Skip to content
  • About
  • Contact
  • Contribute
  • Book
  • Careers
  • Podcast
  • Recommended
  • Speaking
  • All
  • Physician
  • Practice
  • Policy
  • Finance
  • Conditions
  • .edu
  • Patient
  • Meds
  • Tech
  • Social
  • Video
    • All
    • Physician
    • Practice
    • Policy
    • Finance
    • Conditions
    • .edu
    • Patient
    • Meds
    • Tech
    • Social
    • Video
    • About
    • Contact
    • Contribute
    • Book
    • Careers
    • Podcast
    • Recommended
    • Speaking

Unread echocardiogram fallout at Harlem Hospital Center

Larry Husten, PhD
Conditions
August 3, 2010
Share
Tweet
Share

Recently, the New York Times reported that Harlem Hospital Center had finally completed its investigation into thousands of echocardiograms that after receiving an initial reading by a technician had never been read by a physician.

It turns out that out of 7,000 tests that went unread, only 14 patients “might have been misdiagnosed because their tests had not been handled properly,” according to the hospital spokeswoman quoted in the story. Of the 12 patients who have been contacted, none “were found to have suffered adverse effects from the failure to properly read their tests.”

I’ve received two thoughtful and provocative responses from cardiologists about the latest development in this fascinating and disturbing story. Here they are:

Cardiologist #1 (John Osborne):

The story of the unread echoes in Harlem continues to ripen – and possibly to instruct.

As we all know (thanks to the New York Times reporting and the efforts of Larry Husten to get this story out to the cardiology community), that over a five year period of time, some 7,000 echocardiograms that were ordered at the Harlem Hospital Center were only reviewed by the echo technicians and never officially reviewed and signed off by physician readers.

After this story was “outed”, the appropriate damage control was performed, and – what the hey, let’s actually read those echos – we were just informed that of the 7,000-ish echos, only 14 patients were “misdiagnosed’. Note that 12 of the 14 patients were subsequently found and that none of them were “found to have suffered adverse effects from the failure to properly read their tests”, according to a hospital spokesperson.  While these events are truly scandalous, there may be some very interesting hypotheses that could come of this “echo disaster.”

Before we go any further, I acknowledge the very broad caveats of any conclusions drawn from this lapse of care and professional responsibility. We don’t know anything about the population, the indications for performing the echos are unknown, and the details of how they found that there where only 14 misreads of 7,000 studies are also undefined.

Having stated these caveats, there are a few intriguing hypotheses, Firstly, does this suggest that there is a scandalous level of overuse of echo (incompetence, greed, defensive medicine?). Clearly, as the results of thousands of echo were not demanded (or even noticed to be absent!), the data apparently was not needed for clinical decision making.

Furthermore, I was particularly struck by the claim in this story that of the 7,000 echos done over five years that were never read by docs, that in only 14 patients did the information make a difference in their diagnosis. Given that the role of any testing procedure is to potentially allow one to make a new diagnosis and/or change therapy, that they only found that 0.2% of these patients, once their echo data was “unblinded,” resulted in a misdiagnosis is amazing!

Does it say that the vast majority of the echos (99.8%) that were ordered were useless – in that they did not change the diagnosis or therapy, or that the tech did a great job of interpreting them (as a shudder goes up the spine of all the ASE-certified echo readers), or perhaps that the real number of patients affected by this is being dramatically low-balled.

Lastly, it is interesting that the number of unread echos continues to increase dramatically, much like the estimates of oil in the gulf. Just as in the gulf, incompetence and lack of oversight conspire to spell a disaster.

It will be interesting to see how this story evolves.

ADVERTISEMENT

–John A Osborne MD, PhD, FACC, State of the Heart Cardiology, Grapevine, Texas

Cardiologist #2 (anonymous):

1. Of the 7,000 echos reviewed, there were only 17 significant misdiagnoses? That’s a 99.8% accuracy rate for Harlem’s echo techs’ interpretation, which flies in the face of established literature for non-expert diagnosis. I doubt that Harlem Hospital has been able to recruit the world’s best cardiac sonographers.

2. Doctors complained that they were understaffed to read 2500 echos per year — that’s <10 per working day for one FTE. What are their staffing expectations if one FTE can’t handle 10 echos?

Finally, here’s an observation from a medical student who will rotate through Harlem Hospital next year:

… many of the patients (largely Black and Latino) in the neighborhood don’t trust the hospital or their doctors.  Even before this happened.  Health care disparities are being highlighted here … and sadly there are echoes to Tuskegee.

Larry Husten is a writer and editor of CardioBrief.org.

Submit a guest post and be heard.

Prev

Create a family practice mystique in medical school

August 3, 2010 Kevin 21
…
Next

How to say goodbye to patients

August 3, 2010 Kevin 3
…

Tagged as: Cardiology, Hospital-Based Medicine, Malpractice

Post navigation

< Previous Post
Create a family practice mystique in medical school
Next Post >
How to say goodbye to patients

ADVERTISEMENT

More by Larry Husten, PhD

  • a desk with keyboard and ipad with the kevinmd logo

    The worst abuse of an embargo this medical journalist has ever seen

    Larry Husten, PhD
  • a desk with keyboard and ipad with the kevinmd logo

    The official response to Mark Midei is not satisfactory

    Larry Husten, PhD
  • a desk with keyboard and ipad with the kevinmd logo

    How academic physicians are being used as live bait for journalists

    Larry Husten, PhD

More in Conditions

  • What is a varicocele and how does it affect fertility?

    Martina Ambardjieva, MD, PhD
  • How profit-driven hospitals fail long-term patient care

    John Corsino, DPT
  • How nature is inspiring the future of pain medicine

    Varun Mangal
  • Psychiatrist tests ketogenic diet for mental health benefits

    Zane Kaleem, MD
  • The myth of biohacking your way past death

    Larry Kaskel, MD
  • Why Hollywood’s allergy jokes are dangerous

    Lianne Mandelbaum, PT
  • Most Popular

  • Past Week

    • Why doctors must fight for a just health care system

      Alankrita Olson, MD, MPH & Ashley Duhon, MD & Toby Terwilliger, MD | Policy
    • The human case for preserving the nipple after mastectomy

      Thomas Amburn, MD | Conditions
    • IMGs are the future of U.S. primary care

      Adam Brandon Bondoc, MD | Physician
    • How transplant recipients can pay it forward through organ donation

      Deepak Gupta, MD | Physician
    • Women physicians: How can they survive and thrive in academic medicine?

      Elina Maymind, MD | Physician
    • Why AI in health care needs stronger testing before clinical use [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
  • Past 6 Months

    • Health equity in Inland Southern California requires urgent action

      Vishruth Nagam | Policy
    • How restrictive opioid policies worsen the crisis

      Kayvan Haddadan, MD | Physician
    • Why primary care needs better dermatology training

      Alex Siauw | Conditions
    • Why pain doctors face unfair scrutiny and harsh penalties in California

      Kayvan Haddadan, MD | Physician
    • How hospitals can prepare for CMS’s new patient safety rule

      Kim Adelman, PhD | Conditions
    • Why physician strikes are a form of hospice

      Patrick Hudson, MD | Physician
  • Recent Posts

    • How to transform your mindset by rewiring your brain with positive language [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • What is a varicocele and how does it affect fertility?

      Martina Ambardjieva, MD, PhD | Conditions
    • How profit-driven hospitals fail long-term patient care

      John Corsino, DPT | Conditions
    • Complicity vs. protest: a doctor’s choice

      Patrick Hudson, MD | Physician
    • How physician burnout and system reform are shaping the future of U.S. health care

      Irim Salik, MD | Policy
    • How nature is inspiring the future of pain medicine

      Varun Mangal | Conditions

Subscribe to KevinMD and never miss a story!

Get free updates delivered free to your inbox.


Find jobs at
Careers by KevinMD.com

Search thousands of physician, PA, NP, and CRNA jobs now.

Learn more

View 3 Comments >

Founded in 2004 by Kevin Pho, MD, KevinMD.com is the web’s leading platform where physicians, advanced practitioners, nurses, medical students, and patients share their insight and tell their stories.

Social

  • Like on Facebook
  • Follow on Twitter
  • Connect on Linkedin
  • Subscribe on Youtube
  • Instagram

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Most Popular

  • Past Week

    • Why doctors must fight for a just health care system

      Alankrita Olson, MD, MPH & Ashley Duhon, MD & Toby Terwilliger, MD | Policy
    • The human case for preserving the nipple after mastectomy

      Thomas Amburn, MD | Conditions
    • IMGs are the future of U.S. primary care

      Adam Brandon Bondoc, MD | Physician
    • How transplant recipients can pay it forward through organ donation

      Deepak Gupta, MD | Physician
    • Women physicians: How can they survive and thrive in academic medicine?

      Elina Maymind, MD | Physician
    • Why AI in health care needs stronger testing before clinical use [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
  • Past 6 Months

    • Health equity in Inland Southern California requires urgent action

      Vishruth Nagam | Policy
    • How restrictive opioid policies worsen the crisis

      Kayvan Haddadan, MD | Physician
    • Why primary care needs better dermatology training

      Alex Siauw | Conditions
    • Why pain doctors face unfair scrutiny and harsh penalties in California

      Kayvan Haddadan, MD | Physician
    • How hospitals can prepare for CMS’s new patient safety rule

      Kim Adelman, PhD | Conditions
    • Why physician strikes are a form of hospice

      Patrick Hudson, MD | Physician
  • Recent Posts

    • How to transform your mindset by rewiring your brain with positive language [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • What is a varicocele and how does it affect fertility?

      Martina Ambardjieva, MD, PhD | Conditions
    • How profit-driven hospitals fail long-term patient care

      John Corsino, DPT | Conditions
    • Complicity vs. protest: a doctor’s choice

      Patrick Hudson, MD | Physician
    • How physician burnout and system reform are shaping the future of U.S. health care

      Irim Salik, MD | Policy
    • How nature is inspiring the future of pain medicine

      Varun Mangal | Conditions

MedPage Today Professional

An Everyday Health Property Medpage Today
  • Terms of Use | Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • DMCA Policy
All Content © KevinMD, LLC
Site by Outthink Group

Unread echocardiogram fallout at Harlem Hospital Center
3 comments

Comments are moderated before they are published. Please read the comment policy.

Loading Comments...