Skip to content
  • About
  • Contact
  • Contribute
  • Book
  • Careers
  • Podcast
  • Recommended
  • Speaking
  • All
  • Physician
  • Practice
  • Policy
  • Finance
  • Conditions
  • .edu
  • Patient
  • Meds
  • Tech
  • Social
  • Video
    • All
    • Physician
    • Practice
    • Policy
    • Finance
    • Conditions
    • .edu
    • Patient
    • Meds
    • Tech
    • Social
    • Video
    • About
    • Contact
    • Contribute
    • Book
    • Careers
    • Podcast
    • Recommended
    • Speaking

Georgia’s new law promoting truth and transparency in health care credentials

Carmen Kavali, MD
Policy
June 8, 2023
Share
Tweet
Share

Landmark legislation was signed into law by Georgia Governor Brian Kemp on May 2, 2023. Senate Bill 197, the Health Care Practitioners Truth and Transparency Act, is likely the most comprehensive state law promoting exactly what its name promises: truth and transparency, in this case regarding health care credentials.

Informed consent for a patient means, in part, that the patient understands exactly who is treating them. This new Georgia law is a huge step in the right direction. But there is a glaring truth and transparency problem within our health care language that remains pervasive and should be addressed: the word “provider.”

Language is a powerful tool. Language doesn’t just convey thoughts; it shapes thoughts.

The word “provider” has no positive connotations within health care. There is some controversy regarding its origins related to health care. Some reports link the word back to World War II, when the Nazi regime stripped Jewish physicians of their titles, branding them “behandlers” (translated to “provider” by some) instead of physicians. Regardless of any translation concerns, the intent was clear: to reduce the education and training of physicians to something less, to obscure their expertise, to dehumanize them and demoralize them.

Other reports note that “provider” was introduced in the 1960s as part of Medicare. The word was used in the sense of a contractor being paid for paid for delivering health-related products and services. Over the following decades, the word grew to include any professional caring for patients. Here, the word “provider” is used to create a transactional relationship between physicians and patients, and it has the effect of dehumanizing health care.

No “have it your way health care”

Most patients do not want to be seen as consumers. They want to feel empowered and be a partner in their own care, but they do not want to “shop around,” especially when it comes to their primary care, where an ongoing, trusting relationship is key.

Our value as physicians is not based on what we provide. It is based on the relationships we form with our patients, the trust and expertise we employ, and the personalized care we give. We are so much more than the boxes we click, the medications we prescribe, or the tests we order. What we do provide is not meant to satisfy some market demand, but to augment our diagnostic acumen and best serve our patients in a dynamic, individualized way.

Blurring the lines

Patient care today is typically delivered by a team of professionals, each serving our patients in our own unique way, based on our distinct training, education, licensure, and expertise.

Who, exactly, is that white-coat-clad “provider” that just walked out of your father’s hospital room? Unless they told you specifically, you wouldn’t know. They could be a physician (MD or DO), nurse practitioner, physician assistant, or any of the other professionals on a health care team.

Imagine calling Peyton Manning a “pass provider,” or your attorney a “law provider.” No physician ever dreamed of going to “provider school.”

The word “provider” blurs professional lines, making everyone on the health care team seem homogenous and interchangeable. The nomenclature strips professionals of their earned titles and ignores their unique training, education, credentials, and expertise.

Depersonalization in health care

ADVERTISEMENT

Being referred to as a “provider” is offensive to many physicians and other health professionals, who find the word demeans their profession, ignores their level of training, and belittles their unique contribution to care. This sort of depersonalization causes moral injury, which contributes to burnout.

In 1993, William Safire shared these prescient words:

As a physician, I am somewhat distressed at being called a health care provider,” writes David A. Worth, M.D., P.A., of Union, N.J., “rather than a doctor, a physician or a professional.” He suspects he knows why the new nomenclature is being adopted: “It is easy to regulate providers but more difficult to regulate doctors, as people have a mental picture of their own doctors’ care. Let us not devalue our physicians by terming them providers. This is just one step away from limiting what they say and depriving them of their ability to make professional decisions.”

When physicians speak up regarding patient safety or transparency concerns, or even ask not to be called “providers”, they are often labeled “disruptive” or accused of creating a “hostile work environment.” Dr. Worth was right, and he wrote those words three decades ago.

Changing the lexicon

How can we remedy this “provider” situation? We must change our language and root out the word “provider” from every connection to individual health care professionals.

1. Every professional organization should adopt policies banning the use of the word “provider” to describe health care professionals. Many large physician organizations have policies maligning the word “provider,” some even banning the word from their publications and conferences. All medical professional organizations should adopt such policies and actively enforce them in every form of communication.

2. Hospitals and other health care facilities should encourage transparency by creating and enforcing policies to remove the word “provider” from usage.

Recognizing the potential for patient confusion and the moral injury it causes physicians should be reason enough to remove the word “provider” from hospitals. EHR systems should be configured so that each professional is accurately identified by their licensure, not as a “provider.”

3. Health care staff must be trained to use individual titles, rather than the word “provider.” Staff should use titles and licensure to describe health care professionals at their workplace.

4. Patients should be empowered and feel encouraged to ask about credentials. No patient should ever be shamed for asking for clarity of health care credentials, and they should never be confused by “provider.”

In this era of instant access to information, we must be constantly aware of the “illusory truth effect”:  when a statement is repeated enough, we tend to believe it, no matter how false it may be. “The effect is so powerful that repetition can persuade us to believe information we know is false in the first place.”

If ever words have mattered, it is now.

Carmen Kavali is a plastic surgeon.

Prev

Physician employment contracts: the key to fighting burnout and improving working conditions [PODCAST]

June 7, 2023 Kevin 0
…
Next

Unveiling the secrets to effective resuscitation and overcoming obstacles

June 8, 2023 Kevin 0
…

Tagged as: Public Health & Policy

Post navigation

< Previous Post
Physician employment contracts: the key to fighting burnout and improving working conditions [PODCAST]
Next Post >
Unveiling the secrets to effective resuscitation and overcoming obstacles

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

Related Posts

  • How social media can help or hurt your health care career

    Health eCareers
  • Melting the iron triangle: Prioritizing health equity in dynamic, innovative health care landscapes

    Nina Cloven, MHA
  • Why the health care industry must prioritize health equity

    George T. Mathew, MD, MBA
  • Primary care colonialism: the impact of profit-driven health care on communities

    Michael Fine, MD
  • Ensuring universal access and quality care: the advantages of a mixed health care system in Canada

    Jean Paul Brutus, MD
  • New proposals for universal health care in Oregon and Washington

    Roger Collier

More in Policy

  • The lab behind the lens: Equity begins with diagnosis

    Michael Misialek, MD
  • Conflicts of interest are eroding trust in U.S. health agencies

    Martha Rosenberg
  • When America sneezes, the world catches a cold: Trump’s freeze on HIV/AIDS funding

    Koketso Masenya
  • A surgeon’s late-night crisis reveals the cost confusion in health care

    Christine Ward, MD
  • The school cafeteria could save American medicine

    Scarlett Saitta
  • Native communities deserve better: the truth about Pine Ridge health care

    Kaitlin E. Kelly
  • Most Popular

  • Past Week

    • What’s driving medical students away from primary care?

      ​​Vineeth Amba, MPH, Archita Goyal, and Wayne Altman, MD | Education
    • How scales of justice saved a doctor-patient relationship

      Neil Baum, MD | Physician
    • Make cognitive testing as routine as a blood pressure check

      Joshua Baker and James Jackson, PsyD | Conditions
    • The dreaded question: Do you have boys or girls?

      Pamela Adelstein, MD | Physician
    • The broken health care system doesn’t have to break you

      Jessie Mahoney, MD | Physician
    • The hidden cost of delaying back surgery

      Gbolahan Okubadejo, MD | Conditions
  • Past 6 Months

    • What’s driving medical students away from primary care?

      ​​Vineeth Amba, MPH, Archita Goyal, and Wayne Altman, MD | Education
    • Internal Medicine 2025: inspiration at the annual meeting

      American College of Physicians | Physician
    • What happened to real care in health care?

      Christopher H. Foster, PhD, MPA | Policy
    • Residency as rehearsal: the new pediatric hospitalist fellowship requirement scam

      Anonymous | Physician
    • Are quotas a solution to physician shortages?

      Jacob Murphy | Education
    • A faster path to becoming a doctor is possible—here’s how

      Ankit Jain | Education
  • Recent Posts

    • Addressing America’s reliance on psychotropic medication [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • The hidden cost of malpractice: Why doctors are losing control

      Howard Smith, MD | Physician
    • How scales of justice saved a doctor-patient relationship

      Neil Baum, MD | Physician
    • Rediscovering the soul of medicine in the quiet of a Sunday morning

      Syed Ahmad Moosa, MD | Physician
    • An introduction to occupational and environmental medicine [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • Does silence as a faculty retention strategy in academic medicine and health sciences work?

      Sylk Sotto, EdD, MPS, MBA | Conditions

Subscribe to KevinMD and never miss a story!

Get free updates delivered free to your inbox.


Find jobs at
Careers by KevinMD.com

Search thousands of physician, PA, NP, and CRNA jobs now.

Learn more

View 5 Comments >

Founded in 2004 by Kevin Pho, MD, KevinMD.com is the web’s leading platform where physicians, advanced practitioners, nurses, medical students, and patients share their insight and tell their stories.

Social

  • Like on Facebook
  • Follow on Twitter
  • Connect on Linkedin
  • Subscribe on Youtube
  • Instagram

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Most Popular

  • Past Week

    • What’s driving medical students away from primary care?

      ​​Vineeth Amba, MPH, Archita Goyal, and Wayne Altman, MD | Education
    • How scales of justice saved a doctor-patient relationship

      Neil Baum, MD | Physician
    • Make cognitive testing as routine as a blood pressure check

      Joshua Baker and James Jackson, PsyD | Conditions
    • The dreaded question: Do you have boys or girls?

      Pamela Adelstein, MD | Physician
    • The broken health care system doesn’t have to break you

      Jessie Mahoney, MD | Physician
    • The hidden cost of delaying back surgery

      Gbolahan Okubadejo, MD | Conditions
  • Past 6 Months

    • What’s driving medical students away from primary care?

      ​​Vineeth Amba, MPH, Archita Goyal, and Wayne Altman, MD | Education
    • Internal Medicine 2025: inspiration at the annual meeting

      American College of Physicians | Physician
    • What happened to real care in health care?

      Christopher H. Foster, PhD, MPA | Policy
    • Residency as rehearsal: the new pediatric hospitalist fellowship requirement scam

      Anonymous | Physician
    • Are quotas a solution to physician shortages?

      Jacob Murphy | Education
    • A faster path to becoming a doctor is possible—here’s how

      Ankit Jain | Education
  • Recent Posts

    • Addressing America’s reliance on psychotropic medication [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • The hidden cost of malpractice: Why doctors are losing control

      Howard Smith, MD | Physician
    • How scales of justice saved a doctor-patient relationship

      Neil Baum, MD | Physician
    • Rediscovering the soul of medicine in the quiet of a Sunday morning

      Syed Ahmad Moosa, MD | Physician
    • An introduction to occupational and environmental medicine [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • Does silence as a faculty retention strategy in academic medicine and health sciences work?

      Sylk Sotto, EdD, MPS, MBA | Conditions

MedPage Today Professional

An Everyday Health Property Medpage Today
  • Terms of Use | Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • DMCA Policy
All Content © KevinMD, LLC
Site by Outthink Group

Georgia’s new law promoting truth and transparency in health care credentials
5 comments

Comments are moderated before they are published. Please read the comment policy.

Loading Comments...