Skip to content
  • About
  • Contact
  • Contribute
  • Book
  • Careers
  • Podcast
  • Recommended
  • Speaking
  • All
  • Physician
  • Practice
  • Policy
  • Finance
  • Conditions
  • .edu
  • Patient
  • Meds
  • Tech
  • Social
  • Video
    • All
    • Physician
    • Practice
    • Policy
    • Finance
    • Conditions
    • .edu
    • Patient
    • Meds
    • Tech
    • Social
    • Video
    • About
    • Contact
    • Contribute
    • Book
    • Careers
    • Podcast
    • Recommended
    • Speaking

Hospital mergers and the risk to patient safety

Susan Haas, MD, William Berry, MD, and Mark E. Reynolds
Policy
August 14, 2018
Share
Tweet
Share

STAT_Logo

“Better patient care” is the reason hospital and health systems usually give when they merge or acquire one another. Our research suggests that mergers and affiliations might, paradoxically, increase the risk of harm to patients in the short run. Improving the safety of patient care is possible during mergers and affiliations, but requires intentional efforts.

What happens after a merger or acquisition matters keenly to patients, and tens of millions of them are affected by such deals each year. There have been more than 100 hospital or health system mergers and acquisitions each year since 2014, with a high of 115 in 2017, and that pace is likely to continue. No part of the country has been spared. Although much is known about the financial impact of hospital and health system mergers and acquisitions, we know almost nothing about how they affect patient care or patient safety.

When hospitals or health systems begin talking about mergers or acquisitions, network development leaders — whose training is usually in business, not medicine — tend to be at the forefront of the discussions. Clinicians often aren’t included, especially early in the process, although this is beginning to change. It’s usually not until after the deal has been completed that they are asked to work out the necessary arrangements to fill gaps and coordinate and standardize clinical care. That’s too late.

Over the past few years, Harvard-affiliated hospital systems have expanded, much like their counterparts in other parts of the country. The leadership of these systems identified mergers and affiliations as an emerging area of risk. They asked their malpractice carrier, CRICO/Risk Management Foundation, to support a process to better understand the nature of the risk caused by the variation in how care is provided in the different hospitals and to propose solutions. CRICO partnered with Ariadne Labs to do this.

To get a better sense of the clinical landscape after a merger or acquisition, we started simply: polling physicians in our research group whose practices had been involved in one. Each had one or more stories of incidents in which patients had been put at risk following a merger or acquisition.

To understand if risks to safety occur because of system expansion, where they might come from, and what could be done to reduce them, we interviewed more than 70 clinicians (mostly physicians) as well as business staff involved in network development. We also convened large, multidisciplinary discussion groups.

The stories we heard shaped our understanding of the sources of risk to patient safety. They also guided the development of tools we built (more about that in a minute) to address the risks. Here are just a few examples:

  • A surgeon described being called to assist in a code when a patient’s heart stopped beating. The patient was in a rehabilitation unit in a separate building that was accessible only by a connecting bridge. Because of a poor orientation process, the surgeon got lost trying to locate the patient she was trying to help.
  • An anesthesiologist found himself late at night in the basement of a hospital that had merged with the one where he usually worked. Again, because of poor orientation, he had trouble finding the room in the radiology suite where a patient had stopped breathing and needed a breathing tube inserted immediately.
  • A pediatrician covering the emergency department in a hospital that was seeing more pediatric patients as a result of a new affiliation inadvertently gave a child double the dose of an anti-seizure medicine. That happened because medication doses for children are based on their weight in kilograms and this emergency department, not used to treating children, didn’t have a reliable system for converting pounds to kilograms.
  • An emergency medicine physician was assigned to cover a 24-hour urgent care center with just 30 minutes of orientation. With only three nurses to assist, he suddenly found himself faced with multiple ambulances arriving with patients from a car crash. He had not been briefed on how to obtain backup help in such an unexpected emergency, and care was delayed for all but the most critically injured patients.

As we wrote in a Viewpoint article in the Journal of the American Medical Association, from these and other stories we identified three key sources of risk:

New patient populations. After an expansion, a health care institution’s patient population may change. The institution may experience a general increase in volume, a change in the demographic characteristics of its patients, or increases in patients with certain conditions. Even if more providers and support staff are hired, staff members who interact with and care for these patients elsewhere in the hospital or health system may need new knowledge and support.

Unfamiliar infrastructure. Institutions often intentionally standardize supplies, processes, equipment, and protocols during a system expansion as a way to meet fiscal goals. When faced with unfamiliar tools, clinicians must pay extra attention to using them correctly, attention that is taken away from talking to and examining their patients. Failing to connect with patients and understand their problems can lead to medical errors. Errors can also arise from using equipment incorrectly or prescribing a medication incorrectly based on new formulary.

New settings for physicians. System expansion can result in clinicians having to travel to practice at another institution, intermittently and often temporarily, under a professional services agreement. They often receive little systematic orientation to their new setting. As a result, they can be faced with infrastructure, responsibilities, team members, and a clinical culture that can vary significantly — and unexpectedly — from those at their home institution.

To further address these areas of risk, CRICO and Ariadne Labs convened meetings of clinical and network development leaders across the Harvard clinical system. Our team took what we learned from the stories we had gathered and from these meetings and developed several free toolkits. One is a guide meant to be used before affiliation to help clinicians identify important variations in practice between institutions. We believe that such variations arise normally and are not in themselves a problem. But they can become a problem when they are not surfaced and addressed before physicians are assigned to new settings. To leverage the new relationships and information flows that develop after an affiliation, we also created a guide for clinical and nonclinical leaders to ensure that problems identified during pre-affiliation discussions are focused on after it begins.

Two issues emerged in this work that we plan to focus on next. First, we need to create tools to support clinicians when they are deployed to new institutions. There is a widespread assumption that a clinician who knows how to practice in one setting can do so in a different one. One of the most poignant and telling quotes from all of our interviews was from a physician who said, “I know the medicine. I just don’t know how to get things done around here, and especially how to get them done fast.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Second, a particular challenge of affiliations that became evident during our work was the difficulty transferring patients between hospitals within a network when the patient’s condition changes. No guidelines exist for what should trigger a transfer and many institutions lack protocols to guide safe and timely transfers.

There are no signs that the pace of hospital and health system mergers and acquisitions will slow. Clinicians and leaders of the Harvard institutions shared their experiences to develop a broad understanding of the sources of risk to patient safety during system expansion and solutions for them. Many have already incorporated these tools — which are generalizable to hospitals and health systems across the country — into their work. Incorporating early, clinician-led evaluation of the potential patient safety risks from system expansion is a practice every health care system should incorporate into its planning process.

Susan Haas is co-principal investigator, Ariadne Labs’ CRICO-funded work on reducing the risks to patient safety of health care system expansion. William Berry is associate director and senior adviser, Ariadne Labs. Mark E. Reynolds is president and CEO, CRICO/Risk Management Foundation.

Image credit: Shutterstock.com

Prev

4 disturbing trends in health care

August 13, 2018 Kevin 6
…
Next

Dear science: an appreciation

August 14, 2018 Kevin 0
…

Tagged as: Hospital-Based Medicine, Public Health & Policy

Post navigation

< Previous Post
4 disturbing trends in health care
Next Post >
Dear science: an appreciation

ADVERTISEMENT

Related Posts

  • An important health care safety net is at risk

    Mark Pappadakis, DO
  • Why hospital mergers are destined to fail

    Robert Pearl, MD
  • Don’t judge when trainees use dating apps in the hospital

    Austin Perlmutter, MD
  • What does curiosity have to do with patient safety?

    Elizabeth Lerner Papautsky, PhD
  • The risk physicians take when going on social media

    Anonymous
  • The criminalization of true medical errors is a step backwards for patient safety

    Michael Ramsay, MD

More in Policy

  • Why nearly 800 U.S. hospitals are at risk of shutting down

    Harry Severance, MD
  • Innovation is moving too fast for health care workers to catch up

    Tiffiny Black, DM, MPA, MBA
  • How pediatricians can address the health problems raised in the MAHA child health report

    Joseph Barrocas, MD
  • How reforming insurance, drug prices, and prevention can cut health care costs

    Patrick M. O'Shaughnessy, DO, MBA
  • Bundled payments in Medicare: Will fixed pricing reshape surgery costs?

    AMA Committee on Economics and Quality in Medicine, Medical Student Section
  • Who gets to be well in America: Immigrant health is on the line

    Joshua Vasquez, MD
  • Most Popular

  • Past Week

    • Why primary care doctors are drowning in debt despite saving lives

      John Wei, MD | Physician
    • How federal actions threaten vaccine policy and trust

      American College of Physicians | Conditions
    • Are we repeating the statin playbook with lipoprotein(a)?

      Larry Kaskel, MD | Conditions
    • When the clinic becomes the battlefield: Defending rural health care in the age of AI-driven attacks

      Holland Haynie, MD | Physician
    • mRNA post vaccination syndrome: Is it real?

      Harry Oken, MD | Conditions
    • Putting food allergy safety on the menu [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
  • Past 6 Months

    • The shocking risk every smart student faces when applying to medical school

      Curtis G. Graham, MD | Physician
    • COVID-19 was real: a doctor’s frontline account

      Randall S. Fong, MD | Conditions
    • Why so many doctors secretly feel like imposters

      Ryan Nadelson, MD | Physician
    • Confessions of a lipidologist in recovery: the infection we’ve ignored for 40 years

      Larry Kaskel, MD | Conditions
    • A physician employment agreement term that often tricks physicians

      Dennis Hursh, Esq | Finance
    • Why taxing remittances harms families and global health care

      Dalia Saha, MD | Finance
  • Recent Posts

    • Putting food allergy safety on the menu [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • Why transgender health care needs urgent reform and inclusive practices

      Angela Rodriguez, MD | Conditions
    • Why “the best physicians” risk burnout and isolation

      Scott Abramson, MD | Physician
    • Why the Sean Combs trial is a wake-up call for HIV prevention

      Catherine Diamond, MD | Conditions
    • Why real medicine is more than quick labels

      Arthur Lazarus, MD, MBA | Physician
    • New surge in misleading ads about diabetes on social media poses a serious health risk

      Laura Syron | Conditions

Subscribe to KevinMD and never miss a story!

Get free updates delivered free to your inbox.


Find jobs at
Careers by KevinMD.com

Search thousands of physician, PA, NP, and CRNA jobs now.

Learn more

View 3 Comments >

Founded in 2004 by Kevin Pho, MD, KevinMD.com is the web’s leading platform where physicians, advanced practitioners, nurses, medical students, and patients share their insight and tell their stories.

Social

  • Like on Facebook
  • Follow on Twitter
  • Connect on Linkedin
  • Subscribe on Youtube
  • Instagram

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Most Popular

  • Past Week

    • Why primary care doctors are drowning in debt despite saving lives

      John Wei, MD | Physician
    • How federal actions threaten vaccine policy and trust

      American College of Physicians | Conditions
    • Are we repeating the statin playbook with lipoprotein(a)?

      Larry Kaskel, MD | Conditions
    • When the clinic becomes the battlefield: Defending rural health care in the age of AI-driven attacks

      Holland Haynie, MD | Physician
    • mRNA post vaccination syndrome: Is it real?

      Harry Oken, MD | Conditions
    • Putting food allergy safety on the menu [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
  • Past 6 Months

    • The shocking risk every smart student faces when applying to medical school

      Curtis G. Graham, MD | Physician
    • COVID-19 was real: a doctor’s frontline account

      Randall S. Fong, MD | Conditions
    • Why so many doctors secretly feel like imposters

      Ryan Nadelson, MD | Physician
    • Confessions of a lipidologist in recovery: the infection we’ve ignored for 40 years

      Larry Kaskel, MD | Conditions
    • A physician employment agreement term that often tricks physicians

      Dennis Hursh, Esq | Finance
    • Why taxing remittances harms families and global health care

      Dalia Saha, MD | Finance
  • Recent Posts

    • Putting food allergy safety on the menu [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • Why transgender health care needs urgent reform and inclusive practices

      Angela Rodriguez, MD | Conditions
    • Why “the best physicians” risk burnout and isolation

      Scott Abramson, MD | Physician
    • Why the Sean Combs trial is a wake-up call for HIV prevention

      Catherine Diamond, MD | Conditions
    • Why real medicine is more than quick labels

      Arthur Lazarus, MD, MBA | Physician
    • New surge in misleading ads about diabetes on social media poses a serious health risk

      Laura Syron | Conditions

MedPage Today Professional

An Everyday Health Property Medpage Today
  • Terms of Use | Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • DMCA Policy
All Content © KevinMD, LLC
Site by Outthink Group

Hospital mergers and the risk to patient safety
3 comments

Comments are moderated before they are published. Please read the comment policy.

Loading Comments...