Skip to content
  • About
  • Contact
  • Contribute
  • Book
  • Careers
  • Podcast
  • Recommended
  • Speaking
  • All
  • Physician
  • Practice
  • Policy
  • Finance
  • Conditions
  • .edu
  • Patient
  • Meds
  • Tech
  • Social
  • Video
    • All
    • Physician
    • Practice
    • Policy
    • Finance
    • Conditions
    • .edu
    • Patient
    • Meds
    • Tech
    • Social
    • Video
    • About
    • Contact
    • Contribute
    • Book
    • Careers
    • Podcast
    • Recommended
    • Speaking

Treatment guidelines pros and cons

David Williams
Conditions
February 17, 2011
Share
Tweet
Share

I was puzzled by a Health Affairs article showing the public finds arguments against treatment guidelines a lot more compelling than arguments in favor. But after reading the technical appendix, which contains the full text of the survey, I think the problem is that the researchers framed the question poorly. In particular, the researchers portrayed guidelines as unrealistically rigid.

In A National Survey Reveals Public Skepticism About Research-Based Treatment Guidelines, Gerber et al. asked respondents to rate their level of agreement with arguments for and against the use of guidelines.

Arguments for guidelines (in order of percentage of respondents finding them convincing) include:

  • Doctors have economic incentives to provide inappropriate care
  • Following guidelines will improve care for most patients
  • Doctors don’t keep up with the literature
  • Doctors are unaware of better approaches followed elsewhere

Con arguments (also ordered by percentage of respondents finding them convincing) are:

  • No outside group should come between doctors and patients
  • Doctors will be unable to tailor care to needs of individual patients
  • Guidelines are vulnerable to abuse and corruption
  • Payers will use guidelines to control costs and ration care
  • Guidelines can’t keep up with pace of medical innovation

About half or more of respondents found the average “pro” argument convincing while close to 80 percent felt that way about the “con” arguments. That’s discouraging to people like me who think guidelines are useful. But what caught me by surprise is that even though most people were concerned that doctors provided inappropriate care due to economic incentives and that guidelines would improve care for most people, they came out so strongly in favor of preventing an “outside group” from issuing guidelines and were so concerned that guidelines would prevent tailoring.

However, once I read in the technical appendix how the question was posed I could understand the results. In fact I would have answered the “con” questions similarly to the typical respondent. Here’s the wording:

Some people have proposed establishing an outside group to develop national treatment guidelines based on the latest scientific evidence. Doctors would be required to follow these guidelines when they treat patients. The government and insurance companies would refuse to pay for any treatments not supported by the guidelines even if a doctor thinks this treatment is best for their patient.

The researchers themselves included the emphasis on the words “even if a doctor thinks this treatment is best for their patient.” Instead, I think the researchers should have replaced the italicized words with, “unless a physician documents why this treatment is best for their patient.” Payers do tend to base payments on adherence to guidelines, but there is generally a lot more wiggle room than the authors imply. The authors’ wording certainly explains why people would be convinced that doctors would not be able to tailor treatment!

What the researchers call “guidelines” are more like mandated treatment pathways.

More appropriate wording about guidelines would probably shift results toward the “for” arguments.

David E. Williams is co-founder of MedPharma Partners and blogs at the Health Business Blog.

Submit a guest post and be heard on social media’s leading physician voice.

Prev

Requiring an ultrasound and counselling before an abortion

February 17, 2011 Kevin 34
…
Next

Let Me Down Easy and facing illness and death

February 17, 2011 Kevin 1
…

ADVERTISEMENT

Tagged as: Public Health & Policy

Post navigation

< Previous Post
Requiring an ultrasound and counselling before an abortion
Next Post >
Let Me Down Easy and facing illness and death

ADVERTISEMENT

More by David Williams

  • The dialysis industry is a microcosm of what ails the health care system

    David Williams
  • Should patients be responsible for physician handwashing?

    David Williams
  • a desk with keyboard and ipad with the kevinmd logo

    The state of online doctor ratings: It’s still early

    David Williams

More in Conditions

  • Ancient health secrets for modern life

    Larry Kaskel, MD
  • How the internet broke the doctor-parent trust

    Wendy L. Hunter, MD
  • Mpox isn’t over: A silent epidemic is growing

    Melvin Sanicas, MD
  • How your family system secretly shapes your health

    Su Yeong Kim, PhD
  • The human case for preserving the nipple after mastectomy

    Thomas Amburn, MD
  • Inside the high-stakes world of neurosurgery

    Isaac Yang, MD
  • Most Popular

  • Past Week

    • Why your clinic waiting room may affect patient outcomes

      Ziya Altug, PT, DPT and Shirish Sachdeva, PT, DPT | Conditions
    • The human case for preserving the nipple after mastectomy

      Thomas Amburn, MD | Conditions
    • Nuclear verdicts and rising costs: How inflation is reshaping medical malpractice claims

      Robert E. White, Jr. & The Doctors Company | Policy
    • How new loan caps could destroy diversity in medical education

      Caleb Andrus-Gazyeva | Policy
    • The ethical crossroads of medicine and legislation

      M. Bennet Broner, PhD | Conditions
    • How community and buses saved my retirement

      Raymond Abbott | Conditions
  • Past 6 Months

    • Health equity in Inland Southern California requires urgent action

      Vishruth Nagam | Policy
    • Why transgender health care needs urgent reform and inclusive practices

      Angela Rodriguez, MD | Conditions
    • How restrictive opioid policies worsen the crisis

      Kayvan Haddadan, MD | Physician
    • Why primary care needs better dermatology training

      Alex Siauw | Conditions
    • New student loan caps could shut low-income students out of medicine

      Tom Phan, MD | Physician
    • Why pain doctors face unfair scrutiny and harsh penalties in California

      Kayvan Haddadan, MD | Physician
  • Recent Posts

    • Unused IV catheters cost U.S. hospitals billions

      Piyush Pillarisetti | Policy
    • Why U.S. universities should adopt a standard pre-med major [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • Ancient health secrets for modern life

      Larry Kaskel, MD | Conditions
    • How the internet broke the doctor-parent trust

      Wendy L. Hunter, MD | Conditions
    • Why don’t women in medicine support each other?

      Jessie Mahoney, MD | Physician
    • Why doctors need emotional literacy training

      Vineet Vishwanath | Education

Subscribe to KevinMD and never miss a story!

Get free updates delivered free to your inbox.


Find jobs at
Careers by KevinMD.com

Search thousands of physician, PA, NP, and CRNA jobs now.

Learn more

View 7 Comments >

Founded in 2004 by Kevin Pho, MD, KevinMD.com is the web’s leading platform where physicians, advanced practitioners, nurses, medical students, and patients share their insight and tell their stories.

Social

  • Like on Facebook
  • Follow on Twitter
  • Connect on Linkedin
  • Subscribe on Youtube
  • Instagram

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Most Popular

  • Past Week

    • Why your clinic waiting room may affect patient outcomes

      Ziya Altug, PT, DPT and Shirish Sachdeva, PT, DPT | Conditions
    • The human case for preserving the nipple after mastectomy

      Thomas Amburn, MD | Conditions
    • Nuclear verdicts and rising costs: How inflation is reshaping medical malpractice claims

      Robert E. White, Jr. & The Doctors Company | Policy
    • How new loan caps could destroy diversity in medical education

      Caleb Andrus-Gazyeva | Policy
    • The ethical crossroads of medicine and legislation

      M. Bennet Broner, PhD | Conditions
    • How community and buses saved my retirement

      Raymond Abbott | Conditions
  • Past 6 Months

    • Health equity in Inland Southern California requires urgent action

      Vishruth Nagam | Policy
    • Why transgender health care needs urgent reform and inclusive practices

      Angela Rodriguez, MD | Conditions
    • How restrictive opioid policies worsen the crisis

      Kayvan Haddadan, MD | Physician
    • Why primary care needs better dermatology training

      Alex Siauw | Conditions
    • New student loan caps could shut low-income students out of medicine

      Tom Phan, MD | Physician
    • Why pain doctors face unfair scrutiny and harsh penalties in California

      Kayvan Haddadan, MD | Physician
  • Recent Posts

    • Unused IV catheters cost U.S. hospitals billions

      Piyush Pillarisetti | Policy
    • Why U.S. universities should adopt a standard pre-med major [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • Ancient health secrets for modern life

      Larry Kaskel, MD | Conditions
    • How the internet broke the doctor-parent trust

      Wendy L. Hunter, MD | Conditions
    • Why don’t women in medicine support each other?

      Jessie Mahoney, MD | Physician
    • Why doctors need emotional literacy training

      Vineet Vishwanath | Education

MedPage Today Professional

An Everyday Health Property Medpage Today
  • Terms of Use | Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • DMCA Policy
All Content © KevinMD, LLC
Site by Outthink Group

Treatment guidelines pros and cons
7 comments

Comments are moderated before they are published. Please read the comment policy.

Loading Comments...