Skip to content
  • About
  • Contact
  • Contribute
  • Book
  • Careers
  • Podcast
  • Recommended
  • Speaking
  • All
  • Physician
  • Practice
  • Policy
  • Finance
  • Conditions
  • .edu
  • Patient
  • Meds
  • Tech
  • Social
  • Video
    • All
    • Physician
    • Practice
    • Policy
    • Finance
    • Conditions
    • .edu
    • Patient
    • Meds
    • Tech
    • Social
    • Video
    • About
    • Contact
    • Contribute
    • Book
    • Careers
    • Podcast
    • Recommended
    • Speaking

Health care efficiency can mean different things

Rahul K. Parikh, MD
Policy
July 31, 2014
Share
Tweet
Share

Whether you’ve praised or vilified Obamacare, see it as an amazing achievement or an existential threat, it is the law of the land.  The price transparency created by online exchanges, a vital part of the law, stands to make cost the biggest driver of choice. This, along with cuts in government health spending, will disrupt the economics of health care in dramatic new ways.

Our first response to this brave new world is to declare that American health care needs to be more efficient. While this is not a new refrain, it is one being heard more loudly and urgently, from the office of the solo practitioner to the boardrooms of the most reputable hospitals and health care systems, than ever before. The Center for Medicare Services, the Institute of Medicine, and even the White House have endorsed the need for greater efficiency.  Employers and other payers want to factor efficiency into their decision about whether to use the services of a particular doctor, hospital or health care system.

But just what is efficiency in health care?  In many other industries, the answer is clear: produce or move more goods with the same or fewer resources (money, people, machines).   What turns out be both striking and surprising in health care, however, is that the term is a bit of a Rorschach test — prone to interpretation depending on who you ask and the lens through they view things.  Without a common understanding, any chance of making American health care better stands to stall.

I learned about this lack of clarity as I spent some time asking a variety of stakeholders  — both inside and outside of my health system — about what efficiency means.  Rarely were there two identical responses.  Physicians, those who see patients day to day in the trenches of their exam rooms, identified efficiency to be “less paperwork,” “more time,” or, for those who use electronic medical records, “fewer clicks of the mouse.” Some nurses I asked came back with comments about “patient ratios.”  Other health professionals had still other interpretations.  “Using technology to educate and help patients ‘own’ their health care decisions,”was one from a patient educator.

When I asked the question of those a little higher up the health care business food chain, the answers sharpened somewhat but were just as diverse. “Eliminate waste,”“do the right thing the first time,” “save money ““high quality service at affordable rates” were among them.  Finally, I took the time to ask some patients: “give me what I want or need,” “convenience,” “one stop shopping,” and “don’t keep me waiting” came back to me.

Why is it so hard to find agreement on the meaning of efficiency?  One reason is that we cannot agree what to measure. In a review of over 250 articles, a team of researchers found very little overlap among measures being used to measure efficiency.  Among any they did find, few to none have been subjected to rigorous evaluations to measure their reliability, validity, and sensitivity.  Finally, the researchers found very little overlap between any of these measures and measures of actual quality of care. Just as my informal poll of doctors, health care workers and patients found,  “the term efficiency is used by different stakeholders to connote various constructs.”

Another reason for our lack of agreement may have to do with the origins of the idea itself:  The concept of efficiency comes from a place that seems far removed from the internist’s exam room and the surgeon’s operating suite: the factory floor.  Efficiency was originally championed by the 19th Century management pioneer Frederick Winslow Taylor.  Taylor was steel factory machinist who saw who recognized that workers were not nearly as productive as they could be. He set about analyzing and scrutinizing their work habits so his factory could produce more widgets with a defined set of people and machines, the very definition of efficiency that we still use today.   He is widely credited as having launched management science and his career was loosely portrayed in the movie “The Efficiency Expert. ”

Attempts to translate this industrial view of efficiency to the world of medicine face resistance. There are no blue collar physicians.  We believe, by virtue of our ideals, education and rigor of our training, that our work cannot be standardized. A physician’s office, from reception to waiting to exam room is not an assembly line. Patients can’t and should never be seen as widgets to be moved along the floor.  On the contrary, we are professionals who use specialized skills (scientific and humanistic) to care for our patients. And even if each of those patients has the exact same problem, differences in their expectations, assumptions, values and a myriad of other factors make each non-interchangeable. Hence, the practice of medicine, a point of view that immediately casts doubt on the idea of efficiency among those on the front lines of medical care.

One solution to our dilemma is to acknowledge that (perhaps) efficiency is too insular a view.  Perhaps some rhetorical jiu jitsu, one which puts the patient out front, is a better approach.   Harvard Professor and health care thinker Michael Porter and former health care executive Thomas Lee hinted this recently: “Efforts to reform health care have been hobbled by lack of clarity about the goal … Narrow goals such as improving access to care, containing costs, and boosting profits have been a distraction,” they wrote in a recent article for Harvard Business Review.  Some of these items he mentions could easily be lay definitions of efficiency, like those folks gave me in my informal poll.

Porter and Lee offer a solution: To look outward by establishing a value agenda, one in which American health care moves away from a system organized around volume of visits, procedures and a system based what physicians do to one in which care is better coordinated around patients and the outcomes that matter to them, such as their time to recovery after illness, how sustained their recovery remains and their functional status, for example.  They outline 6 components to achieve this, which include organizing into integrated practice units, coordinating care across facilities, and moving to bundled payments for cycles of care.  While parts of these have certainly been established in various health care settings, any group that establishes the full complement of them will have a strategic advantage in the post-ACA world.

With their value agenda, Porter and Lee don’t jettison efficiency as much as they reframe it.  “At its core maximizing value for patients: that is, achieving the best outcomes at the lowest cost.”  This they argues, increases “the efficiency of providing excellent care.”  Thus, Porter and Lee turn the tables from an internally focused view where everybody agrees to disagree about — even abhor — the meaning of efficiency to one which those who truly have a patient-centered mission can set as a destination.  I’d be hard pressed to find a physician, non-physician colleague or patient who wouldn’t want to get there.

Rahul K. Parikh is a pediatrician and a writer.  He can be reached at his self-titled site, Dr. Rahul K. Parikh.

Prev

It's time to bring back morbidity and mortality conferences

July 30, 2014 Kevin 3
…
Next

It’s time we stood up for the orphan of organs: the brain

July 31, 2014 Kevin 0
…

ADVERTISEMENT

Tagged as: Public Health & Policy

Post navigation

< Previous Post
It's time to bring back morbidity and mortality conferences
Next Post >
It’s time we stood up for the orphan of organs: the brain

ADVERTISEMENT

More by Rahul K. Parikh, MD

  • a desk with keyboard and ipad with the kevinmd logo

    The Apple Genius Bar could learn some bedside manner

    Rahul K. Parikh, MD
  • a desk with keyboard and ipad with the kevinmd logo

    Medicine needs to get back to hands-on basics, rather than focusing on technology

    Rahul K. Parikh, MD
  • a desk with keyboard and ipad with the kevinmd logo

    What health reform can learn from Regina Holliday

    Rahul K. Parikh, MD

More in Policy

  • How the One Big Beautiful Bill could reshape your medical career

    Kara Pepper, MD
  • Why the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force is essential to saving lives

    J. Leonard Lichtenfeld, MD
  • Brooklyn hepatitis C cluster reveals hidden dangers in outpatient clinics

    Don Weiss, MD, MPH
  • Why nearly 800 U.S. hospitals are at risk of shutting down

    Harry Severance, MD
  • Innovation is moving too fast for health care workers to catch up

    Tiffiny Black, DM, MPA, MBA
  • How pediatricians can address the health problems raised in the MAHA child health report

    Joseph Barrocas, MD
  • Most Popular

  • Past Week

    • How a doctor defied a hurricane to save a life

      Dharam Persaud-Sharma, MD, PhD | Physician
    • Why primary care needs better dermatology training

      Alex Siauw | Conditions
    • Guilty until proven innocent? My experience with a state medical board.

      Jeffrey Hatef, Jr., MD | Physician
    • Why physician strikes are a form of hospice

      Patrick Hudson, MD | Physician
    • Why medical notes have become billing scripts instead of patient stories

      Sriman Swarup, MD, MBA | Tech
    • The truth about sun exposure: What dermatologists want you to know

      Shafat Hassan, MD, PhD, MPH | Conditions
  • Past 6 Months

    • Why transgender health care needs urgent reform and inclusive practices

      Angela Rodriguez, MD | Conditions
    • COVID-19 was real: a doctor’s frontline account

      Randall S. Fong, MD | Conditions
    • Why primary care doctors are drowning in debt despite saving lives

      John Wei, MD | Physician
    • New student loan caps could shut low-income students out of medicine

      Tom Phan, MD | Physician
    • Confessions of a lipidologist in recovery: the infection we’ve ignored for 40 years

      Larry Kaskel, MD | Conditions
    • mRNA post vaccination syndrome: Is it real?

      Harry Oken, MD | Conditions
  • Recent Posts

    • The truth about sun exposure: What dermatologists want you to know

      Shafat Hassan, MD, PhD, MPH | Conditions
    • Learning medicine in the age of AI: Why future doctors need digital fluency

      Kelly D. França | Education
    • How a South Asian nurse challenged stereotypes in health care

      Viksit Bali, RN | Conditions
    • Doctors reclaiming their humanity in a broken system [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • Guilty until proven innocent? My experience with a state medical board.

      Jeffrey Hatef, Jr., MD | Physician
    • How to balance clinical duties with building a startup

      Arlen Meyers, MD, MBA | Physician

Subscribe to KevinMD and never miss a story!

Get free updates delivered free to your inbox.


Find jobs at
Careers by KevinMD.com

Search thousands of physician, PA, NP, and CRNA jobs now.

Learn more

View 2 Comments >

Founded in 2004 by Kevin Pho, MD, KevinMD.com is the web’s leading platform where physicians, advanced practitioners, nurses, medical students, and patients share their insight and tell their stories.

Social

  • Like on Facebook
  • Follow on Twitter
  • Connect on Linkedin
  • Subscribe on Youtube
  • Instagram

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Most Popular

  • Past Week

    • How a doctor defied a hurricane to save a life

      Dharam Persaud-Sharma, MD, PhD | Physician
    • Why primary care needs better dermatology training

      Alex Siauw | Conditions
    • Guilty until proven innocent? My experience with a state medical board.

      Jeffrey Hatef, Jr., MD | Physician
    • Why physician strikes are a form of hospice

      Patrick Hudson, MD | Physician
    • Why medical notes have become billing scripts instead of patient stories

      Sriman Swarup, MD, MBA | Tech
    • The truth about sun exposure: What dermatologists want you to know

      Shafat Hassan, MD, PhD, MPH | Conditions
  • Past 6 Months

    • Why transgender health care needs urgent reform and inclusive practices

      Angela Rodriguez, MD | Conditions
    • COVID-19 was real: a doctor’s frontline account

      Randall S. Fong, MD | Conditions
    • Why primary care doctors are drowning in debt despite saving lives

      John Wei, MD | Physician
    • New student loan caps could shut low-income students out of medicine

      Tom Phan, MD | Physician
    • Confessions of a lipidologist in recovery: the infection we’ve ignored for 40 years

      Larry Kaskel, MD | Conditions
    • mRNA post vaccination syndrome: Is it real?

      Harry Oken, MD | Conditions
  • Recent Posts

    • The truth about sun exposure: What dermatologists want you to know

      Shafat Hassan, MD, PhD, MPH | Conditions
    • Learning medicine in the age of AI: Why future doctors need digital fluency

      Kelly D. França | Education
    • How a South Asian nurse challenged stereotypes in health care

      Viksit Bali, RN | Conditions
    • Doctors reclaiming their humanity in a broken system [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • Guilty until proven innocent? My experience with a state medical board.

      Jeffrey Hatef, Jr., MD | Physician
    • How to balance clinical duties with building a startup

      Arlen Meyers, MD, MBA | Physician

MedPage Today Professional

An Everyday Health Property Medpage Today
  • Terms of Use | Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • DMCA Policy
All Content © KevinMD, LLC
Site by Outthink Group

Health care efficiency can mean different things
2 comments

Comments are moderated before they are published. Please read the comment policy.

Loading Comments...