I was never suicidal.
I said the words because I believed I had no other way out.
By then I was restrained, masked, surrounded, and being moved through a medical system I understood too well. I am a physician. I have spent my career in pulmonary, critical care, and sleep medicine. I have managed patients on ventilators, spoken with families at the edge of death, treated sleep and breathing disorders, and taught clinicians how to think through physiology under stress.
I am also a survivor of critical illness. That matters because the body remembers what the mind can explain only later.
Years before I became a physician, I was the patient. I was intubated. I was restrained. I lost control of my body, my voice, and my place in the world. I survived the ICU, but survival is not the same as recovery. Post-intensive care syndrome is not a metaphor. It is a lived condition of body, brain, memory, strength, fear, and autonomic instability. It is what happens when the nervous system learns that help can also arrive as force.
So when I say I was never suicidal, I am not minimizing what I said. I am explaining why I said it.
The day began as an injury. I had sustained a fall in a hotel room. I hit my head. My scalp was bleeding. I had pain in my shoulder, hip, and knee. I was concerned about my neck. I was on the floor, vulnerable, trying not to make a possible injury worse. I asked for help.
When emergency responders arrived, I tried to explain what I needed. I was alert. I was oriented. I identified myself. I explained my medical concerns. I tried to tell them about my history, my body, my injury, and my fear of being handled incorrectly. I did not need to be believed as important. I needed to be believed as present.
There is a difference.
I also need to be honest about my state. I was not calm. I was not easy. I was sleep-deprived, injured, frightened, angry, and emotionally dysregulated. I was profane at times. I was intense. I will not sanitize that, because the truth matters.
But difficulty is not incapacity. Emotional intensity is not the same as confusion. Anger is not the same as violence. And psychiatric activation, whether one calls it panic, trauma, mania, hypomania, or dysregulation, does not erase a patient’s humanity or rights.
One of the most dangerous failures in acute care is not ignorance. It is certainty.
Once a patient is classified as intoxicated, combative, manic, noncompliant, or dangerous, every subsequent action begins to orbit that label. The person disappears and the category remains. The chart starts writing the patient before the patient can speak. I felt that happen in real time.
I was angry. I was dysregulated. I do not need to pretend otherwise. But I was not confused. I was not without capacity. I was not threatening people. I was an injured patient trying to explain that the response itself was making me worse.
Dysregulated does not mean unconscious. Loud does not mean irrational. Angry does not mean dangerous. And manic, if that is the word someone wants to use, does not mean disposable.
The first duty of care is not control. It is recognition.
I kept trying to create an off-ramp. Listen. Do not pull that arm. I may have injured my neck. I have post-intensive care syndrome. Restraints will make this worse. I do not need a gurney. I can use a wheelchair. Please call someone who knows me. Please loosen this. Please give me water.
At some point, the off-ramps closed.
Restraint is often described in medical language as a safety intervention. Sometimes it is. I have worked in ICUs. I know there are moments when restraint prevents immediate harm. But restraint is not neutral. It is not merely a strap. It is an event.
For some patients, especially survivors of critical illness, restraint is not calming. It is the stimulus that perpetuates the crisis.
The best way I can describe it is this: Each limb becomes its own alarm. Each point of restraint sends a signal through the body that liberation is the only goal. The thinking mind can understand the situation, but the nervous system has already declared an emergency. The more force applied, the more the body fights. The more the body fights, the more the system believes force was justified.
That loop is catastrophic. The restraint becomes the evidence used to justify the restraint.
I tried to explain this. I tried to explain that my autonomic nervous system was not going to calm while the stimulus remained in place. Remove the stimulus. Give me space. Let me breathe. Let me yell if I need to yell. Let me be a distressed human being without converting me into a dangerous object.
This is where trauma-informed care matters. Not as a slogan. Not as an online module. As a real-time clinical skill.
Trauma-informed care begins by assuming that behavior has context. It asks what happened before it asks what is wrong. It recognizes that coercion can be experienced as threat even when clinicians intend safety. It does not require the patient to be soft-spoken before the clinician becomes humane.
Instead, the situation escalated. By the time I was in the emergency department, I was no longer simply a patient who had fallen. I was a problem to be managed. Staff were masked. I could not see identifying badges. I asked for physicians I knew. I tried to explain who I was and what post-intensive care syndrome meant. I remember hearing versions of the same message again and again: We do not know who that is; we do not know what that is; we do not care who you are.
What I needed was not special treatment. I needed context to matter. I needed someone to say my name. I needed someone to recognize that a person can be intensely activated and still be telling the truth.
Then came the spit mask.
I return to that image because it was the moment that condensed everything. It was terrifying. It was humiliating. It was animalizing. It was the ultimate power move. Yes, technically one can breathe through it. Yes, technically one can speak through it. But its meaning is unmistakable: Your mouth is the problem; your voice is the threat; your face is no longer yours.
For a survivor of critical illness, any intervention involving the face, airway, breathing, or forced immobilization can become more than a present event. It can reactivate an earlier physiology. The body does not pause to ask whether this is the ICU again. The body recognizes threat before language can negotiate.
I feared that if I did not find a way out, the next step would be more sedation, more force, perhaps even intubation. That fear was not theoretical for me. I knew the medicine. I knew the pathway. I knew what institutions can do once a story has been written around a body.
While restrained and masked, I said I wanted to kill myself.
That sentence changed the pathway. It also changed the story other people could tell about me.
But the truth is this: I did not want to die. I wanted the situation to stop. I wanted a different authority to enter. I wanted the machine to change tracks because every ordinary way of asking had failed.
It was not a plan for death. It was a desperate attempt to interrupt a process that felt increasingly unsafe and inescapable.
I did a 5150 to survive.
Later, in an acute psychiatric facility, the label became the center of the room. Mania. Grandiosity. Medication. Hold. Risk. The original injury receded. The restraint receded. The mask receded. The context receded.
I was told I needed sleep in a place where sleep was nearly impossible. The lights did not truly go off. People paced at night. Patients with obvious sleep-disordered breathing went untreated. Outdoor air was rationed. Smoke breaks became one of the few reliable ways to stand outside, breathe, and speak with other human beings. I am a sleep physician. I have spent my life explaining that sleep is not optional physiology. Inside that place, the contradiction was almost unbearable. Acute psychiatric care tells people they need sleep while placing them in environments designed to prevent sleep.
Sleep is not ancillary to psychiatric recovery. Sleep is psychiatric care.
This is not a small point. We cannot keep treating sleep as a comfort measure in the very settings where emotional regulation, impulse control, psychosis, mood stability, trauma recovery, and cognition are on the line. Light, noise, circadian disruption, untreated sleep apnea, and the absence of real rest are not background conditions. They are active clinical forces.
Something changed when one physician finally recognized me. He knew who I was. He asked why I was there. He said he was going to help.
I felt relief first. Some embarrassment, yes. But mostly relief.
That moment matters because recognition did not escalate me. Recognition regulated me.
Being seen accurately did not make me more dangerous. It made me more human.
Eventually, I moved into a less acute environment. The windows were better. Sleep was more possible. Food was easier. Outside air was more available. People became people again. I met patients whose lives were radically different from mine and found the same thing I have found in ICUs, clinics, hospital rooms, family meetings, and grief: Everybody wants to be seen before they are managed.
The diagnosis had not changed. The environment had. And my nervous system knew the difference.
Later, in Sedona, the red rocks did what institutions had not. They did not interrogate me. They did not restrain me. They did not ask me to prove my identity. They received me.
When I enter that landscape, I feel something happen in my body before I can explain it. The rock structures feel like old friends. The air feels weighted, like a blanket placed over the entire nervous system. The red walls, iron-rich and ancient, shift with the light. They are monuments, dragons, heroes, sleeping animals, temples, and dust. They remind me that even the mighty eventually dissolve. They simply live on a different timeline.
In Sedona, I sleep early. I wake with the sun.
That is not incidental. That is medicine.
This experience has not made me less committed to medicine. It has made me less willing to confuse medicine with control.
Modern systems have protocols for managing a dysregulated body. Too often, they lack the relational intelligence to recognize the intact person inside that body.
That is the work now. To teach that emotional dysregulation is not the same as incapacity. To teach that restraint is never just a mechanical act. To teach that sleep, breath, light, food, air, dignity, and recognition are not luxuries. They are clinical interventions. To build environments where suffering does not make the face of the room change.
For clinicians, the lesson is not that restraint is never necessary. The lesson is that restraint is never neutral. It should never become the first language of care simply because a patient is loud, angry, frightened, or hard to categorize.
For health systems, the lesson is that identity and context are not distractions from safety. They are part of safety.
For psychiatric care, the lesson is that sleep and environment are not secondary. They are treatment.
For survivors of critical illness, the lesson is more painful: The body may carry old rooms into new ones. A strap is not always just a strap. A mask is not always just a mask. A locked unit is not always just a locked unit. Sometimes the nervous system is responding to history before anyone else in the room understands the present.
I was never suicidal. I was injured, terrified, restrained, and unheard.
And I am still here. Not because the system saved me. Because somewhere underneath the straps, the mask, the labels, and the fluorescent light, the part of me that witnesses everything stayed awake.
Ravi S. Aysola is a pulmonary, critical care, and sleep medicine physician, scientist, inventor, and founder. He is the founder and CEO of The Aysola Center for Respiratory, Sleep, and Restorative Medicine, a concierge medical practice focused on complex sleep, breathing, fatigue, autonomic arousal, and restorative health.
Dr. Aysola previously served in senior academic leadership roles in sleep medicine, including as clinical professor of medicine and chief of the sleep medicine section at UCLA, where he was also the former director of the UCLA Sleep Disorders Center. He helped build multidisciplinary programs integrating pulmonary medicine, critical care, sleep medicine, neuromuscular care, dental sleep medicine, ENT, behavioral sleep care, and post-ICU recovery. His work is shaped by both clinical expertise and lived experience as a former ICU survivor, giving him a rare perspective on how medicine can better address recovery, resilience, and human physiology.
He is also the founder and CEO of TOORYA, a health technology company developing tools to measure and improve sleep, vigilance, and physiologic readiness. His research spans pulmonary imaging, obstructive sleep apnea physiology, cardiopulmonary sleep medicine, patient-centered sleep apnea care, and physiologic signal analysis, with additional work available on PubMed. His current focus bridges clinical medicine, technology, restorative sleep therapy, and human performance, helping patients and organizations move beyond fragmented care toward deeper recovery and sustained function. He shares updates on LinkedIn.



















