Skip to content
  • About
  • Contact
  • Contribute
  • Book
  • Careers
  • Podcast
  • Recommended
  • Speaking
  • All
  • Physician
  • Practice
  • Policy
  • Finance
  • Conditions
  • .edu
  • Patient
  • Meds
  • Tech
  • Social
  • Video
    • All
    • Physician
    • Practice
    • Policy
    • Finance
    • Conditions
    • .edu
    • Patient
    • Meds
    • Tech
    • Social
    • Video
    • About
    • Contact
    • Contribute
    • Book
    • Careers
    • Podcast
    • Recommended
    • Speaking

Why mammography is an imperfect test

Stacey Vitiello, MD
Conditions
January 15, 2012
Share
Tweet
Share

It is a scenario familiar to all breast imaging practices.

A patient feels a lump in her breast and calls her doctor.  The doctor examines her, agrees that a lump is present, and refers the patient to a breast imaging facility for a diagnostic mammogram and breast ultrasound (also known as a sonogram).  At her mammogram appointment, a little sticker is placed on the lump felt by the patient, and mammogram images are taken.  Something may or may not be seen on the mammogram at the site of the lump.  A breast sonogram is performed, and a suspicious mass is seen, clear as day.  And sometimes it’s not so tiny.

The yellow arrow in the sonogram image below demonstrates one such mass:

The radiologist assigned to read mammograms that day tells the patient that a mass has been found, and she needs to have a needle biopsy.  The biopsy is performed, cancer is diagnosed, and when the patient is given this news she exclaims, “But how can I possibly have cancer?  I just had a normal mammogram a few months ago!”  Everyone is upset.  The radiologist who read that “normal” mammogram a few months back (sometimes it’s only a few days or weeks before) frantically pulls up those films to see if he/she missed the cancer.  Very often there was nothing on the mammogram that would have raised suspicion, yet there must have been something there since the patient now comes in a short time later with a palpable lump.  How did this happen?

The answer is simple.  Mammography is an imperfect test.  A “normal mammogram” report does not mean that a woman does not have breast cancer.  Overall, mammograms will pick up 80-90% of cancers.  That’s pretty good, but there are still 10-20% of cancers that will not be seen, and will present as an “interval cancer” with a palpable lump, as in the example above.

The cancer detection rate plummets in women with dense breasts to only 40-50% of cancers picked up on a mammogram.  That’s about the odds of a coin toss.  This is ineffective screening by anyone’s standards.

So what is a woman over 40 to do?  Find out your breast density.  If you have dense breasts, you need to be especially proactive to make sure that if you do have breast cancer, you increase the odds of it being found early.   Ask your doctor to send you for a screening breast ultrasound (sonogram) when you have your annual mammogram (and go to a facility that has digital mammograms).

The findings from a recent large multicenter study (ACRIN 6666) are clear:

  • 7.6 cancers were found per 1000 women who had a mammogram only
  • 11.8 cancers were found per 1000 women who had a mammogram and a screening sonogram

That’s an increase in the cancer detection rate of 50%.

Critics would argue that something might be found on the sonogram that requires a needle biopsy, and turns out not to be cancer (false positive).  In my experience, most women accept the low (5%) risk of possibly having a benign needle biopsy, and don’t subscribe to the “don’t ask, don’t tell” policy when it comes to their breasts.   Do yourself a favor and insist on that sonogram.  Don’t take no for an answer from either your doctor or from a radiology center that tells you they don’t do screening sonograms.  Seek a second opinion from another doctor.  Find a radiology practice that is proactive about breast cancer screening.  It’s worth your time and effort.

I’ve seen a few patients recently who have been turned away by other practices in New Jersey that won’t perform screening breast ultrasound, even though their doctor wrote them a prescription for one.  Truly unbelievable, but unfortunately true.  Perhaps these practices are unaware that a bill has been proposed in the NJ state legislature, which requires that women be informed of their breast density when they have a mammogram.  Connecticut and Texas have passed similar bills, and the radiology practices in these states have had to accommodate the increased demand for breast ultrasounds.  Bills are pending in 11 additional states, as well as at the federal level.  Practices need to plan for the increased volume as women and their doctors become more aware of this important issue.  (If you are at high risk for breast cancer, a breast MRI might be the better test for you; ask your doctor about this, and see “How Do I Know If I’m High Risk?”)

Be your own advocate!  Your life is too important, and you only get one.

Stacey Vitiello is a radiologist who blogs at The Breast Diaries.

ADVERTISEMENT

Submit a guest post and be heard on social media’s leading physician voice.

Prev

Doctors are forced to choose between really small or super big

January 14, 2012 Kevin 56
…
Next

Physicians should be concerned about malingering

January 15, 2012 Kevin 40
…

Tagged as: Oncology/Hematology, Radiology

Post navigation

< Previous Post
Doctors are forced to choose between really small or super big
Next Post >
Physicians should be concerned about malingering

ADVERTISEMENT

More by Stacey Vitiello, MD

  • a desk with keyboard and ipad with the kevinmd logo

    Where you have your mammogram, and who reads it, matter

    Stacey Vitiello, MD
  • a desk with keyboard and ipad with the kevinmd logo

    A radiologist disagrees with the breast cancer screening guidelines

    Stacey Vitiello, MD
  • a desk with keyboard and ipad with the kevinmd logo

    Practical tips for a more comfortable mammogram

    Stacey Vitiello, MD

More in Conditions

  • Is direct primary care sustainable in a downturn?

    Dana Y. Lujan, MBA
  • How movement improves pelvic floor function

    Martina Ambardjieva, MD, PhD
  • How immigrant physicians solved a U.S. crisis

    Eram Alam, PhD
  • Pediatric leadership silence on FDA ADHD recall

    Ronald L. Lindsay, MD
  • The ethical conflict of the Charlie Gard case

    Timothy Lesaca, MD
  • The ethics of mandatory Tay-Sachs testing

    Sheryl J. Nicholson
  • Most Popular

  • Past Week

    • Direct primary care in low-income markets

      Dana Y. Lujan, MBA | Policy
    • Is direct primary care sustainable in a downturn?

      Dana Y. Lujan, MBA | Conditions
    • Female athlete urine leakage: A urologist explains

      Martina Ambardjieva, MD, PhD | Conditions
    • AI in medical imaging: When algorithms block the view

      Gerald Kuo | Tech
    • Are you neurodivergent or just bored?

      Martha Rosenberg | Meds
    • The danger of dismantling DEI in medicine

      Jacquelyne Gaddy, MD | Physician
  • Past 6 Months

    • Why you should get your Lp(a) tested

      Monzur Morshed, MD and Kaysan Morshed | Conditions
    • Rebuilding the backbone of health care [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • The dismantling of public health infrastructure

      Ronald L. Lindsay, MD | Physician
    • The flaw in the ACA’s physician ownership ban

      Luis Tumialán, MD | Policy
    • Systematic neglect of mental health

      Ronke Lawal | Tech
    • Silicon Valley’s primary care doctor shortage

      George F. Smith, MD | Physician
  • Recent Posts

    • Is direct primary care sustainable in a downturn?

      Dana Y. Lujan, MBA | Conditions
    • The Silicon Valley primary care doctor shortage

      George F. Smith, MD | Physician
    • Transforming patient fear into understanding through clear communication [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • How movement improves pelvic floor function

      Martina Ambardjieva, MD, PhD | Conditions
    • How immigrant physicians solved a U.S. crisis

      Eram Alam, PhD | Conditions
    • Pediatric leadership silence on FDA ADHD recall

      Ronald L. Lindsay, MD | Conditions

Subscribe to KevinMD and never miss a story!

Get free updates delivered free to your inbox.


Find jobs at
Careers by KevinMD.com

Search thousands of physician, PA, NP, and CRNA jobs now.

Learn more

View 19 Comments >

Founded in 2004 by Kevin Pho, MD, KevinMD.com is the web’s leading platform where physicians, advanced practitioners, nurses, medical students, and patients share their insight and tell their stories.

Social

  • Like on Facebook
  • Follow on Twitter
  • Connect on Linkedin
  • Subscribe on Youtube
  • Instagram

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Most Popular

  • Past Week

    • Direct primary care in low-income markets

      Dana Y. Lujan, MBA | Policy
    • Is direct primary care sustainable in a downturn?

      Dana Y. Lujan, MBA | Conditions
    • Female athlete urine leakage: A urologist explains

      Martina Ambardjieva, MD, PhD | Conditions
    • AI in medical imaging: When algorithms block the view

      Gerald Kuo | Tech
    • Are you neurodivergent or just bored?

      Martha Rosenberg | Meds
    • The danger of dismantling DEI in medicine

      Jacquelyne Gaddy, MD | Physician
  • Past 6 Months

    • Why you should get your Lp(a) tested

      Monzur Morshed, MD and Kaysan Morshed | Conditions
    • Rebuilding the backbone of health care [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • The dismantling of public health infrastructure

      Ronald L. Lindsay, MD | Physician
    • The flaw in the ACA’s physician ownership ban

      Luis Tumialán, MD | Policy
    • Systematic neglect of mental health

      Ronke Lawal | Tech
    • Silicon Valley’s primary care doctor shortage

      George F. Smith, MD | Physician
  • Recent Posts

    • Is direct primary care sustainable in a downturn?

      Dana Y. Lujan, MBA | Conditions
    • The Silicon Valley primary care doctor shortage

      George F. Smith, MD | Physician
    • Transforming patient fear into understanding through clear communication [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • How movement improves pelvic floor function

      Martina Ambardjieva, MD, PhD | Conditions
    • How immigrant physicians solved a U.S. crisis

      Eram Alam, PhD | Conditions
    • Pediatric leadership silence on FDA ADHD recall

      Ronald L. Lindsay, MD | Conditions

MedPage Today Professional

An Everyday Health Property Medpage Today
  • Terms of Use | Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • DMCA Policy
All Content © KevinMD, LLC
Site by Outthink Group

Why mammography is an imperfect test
19 comments

Comments are moderated before they are published. Please read the comment policy.

Loading Comments...