Skip to content
  • About
  • Contact
  • Contribute
  • Book
  • Careers
  • Podcast
  • Recommended
  • Speaking
  • All
  • Physician
  • Practice
  • Policy
  • Finance
  • Conditions
  • .edu
  • Patient
  • Meds
  • Tech
  • Social
  • Video
    • All
    • Physician
    • Practice
    • Policy
    • Finance
    • Conditions
    • .edu
    • Patient
    • Meds
    • Tech
    • Social
    • Video
    • About
    • Contact
    • Contribute
    • Book
    • Careers
    • Podcast
    • Recommended
    • Speaking

It’s time we stood up for the orphan of organs: the brain

Marilyn B. Benoit, MD
Conditions
July 31, 2014
Share
Tweet
Share

It was with much distress that I read a New York Times front page article by Benedict Carey about the heart wrenching plight of the Serpico family in their journey to get proper psychiatric treatment for their two sons. As a child and adolescent psychiatrist who has served children and families for more than 30 years, trained many child psychiatrists, and served as president of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, I am deeply disturbed by the current psycho-pharmacologic practice of psychiatry.

Over the past decade, there have been amazing advances in medicine that have pushed the profession in the direction of utilizing more evidence-based practices.  This is easy to see in most specialties, such as cardiovascular medicine, where implementing the latest surgical best practices results in proven, tangible positive outcomes. Unfortunately, it is not that clear cut in the field of psychiatry.

Every other medical specialty claims an organ of interest: cardiologists have their heart, nephrologists have their kidneys, hepatologists have their livers, yet the brain remains a medical orphan.

In the “mental health” field we treat diseases of the brain, yet we shy away from claiming the brain as our organ of interest. The brain is the only organ that cannot be transplanted, nor can a person survive without it. People actually survive with mechanical hearts while awaiting heart transplants. The idea that a child can go into an inpatient unit with emotional and behavioral problems and simply be treated in five days with reckless medication trials, without any diagnostic tests that guide an understanding of the genesis of the problems, is preposterous. There is no evidence-based science to support such treatment. The “health” (misnomer?) insurance industry has been the driver of such treatments, and, unfortunately, psychiatry has capitulated instead of pushing back and advocating for appropriate time to evaluate, diagnose, and properly treat our patients. I do not think there is a nephrologist in the world that would accept fewer dialysis sessions for a patient in renal failure, or a cardiologist who would deny critical diagnostic testing simply because the insurance company decided they would not pay for it. Medical necessity should drive assessments, not the insurance industry.

Most inpatient units fail to do any psychological testing.  They typically do no testing to probe for language and communication problems, learning disabilities, or other cognitive challenges that may be at the root of the problem. Children with early traumatic experiences are not being diagnosed appropriately; instead behaviors associated with such trauma are targeted for treatment with medications. If the diagnosis is incorrect, then so is the treatment intervention.

Medicating children to address episodes of challenging behaviors is destined to fail.  Without an understanding of what is driving the behavior, how can we ever help find a solution? Functional behavior analyses would help to clarify this, but most inpatient stays do not allow enough time — let alone resources — to complete such an analysis. If we want to truly address these issues and find real solutions, we must advocate for adequate time to conduct proper bio-psycho-social evaluations, examining historical information about myriad aspects of the family’s life, probing the family and personal medical histories, and considering the social ecosystems that have impacted the developing brain of the child. Simply treating the behaviors with psychotropic medications and sending children home in five to seven days results in what we see as revolving door admissions that only further traumatize children and increase frustration and hopelessness in their families. The costs — in hard dollars, opportunity costs, and emotional costs — far outweigh any short-term behavioral benefits.

The brain of a developing child presents a complex set of challenges. Research proves that environment is constantly impacting a child’s brain development in ways that we are still trying to understand. The Adverse Childhood Events (ACEs) study by Kaiser Permanente has finally infiltrated the mainstream of the medical profession. For the first time, there is credible, scientific evidence that increasing numbers of ACEs impact the total health of individuals, leading to increased chronic illnesses, earlier mortality, and greater dependence on tax payer dollars.

Judicious use of psychotropic medications has a place in treating some brain disorders that have been properly assessed and diagnosed (depression, anxiety, Tourette’s, schizophrenia, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, and complex partial seizure disorder to name a few). However, medication cannot treat the family environment, parental neglect, physical and sexual abuse, exposure to violence at home and/or in the neighborhood, parental mental illness, and substance abuse, all critical elements in understanding and diagnosing emotional and behavioral disorders, which often have a trauma substrate.   Quickie checklists filled out in a waiting room cannot replace a thorough clinical evaluation. The era of checklist medicine is doing our patients a disservice. It simply does not work!

Psychiatry provides interventions that treat the brain, our most precious organ. It’s time for the profession to stand up and begin working more aggressively with the insurance companies to research our current practices and determine the long-term impacts of the widespread use of psychotropic medications as a first line intervention in the treatment of behavioral and emotional brain disorders. Research proves it takes time for the brain to make changes; and for families, it really means changing several brains in order to make behavioral changes.  Quick fixes clearly have not created a lasting solution. It’s time we find a new approach, one that goes back to the basics of medicine. We took an oath to, “first do no harm,” and right now we’re failing these children and families.  We should not focus our attention on dollars and cents or add to the complex trauma so many children who are hospitalized have experienced in their young lives.  They deserve better.

Marilyn B. Benoit is senior vice president and chief clinical officer, Devereux.

Prev

Health care efficiency can mean different things

July 31, 2014 Kevin 2
…
Next

Getting personal with patients really matters

July 31, 2014 Kevin 3
…

Tagged as: Psychiatry

Post navigation

< Previous Post
Health care efficiency can mean different things
Next Post >
Getting personal with patients really matters

ADVERTISEMENT

More in Conditions

  • Post-stroke cognitive impairment: the hidden challenge of recovery

    Rida Ghani
  • The milkweed and the wind: a poem on aging as renewal

    Michele Luckenbaugh
  • Alex Pretti’s death: Why politics belongs in emergency medicine

    Marilyn McCullum, RN
  • Women in health care leadership: Navigating competition and mentorship

    Sarah White, APRN
  • Senior financial scams: a guide for primary care physicians

    John C. Hagan III, MD
  • Genetic mutations and racial disparities in leukemia survival

    Kurt Miceli, MD, MBA
  • Most Popular

  • Past Week

    • Alex Pretti: a physician’s open letter defending his legacy

      Mousson Berrouet, DO | Physician
    • The hidden costs of the physician non-clinical career transition

      Carlos N. Hernandez-Torres, MD | Physician
    • ADHD and cannabis use: Navigating the diagnostic challenge

      Farid Sabet-Sharghi, MD | Conditions
    • AI-enabled clinical data abstraction: a nurse’s perspective

      Pamela Ashenfelter, RN | Tech
    • Why private equity is betting on employer DPC over retail

      Dana Y. Lujan, MBA | Policy
    • Leading with love: a physician’s guide to clarity and compassion

      Jessie Mahoney, MD | Physician
  • Past 6 Months

    • Physician on-call compensation: the unpaid labor driving burnout

      Corinne Sundar Rao, MD | Physician
    • How environmental justice and health disparities connect to climate change

      Kaitlynn Esemaya, Alexis Thompson, Annique McLune, and Anamaria Ancheta | Policy
    • Will AI replace primary care physicians?

      P. Dileep Kumar, MD, MBA | Tech
    • A physician father on the Dobbs decision and reproductive rights

      Travis Walker, MD, MPH | Physician
    • What is the minority tax in medicine?

      Tharini Nagarkar and Maranda C. Ward, EdD, MPH | Education
    • Why the U.S. health care system is failing patients and physicians

      John C. Hagan III, MD | Policy
  • Recent Posts

    • Post-stroke cognitive impairment: the hidden challenge of recovery

      Rida Ghani | Conditions
    • The milkweed and the wind: a poem on aging as renewal

      Michele Luckenbaugh | Conditions
    • The cost of certainty in modern medicine

      Priya Dudhat | Education
    • Blaming younger doctors for setting boundaries ignores the broken system [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • Nervous system dysregulation vs. stress: Why “just relaxing” doesn’t work

      Claudine Holt, MD | Physician
    • U.S. opioid policy history: How politics replaced science in pain care

      Richard A. Lawhern, PhD & Stephen E. Nadeau, MD | Meds

Subscribe to KevinMD and never miss a story!

Get free updates delivered free to your inbox.


Find jobs at
Careers by KevinMD.com

Search thousands of physician, PA, NP, and CRNA jobs now.

Learn more

Leave a Comment

Founded in 2004 by Kevin Pho, MD, KevinMD.com is the web’s leading platform where physicians, advanced practitioners, nurses, medical students, and patients share their insight and tell their stories.

Social

  • Like on Facebook
  • Follow on Twitter
  • Connect on Linkedin
  • Subscribe on Youtube
  • Instagram

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Most Popular

  • Past Week

    • Alex Pretti: a physician’s open letter defending his legacy

      Mousson Berrouet, DO | Physician
    • The hidden costs of the physician non-clinical career transition

      Carlos N. Hernandez-Torres, MD | Physician
    • ADHD and cannabis use: Navigating the diagnostic challenge

      Farid Sabet-Sharghi, MD | Conditions
    • AI-enabled clinical data abstraction: a nurse’s perspective

      Pamela Ashenfelter, RN | Tech
    • Why private equity is betting on employer DPC over retail

      Dana Y. Lujan, MBA | Policy
    • Leading with love: a physician’s guide to clarity and compassion

      Jessie Mahoney, MD | Physician
  • Past 6 Months

    • Physician on-call compensation: the unpaid labor driving burnout

      Corinne Sundar Rao, MD | Physician
    • How environmental justice and health disparities connect to climate change

      Kaitlynn Esemaya, Alexis Thompson, Annique McLune, and Anamaria Ancheta | Policy
    • Will AI replace primary care physicians?

      P. Dileep Kumar, MD, MBA | Tech
    • A physician father on the Dobbs decision and reproductive rights

      Travis Walker, MD, MPH | Physician
    • What is the minority tax in medicine?

      Tharini Nagarkar and Maranda C. Ward, EdD, MPH | Education
    • Why the U.S. health care system is failing patients and physicians

      John C. Hagan III, MD | Policy
  • Recent Posts

    • Post-stroke cognitive impairment: the hidden challenge of recovery

      Rida Ghani | Conditions
    • The milkweed and the wind: a poem on aging as renewal

      Michele Luckenbaugh | Conditions
    • The cost of certainty in modern medicine

      Priya Dudhat | Education
    • Blaming younger doctors for setting boundaries ignores the broken system [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • Nervous system dysregulation vs. stress: Why “just relaxing” doesn’t work

      Claudine Holt, MD | Physician
    • U.S. opioid policy history: How politics replaced science in pain care

      Richard A. Lawhern, PhD & Stephen E. Nadeau, MD | Meds

MedPage Today Professional

An Everyday Health Property Medpage Today
  • Terms of Use | Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • DMCA Policy
All Content © KevinMD, LLC
Site by Outthink Group

Leave a Comment

Comments are moderated before they are published. Please read the comment policy.

Loading Comments...