Skip to content
  • About
  • Contact
  • Contribute
  • Book
  • Careers
  • Podcast
  • Recommended
  • Speaking
  • All
  • Physician
  • Practice
  • Policy
  • Finance
  • Conditions
  • .edu
  • Patient
  • Meds
  • Tech
  • Social
  • Video
    • All
    • Physician
    • Practice
    • Policy
    • Finance
    • Conditions
    • .edu
    • Patient
    • Meds
    • Tech
    • Social
    • Video
    • About
    • Contact
    • Contribute
    • Book
    • Careers
    • Podcast
    • Recommended
    • Speaking

Is CT lung cancer screening worth it?

Deep Ramachandran, MD
Conditions
June 14, 2012
Share
Tweet
Share

In 2011 The National Cancer Institute published results from their study of low dose CT lung cancer screening of individuals identified as at risk for lung cancer. The investigators enrolled those between 55 to 74 years of age who had at least 30 pack years of smoking under their belt (number of packs per day multiplied by number of years smoked). These people were then randomly assigned to either a chest x-ray group or a “low dose” CT scan group, with 3 images over 2 years. There was initial criticism that the authors used chest x-rays as the control rather than “usual care”. However the PLCO trial, which compared chest x-rays to usual care, subsequently showed no difference between the two, a vindication of the investigator’s strategy.

The study also received some well deserved praise, as it was the largest study of its kind, and demonstrated some very impressive findings, as detailed in the article’s abstract. The most striking findings were:

  • a 20% reduction in the risk of death from cancer relative to the control group.
  • a 6.7% reduction in the risk of death from any cause relative to the control group.

I cannot sum up how to you how astounding these results were/are to the medical community, specifically to those who are involved as patients, or in the treatment, diagnosis, support, research, and  fund raising of lung cancer. For years, many who have suffered from lung cancer, and many more who have labored to care for them and to find a cure, have felt like the orphaned stepchildren of the cancer world. We experience greater incidence than most cancers, have the greatest number of deaths, and yet have less treatment options, less fundraising, less media attention, and the general sense that lung cancer is a condition brought on one’s self by irresponsible behavior.

So these results brought a sense of excitement … finally there is something do! Heck with these results, light me up! I don’t even smoke, but what harm could come from a few seconds of exposure to a little itty-bitty dose of radiation, followed by its interpretation by a guy (or gal) in a dimly lit room?

As it turns out, quite a bit of harm. 26,722 people were assigned to the low dose CT arm of the study, a total of 1060 cancers were diagnosed in these people. And while there was the above mentioned mortality benefit in those that truly did have cancer, about 96% of people who had a positive scan did not end up having cancer (false positive). Those people who received a positive scan (of whom we know 96% did not have cancer) endured 2043 invasive diagnostic procedures (of which 503 were an open chest surgery called a thoracotomy). From these procedures, there were 75 complications classified as “major”, while in the control group, only 768 people underwent an invasive procedure.

An analysis of the data shows that overall, 99.5% of high-risk people who underwent this screening received no benefit from it.  A total of 217 people needed to be screened to prevent one death (NNT=217). But at a cost of one in four people being screened receiving false positive test results, and one in thirty people screened undergoing unnecessary surgery.

The question now is “Is it Worth It?” This question comes down to how one would define “harm.” In most analyses, a false positive (i.e. cancer scare) is considered a psychological harm, which places unneeded stress on people and families, even if no procedure is then performed. If a procedure is then performed to confirm a lack of cancer, then from a researcher’s standpoint, this is now 2 harms done to a patient who would have not otherwise had any psychological or physical harm done to them. Conversely many people who have undergone such an ordeal might ultimately be relieved and thankful that they had the test done and reassured that they do not have cancer.

Eventually, some of these people will die from complications to confirm that they did not have cancer, whereas others who did have cancer will survive. On balance, the number of people who survived as a result of this intervention is greater than the number of people who died because of the intervention. These are the sorts of analyses that are currently underway. Investigators are attempting to determine both the length and quality of life gained due to the screening intervention and its cost effectiveness to see whether it falls on the right side of the fine line that takes cost, efficacy, and harm into account.

Some have already decided that the available data is sufficient to make recommendations. Currently the American College of Chest Physicians (ACCP; of which I am a member) and the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) have  released a joint clinical practice guideline endorsing the use of low dose CT screening for “smokers and former smokers who are age 55 to 74 and who have smoked for 30 pack years or more and either continue to smoke or have quit within the past 15 years.”

While we are a long way away from nationwide screening, such statements from interested medical societies are often the first step towards a time when this would be offered by insurance companies as a covered procedure. The next step involves the analysis of quality of life and cost effectiveness data, which is currently underway. Finally other societies and organizations such as US Preventive Services Task Force may weigh in on the issue before Medicare makes its decision on whether to offer CT screening as a covered service. And as Medicare leads, many private insurers often follow.

Deep Ramachandran is a pulmonary and critical care physician who blogs at CaduceusBlog.

Prev

Medical students need guides during their clinical years

June 14, 2012 Kevin 1
…
Next

Should doctors really want ideal patients?

June 15, 2012 Kevin 11
…

Tagged as: Oncology/Hematology, Radiology

Post navigation

< Previous Post
Medical students need guides during their clinical years
Next Post >
Should doctors really want ideal patients?

ADVERTISEMENT

More by Deep Ramachandran, MD

  • We can’t build our way out of the ventilator shortage. But there is a solution.

    Deep Ramachandran, MD
  • When someone is not dead but not alive

    Deep Ramachandran, MD
  • The hurricane in Puerto Rico is leading a shortage in saline bags

    Deep Ramachandran, MD

More in Conditions

  • Understanding depression beyond biology: the power of therapy and meaning

    Maire Daugharty, MD
  • Why medicine must stop worshipping burnout and start valuing humanity

    Sarah White, APRN
  • Why perinatal mental health is the top cause of maternal death in the U.S.

    Sheila Noon
  • A world without vaccines: What history teaches us about public health

    Drew Remignanti, MD, MPH
  • Unraveling the mystery behind one of the most dangerous pregnancy complications: preeclampsia

    Thomas McElrath, MD, PhD and Kara Rood, MD
  • How community paramedicine impacts Indigenous elders

    Noah Weinberg
  • Most Popular

  • Past Week

    • Why are medical students turning away from primary care? [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • Here’s what providers really need in a modern EHR

      Laura Kohlhagen, MD, MBA | Tech
    • Why “do no harm” might be harming modern medicine

      Sabooh S. Mubbashar, MD | Physician
    • Why doctors are reclaiming control from burnout culture

      Maureen Gibbons, MD | Physician
    • How community paramedicine impacts Indigenous elders

      Noah Weinberg | Conditions
    • A physician’s reflection on love, loss, and finding meaning in grief [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
  • Past 6 Months

    • Why are medical students turning away from primary care? [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • Why tracking cognitive load could save doctors and patients

      Hiba Fatima Hamid | Education
    • Why “do no harm” might be harming modern medicine

      Sabooh S. Mubbashar, MD | Physician
    • Here’s what providers really need in a modern EHR

      Laura Kohlhagen, MD, MBA | Tech
    • What the world must learn from the life and death of Hind Rajab

      Saba Qaiser, RN | Conditions
    • How medical culture hides burnout in plain sight

      Marco Benítez | Conditions
  • Recent Posts

    • A physician’s reflection on love, loss, and finding meaning in grief [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • How fragmented records and poor tracking degrade patient outcomes

      Michael R. McGuire | Policy
    • How New Mexico became a malpractice lawsuit hotspot

      Patrick Hudson, MD | Physician
    • How I learned to stop worrying and love AI

      Rajeev Dutta | Education
    • Understanding depression beyond biology: the power of therapy and meaning

      Maire Daugharty, MD | Conditions
    • Why compassion—not credentials—defines great doctors

      Dr. Saad S. Alshohaib | Physician

Subscribe to KevinMD and never miss a story!

Get free updates delivered free to your inbox.


Find jobs at
Careers by KevinMD.com

Search thousands of physician, PA, NP, and CRNA jobs now.

Learn more

View 3 Comments >

Founded in 2004 by Kevin Pho, MD, KevinMD.com is the web’s leading platform where physicians, advanced practitioners, nurses, medical students, and patients share their insight and tell their stories.

Social

  • Like on Facebook
  • Follow on Twitter
  • Connect on Linkedin
  • Subscribe on Youtube
  • Instagram

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Most Popular

  • Past Week

    • Why are medical students turning away from primary care? [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • Here’s what providers really need in a modern EHR

      Laura Kohlhagen, MD, MBA | Tech
    • Why “do no harm” might be harming modern medicine

      Sabooh S. Mubbashar, MD | Physician
    • Why doctors are reclaiming control from burnout culture

      Maureen Gibbons, MD | Physician
    • How community paramedicine impacts Indigenous elders

      Noah Weinberg | Conditions
    • A physician’s reflection on love, loss, and finding meaning in grief [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
  • Past 6 Months

    • Why are medical students turning away from primary care? [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • Why tracking cognitive load could save doctors and patients

      Hiba Fatima Hamid | Education
    • Why “do no harm” might be harming modern medicine

      Sabooh S. Mubbashar, MD | Physician
    • Here’s what providers really need in a modern EHR

      Laura Kohlhagen, MD, MBA | Tech
    • What the world must learn from the life and death of Hind Rajab

      Saba Qaiser, RN | Conditions
    • How medical culture hides burnout in plain sight

      Marco Benítez | Conditions
  • Recent Posts

    • A physician’s reflection on love, loss, and finding meaning in grief [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • How fragmented records and poor tracking degrade patient outcomes

      Michael R. McGuire | Policy
    • How New Mexico became a malpractice lawsuit hotspot

      Patrick Hudson, MD | Physician
    • How I learned to stop worrying and love AI

      Rajeev Dutta | Education
    • Understanding depression beyond biology: the power of therapy and meaning

      Maire Daugharty, MD | Conditions
    • Why compassion—not credentials—defines great doctors

      Dr. Saad S. Alshohaib | Physician

MedPage Today Professional

An Everyday Health Property Medpage Today
  • Terms of Use | Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • DMCA Policy
All Content © KevinMD, LLC
Site by Outthink Group

Is CT lung cancer screening worth it?
3 comments

Comments are moderated before they are published. Please read the comment policy.

Loading Comments...