Skip to content
  • About
  • Contact
  • Contribute
  • Book
  • Careers
  • Podcast
  • Recommended
  • Speaking
  • All
  • Physician
  • Practice
  • Policy
  • Finance
  • Conditions
  • .edu
  • Patient
  • Meds
  • Tech
  • Social
  • Video
    • All
    • Physician
    • Practice
    • Policy
    • Finance
    • Conditions
    • .edu
    • Patient
    • Meds
    • Tech
    • Social
    • Video
    • About
    • Contact
    • Contribute
    • Book
    • Careers
    • Podcast
    • Recommended
    • Speaking

Should the government regulate hearing aids as consumer electronic products?

Shari A. Hicks, CPhT
Policy
September 21, 2019
Share
Tweet
Share

As a pharmacy technician, I watched countless individuals speak with a pharmacist about how different drug therapies work, and what they should know before taking any pharmaceuticals.

But I also have a hearing loss, and as a patient myself, I am struck by how confusing it is for consumers to find the right treatment.

Hearing loss is a medical condition that affects nearly one-third of adults between 65 and 75, and half of those 75 and older. But only about 30 percent of those who could benefit from hearing aids have ever tried them. This is a troubling statistic.

Two years ago, Congress passed the Over-the-Counter-Hearing-Aid Act of 2017 that mandates the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) create a new category of hearing aids for mild-to-moderate hearing losses. This law was designed to increase consumer access by making hearing solutions available over-the-counter without the guidance of a licensed professional.

The FDA is determining how to regulate this new category of consumer products and how to expand access to hearing devices, while fulfilling its Congressional mandate to ensure they are safe, effective, and used correctly.

Currently, there are two main categories of products designed to amplify in-ear sounds.

Hearing aids are medical devices intended to correct hearing loss and are already regulated by the FDA.  Currently, hearing aids are dispensed only after a hearing care professional performs testing to determine the level and type of hearing loss. If appropriate as treatment, a device is then recommended, and programmed to the precise needs of the individual hearing experience.

Personal sound amplification products or PSAPs, on the other hand, are designed to increase environmental sounds for non-hearing-impaired consumers and are not regulated as medical devices. PSAPs amplify all nearby sounds, which is useful for certain specific activities, such as detecting animal sounds in the wild.

The FDA has acknowledged that PSAPs are not a replacement for hearing aids, as the characteristics that make for a good PSAP are very different than those in a hearing aid designed to correct a medical condition.

While the FDA has not yet revealed specifications for the new OTC category of hearing aids, actions by the agency last fall related to the marketing of ‘self-fitting’ hearing aids suggest it may be leaning toward regulating the OTC hearing aids based on a “consumer electronics” standard and not on a standard for medical devices.

If OTC hearing aids are regulated as consumer electronics products, these devices will be allowed to produce a maximum output of 120 decibels. This is as loud as a live rock concert or aircraft at take-off. This can be dangerous – not only could it increase the consumer’s hearing loss, but it could induce pain and ear injury.

This is neither safe nor effective.

Both the World Health Organization and the U.S. Center for Disease Control recommendations state that sounds as high as 120 decibels can be safely listened to for only seconds per day. Consistently, hearing care professionals have made recommendations more in line with safe and effective standards for medical devices that include a maximum output at 110 decibels and a limit on the gain (or amplification) that the devices can produce.

ADVERTISEMENT

Over-the-counter hearing aids could benefit many people who suffer from mild to moderate hearing loss. Making them accessible through popular retail outlets is a good idea that promotes consumer choice. But the FDA has the responsibility to ensure consumers are protected against misuse of products designed for a different purpose entirely.

Shari A. Hicks is a pharmacy technician.

Image credit: Shutterstock.com

Prev

The orthopedic objectification of women

September 21, 2019 Kevin 10
…
Next

An American doctor in Rome

September 21, 2019 Kevin 6
…

Tagged as: Otolaryngology

Post navigation

< Previous Post
The orthopedic objectification of women
Next Post >
An American doctor in Rome

ADVERTISEMENT

Related Posts

  • HIV/AIDS vaccine underscores need for better health access

    Alyson O’Daniel, PhD
  • People who take opioids are the AIDS patients of today

    Heather Finlay-Morreale, MD
  • Unapproved CBD products may not be as safe as they seem

    Kenneth Finn, MD
  • It’s time for presidential candidates to debate the safety of pharmaceutical products

    Steven Reznick, MD
  • It’s time to change how we regulate methadone

    Paul Joudrey, MD, MPH
  • What matters in an optimal consumer health care market

    Richard Reece, MD

More in Policy

  • Why private equity is betting on employer DPC over retail

    Dana Y. Lujan, MBA
  • Why PBM transparency rules aren’t enough to lower drug prices

    Armin Pazooki
  • Emergency department metrics vs. reality: Why the numbers lie

    Marilyn McCullum, RN
  • Black women’s health resilience: the hidden cost of “pushing through”

    Latesha K. Harris, PhD, RN
  • FDA loosens AI oversight: What clinicians need to know about the 2026 guidance

    Arthur Lazarus, MD, MBA
  • Why the U.S. health care system is failing patients and physicians

    John C. Hagan III, MD
  • Most Popular

  • Past Week

    • Alex Pretti: a physician’s open letter defending his legacy

      Mousson Berrouet, DO | Physician
    • The hidden costs of the physician non-clinical career transition

      Carlos N. Hernandez-Torres, MD | Physician
    • ADHD and cannabis use: Navigating the diagnostic challenge

      Farid Sabet-Sharghi, MD | Conditions
    • AI-enabled clinical data abstraction: a nurse’s perspective

      Pamela Ashenfelter, RN | Tech
    • Why private equity is betting on employer DPC over retail

      Dana Y. Lujan, MBA | Policy
    • Leading with love: a physician’s guide to clarity and compassion

      Jessie Mahoney, MD | Physician
  • Past 6 Months

    • Physician on-call compensation: the unpaid labor driving burnout

      Corinne Sundar Rao, MD | Physician
    • How environmental justice and health disparities connect to climate change

      Kaitlynn Esemaya, Alexis Thompson, Annique McLune, and Anamaria Ancheta | Policy
    • Will AI replace primary care physicians?

      P. Dileep Kumar, MD, MBA | Tech
    • A physician father on the Dobbs decision and reproductive rights

      Travis Walker, MD, MPH | Physician
    • What is the minority tax in medicine?

      Tharini Nagarkar and Maranda C. Ward, EdD, MPH | Education
    • Why the U.S. health care system is failing patients and physicians

      John C. Hagan III, MD | Policy
  • Recent Posts

    • Blaming younger doctors for setting boundaries ignores the broken system [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • Nervous system dysregulation vs. stress: Why “just relaxing” doesn’t work

      Claudine Holt, MD | Physician
    • U.S. opioid policy history: How politics replaced science in pain care

      Richard A. Lawhern, PhD & Stephen E. Nadeau, MD | Meds
    • Alex Pretti’s death: Why politics belongs in emergency medicine

      Marilyn McCullum, RN | Conditions
    • Women in health care leadership: Navigating competition and mentorship

      Sarah White, APRN | Conditions
    • Senior financial scams: a guide for primary care physicians

      John C. Hagan III, MD | Conditions

Subscribe to KevinMD and never miss a story!

Get free updates delivered free to your inbox.


Find jobs at
Careers by KevinMD.com

Search thousands of physician, PA, NP, and CRNA jobs now.

Learn more

View 2 Comments >

Founded in 2004 by Kevin Pho, MD, KevinMD.com is the web’s leading platform where physicians, advanced practitioners, nurses, medical students, and patients share their insight and tell their stories.

Social

  • Like on Facebook
  • Follow on Twitter
  • Connect on Linkedin
  • Subscribe on Youtube
  • Instagram

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Most Popular

  • Past Week

    • Alex Pretti: a physician’s open letter defending his legacy

      Mousson Berrouet, DO | Physician
    • The hidden costs of the physician non-clinical career transition

      Carlos N. Hernandez-Torres, MD | Physician
    • ADHD and cannabis use: Navigating the diagnostic challenge

      Farid Sabet-Sharghi, MD | Conditions
    • AI-enabled clinical data abstraction: a nurse’s perspective

      Pamela Ashenfelter, RN | Tech
    • Why private equity is betting on employer DPC over retail

      Dana Y. Lujan, MBA | Policy
    • Leading with love: a physician’s guide to clarity and compassion

      Jessie Mahoney, MD | Physician
  • Past 6 Months

    • Physician on-call compensation: the unpaid labor driving burnout

      Corinne Sundar Rao, MD | Physician
    • How environmental justice and health disparities connect to climate change

      Kaitlynn Esemaya, Alexis Thompson, Annique McLune, and Anamaria Ancheta | Policy
    • Will AI replace primary care physicians?

      P. Dileep Kumar, MD, MBA | Tech
    • A physician father on the Dobbs decision and reproductive rights

      Travis Walker, MD, MPH | Physician
    • What is the minority tax in medicine?

      Tharini Nagarkar and Maranda C. Ward, EdD, MPH | Education
    • Why the U.S. health care system is failing patients and physicians

      John C. Hagan III, MD | Policy
  • Recent Posts

    • Blaming younger doctors for setting boundaries ignores the broken system [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • Nervous system dysregulation vs. stress: Why “just relaxing” doesn’t work

      Claudine Holt, MD | Physician
    • U.S. opioid policy history: How politics replaced science in pain care

      Richard A. Lawhern, PhD & Stephen E. Nadeau, MD | Meds
    • Alex Pretti’s death: Why politics belongs in emergency medicine

      Marilyn McCullum, RN | Conditions
    • Women in health care leadership: Navigating competition and mentorship

      Sarah White, APRN | Conditions
    • Senior financial scams: a guide for primary care physicians

      John C. Hagan III, MD | Conditions

MedPage Today Professional

An Everyday Health Property Medpage Today
  • Terms of Use | Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • DMCA Policy
All Content © KevinMD, LLC
Site by Outthink Group

Should the government regulate hearing aids as consumer electronic products?
2 comments

Comments are moderated before they are published. Please read the comment policy.

Loading Comments...