The inconsistent academic peer review process
I check the submission website again. And again. Sometimes in the middle of the night, I find myself refreshing the page, hoping for a small update (a new status, a change in wording, a sign that my manuscript has moved from “under review” to “decision in process”).
For early-career researchers, this waiting game is familiar. We pour months, sometimes years, of effort into designing a study, collecting data, writing, revising, and …
The inconsistent academic peer review process







![Clinicians are failing at value-based care because no one taught them the system [PODCAST]](https://kevinmd.com/wp-content/uploads/bd31ce43-6fb7-4665-a30e-ee0a6b592f4c-190x100.jpeg)







