KevinMD.com: Social media’s leading physician voice
The KevinMD newsletterReal physician voices, twice a weekFree, and one click to unsubscribe.
Subscribe free →

CodeBlueBlog puts to rest whether the fetal foot impression was real

CodeBlueBlog puts to rest whether the fetal foot impression was real

“Well, ladies and gents, if you’ve ever seen an X-ray of a newborn foot you would notice that there is very little mineralized bone present. This image shows impressions created by distal phalangeal tips that don’t exist in the fetus; the lateral ridge in this image would represent an abnormally flattened calcaneus, if a fetus had a developed calcaneus — which it doesn’t; finally, what are those two bumps — lateral and medial at the base of the phalanges? If someone is trying to simulate the os of the great toe on one side — puleaze…those won’t be calcified for years. The bump on the medial side? I dunno. This might be an alien.

One last addition…the asymmetric impression of the phalanges implies an amount of dorsifelexion that this foot is not capable of.”

Share this articleLinkedInFacebookXEmail

Real physician voices, twice a week

Free, and one click to unsubscribe.

No spam. We never share your email.