Skip to content
  • About
  • Contact
  • Contribute
  • Book
  • Careers
  • Podcast
  • Recommended
  • Speaking
  • All
  • Physician
  • Practice
  • Policy
  • Finance
  • Conditions
  • .edu
  • Patient
  • Meds
  • Tech
  • Social
  • Video
    • All
    • Physician
    • Practice
    • Policy
    • Finance
    • Conditions
    • .edu
    • Patient
    • Meds
    • Tech
    • Social
    • Video
    • About
    • Contact
    • Contribute
    • Book
    • Careers
    • Podcast
    • Recommended
    • Speaking

The heartbreaking story of Jimmy Carter: a call for Medicare reform in end-of-life care

Kevin Haselhorst, MD
Conditions
April 4, 2023
Share
Tweet
Share

The purpose of the serious illness conversation is to offer patients a clear choice between treating and not treating an incurable disease like liver cancer. The goal is to give the person permission to alleviate pain and suffering. The individual might decide to be treated as a patient or honored as a person if given this option near the end of life.

A non-serious illness conversation ends with the patient wishing to deny fate and oblige suffering recommended by health care heroes. A serious illness conversation begins with the person accepting fate and resting in peace through the tender loving care of nonmedical humanitarians.

Spiritual wisdom teaches us that serious illness is painful, but suffering from it is optional. Spirituality guides the serious illness conversation.

The “non-serious” illness conversation amounts to nonsense and leads people to the agony of defeat when they die from an incurable illness. Such is the new normal for Jimmy Carter, who was recently admitted to hospice after failing treatment for malignant melanoma.

The dubious question of most politicians is: “What did he know, and when did he know” malignant melanoma would end his life?

At age 90, Carter held a press conference and told the world that his cancer had spread. He believed he didn’t have much time left and was surprisingly at ease, more so than his wife, Rosalynn.

Jimmy implied Rosalynn was not keen on having “this conversation” about not treating malignant melanoma because her salvation depended on Jimmy staying alive. Even with having a full life and being at peace, Jimmy decided to follow his doctors’ recommendations (and not risk Rosalynn’s scorn) to “extend his life as long as he can.”

A non-serious illness conversation takes place when people become emotional and closed-minded. A real serious illness happens when people are at ease and open-minded. Most people are cleared-headed during Medicare enrollment while considering their health coverage for the next year and the importance of an advance directive in case of an emergency or the unlikely discovery of a liver mass.

The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) reimburses medical providers to have serious illness conversations with seniors and also pays them to treat incurable diseases, creating a conflict of interest. CMS also determines hospice eligibility. The nonsense supporting non-serious illness conversations arises from a 90-year-old man being ineligible for hospice until a liver mass becomes terminal. CMS is essentially telling seniors, “We’re not having this conversation” until they fail treatment.

Medicare functions as the moral authority over health care decisions, situated between the medical authority that saves lives and the merciful authority that ends suffering. Medicare might surrender its authority and remain impartial by upholding the Patient Self-Determination Act of 1992, which grants seniors the right to make their own health care decisions.

Jimmy Carter might have chosen one of three advance directives eight years ago:

Medicare Directive A (Aggressive):  Defers to the medical authority who treats serious illness

Medicare Directive B (Benevolent):  Defers to the merciful authority who alleviates suffering

ADVERTISEMENT

Medicare Directive C (Considerate): Defers to the moral authority of those who hold out hope

Having practiced emergency medicine for 30+ years, I’m often the first to find a liver mass and assess who’s positioned to have a serious illness conversation. Both patients and family members are hard-pressed to know what they wish. Yet a husband readily declared that his 72-year-old wife, who suffered a brain bleed, did not wish medical resuscitation and opted for mercy. He was clearly positioned to make this life-or-death decision from her advance directive.

Dignitaries like Ariel Sharon, the Prime Minister of Israel and Carter’s contemporary, suffered a similar brain bleed and lived in a coma for eight years. His caregivers held out hope to the bitter end! Physical pain and mental suffering are part of life, but not necessary at the end of life unless you’re righteous – those who often give reverence to nonsense. Seemingly, they’re compelled to go through hell to get to heaven.

Family caregivers, like Rosalynn who founded the Institute for Caregiving, know when emergency physicians are wrong or right. But trust medical authorities like oncologists who can do no wrong by doing everything medically necessary to save lives. Emergency physicians manage acute illness, while palliative physicians manage advanced illness. Both are caught in the middle of do-or-die situations that family caregivers might dismiss because they’re not ready to have serious illness conversations and make the final decision to show mercy over hold out hope.

In the “game of life,” players arrive at Millionaire Acres and rest in peace. In real life, people might accept “game over” with the diagnosis of a serious illness and declare Millionaire Acres to be the Habitat for Humanity (mercy) or the Institute for Caregiving (morality). It seems obvious that Jimmy Carter would choose Habitat for Humanity over the Institute of Caregiving if a serious illness conversation took place at the appropriate time of Medicare enrollment.

A simple act of Congress to have seniors select Medicare Advance Directive A, B, or C could have made a world of difference for Jimmy Carter. The choice to remain at ease at age 90 makes sense. Battling a terminal illness for eight years is nonsense. Improving end-of-life care begins with Congress passing the Medicare Advance Directive Act that builds upon the Patient Self-Determination Act.

The legacy of Jimmy Carter as a Nobel Peace Prize recipient and consummate humanitarian did not align with his end-of-life experience. By the Mercy of God, he might have passed on his own time rather than borrowed time lent by Medicare.

CMS can right the harm done to Jimmy Carter by initiating serious illness conversations with seniors during Medicare enrollment rather than ER visits. The importance of obtaining informed consent before doing harm is how we treat others with reverence near the end of life.

Kevin Haselhorst is an emergency physician and author of Wishes To Die For: Expanding Upon Doing Less in Advance Care Directives. 

Prev

I'm a medical oncologist. Here's why AI isn't going to cure cancer.

April 4, 2023 Kevin 0
…
Next

Breaking the stigma: Using life coaching to navigate chronic disease [PODCAST]

April 4, 2023 Kevin 0
…

Tagged as: Palliative Care

Post navigation

< Previous Post
I'm a medical oncologist. Here's why AI isn't going to cure cancer.
Next Post >
Breaking the stigma: Using life coaching to navigate chronic disease [PODCAST]

ADVERTISEMENT

More by Kevin Haselhorst, MD

  • President Biden: a closer look at leadership, dignity, and aging

    Kevin Haselhorst, MD
  • Advance directives amidst COVID: a critical look

    Kevin Haselhorst, MD
  • April 16th is National Healthcare Decisions Day: Plan for your end-of-life care now

    Kevin Haselhorst, MD

Related Posts

  • How social media can help or hurt your health care career

    Health eCareers
  • A real-life example of irrational health care spending

    Taylor J. Christensen, MD
  • Medicare for all and the problem of health care on demand

    Michael Brant-Zawadzki, MD
  • Patients over paperwork: Medicare has delivered lower costs and regulatory relief for health care providers

    Seema Verma, MPH
  • The solution to a crumbling primary care foundation is direct primary care

    Sara Pastoor, MD
  • Care is no longer personal. Care is political.

    Eva Kittay, PhD

More in Conditions

  • Facing terminal cancer as a doctor and mother

    Kelly Curtin-Hallinan, DO
  • Why doctors must stop ignoring unintentional weight loss in patients with obesity

    Samantha Malley, FNP-C
  • Why hospitals are quietly capping top doctors’ pay

    Dennis Hursh, Esq
  • Why point-of-care ultrasound belongs in emergency department triage

    Resa E. Lewiss, MD and Courtney M. Smalley, MD
  • Why PSA levels alone shouldn’t define your prostate cancer risk

    Martina Ambardjieva, MD, PhD
  • Reframing chronic pain and dignity: What a pain clinic teaches us about MAiD and chronic suffering

    Olumuyiwa Bamgbade, MD
  • Most Popular

  • Past Week

    • Forced voicemail and diagnosis codes are endangering patient access to medications

      Arthur Lazarus, MD, MBA | Meds
    • How President Biden’s cognitive health shapes political and legal trust

      Muhamad Aly Rifai, MD | Conditions
    • The One Big Beautiful Bill and the fragile heart of rural health care

      Holland Haynie, MD | Policy
    • America’s ER crisis: Why the system is collapsing from within

      Kristen Cline, BSN, RN | Conditions
    • Why timing, not surgery, determines patient survival

      Michael Karch, MD | Conditions
    • How early meetings and after-hours events penalize physician-mothers

      Samira Jeimy, MD, PhD and Menaka Pai, MD | Physician
  • Past 6 Months

    • Forced voicemail and diagnosis codes are endangering patient access to medications

      Arthur Lazarus, MD, MBA | Meds
    • How President Biden’s cognitive health shapes political and legal trust

      Muhamad Aly Rifai, MD | Conditions
    • Why are medical students turning away from primary care? [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • The One Big Beautiful Bill and the fragile heart of rural health care

      Holland Haynie, MD | Policy
    • Why “do no harm” might be harming modern medicine

      Sabooh S. Mubbashar, MD | Physician
    • The hidden health risks in the One Big Beautiful Bill Act

      Trevor Lyford, MPH | Policy
  • Recent Posts

    • Beyond burnout: Understanding the triangle of exhaustion [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • Facing terminal cancer as a doctor and mother

      Kelly Curtin-Hallinan, DO | Conditions
    • Online eye exams spark legal battle over health care access

      Joshua Windham, JD and Daryl James | Policy
    • FDA delays could end vital treatment for rare disease patients

      G. van Londen, MD | Meds
    • Pharmacists are key to expanding Medicaid access to digital therapeutics

      Amanda Matter | Meds
    • Why ADHD in women requires a new approach [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast

Subscribe to KevinMD and never miss a story!

Get free updates delivered free to your inbox.


Find jobs at
Careers by KevinMD.com

Search thousands of physician, PA, NP, and CRNA jobs now.

Learn more

View 3 Comments >

Founded in 2004 by Kevin Pho, MD, KevinMD.com is the web’s leading platform where physicians, advanced practitioners, nurses, medical students, and patients share their insight and tell their stories.

Social

  • Like on Facebook
  • Follow on Twitter
  • Connect on Linkedin
  • Subscribe on Youtube
  • Instagram

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Most Popular

  • Past Week

    • Forced voicemail and diagnosis codes are endangering patient access to medications

      Arthur Lazarus, MD, MBA | Meds
    • How President Biden’s cognitive health shapes political and legal trust

      Muhamad Aly Rifai, MD | Conditions
    • The One Big Beautiful Bill and the fragile heart of rural health care

      Holland Haynie, MD | Policy
    • America’s ER crisis: Why the system is collapsing from within

      Kristen Cline, BSN, RN | Conditions
    • Why timing, not surgery, determines patient survival

      Michael Karch, MD | Conditions
    • How early meetings and after-hours events penalize physician-mothers

      Samira Jeimy, MD, PhD and Menaka Pai, MD | Physician
  • Past 6 Months

    • Forced voicemail and diagnosis codes are endangering patient access to medications

      Arthur Lazarus, MD, MBA | Meds
    • How President Biden’s cognitive health shapes political and legal trust

      Muhamad Aly Rifai, MD | Conditions
    • Why are medical students turning away from primary care? [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • The One Big Beautiful Bill and the fragile heart of rural health care

      Holland Haynie, MD | Policy
    • Why “do no harm” might be harming modern medicine

      Sabooh S. Mubbashar, MD | Physician
    • The hidden health risks in the One Big Beautiful Bill Act

      Trevor Lyford, MPH | Policy
  • Recent Posts

    • Beyond burnout: Understanding the triangle of exhaustion [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • Facing terminal cancer as a doctor and mother

      Kelly Curtin-Hallinan, DO | Conditions
    • Online eye exams spark legal battle over health care access

      Joshua Windham, JD and Daryl James | Policy
    • FDA delays could end vital treatment for rare disease patients

      G. van Londen, MD | Meds
    • Pharmacists are key to expanding Medicaid access to digital therapeutics

      Amanda Matter | Meds
    • Why ADHD in women requires a new approach [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast

MedPage Today Professional

An Everyday Health Property Medpage Today
  • Terms of Use | Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • DMCA Policy
All Content © KevinMD, LLC
Site by Outthink Group

The heartbreaking story of Jimmy Carter: a call for Medicare reform in end-of-life care
3 comments

Comments are moderated before they are published. Please read the comment policy.

Loading Comments...