Skip to content
  • About
  • Contact
  • Contribute
  • Book
  • Careers
  • Podcast
  • Recommended
  • Speaking
  • All
  • Physician
  • Practice
  • Policy
  • Finance
  • Conditions
  • .edu
  • Patient
  • Meds
  • Tech
  • Social
  • Video
    • All
    • Physician
    • Practice
    • Policy
    • Finance
    • Conditions
    • .edu
    • Patient
    • Meds
    • Tech
    • Social
    • Video
    • About
    • Contact
    • Contribute
    • Book
    • Careers
    • Podcast
    • Recommended
    • Speaking

What does cable news do to your brain? A neurosurgeon explains.

Marc Arginteanu, MD
Conditions
October 25, 2019
Share
Tweet
Share

The availability of up to the minute information, presented 24/7/365, could assist a democratic society in making the best choices in determining its future. That was the promise of cable news. Unfortunately, cable news has fallen short of its potential and has led to the further polarization of America. More than that, it has changed the way your brain works. Not for the better!

The various cable news channels each have a clearly defined partisan agenda. Each network tailors its presentation of facts to promote the worldview that they seek to promulgate. A person who is looking for either a conservative or liberal point of view knows exactly where to find it. A relatively neutral person who politically leaned in one direction or another might have started out with an open mind. But the networks present information with such homogeneity of thought that they create an echo chamber. This reinforces the viewer’s bias to a pathological level. Ultimately, those with different political and cultural thought are not viewed as neighbors or friends who hold different beliefs, but are dehumanized as evil. Attempts at civilized discussion are shouted down and sometimes met with violence. Many learn that it is safer to remain silent than risk being ostracized. 

Why do you seek echo chambers that confirm your own opinions?  

This preference seems hard-wired into our brains. Scientists at University College London, in collaboration with colleagues at Aarhus University in Denmark, reported, in 2010, that the “reward” area of the brain is activated when we encounter people who agree with our opinions. The researchers instructed 28 volunteers to make a list of 20 songs that they liked and rate each song on a scale from 1 to 10.  The researchers then played a highly rated song from the list and informed the participant that experts either agreed or disagreed with their assessment of the music. The participants’ brain activity was monitored using fMRI scans. When the volunteer opinion coincided with a single expert, the ventral striatum (an area of the brain considered a primary component of the reward system) lit up with activity. With increased validation (the volunteer opinion coincided with multiple experts), the activity in the ventral striatum increased further.

Does cable news change how your brain works?

The disparity in worldview between political conservatives and liberals seems an unbridgeable chasm that only widens with each passing election.  Although this is sad for many reasons, it provides neuroscientists an opportunity to determine whether there are differences in brain anatomy between the two groups.

Two sets of experiments from British Scientists sought to address this question. One group, working at the University of Exeter, reported their results in 2013.  The other team at University College, London, published their data in 2011. The methods of scientists differed slightly. They based the designation of political affiliation on either self-reported political views or voter registration data.  They investigated the neuroanatomy with either standard or fMRI scans. Both groups reported that politically conservative individuals had enhanced activity or brain volume in the right-sided amygdala (area of the brain involved in emotions and memories).  One group reported that the liberals demonstrated significantly greater activity in the left insular cortex (an area that controls empathetic emotional responses), while the other group correlated greater liberalism with increased gray matter volume in the anterior cingulate cortex (an area involved with emotion, learning, and memory).  These results suggest that liberals and conservatives engage different cognitive processes and that political attitudes reflect differences in human brain structure. 

However, these findings beg the ‘chicken and egg’ question. The data do not determine whether these regions play a causal role in the formation of political attitudes, or whether the brain structures are altered by the different modes of thought. It is possible that reinforced thinking in a partisan manner actually causes the differences observed in the brains of conservatives and liberals.

Even if cable news changes your brain wiring, is it for the worse?

The brain science answer is, “Yes.”  

A  multi-institutional study that sought to determine the cerebral source of creativity was recently published.  The researchers evaluated 163 volunteers for their ability to generate creative and original ideas. The participants were engaged in a classic divergent thinking task (divergent thinking ability is a proven predictor of real-world creative achievement in the arts and sciences).  They were presented with a common object and instructed to imagine an unusual and creative use. All of the 163 volunteers’ creations were then judged by four raters. The participants underwent fMRI, which was used to evaluate the anatomy of different brain regions as well as their connections.  The investigators determined that those individuals judged to be most creative, simultaneously engaged large scale brain networks. They reported that the essential underlying commonality in the generation of creative ideas was that different cortical hubs were richly connected and working in unison. 

We are all gifted with a certain amount of innate creativity. Neurobiological research implies that creative thinking is correlated with a wide network of brain engagement. It is reasonable to conclude, based on the neurobiological evidence that becoming mired in the echo chamber of cable news may limit our thinking to a particular part of the brain. Since creativity is a full brain process, some groundbreaking ideas are likely to be missed.  

Brain science supports the notion that intellectual bubbles, such as those created by cable news, are bad for society. Citizens are intellectually impoverished by the absence of input from those with different life experiences and different perspectives. Cable news is also bad for your brain.

ADVERTISEMENT

Marc Arginteanu is a neurosurgeon.

Image credit: Shutterstock.com

Prev

Can CRP testing guide antibiotic decisions?

October 25, 2019 Kevin 0
…
Next

How best to support, honor, and show gratitude for your mentors

October 26, 2019 Kevin 0
…

Tagged as: Mainstream media, Neurology

Post navigation

< Previous Post
Can CRP testing guide antibiotic decisions?
Next Post >
How best to support, honor, and show gratitude for your mentors

ADVERTISEMENT

More by Marc Arginteanu, MD

  • How the shingles vaccine could help prevent dementia

    Marc Arginteanu, MD
  • Diabetes and Alzheimer’s: What your blood sugar might be doing to your brain

    Marc Arginteanu, MD
  • Do microplastics cause dementia?

    Marc Arginteanu, MD

Related Posts

  • Are negative news cycles and social media injurious to our health?

    Rabia Jalal, MD
  • How online physician reviews can be fake news

    Deborah Burton, MD
  • While pharmacy benefit managers are watching cable, patients are streaming Netflix

    Keely McManamon
  • Motrin vs. Tylenol for children: A pediatrician explains

    Jennifer Trachtenberg, MD
  • A DEA agent explains how to fight the opioid crisis and mitigate DEA risk

    Dennis Wichern
  • Esketamine is not a breakthrough new drug: Why the nasal spray for depression is old news

    Erik Messamore, MD, PhD

More in Conditions

  • What Elon Musk and Diddy reveal about the price of power

    Osmund Agbo, MD
  • Understanding depression beyond biology: the power of therapy and meaning

    Maire Daugharty, MD
  • Why medicine must stop worshipping burnout and start valuing humanity

    Sarah White, APRN
  • Why perinatal mental health is the top cause of maternal death in the U.S.

    Sheila Noon
  • A world without vaccines: What history teaches us about public health

    Drew Remignanti, MD, MPH
  • Unraveling the mystery behind one of the most dangerous pregnancy complications: preeclampsia

    Thomas McElrath, MD, PhD and Kara Rood, MD
  • Most Popular

  • Past Week

    • Why are medical students turning away from primary care? [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • Why “do no harm” might be harming modern medicine

      Sabooh S. Mubbashar, MD | Physician
    • How New Mexico became a malpractice lawsuit hotspot

      Patrick Hudson, MD | Physician
    • Why doctors are reclaiming control from burnout culture

      Maureen Gibbons, MD | Physician
    • Why helping people means more than getting an MD

      Vaishali Jha | Education
    • Why public health must be included in AI development

      Laura E. Scudiere, RN, MPH | Tech
  • Past 6 Months

    • Why tracking cognitive load could save doctors and patients

      Hiba Fatima Hamid | Education
    • Why are medical students turning away from primary care? [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • What the world must learn from the life and death of Hind Rajab

      Saba Qaiser, RN | Conditions
    • Why “do no harm” might be harming modern medicine

      Sabooh S. Mubbashar, MD | Physician
    • Here’s what providers really need in a modern EHR

      Laura Kohlhagen, MD, MBA | Tech
    • Why flashy AI tools won’t fix health care without real infrastructure

      David Carmouche, MD | Tech
  • Recent Posts

    • Why helping people means more than getting an MD

      Vaishali Jha | Education
    • How digital tools are reshaping the doctor-patient relationship

      Vineet Vishwanath | Tech
    • Why evidence-based management may be an effective strategy for stronger health care leadership and equity

      Olumuyiwa Bamgbade, MD | Physician
    • Why health care leaders fail at execution—and how to fix it

      Dave Cummings, RN | Policy
    • Residency match tips: Building mentorship, research, and community

      Simran Kaur, MD and Eva Shelton, MD | Education
    • From Founding Fathers to modern battles: physician activism in a politicized era [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast

Subscribe to KevinMD and never miss a story!

Get free updates delivered free to your inbox.


Find jobs at
Careers by KevinMD.com

Search thousands of physician, PA, NP, and CRNA jobs now.

Learn more

View 5 Comments >

Founded in 2004 by Kevin Pho, MD, KevinMD.com is the web’s leading platform where physicians, advanced practitioners, nurses, medical students, and patients share their insight and tell their stories.

Social

  • Like on Facebook
  • Follow on Twitter
  • Connect on Linkedin
  • Subscribe on Youtube
  • Instagram

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Most Popular

  • Past Week

    • Why are medical students turning away from primary care? [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • Why “do no harm” might be harming modern medicine

      Sabooh S. Mubbashar, MD | Physician
    • How New Mexico became a malpractice lawsuit hotspot

      Patrick Hudson, MD | Physician
    • Why doctors are reclaiming control from burnout culture

      Maureen Gibbons, MD | Physician
    • Why helping people means more than getting an MD

      Vaishali Jha | Education
    • Why public health must be included in AI development

      Laura E. Scudiere, RN, MPH | Tech
  • Past 6 Months

    • Why tracking cognitive load could save doctors and patients

      Hiba Fatima Hamid | Education
    • Why are medical students turning away from primary care? [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • What the world must learn from the life and death of Hind Rajab

      Saba Qaiser, RN | Conditions
    • Why “do no harm” might be harming modern medicine

      Sabooh S. Mubbashar, MD | Physician
    • Here’s what providers really need in a modern EHR

      Laura Kohlhagen, MD, MBA | Tech
    • Why flashy AI tools won’t fix health care without real infrastructure

      David Carmouche, MD | Tech
  • Recent Posts

    • Why helping people means more than getting an MD

      Vaishali Jha | Education
    • How digital tools are reshaping the doctor-patient relationship

      Vineet Vishwanath | Tech
    • Why evidence-based management may be an effective strategy for stronger health care leadership and equity

      Olumuyiwa Bamgbade, MD | Physician
    • Why health care leaders fail at execution—and how to fix it

      Dave Cummings, RN | Policy
    • Residency match tips: Building mentorship, research, and community

      Simran Kaur, MD and Eva Shelton, MD | Education
    • From Founding Fathers to modern battles: physician activism in a politicized era [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast

MedPage Today Professional

An Everyday Health Property Medpage Today
  • Terms of Use | Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • DMCA Policy
All Content © KevinMD, LLC
Site by Outthink Group

What does cable news do to your brain? A neurosurgeon explains.
5 comments

Comments are moderated before they are published. Please read the comment policy.

Loading Comments...