Skip to content
  • About
  • Contact
  • Contribute
  • Book
  • Careers
  • Podcast
  • Recommended
  • Speaking
  • All
  • Physician
  • Practice
  • Policy
  • Finance
  • Conditions
  • .edu
  • Patient
  • Meds
  • Tech
  • Social
  • Video
    • All
    • Physician
    • Practice
    • Policy
    • Finance
    • Conditions
    • .edu
    • Patient
    • Meds
    • Tech
    • Social
    • Video
    • About
    • Contact
    • Contribute
    • Book
    • Careers
    • Podcast
    • Recommended
    • Speaking

Dr. Google should be sued for malpractice. Here’s why.

Tanya Feke, MD
Physician
August 9, 2015
Share
Tweet
Share

shutterstock_169451723

Dr. Google wants you to think he is your best friend. He is there for you day and night, no waiting rooms or office hours needed. He promises answers, and he gives them now. No testing, no lab draws. Dr. Google provides diagnoses after a few clicks on a keyboard and delivers the news in minutes, if not seconds. Dr. Google will tell you what you want to know, and he is going to score highly on a patient satisfaction survey.

Dr. Google should be sued for malpractice.

The truth is that Dr. Google often does more harm than good. Information found on the Internet is often unreliable and can unnecessarily increase anxiety. Worse, it can lead to people questioning their doctor’s judgment even after they have been properly seen and examined. I admit my heart plummets when I hear the words, “but I read it on the Internet,” at the end of a visit. While I appreciate that someone wants to be proactive for their health, those words often mean my patient has an agenda and will demand certain tests and treatments even if there is not a medical indication, even if I carefully explain to them why that is the case. This happens at least once every day.

The Internet holds vast information, and while I thank Google for its entertainment value, I have to express my concerns when it comes to matters of health. This is not an attack on Google so much as it for those who post online content that is not up to snuff. Much of the medical content out there is not reliable. Here is what to watch out for.

1. Outdated content. Thanks to ongoing research, medical information is always evolving. One day cholesterol is bad for you, the next it is not. That said, is there really such a thing as evergreen content in medicine? A good source will update their content regularly. They will post when they last updated that information or at least when they last reviewed it.

2. Biased information. If you think you have a certain medical problem, it might not be hard to find information skewed in that direction. Your search words and phrases could push you towards certain content, whether or not it is the most up to date or from a reliable source. Try to be as objective as you can when doing a search.

3. Experience. Have you ever thought about who is writing all this medical content? The majority of medical writers are not doctors or nurses. Many writers have never even worked in the healthcare field, never mind received formal training in medicine. While medical writers can do research on their topics, they may not always have the experience with these conditions to fully report on some issues. Depending on want you are researching, you may want to take this into account.

4. References. How many times have you found a compelling article on a medical subject but not found a list of references to support it? The bulk of media reports falls into this category, even as they raise controversial issues and make broad sweeping claims. How can you know that the resources they used had any substance to them? Often times, information is sensationalized to drive ratings and page views. A good article will not only inform you but will let you make an educated decision on the content for yourself.

Let’s face it. If Dr. Google were a real person, there is no question he would be sued for malpractice. He often gives inaccurate diagnoses. He promotes unnecessary testing. He causes increased worry and anxiety without a proper evaluation. He does not fulfill basic standards of care. Altogether, he breaks the tenant of medicine so graciously put forth in the Hippocratic Oath: Do no harm.

I 100 percent understand the need to be independent and research what ails you. I know I do the same. With the Internet so accessible, it is too tempting not to. You need to understand that not all the information Dr. Google feeds you will hold true and you must often take search results with a grain of salt. Take my warnings above to heart. If you have a real concern, seek out an evaluation with a medical professional. They have the training and expertise to help you on the path to health or at least a diagnosis.

Tanya Feke is founder, Diagnosis Life.

Image credit: antb / Shutterstock.com

Prev

The problem with resident training hours: The numbers don't add up

August 9, 2015 Kevin 14
…
Next

How to survive the stress of a medical liability lawsuit

August 9, 2015 Kevin 5
…

ADVERTISEMENT

Tagged as: Primary Care

Post navigation

< Previous Post
The problem with resident training hours: The numbers don't add up
Next Post >
How to survive the stress of a medical liability lawsuit

ADVERTISEMENT

More by Tanya Feke, MD

  • What does the opioid crisis have to do with patient satisfaction?

    Tanya Feke, MD
  • I am a doctor, but I didn’t cause the opioid epidemic

    Tanya Feke, MD
  • This is why patients cannot be customers

    Tanya Feke, MD

Related Posts

  • Remembering Dr. Denton A. Cooley

    Ton La, Jr., MD, JD
  • A physician’s addiction to social media

    Amanda Xi, MD
  • Understanding consent-to-settle in your malpractice insurance policy

    Jennifer Wiggins
  • Medical malpractice: Don’t let the minority define us

    Shah-Naz H. Khan, MD
  • Gun and health care workplace violence: Dr. Lindley Dodson’s tragic death

    Sheryl Yanger, MD
  • Malpractice claims from the COVID-19 pandemic: more questions than answers

    Robert E. White, Jr. & The Doctors Company

More in Physician

  • Why every physician needs a sabbatical (and how to take one)

    Christie Mulholland, MD
  • The moral injury of “not medically necessary” denials

    Arthur Lazarus, MD, MBA
  • Is physician unionization the answer to a broken health care system?

    Allan Dobzyniak, MD
  • The decline of professionalism in medicine: a structural diagnosis

    Patrick Hudson, MD
  • The patchwork era of medical board certification

    Brian Hudes, MD
  • How neurodiversity in relationships shapes communication

    Farid Sabet-Sharghi, MD
  • Most Popular

  • Past Week

    • A physician father on the Dobbs decision and reproductive rights

      Travis Walker, MD, MPH | Physician
    • Putting health back into insurance: the case for tobacco cessation

      Edward Anselm, MD | Policy
    • What is the minority tax in medicine?

      Tharini Nagarkar and Maranda C. Ward, EdD, MPH | Education
    • Will AI replace primary care physicians?

      P. Dileep Kumar, MD, MBA | Tech
    • Why every physician needs a sabbatical (and how to take one)

      Christie Mulholland, MD | Physician
    • Retail health care vs. employer DPC: Preparing for 2026 policy shifts

      Dana Y. Lujan, MBA | Policy
  • Past 6 Months

    • Why patient trust in physicians is declining

      Mansi Kotwal, MD, MPH | Physician
    • How environmental justice and health disparities connect to climate change

      Kaitlynn Esemaya, Alexis Thompson, Annique McLune, and Anamaria Ancheta | Policy
    • A physician father on the Dobbs decision and reproductive rights

      Travis Walker, MD, MPH | Physician
    • The blind men and the elephant: a parable for modern pain management

      Richard A. Lawhern, PhD | Conditions
    • Is tramadol really ineffective and risky?

      John A. Bumpus, PhD | Meds
    • Why insurance must cover home blood pressure monitors

      Soneesh Kothagundla | Conditions
  • Recent Posts

    • Silence is a survival mechanism that costs women their joy [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • FDA loosens AI oversight: What clinicians need to know about the 2026 guidance

      Arthur Lazarus, MD, MBA | Policy
    • Why the U.S. health care system is failing patients and physicians

      John C. Hagan III, MD | Policy
    • Focusing on outcomes over novelty prevents AI failure in health care [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • What is the minority tax in medicine?

      Tharini Nagarkar and Maranda C. Ward, EdD, MPH | Education
    • Putting health back into insurance: the case for tobacco cessation

      Edward Anselm, MD | Policy

Subscribe to KevinMD and never miss a story!

Get free updates delivered free to your inbox.


Find jobs at
Careers by KevinMD.com

Search thousands of physician, PA, NP, and CRNA jobs now.

Learn more

View 26 Comments >

Founded in 2004 by Kevin Pho, MD, KevinMD.com is the web’s leading platform where physicians, advanced practitioners, nurses, medical students, and patients share their insight and tell their stories.

Social

  • Like on Facebook
  • Follow on Twitter
  • Connect on Linkedin
  • Subscribe on Youtube
  • Instagram

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Most Popular

  • Past Week

    • A physician father on the Dobbs decision and reproductive rights

      Travis Walker, MD, MPH | Physician
    • Putting health back into insurance: the case for tobacco cessation

      Edward Anselm, MD | Policy
    • What is the minority tax in medicine?

      Tharini Nagarkar and Maranda C. Ward, EdD, MPH | Education
    • Will AI replace primary care physicians?

      P. Dileep Kumar, MD, MBA | Tech
    • Why every physician needs a sabbatical (and how to take one)

      Christie Mulholland, MD | Physician
    • Retail health care vs. employer DPC: Preparing for 2026 policy shifts

      Dana Y. Lujan, MBA | Policy
  • Past 6 Months

    • Why patient trust in physicians is declining

      Mansi Kotwal, MD, MPH | Physician
    • How environmental justice and health disparities connect to climate change

      Kaitlynn Esemaya, Alexis Thompson, Annique McLune, and Anamaria Ancheta | Policy
    • A physician father on the Dobbs decision and reproductive rights

      Travis Walker, MD, MPH | Physician
    • The blind men and the elephant: a parable for modern pain management

      Richard A. Lawhern, PhD | Conditions
    • Is tramadol really ineffective and risky?

      John A. Bumpus, PhD | Meds
    • Why insurance must cover home blood pressure monitors

      Soneesh Kothagundla | Conditions
  • Recent Posts

    • Silence is a survival mechanism that costs women their joy [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • FDA loosens AI oversight: What clinicians need to know about the 2026 guidance

      Arthur Lazarus, MD, MBA | Policy
    • Why the U.S. health care system is failing patients and physicians

      John C. Hagan III, MD | Policy
    • Focusing on outcomes over novelty prevents AI failure in health care [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • What is the minority tax in medicine?

      Tharini Nagarkar and Maranda C. Ward, EdD, MPH | Education
    • Putting health back into insurance: the case for tobacco cessation

      Edward Anselm, MD | Policy

MedPage Today Professional

An Everyday Health Property Medpage Today
  • Terms of Use | Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • DMCA Policy
All Content © KevinMD, LLC
Site by Outthink Group

Dr. Google should be sued for malpractice. Here’s why.
26 comments

Comments are moderated before they are published. Please read the comment policy.

Loading Comments...