Skip to content
  • About
  • Contact
  • Contribute
  • Book
  • Careers
  • Podcast
  • Recommended
  • Speaking
  • All
  • Physician
  • Practice
  • Policy
  • Finance
  • Conditions
  • .edu
  • Patient
  • Meds
  • Tech
  • Social
  • Video
    • All
    • Physician
    • Practice
    • Policy
    • Finance
    • Conditions
    • .edu
    • Patient
    • Meds
    • Tech
    • Social
    • Video
    • About
    • Contact
    • Contribute
    • Book
    • Careers
    • Podcast
    • Recommended
    • Speaking

Obamacare isn’t a train wreck. Here’s why.

Bob Doherty
Policy
August 13, 2014
Share
Tweet
Share

For years, critics of Obamacare (Affordable Care Act), have predicted that it would turn out to be a “train wreck” — or something worse.  But now we know that by every objective measure, the ACA is working out pretty darn well.  Let’s run through the “train wreck” predictions, and what we now know to actually be the case:

Train wreck prediction #1: “Obamacare will lead to skyrocketing health care cost increases and explode the deficit.”

Typical was the claim by Obamacare opponent Avik Roy that “health care spending will explode under Obamacare.”

But now we know that:

In 2012, total health care spending increased by 3.7%, the “lowest rate since 1960.” Most recently, the CBO substantially reduced its forecast of projected deficit spending, largely because of the slowdown in health care spending.  And the CBO’s director confirmed his agency’s long-standing view that the ACA will lower the deficit.

The ACA may not be totally responsible for the health care spending slow down — the same thing is happening in other wealthier countries reports the New York Times.

But the facts to date show that Obamacare surely has not caused health care costs to skyrocket, or the deficit to explode; rather, health care spending has slowed and deficits are going down.

Train wreck prediction #2: “More people will lose coverage under Obamacare than gain it.”

Speaker of the House John Boehner was one of many ACA critics who made this claim.

But now we know that:

Far more people gained coverage than lost it.

The Washington Post’s independent fact-checker wrote in March that there’s “more than enough to demonstrate that no matter how you count it, there has been no net loss in insurance coverage.”

In fact, today we now know for sure that Obamacare has allowed far more previously uninsured people to gain health insurance coverage than lost it.  It’s not even close.  Kaiser Health News reports that three independent studies found that the ACA “reduced the number of uninsured adults by 8 to 11 million people.”

Politico, a highly respected, independent and non-partisan news source for DC policy wonks and politicians, concludes that “by now, the trend is unmistakable: Millions of people who didn’t have health insurance before the Affordable Care Act have gained it since last fall. The law is not just covering people who already had health coverage, but adding new people to the ranks of the insured — which was the point of the law all along.”

To recap, these are the plain and simple facts:

ADVERTISEMENT

Opponents of Obamacare predicted that Obamacare would become a train wreck because health care spending would skyrocket and the deficit would explode as a result.  The fact is you’d have to go back over half a century to find a time when health care spending has  grown so slowly;  the CBO says that federal deficit spending is declining (largely due to the slowdown in health care spending), and that the ACA will continue to lower the deficit in the future.

Opponents of Obamacare predicted that it would become a train wreck because  millions more would lose coverage than gain it.  But the fact is that under Obamacare, the uninsured rate is the lowest it’s been since at least 2008, according to Gallup, with the rate dropping across nearly every subgroup — extending coverage to some 8 to 11 million previously uninsured adults.

For the millions who have gained coverage, Obamacare today is looking a lot more like a lifeline than a train wreck.

But it’s not only the uninsured who benefit.  Don’t we all share in the benefit of having  lower health care spending, lower deficits, and from seeing fewer of our neighbors delay getting needed health care because they couldn’t afford health insurance?

Bob Doherty is senior vice president, governmental affairs and public policy, American College of Physicians and blogs at The ACP Advocate Blog. 

Prev

Can we get more from our medical meetings?

August 13, 2014 Kevin 11
…
Next

Dr. House of Cards takes down Dr. Oz. Brilliant.

August 13, 2014 Kevin 1
…

Tagged as: Obama, Public Health & Policy

Post navigation

< Previous Post
Can we get more from our medical meetings?
Next Post >
Dr. House of Cards takes down Dr. Oz. Brilliant.

ADVERTISEMENT

More by Bob Doherty

  • Don’t underestimate the appeal of a Trump “health plan”

    Bob Doherty
  • 5 health care lessons from the mid-term elections

    Bob Doherty
  • Medicare’s historic proposal to change how it pays physicians

    Bob Doherty

More in Policy

  • The physician mental health crisis in the ER

    Ronke Lawal
  • Why the MAHA plan is the wrong cure

    Emily Doucette, MPH and Wayne Altman, MD
  • How AI on social media fuels body dysmorphia

    STRIPED, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health
  • Why direct primary care (DPC) models fail

    Dana Y. Lujan, MBA
  • Why doctors are losing the health care culture war

    Rusha Modi, MD, MPH
  • The smart way to transition to direct care

    Dana Y. Lujan, MBA
  • Most Popular

  • Past Week

    • The decline of the doctor-patient relationship

      William Lynes, MD | Physician
    • Rethinking cholesterol and atherosclerosis

      Larry Kaskel, MD | Conditions
    • The difference between a doctor and a physician

      Mick Connors, MD | Physician
    • The dismantling of public health infrastructure

      Ronald L. Lindsay, MD | Physician
    • A pediatrician on the lead contamination crisis

      Eric Fethke, MD | Physician
    • The infectious hypothesis of Alzheimer’s disease

      Larry Kaskel, MD | Conditions
  • Past 6 Months

    • Rethinking the JUPITER trial and statin safety

      Larry Kaskel, MD | Conditions
    • The dangerous racial bias in dermatology AI

      Alex Siauw | Tech
    • When language barriers become a medical emergency

      Monzur Morshed, MD and Kaysan Morshed | Physician
    • The mental health workforce is collapsing

      Ronke Lawal | Conditions
    • A doctor’s struggle with burnout and boundaries

      Humeira Badsha, MD | Physician
    • The hypocrisy of insurance referral mandates

      Ryan Nadelson, MD | Physician
  • Recent Posts

    • Are we scared of the wrong environmental toxins?

      M. Bennet Broner, PhD | Conditions
    • A doctor’s fight to repair, not replace

      Xiang Xie | Conditions
    • How to prepare for your death [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • The dismantling of public health infrastructure

      Ronald L. Lindsay, MD | Physician
    • The case for therapeutic nicotine use

      Larry Kaskel, MD | Conditions
    • What is your physician well-being strategy?

      Jennifer Shaer, MD | Physician

Subscribe to KevinMD and never miss a story!

Get free updates delivered free to your inbox.


Find jobs at
Careers by KevinMD.com

Search thousands of physician, PA, NP, and CRNA jobs now.

Learn more

View 35 Comments >

Founded in 2004 by Kevin Pho, MD, KevinMD.com is the web’s leading platform where physicians, advanced practitioners, nurses, medical students, and patients share their insight and tell their stories.

Social

  • Like on Facebook
  • Follow on Twitter
  • Connect on Linkedin
  • Subscribe on Youtube
  • Instagram

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Most Popular

  • Past Week

    • The decline of the doctor-patient relationship

      William Lynes, MD | Physician
    • Rethinking cholesterol and atherosclerosis

      Larry Kaskel, MD | Conditions
    • The difference between a doctor and a physician

      Mick Connors, MD | Physician
    • The dismantling of public health infrastructure

      Ronald L. Lindsay, MD | Physician
    • A pediatrician on the lead contamination crisis

      Eric Fethke, MD | Physician
    • The infectious hypothesis of Alzheimer’s disease

      Larry Kaskel, MD | Conditions
  • Past 6 Months

    • Rethinking the JUPITER trial and statin safety

      Larry Kaskel, MD | Conditions
    • The dangerous racial bias in dermatology AI

      Alex Siauw | Tech
    • When language barriers become a medical emergency

      Monzur Morshed, MD and Kaysan Morshed | Physician
    • The mental health workforce is collapsing

      Ronke Lawal | Conditions
    • A doctor’s struggle with burnout and boundaries

      Humeira Badsha, MD | Physician
    • The hypocrisy of insurance referral mandates

      Ryan Nadelson, MD | Physician
  • Recent Posts

    • Are we scared of the wrong environmental toxins?

      M. Bennet Broner, PhD | Conditions
    • A doctor’s fight to repair, not replace

      Xiang Xie | Conditions
    • How to prepare for your death [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • The dismantling of public health infrastructure

      Ronald L. Lindsay, MD | Physician
    • The case for therapeutic nicotine use

      Larry Kaskel, MD | Conditions
    • What is your physician well-being strategy?

      Jennifer Shaer, MD | Physician

MedPage Today Professional

An Everyday Health Property Medpage Today
  • Terms of Use | Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • DMCA Policy
All Content © KevinMD, LLC
Site by Outthink Group

Obamacare isn’t a train wreck. Here’s why.
35 comments

Comments are moderated before they are published. Please read the comment policy.

Loading Comments...