Skip to content
  • About
  • Contact
  • Contribute
  • Book
  • Careers
  • Podcast
  • Recommended
  • Speaking
  • All
  • Physician
  • Practice
  • Policy
  • Finance
  • Conditions
  • .edu
  • Patient
  • Meds
  • Tech
  • Social
  • Video
    • All
    • Physician
    • Practice
    • Policy
    • Finance
    • Conditions
    • .edu
    • Patient
    • Meds
    • Tech
    • Social
    • Video
    • About
    • Contact
    • Contribute
    • Book
    • Careers
    • Podcast
    • Recommended
    • Speaking

Natural lifespan and whether a woman is designed to give birth

Amy Tuteur, MD
Conditions
December 19, 2010
Share
Tweet
Share

Advocates of alternative health attribute all sorts of fantastical properties to the human body. The body supposedly “knows” how to live a long healthy life; the body is supposedly “designed” to work perfectly. The tenets of natural childbirth philosophy also invoke these fantastical properties. The body “knows” how to give birth; a woman’s body is “designed” to give birth.

On their face these claims are obviously false. The body doesn’t “know” anything and the body is certainly not designed by anyone. It is the product of millions of years of evolution with the many trade offs that evolution requires. At a deeper level, claims about what the body “knows” or is “designed” to do reflect a fundamental misunderstanding of evolution. There is an unstated belief that the human body reflects precision craftsmanship, but evolution is not a precision craftsman. Indeed it has much more in common with a football coach than an individual who works according to a predetermined template.

I became a football fan when one of my sons played PeeWee Football. I hated the experience; I was always worried that my son would get hurt, but I learned the game and loved it. It took me a while to understand the different types of players and the different types of plays. But there was one thing I realized from the very beginning: every football play is designed so that if executed properly, it results in a touchdown.

So every play is literally designed to result in a touchdown but very few actually do. Why? One problem is execution. The quarterback fumbles the hand off to the receiver; the receiver slips while running toward the goal line; a lineman throws an illegal block and the play is called back. All of these represent mistakes. Someone fails to do what he is supposed to do and the play never develops as it was designed to do. It’s not surprising then that it doesn’t result in a touchdown.

Illness and accident are the medical equivalent of botched plays. The individual would have gone on to live a long and healthy life had he avoided the polio virus, had he not fallen and broken his leg, had he never started smoking. There was nothing intrinsically wrong with the body. The problem arose outside and then affected the body.

But most plays in a football game are properly executed and yet many don’t result in touchdowns, either. If every play is designed to end in a touchdown, why are touchdowns so rare? The hand off is made properly, the linemen throw their assigned blocks, the crease opens up, yet the receiver never gets to the end zone. What went wrong?

Usually what “goes wrong” is a big guy from the opposing team getting in the way and tackling the receiver far from the goal line. The play is “designed” to the extent that the team members know exactly what they should do, and indeed, if there was no opposing team on the field, every play would end in a touchdown. But there is an opposing team and the play can never account for what they will do.

Similarly evolution means that while every person is supposed to live out his natural lifespan (a touchdown), the environment can never be predicted in advance. The environment is the opposing team and, as in football, it can change at every play. What confers fitness in one environment, may be a fatal weakness in another.

In football, an individual team member can adjust his role in response to a particular player on the defense, while the rest of the play takes place as designed. That option is not possible in human evolution. The woman with the slightly narrower pelvis that conferred on her the speed to escape animal attackers cannot modify that pelvis at the time of birth. The narrow pelvic dimensions that allowed her to be fleet of foot and escape the tiger that killed her sister may condemn her to death during childbirth when the baby cannot fit through that pelvis.

If individuals did not have to contend with environmental factors they would live out their natural life spans, every women would give birth successfully. But that’s the equivalent of no opposing side on the field; it never happens. Therefore, the claim that people are “designed” to live until old age or that women are “designed” to give birth is about as meaningful as the fact that every football play is designed to end in touchdown. The design does not guarantee success.

In football, most plays fail when they come up against the reality of the opposing team. In evolution, many individuals fail (die) when they come up against the reality of the environment. In football, one side wins when it gets more points than the other side, which is doing its best to keep it from getting any points at all. In evolution, a species wins (survives) when enough of its members live to reproduce successfully despite the problems posed by the environment and the additional difficulties posed by the fact that what is adaptive in one environment can be maladaptive in another.

Claiming that people are “designed” to live out their natural lifespans or that women are “designed” to give birth and insisting that things go wrong rarely if ever is like claiming that every football play is designed to end in a touchdown and things rarely if ever go wrong on the field. The play may have been designed perfectly, but when the 350 pound lineman knocks the receiver to the ground, the design is meaningless. Similarly, a woman may be “designed” to give birth, but when the baby doesn’t fit, or her blood pressure rises dangerously, or the placenta does not provide adequate blood flow to the baby, the “design” is meaningless.

Amy Tuteur is an obstetrician-gynecologist who blogs at The Skeptical OB.

ADVERTISEMENT

Submit a guest post and be heard.

Prev

Physician barriers to EMR acceptance

December 19, 2010 Kevin 34
…
Next

Progressive commercialization of American medicine

December 20, 2010 Kevin 72
…

Tagged as: Patients

Post navigation

< Previous Post
Physician barriers to EMR acceptance
Next Post >
Progressive commercialization of American medicine

ADVERTISEMENT

More by Amy Tuteur, MD

  • a desk with keyboard and ipad with the kevinmd logo

    I am so glad that you have chosen me to be your guide

    Amy Tuteur, MD
  • a desk with keyboard and ipad with the kevinmd logo

    What breastfeeding and sex have in common

    Amy Tuteur, MD
  • a desk with keyboard and ipad with the kevinmd logo

    It’s time for a VBAC court

    Amy Tuteur, MD

More in Conditions

  • Why health care needs empathy, not just algorithms

    Muhammad Abdullah Khan
  • A doctor’s story of IV ketamine for depression

    Dee Bonney, MD
  • Why you should get your Lp(a) tested

    Monzur Morshed, MD and Kaysan Morshed
  • Is modern medicine losing its soul?

    Michele Luckenbaugh
  • The opioid crisis’s other victims

    Kayvan Haddadan, MD
  • The need for pediatric respite care

    Kathleen Muldoon, PhD
  • Most Popular

  • Past Week

    • Rebuilding the backbone of health care [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • Why you should get your Lp(a) tested

      Monzur Morshed, MD and Kaysan Morshed | Conditions
    • The psychological trauma of polarization

      Farid Sabet-Sharghi, MD | Physician
    • Why DPC market-model fit matters most

      Dana Y. Lujan, MBA | Physician
    • My journey to a type 1 diabetes diagnosis

      Beth Thacker | Conditions
    • Deaths in custody highlight crisis in Philly prisons

      Kendall Major, MD, Tommy Gautier, MD, Alyssa Lambrecht, DO, and Elle Saine, MD | Policy
  • Past 6 Months

    • Rebuilding the backbone of health care [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • The dangerous racial bias in dermatology AI

      Alex Siauw | Tech
    • When language barriers become a medical emergency

      Monzur Morshed, MD and Kaysan Morshed | Physician
    • The dismantling of public health infrastructure

      Ronald L. Lindsay, MD | Physician
    • The high cost of PCSK9 inhibitors like Repatha

      Larry Kaskel, MD | Conditions
    • A surgeon’s view on RVUs and moral injury

      Rene Loyola, MD | Physician
  • Recent Posts

    • Deaths in custody highlight crisis in Philly prisons

      Kendall Major, MD, Tommy Gautier, MD, Alyssa Lambrecht, DO, and Elle Saine, MD | Policy
    • Why CPT coding ambiguity harms doctors

      Muhamad Aly Rifai, MD | Physician
    • Why health care needs empathy, not just algorithms

      Muhammad Abdullah Khan | Conditions
    • Moral injury, toxic shame, and the new DSM Z code

      Brian Lynch, MD | Physician
    • The problem with the 15-minute doctor appointment

      Mick Connors, MD | Physician
    • Fixing the system that fails psychiatric patients [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast

Subscribe to KevinMD and never miss a story!

Get free updates delivered free to your inbox.


Find jobs at
Careers by KevinMD.com

Search thousands of physician, PA, NP, and CRNA jobs now.

Learn more

View 31 Comments >

Founded in 2004 by Kevin Pho, MD, KevinMD.com is the web’s leading platform where physicians, advanced practitioners, nurses, medical students, and patients share their insight and tell their stories.

Social

  • Like on Facebook
  • Follow on Twitter
  • Connect on Linkedin
  • Subscribe on Youtube
  • Instagram

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Most Popular

  • Past Week

    • Rebuilding the backbone of health care [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • Why you should get your Lp(a) tested

      Monzur Morshed, MD and Kaysan Morshed | Conditions
    • The psychological trauma of polarization

      Farid Sabet-Sharghi, MD | Physician
    • Why DPC market-model fit matters most

      Dana Y. Lujan, MBA | Physician
    • My journey to a type 1 diabetes diagnosis

      Beth Thacker | Conditions
    • Deaths in custody highlight crisis in Philly prisons

      Kendall Major, MD, Tommy Gautier, MD, Alyssa Lambrecht, DO, and Elle Saine, MD | Policy
  • Past 6 Months

    • Rebuilding the backbone of health care [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • The dangerous racial bias in dermatology AI

      Alex Siauw | Tech
    • When language barriers become a medical emergency

      Monzur Morshed, MD and Kaysan Morshed | Physician
    • The dismantling of public health infrastructure

      Ronald L. Lindsay, MD | Physician
    • The high cost of PCSK9 inhibitors like Repatha

      Larry Kaskel, MD | Conditions
    • A surgeon’s view on RVUs and moral injury

      Rene Loyola, MD | Physician
  • Recent Posts

    • Deaths in custody highlight crisis in Philly prisons

      Kendall Major, MD, Tommy Gautier, MD, Alyssa Lambrecht, DO, and Elle Saine, MD | Policy
    • Why CPT coding ambiguity harms doctors

      Muhamad Aly Rifai, MD | Physician
    • Why health care needs empathy, not just algorithms

      Muhammad Abdullah Khan | Conditions
    • Moral injury, toxic shame, and the new DSM Z code

      Brian Lynch, MD | Physician
    • The problem with the 15-minute doctor appointment

      Mick Connors, MD | Physician
    • Fixing the system that fails psychiatric patients [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast

MedPage Today Professional

An Everyday Health Property Medpage Today
  • Terms of Use | Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • DMCA Policy
All Content © KevinMD, LLC
Site by Outthink Group

Natural lifespan and whether a woman is designed to give birth
31 comments

Comments are moderated before they are published. Please read the comment policy.

Loading Comments...