Skip to content
  • About
  • Contact
  • Contribute
  • Book
  • Careers
  • Podcast
  • Recommended
  • Speaking
  • All
  • Physician
  • Practice
  • Policy
  • Finance
  • Conditions
  • .edu
  • Patient
  • Meds
  • Tech
  • Social
  • Video
    • All
    • Physician
    • Practice
    • Policy
    • Finance
    • Conditions
    • .edu
    • Patient
    • Meds
    • Tech
    • Social
    • Video
    • About
    • Contact
    • Contribute
    • Book
    • Careers
    • Podcast
    • Recommended
    • Speaking

Are we repeating the statin playbook with lipoprotein(a)?

Larry Kaskel, MD
Conditions
August 14, 2025
Share
Tweet
Share

In the late 1970s, a Japanese biochemist named Akira Endo discovered a compound from fungus that inhibited HMG-CoA reductase, the enzyme responsible for making cholesterol. It was an academic curiosity at the time. No one knew if lowering cholesterol would prevent heart attacks—it just lowered a number on a lab slip.

That compound eventually became lovastatin, and in 1987, Merck brought it to market with no proof of improved outcomes—only a promising mechanism and a hypothesis in search of validation. The first major trial showing that statins saved lives—4S—didn’t appear until 1994. By then, the narrative had already taken hold.

Statins were the first blockbuster biochemical solution to a statistical abstraction, and they opened the door to a new era: Drugs that treat risk more than illness, and surrogate markers more than suffering.

Now, that playbook is being dusted off—and upgraded. This time the target is Lp(a).

Same story, better marketing

Lp(a) is an LDL-like particle with a kringle-shaped tail that makes it more adhesive and thrombogenic. It’s been linked to early heart disease and aortic stenosis. And yes, it’s genetically inherited, hard to measure, and essentially untreatable with anything lifestyle-related.

Perfect.

It’s the dream of every biotech executive:

  • You can’t feel it.
  • You can’t fix it.
  • But we can—if you take our new monthly injectable.

Drugs like pelacarsen (Novartis), olpasiran (Amgen), and SLN360 (Silence Therapeutics) lower Lp(a) levels by up to 98 percent. And yet not one of them has shown a reduction in cardiovascular events.

No heart attacks avoided. No strokes prevented. No lives saved.

Just a number—falling impressively—on a graph.

And yet advisory boards are already forming. “Educational” modules are circulating. Pharma-funded studies are making headlines. The public is being primed. Cardiologists are being softened. And a new generation of guidelines is on the horizon.

This isn’t just marketing. It’s pre-marketing—conditioning the field for a therapeutic need that hasn’t been proven to exist.

The Sackler parallel

If this feels familiar, it should. It’s Purdue Pharma in a lab coat.

When the Sackler family introduced OxyContin, they didn’t just sell a drug—they fabricated a framework. They created pain advisory boards, launched the American Pain Society, and saturated continuing medical education with the idea that pain was under-treated and opioids were the solution. The entire movement rested on one shaky claim: A single sentence in a 1980 NEJM letter to the editor, which stated—without data—that addiction was rare in patients taking opioids for pain.

ADVERTISEMENT

That sentence became a billion-dollar weapon.

And now? Pharma is again building a disease infrastructure around a single molecule—Lp(a). They are not waiting for outcomes. Because outcomes take time. Narratives sell now.

This is not an accusation that Lp(a) therapies are addictive or deadly. It’s something more insidious: They may be irrelevant. Just like CETP inhibitors that raised HDL but did nothing for outcomes, lowering Lp(a) may not change the course of disease at all. It might be a genetic marker, not a therapeutic target.

But if we let industry write the narrative before the data comes in, it won’t matter. The shots will already be on the market. The guidelines will already be rewritten. And we’ll be living inside another post-truth era of lipidology, just as we did with HDL.

The moral of the story

We’ve seen this movie before. The question isn’t whether it ends in scandal. The question is whether we’re willing to wait for proof before prescribing belief.

Because right now, we’re watching a pill—or rather, a pre-filled syringe—in search of an ill. And the only thing more dangerous than a harmful drug is an unnecessary one.

Larry Kaskel is an internist and “lipidologist in recovery” who has been practicing medicine for more than thirty-five years. He operates a concierge practice in the Chicago area and serves on the teaching faculty at the Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine. In addition, he is affiliated with Northwestern Lake Forest Hospital.

Before podcasts entered mainstream culture, Dr. Kaskel hosted Lipid Luminations on ReachMD, where he produced a library of more than four hundred programs featuring leading voices in cardiology, lipidology, and preventive medicine.

He is the author of Dr. Kaskel’s Living in Wellness, Volume One: Let Food Be Thy Medicine, works that combine evidence-based medical practice with accessible strategies for improving healthspan. His current projects focus on reevaluating the cholesterol hypothesis and investigating the infectious origins of atherosclerosis. More information is available at larrykaskel.com.

Prev

Why our fear of AI is really a fear of ourselves [PODCAST]

August 13, 2025 Kevin 0
…
Next

How the quietly efficient physician can turn perception into power

August 14, 2025 Kevin 0
…

Tagged as: Cardiology

Post navigation

< Previous Post
Why our fear of AI is really a fear of ourselves [PODCAST]
Next Post >
How the quietly efficient physician can turn perception into power

ADVERTISEMENT

More by Larry Kaskel, MD

  • Why does lipoprotein(a) exist?

    Larry Kaskel, MD
  • Is Lp(a) testing the new messiah?

    Larry Kaskel, MD
  • Can flu shots prevent heart attacks?

    Larry Kaskel, MD

Related Posts

  • My experience with repeating a year of medical school

    Marthena Phan
  • The science behind ending on a high note

    Larry Benz, DPT

More in Conditions

  • The risks of the single-provider dental sedation model

    Rita Agarwal, MD and Sangeeta Kumaraswami, MD
  • The quiet bravery of breast cancer screening

    Michele Luckenbaugh
  • How automation threatens medical ethics principles

    Muhammad Mohsin Fareed, MD
  • When to test for pediatric seasonal allergies

    Dr. Tanya Tandon
  • Sustainable health care innovation: Why pilot programs fail

    Gerald Kuo
  • How end-of-life planning can be a gift

    Dustin Grinnell
  • Most Popular

  • Past Week

    • The blind men and the elephant: a parable for modern pain management

      Richard A. Lawhern, PhD | Conditions
    • The dangers of oral steroids for seasonal illness

      Megan Milne, PharmD | Meds
    • Catching type 1 diabetes before it becomes life-threatening [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • A daughter’s reflection on life, death, and pancreatic cancer

      Debbie Moore-Black, RN | Conditions
    • The political selectivity of medical freedom: a double standard

      Arthur Lazarus, MD, MBA | Policy
    • Moral dilemmas in medicine: Why some problems have no solutions

      Patrick Hudson, MD | Physician
  • Past 6 Months

    • The blind men and the elephant: a parable for modern pain management

      Richard A. Lawhern, PhD | Conditions
    • Is primary care becoming a triage station?

      J. Leonard Lichtenfeld, MD | Physician
    • Psychiatrists are physicians: a key distinction

      Farid Sabet-Sharghi, MD | Physician
    • Why feeling unlike yourself is a sign of physician emotional overload

      Stephanie Wellington, MD | Physician
    • The U.S. gastroenterologist shortage explained

      Brian Hudes, MD | Physician
    • Accountable care cooperatives: a community-owned health care fix

      David K. Cundiff, MD | Policy
  • Recent Posts

    • Moral dilemmas in medicine: Why some problems have no solutions

      Patrick Hudson, MD | Physician
    • Physician non-compete clauses: a barrier to patient access

      Sharisse Stephenson, MD, MBA | Physician
    • The risks of the single-provider dental sedation model

      Rita Agarwal, MD and Sangeeta Kumaraswami, MD | Conditions
    • Restoring clinical judgment through medical education reform

      Anonymous | Physician
    • How doctors can reclaim control in a corporate system [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • Why I left pediatric cardiology: a story of moral injury

      Susan MacLellan-Tobert, MD | Physician

Subscribe to KevinMD and never miss a story!

Get free updates delivered free to your inbox.


Find jobs at
Careers by KevinMD.com

Search thousands of physician, PA, NP, and CRNA jobs now.

Learn more

View 1 Comments >

Founded in 2004 by Kevin Pho, MD, KevinMD.com is the web’s leading platform where physicians, advanced practitioners, nurses, medical students, and patients share their insight and tell their stories.

Social

  • Like on Facebook
  • Follow on Twitter
  • Connect on Linkedin
  • Subscribe on Youtube
  • Instagram

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Most Popular

  • Past Week

    • The blind men and the elephant: a parable for modern pain management

      Richard A. Lawhern, PhD | Conditions
    • The dangers of oral steroids for seasonal illness

      Megan Milne, PharmD | Meds
    • Catching type 1 diabetes before it becomes life-threatening [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • A daughter’s reflection on life, death, and pancreatic cancer

      Debbie Moore-Black, RN | Conditions
    • The political selectivity of medical freedom: a double standard

      Arthur Lazarus, MD, MBA | Policy
    • Moral dilemmas in medicine: Why some problems have no solutions

      Patrick Hudson, MD | Physician
  • Past 6 Months

    • The blind men and the elephant: a parable for modern pain management

      Richard A. Lawhern, PhD | Conditions
    • Is primary care becoming a triage station?

      J. Leonard Lichtenfeld, MD | Physician
    • Psychiatrists are physicians: a key distinction

      Farid Sabet-Sharghi, MD | Physician
    • Why feeling unlike yourself is a sign of physician emotional overload

      Stephanie Wellington, MD | Physician
    • The U.S. gastroenterologist shortage explained

      Brian Hudes, MD | Physician
    • Accountable care cooperatives: a community-owned health care fix

      David K. Cundiff, MD | Policy
  • Recent Posts

    • Moral dilemmas in medicine: Why some problems have no solutions

      Patrick Hudson, MD | Physician
    • Physician non-compete clauses: a barrier to patient access

      Sharisse Stephenson, MD, MBA | Physician
    • The risks of the single-provider dental sedation model

      Rita Agarwal, MD and Sangeeta Kumaraswami, MD | Conditions
    • Restoring clinical judgment through medical education reform

      Anonymous | Physician
    • How doctors can reclaim control in a corporate system [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • Why I left pediatric cardiology: a story of moral injury

      Susan MacLellan-Tobert, MD | Physician

MedPage Today Professional

An Everyday Health Property Medpage Today
  • Terms of Use | Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • DMCA Policy
All Content © KevinMD, LLC
Site by Outthink Group

Are we repeating the statin playbook with lipoprotein(a)?
1 comments

Comments are moderated before they are published. Please read the comment policy.

Loading Comments...