Skip to content
  • About
  • Contact
  • Contribute
  • Book
  • Careers
  • Podcast
  • Recommended
  • Speaking
  • All
  • Physician
  • Practice
  • Policy
  • Finance
  • Conditions
  • .edu
  • Patient
  • Meds
  • Tech
  • Social
  • Video
    • All
    • Physician
    • Practice
    • Policy
    • Finance
    • Conditions
    • .edu
    • Patient
    • Meds
    • Tech
    • Social
    • Video
    • About
    • Contact
    • Contribute
    • Book
    • Careers
    • Podcast
    • Recommended
    • Speaking

The FDA-approved concussion blood test isn’t ready for prime time

Neha Raukar, MD
Conditions
March 9, 2018
Share
Tweet
Share

As an emergency medicine physician, a sports medicine physician who has spent countless hours on the sideline, and a concussion researcher, I spent a few minutes on Valentine’s Day reading with great interest the FDA release about a concussion biomarker. Currently, the diagnosis of a concussion is a timely, complicated task, taking into account both subjective historical elements and objective findings from the physical exam. The idea that a blood test could diagnose a concussion would be a game-changer. Unfortunately, after reading the release and the corresponding studies, we have yet to reach the goal line.

The blood test released by San Diego based biotechnology company Banyan Biomarkers looks for serum levels of UCH-L1 (ubiquitin carboxy-terminal hydrolase L1) and GFAP (Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein).  UCH-L1 is a protein that is specific to neurons, the neuroendocrine system, and the testis/ovaries. GFAP is a structural protein found all over the central nervous system, along with kidneys, and the testis. The newly approved blood test can detect these proteins in the blood, and reportedly these protein concentrations rise within 20 minutes of a head injury.  Interestingly, other studies have found that GFAP and UHC-L1 cannot distinguish orthopedic trauma from head injury, especially acutely.

Since the public, health care providers, and sporting agencies are starving for an objective biomarker to help diagnose concussions, this test was fast-tracked through the FDA, under the Breakthrough Devices Program.  However, there are a variety of reasons why these are not ready for immediate institution at your neighborhood emergency departments.

First, the study endpoint was not the diagnosis of concussion, which is elusive and for which health care providers would appreciate an objective biomarker. The endpoint was a negative CT scan.  So, in essence, the test is to predict who is going to have a negative CT scan of the head.  For almost 20 years now, validated decision rules such as the New Orleans Criteria and the Canadian CT Head Rule for adults as well as PECARN and CATCH and CHALICE rules for kids, have existed to help clinicians decide who needs a CT scan, to help predict who would need brain surgery, and to help limit the radiation exposure from a CT scan to patients.

Subjects were considered to have a mild Traumatic Brain Injury (not clear if this is how they define concussion since the patients were not followed) if they had an initial Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) > 13 and met one or more of the following criteria: loss of consciousness (LOC), posttraumatic amnesia, or confusion. Since only 10% of concussions experience a LOC, this disregards a lot of people. And I would submit, if someone came to the ED with any of these criteria, they would be diagnosed with a concussion, and we wouldn’t need a blood test.

Practically speaking, the result of this test takes 3 to 4 hours to become available. This would mean that the already crowded emergency departments would now be holding patients for an additional 3 to 4 hours as healthcare providers await the results of a test to tell them if their patient needs a CT scan.  Of course, if the patient did need a CT scan, the patient could have irreversible brain damage in the time it takes for the results to arrive. As a healthcare provider, I truly hope that my colleagues in the ED continue to rely on the Head CT rules that we were taught and do not let a blood test decide which patients to scan.

Furthermore, the authors suggest that a negative CT scan would indicate a concussion.  Any soccer mom, coach, and hockey dad knows, just because Johnny hit his head and is transiently confused does not mean he has a concussion. This test implies differently.

Since the FDA announcement, I have already had patients ask me to draw this blood test, that is by the way not readily available, to help diagnose their child with a concussion.  All this test will tell me is that their child is not bleeding in their brain. While this is a step in the right direction, we are still a long way from a blood test to diagnose a concussion.

Neha Raukar is an emergency medicine physician.

Image credit: Shutterstock.com

Prev

Are patients using social media to attack physicians?

March 9, 2018 Kevin 4
…
Next

What physicians should know about sanctuary cities

March 9, 2018 Kevin 5
…

Tagged as: Emergency Medicine, Neurology

Post navigation

< Previous Post
Are patients using social media to attack physicians?
Next Post >
What physicians should know about sanctuary cities

ADVERTISEMENT

Related Posts

  • Doctors: It’s time to unionize

    Thomas D. Guastavino, MD
  • Finding happiness in the time of COVID

    Anonymous
  • A medical student’s reflection on time, the scarcest resource

    Natasha Abadilla
  • It’s time to ban productivity from medicine

    Robert Centor, MD
  • It is time to make the unvaccinated pay their fair share

    Hayward Zwerling, MD
  • It’s time for physicians to be less “productive”

    Anonymous

More in Conditions

  • Facing terminal cancer as a doctor and mother

    Kelly Curtin-Hallinan, DO
  • Why doctors must stop ignoring unintentional weight loss in patients with obesity

    Samantha Malley, FNP-C
  • Why hospitals are quietly capping top doctors’ pay

    Dennis Hursh, Esq
  • Why point-of-care ultrasound belongs in emergency department triage

    Resa E. Lewiss, MD and Courtney M. Smalley, MD
  • Why PSA levels alone shouldn’t define your prostate cancer risk

    Martina Ambardjieva, MD, PhD
  • Reframing chronic pain and dignity: What a pain clinic teaches us about MAiD and chronic suffering

    Olumuyiwa Bamgbade, MD
  • Most Popular

  • Past Week

    • Forced voicemail and diagnosis codes are endangering patient access to medications

      Arthur Lazarus, MD, MBA | Meds
    • How President Biden’s cognitive health shapes political and legal trust

      Muhamad Aly Rifai, MD | Conditions
    • The One Big Beautiful Bill and the fragile heart of rural health care

      Holland Haynie, MD | Policy
    • America’s ER crisis: Why the system is collapsing from within

      Kristen Cline, BSN, RN | Conditions
    • Why timing, not surgery, determines patient survival

      Michael Karch, MD | Conditions
    • How early meetings and after-hours events penalize physician-mothers

      Samira Jeimy, MD, PhD and Menaka Pai, MD | Physician
  • Past 6 Months

    • Forced voicemail and diagnosis codes are endangering patient access to medications

      Arthur Lazarus, MD, MBA | Meds
    • How President Biden’s cognitive health shapes political and legal trust

      Muhamad Aly Rifai, MD | Conditions
    • Why are medical students turning away from primary care? [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • The One Big Beautiful Bill and the fragile heart of rural health care

      Holland Haynie, MD | Policy
    • Why “do no harm” might be harming modern medicine

      Sabooh S. Mubbashar, MD | Physician
    • The hidden health risks in the One Big Beautiful Bill Act

      Trevor Lyford, MPH | Policy
  • Recent Posts

    • Beyond burnout: Understanding the triangle of exhaustion [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • Facing terminal cancer as a doctor and mother

      Kelly Curtin-Hallinan, DO | Conditions
    • Online eye exams spark legal battle over health care access

      Joshua Windham, JD and Daryl James | Policy
    • FDA delays could end vital treatment for rare disease patients

      G. van Londen, MD | Meds
    • Pharmacists are key to expanding Medicaid access to digital therapeutics

      Amanda Matter | Meds
    • Why ADHD in women requires a new approach [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast

Subscribe to KevinMD and never miss a story!

Get free updates delivered free to your inbox.


Find jobs at
Careers by KevinMD.com

Search thousands of physician, PA, NP, and CRNA jobs now.

Learn more

Leave a Comment

Founded in 2004 by Kevin Pho, MD, KevinMD.com is the web’s leading platform where physicians, advanced practitioners, nurses, medical students, and patients share their insight and tell their stories.

Social

  • Like on Facebook
  • Follow on Twitter
  • Connect on Linkedin
  • Subscribe on Youtube
  • Instagram

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Most Popular

  • Past Week

    • Forced voicemail and diagnosis codes are endangering patient access to medications

      Arthur Lazarus, MD, MBA | Meds
    • How President Biden’s cognitive health shapes political and legal trust

      Muhamad Aly Rifai, MD | Conditions
    • The One Big Beautiful Bill and the fragile heart of rural health care

      Holland Haynie, MD | Policy
    • America’s ER crisis: Why the system is collapsing from within

      Kristen Cline, BSN, RN | Conditions
    • Why timing, not surgery, determines patient survival

      Michael Karch, MD | Conditions
    • How early meetings and after-hours events penalize physician-mothers

      Samira Jeimy, MD, PhD and Menaka Pai, MD | Physician
  • Past 6 Months

    • Forced voicemail and diagnosis codes are endangering patient access to medications

      Arthur Lazarus, MD, MBA | Meds
    • How President Biden’s cognitive health shapes political and legal trust

      Muhamad Aly Rifai, MD | Conditions
    • Why are medical students turning away from primary care? [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • The One Big Beautiful Bill and the fragile heart of rural health care

      Holland Haynie, MD | Policy
    • Why “do no harm” might be harming modern medicine

      Sabooh S. Mubbashar, MD | Physician
    • The hidden health risks in the One Big Beautiful Bill Act

      Trevor Lyford, MPH | Policy
  • Recent Posts

    • Beyond burnout: Understanding the triangle of exhaustion [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • Facing terminal cancer as a doctor and mother

      Kelly Curtin-Hallinan, DO | Conditions
    • Online eye exams spark legal battle over health care access

      Joshua Windham, JD and Daryl James | Policy
    • FDA delays could end vital treatment for rare disease patients

      G. van Londen, MD | Meds
    • Pharmacists are key to expanding Medicaid access to digital therapeutics

      Amanda Matter | Meds
    • Why ADHD in women requires a new approach [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast

MedPage Today Professional

An Everyday Health Property Medpage Today
  • Terms of Use | Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • DMCA Policy
All Content © KevinMD, LLC
Site by Outthink Group

Leave a Comment

Comments are moderated before they are published. Please read the comment policy.

Loading Comments...