  • Ethical humanism: life after #medbikini and an approach to reimagining professionalism

    Jay Wong
  • The life cycle of medication consumption

    Fery Pashang, PharmD
  • My first end-of-life conversation

    Shereen Jeyakumar
  • There’s no such thing as work-life balance

    Katie Fortenberry, PhD
  • Are the life sciences the best premedical majors?

    Moses Anthony

More in Physician

  • Life’s detours may be blessings in disguise

    Osmund Agbo, MD
  • Inside the heart of internal medicine: Why we stay

    Ryan Nadelson, MD
  • The quiet grief behind hospital walls

    Aaron Grubner, MD
  • a desk with keyboard and ipad with the kevinmd logo

    How to advance workforce development through research mentorship and evidence-based management

    Olumuyiwa Bamgbade, MD
  • The truth about perfection and identity in health care

    Ryan Nadelson, MD
  • Civil discourse as a leadership competency: the case for curiosity in medicine

    All Levels Leadership
  • Most Popular

  • Past Week

    • Forced voicemail and diagnosis codes are endangering patient access to medications

      Arthur Lazarus, MD, MBA | Meds
    • Why specialist pain clinics and addiction treatment services require strong primary care

      Olumuyiwa Bamgbade, MD | Conditions
    • Who gets to be well in America: Immigrant health is on the line

      Joshua Vasquez, MD | Policy
    • When a medical office sublease turns into a legal nightmare

      Ralph Messo, DO | Physician
    • America’s ER crisis: Why the system is collapsing from within

      Kristen Cline, BSN, RN | Conditions
    • FDA delays could end vital treatment for rare disease patients

      GJ van Londen, MD | Meds
  • Past 6 Months

    • Forced voicemail and diagnosis codes are endangering patient access to medications

      Arthur Lazarus, MD, MBA | Meds
    • How President Biden’s cognitive health shapes political and legal trust

      Muhamad Aly Rifai, MD | Conditions
    • Why are medical students turning away from primary care? [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • The One Big Beautiful Bill and the fragile heart of rural health care

      Holland Haynie, MD | Policy
    • Why “do no harm” might be harming modern medicine

      Sabooh S. Mubbashar, MD | Physician
    • Here’s what providers really need in a modern EHR

      Laura Kohlhagen, MD, MBA | Tech
  • Recent Posts

    • Life’s detours may be blessings in disguise

      Osmund Agbo, MD | Physician
    • Inside the heart of internal medicine: Why we stay

      Ryan Nadelson, MD | Physician
    • The quiet grief behind hospital walls

      Aaron Grubner, MD | Physician
    • Why peer support can save lives in high-pressure medical careers

      Maire Daugharty, MD | Conditions
    • Bundled payments in Medicare: Will fixed pricing reshape surgery costs?

      AMA Committee on Economics and Quality in Medicine, Medical Student Section | Policy
    • How Project ECHO is fighting physician isolation and transforming medical education [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast

Subscribe to KevinMD and never miss a story!

Get free updates delivered free to your inbox.


Find jobs at
Careers by KevinMD.com

Search thousands of physician, PA, NP, and CRNA jobs now.

Learn more

View 1 Comments >

Founded in 2004 by Kevin Pho, MD, KevinMD.com is the web’s leading platform where physicians, advanced practitioners, nurses, medical students, and patients share their insight and tell their stories.

Social

  • Like on Facebook
  • Follow on Twitter
  • Connect on Linkedin
  • Subscribe on Youtube
  • Instagram

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Most Popular

  • Past Week

    • Forced voicemail and diagnosis codes are endangering patient access to medications

      Arthur Lazarus, MD, MBA | Meds
    • Why specialist pain clinics and addiction treatment services require strong primary care

      Olumuyiwa Bamgbade, MD | Conditions
    • Who gets to be well in America: Immigrant health is on the line

      Joshua Vasquez, MD | Policy
    • When a medical office sublease turns into a legal nightmare

      Ralph Messo, DO | Physician
    • America’s ER crisis: Why the system is collapsing from within

      Kristen Cline, BSN, RN | Conditions
    • FDA delays could end vital treatment for rare disease patients

      GJ van Londen, MD | Meds
  • Past 6 Months

    • Forced voicemail and diagnosis codes are endangering patient access to medications

      Arthur Lazarus, MD, MBA | Meds
    • How President Biden’s cognitive health shapes political and legal trust

      Muhamad Aly Rifai, MD | Conditions
    • Why are medical students turning away from primary care? [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • The One Big Beautiful Bill and the fragile heart of rural health care

      Holland Haynie, MD | Policy
    • Why “do no harm” might be harming modern medicine

      Sabooh S. Mubbashar, MD | Physician
    • Here’s what providers really need in a modern EHR

      Laura Kohlhagen, MD, MBA | Tech
  • Recent Posts

    • Life’s detours may be blessings in disguise

      Osmund Agbo, MD | Physician
    • Inside the heart of internal medicine: Why we stay

      Ryan Nadelson, MD | Physician
    • The quiet grief behind hospital walls

      Aaron Grubner, MD | Physician
    • Why peer support can save lives in high-pressure medical careers

      Maire Daugharty, MD | Conditions
    • Bundled payments in Medicare: Will fixed pricing reshape surgery costs?

      AMA Committee on Economics and Quality in Medicine, Medical Student Section | Policy
    • How Project ECHO is fighting physician isolation and transforming medical education [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast

MedPage Today Professional

An Everyday Health Property Medpage Today
  • Terms of Use | Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • DMCA Policy
All Content © KevinMD, LLC
Site by Outthink Group

We want a federal budget where the trade-offs support life, not death
1 comments

Comments are moderated before they are published. Please read the comment policy.

Loading Comments...