There are some patients whose names change the atmosphere of a day before they have even entered the room.
You see the name on your schedule and feel it immediately. It may be a glance at the clock, a slight tightening in your chest, or the quiet hope that the visit might somehow be shorter than you remember. Every clinician knows this feeling, although few of us admit it openly.
The patient who is always angry. The patient who never seems satisfied. The patient who returns again and again despite normal investigations. The patient whose chart has accumulated descriptions like “frequent flyer,” “non-compliant,” “drug-seeking,” or simply “difficult.”
For much of my career, I thought these encounters were primarily about the patient. Over time, I began to wonder whether that was too simple an explanation.
Real physician voices, twice a week
Free, and one click to unsubscribe.
What if the problem is not the patient at all? What if the problem is the encounter itself?
Medicine naturally trains us to locate problems within individuals. We diagnose disease, identify pathology, and search for causes. When an interaction becomes challenging, it is easy to apply the same logic. The patient is demanding. The patient is resistant. The patient lacks insight. The patient is difficult. Sometimes those descriptions contain elements of truth. More often, they are incomplete.
The angry patient may be frightened. The demanding patient may be searching for reassurance in a situation that feels profoundly uncertain. The distrustful patient may have spent years feeling dismissed, ignored, or unheard. The patient who repeatedly returns to the emergency department may not be seeking attention as much as they are seeking relief from a fear that never fully settles. The longer I practice, the more convinced I become that behavior often makes sense once we understand the emotion beneath it.
Fear, in particular, is easy to overlook. Patients fear death, disability, pain, dependence, uncertainty, and loss of control. They fear what symptoms might mean. They fear what a test result may reveal. Sometimes they fear that no one believes them. Yet fear rarely announces itself directly. More often, it arrives disguised as anger, criticism, demands, or frustration.
At the same time, patients are only part of the story. Clinicians bring their own emotions into the room as well, whether we acknowledge them or not. We feel frustrated when our efforts do not seem to help. We feel helpless when solutions are unavailable. We feel anxious when confronted with uncertainty. We feel irritated when we perceive that our time, expertise, or goodwill are being challenged. These reactions are not signs of weakness or poor professionalism. They are signs that we are human.
One of the most important lessons medicine has taught me is that difficult encounters occur between people, not within them. A patient arrives carrying fear, grief, trauma, uncertainty, or pain. A clinician arrives carrying fatigue, expectations, competing demands, and the accumulated weight of previous encounters. The health care system contributes its own pressures through wait times, resource limitations, staffing shortages, and barriers to care. By the time everyone arrives in the same room, the conditions for misunderstanding may already be present.
Sometimes the patient leaves feeling unheard. Sometimes the clinician leaves feeling defeated. Often both leave carrying the same emotion: powerlessness.
That realization changed the way I think about difficult encounters. Instead of asking what is wrong with the patient, I find myself asking a different question.
What is happening between us?
The question shifts my attention away from blame and toward curiosity. It creates space to consider not only what the patient is experiencing, but also what I am experiencing and how those experiences may be influencing one another. It does not magically solve every challenging interaction. Some encounters remain difficult despite our best efforts. Some patients remain angry. Some conversations remain frustrating. Some systems remain broken. But curiosity changes the quality of the encounter, even when it cannot change the outcome.
The phrase “difficult patient” suggests that the problem resides entirely within one person. In my experience, that is rarely true. More often, what we call a difficult patient is a difficult encounter unfolding between a person who is suffering, a clinician who is trying to help, and a system that does not always make either task easy.
The patient is not the problem. Neither is the clinician. The encounter is where the work lives.
Devina Maya Wadhwa is a psychiatrist.