Skip to content
  • About
  • Contact
  • Contribute
  • Book
  • Careers
  • Podcast
  • Recommended
  • Speaking
  • All
  • Physician
  • Practice
  • Policy
  • Finance
  • Conditions
  • .edu
  • Patient
  • Meds
  • Tech
  • Social
  • Video
    • All
    • Physician
    • Practice
    • Policy
    • Finance
    • Conditions
    • .edu
    • Patient
    • Meds
    • Tech
    • Social
    • Video
    • About
    • Contact
    • Contribute
    • Book
    • Careers
    • Podcast
    • Recommended
    • Speaking

Sexism in STEM: Don’t base conclusions on flawed data

Timothy Lahey, MD
Physician
January 16, 2015
Share
Tweet
Share

Sexism is a major problem in education around sciences, technology and engineering. The first step in addressing this problem is awareness.

A new study suggests many men deny that sexism is a problem in STEM fields. A study in Psychology of Women Quarterly says that that among 423 respondents in an online forum, men were more likely to suggest sexism isn’t a problem even when confronted with evidence it is.

Wow, men are really clueless. Let’s get out the cattle prods.

Or … maybe not.

A closer reading of the study reveals the way it was conducted could lead to bias. Not bias in the sense of being sexist, but biased in the statistical sense of the word, i.e. that the authors’ conclusions may not be valid.

Here’s why.

It turns out the authors collected 831 responses from an online forum regarding articles on sexism in STEM fields. We don’t know who responded, and how they might differ from those that didn’t. Were non-sexist men less likely to opine, leaving the sexist trolls to exhibit the dark side of their humanity? Probably — but we just can’t be sure because the information isn’t there.

From out of those 831 responses, the authors analyzed data only from the 423 in which the respondent’s sex could be inferred from their response. If the respondent said, “As a man, I am aggrieved that women are scientists,” then their sexist response was included. If a man wrote, “Go women in science!” without indicating his sex, his response was thrown out. Thus, importantly, the authors did not systematically evaluate the major variable of interest – respondent sex – and as a result their analyses were potentially biased to include people who mention their sex when writing about sexism.

If, for instance, male sexists are more likely to mention that they are men, then the study conclusions are completely invalid. Maybe they are, maybe they aren’t.

The authors do cop to some of the study limitations, though not this one. They write, regarding study limitations, that the study approach,

… necessitated the usage of a non-random, self- selected sample of commenters … Commenters were limited to those who had access to the Internet, were sufficiently interested in bias in STEM to read an article on the topic, read one of our three selected articles, and decided to leave a comment. As such, although our sample may be representative of the focal underlying population of individuals who are interested in such issues, as well as read and comment on such articles, these commenters may not be representative of other groups.

True enough, but how can the authors conclude they know how aware men (or rather men online) are of sexism in STEM if they do not even know how many of the original 831 respondents are men? Similarly, how can they conclude that men are more likely to be skeptical of sexism in STEM fields if they cannot compare all men’s responses to all women’s responses.

Short answer: They can’t.

What is sad is that the authors can cite a bevy of other articles that do suggest some men in STEM fields are sexist, and that some men deny sexism. I don’t doubt it: I’ve seen both.

Here’s a random sampling of anonymized Twitter commentary about the findings:

ADVERTISEMENT

5

I would guess that the lived experience of these and other commentators, like mine, supports the idea that some men disregard sexism even when it’s staring them in the face.

From there, when a study comes along that supports that already-held belief, Twitter lights up. Even if the study itself is pretty poor proof.

We should continue to call out and fight sexism in STEM fields. It is pernicious, archaic, and it must go. While fighting that noble fight, which we are winning, we should not undermine the effort by basing conclusions on flawed data.

Timothy Lahey is an infectious disease physician and medical ethicist who blogs at [M U R M U R S].  

Prev

In the airport for a routine flight. And an adventure with urine and an AED.

January 16, 2015 Kevin 8
…
Next

One way to change MOC: Targeted education and testing

January 16, 2015 Kevin 3
…

Tagged as: Medical school

Post navigation

< Previous Post
In the airport for a routine flight. And an adventure with urine and an AED.
Next Post >
One way to change MOC: Targeted education and testing

ADVERTISEMENT

More by Timothy Lahey, MD

  • a desk with keyboard and ipad with the kevinmd logo

    Will the attempt to police HIV transmission be effective?

    Timothy Lahey, MD
  • a desk with keyboard and ipad with the kevinmd logo

    After a Creutzfeldt-Jakob exposure, should patients be told?

    Timothy Lahey, MD

More in Physician

  • Physician grief and patient loss: Navigating the emotional toll of medicine

    Francisco M. Torres, MD
  • Is primary care becoming a triage station?

    J. Leonard Lichtenfeld, MD
  • Violence against physicians and the role of empathy

    Dr. R.N. Supreeth
  • Finding meaning in medicine through the lens of Scarlet Begonias

    Arthur Lazarus, MD, MBA
  • Profit vs. patients in the U.S. health care system

    Banu Symington, MD
  • Why medicine needs military-style leadership and reconnaissance

    Ronald L. Lindsay, MD
  • Most Popular

  • Past Week

    • Psychiatrists are physicians: a key distinction

      Farid Sabet-Sharghi, MD | Physician
    • The blind men and the elephant: a parable for modern pain management

      Richard A. Lawhern, PhD | Conditions
    • Is primary care becoming a triage station?

      J. Leonard Lichtenfeld, MD | Physician
    • Preventing physician burnout before it begins in med school [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • The risk of ideology in gender medicine

      William Malone, MD | Conditions
    • Why we can’t forget public health

      Ryan McCarthy, MD | Physician
  • Past 6 Months

    • Psychiatrists are physicians: a key distinction

      Farid Sabet-Sharghi, MD | Physician
    • Why feeling unlike yourself is a sign of physician emotional overload

      Stephanie Wellington, MD | Physician
    • The U.S. gastroenterologist shortage explained

      Brian Hudes, MD | Physician
    • The Silicon Valley primary care doctor shortage

      George F. Smith, MD | Physician
    • California’s opioid policy hypocrisy

      Kayvan Haddadan, MD | Conditions
    • A lesson in empathy from a young patient

      Dr. Arshad Ashraf | Physician
  • Recent Posts

    • Why high-quality embryos sometimes fail to implant [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • The risk of diagnostic ideology in child psychiatry

      Dr. Sami Timimi | Conditions
    • The blind men and the elephant: a parable for modern pain management

      Richard A. Lawhern, PhD | Conditions
    • L-theanine for stress and cognition

      Kamren Hall | Meds
    • The political selectivity of medical freedom: a double standard

      Arthur Lazarus, MD, MBA | Policy
    • The AI innovation-access gap in medicine

      Tiffiny Black, DM, MPA, MBA | Meds

Subscribe to KevinMD and never miss a story!

Get free updates delivered free to your inbox.


Find jobs at
Careers by KevinMD.com

Search thousands of physician, PA, NP, and CRNA jobs now.

Learn more

Leave a Comment

Founded in 2004 by Kevin Pho, MD, KevinMD.com is the web’s leading platform where physicians, advanced practitioners, nurses, medical students, and patients share their insight and tell their stories.

Social

  • Like on Facebook
  • Follow on Twitter
  • Connect on Linkedin
  • Subscribe on Youtube
  • Instagram

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Most Popular

  • Past Week

    • Psychiatrists are physicians: a key distinction

      Farid Sabet-Sharghi, MD | Physician
    • The blind men and the elephant: a parable for modern pain management

      Richard A. Lawhern, PhD | Conditions
    • Is primary care becoming a triage station?

      J. Leonard Lichtenfeld, MD | Physician
    • Preventing physician burnout before it begins in med school [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • The risk of ideology in gender medicine

      William Malone, MD | Conditions
    • Why we can’t forget public health

      Ryan McCarthy, MD | Physician
  • Past 6 Months

    • Psychiatrists are physicians: a key distinction

      Farid Sabet-Sharghi, MD | Physician
    • Why feeling unlike yourself is a sign of physician emotional overload

      Stephanie Wellington, MD | Physician
    • The U.S. gastroenterologist shortage explained

      Brian Hudes, MD | Physician
    • The Silicon Valley primary care doctor shortage

      George F. Smith, MD | Physician
    • California’s opioid policy hypocrisy

      Kayvan Haddadan, MD | Conditions
    • A lesson in empathy from a young patient

      Dr. Arshad Ashraf | Physician
  • Recent Posts

    • Why high-quality embryos sometimes fail to implant [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • The risk of diagnostic ideology in child psychiatry

      Dr. Sami Timimi | Conditions
    • The blind men and the elephant: a parable for modern pain management

      Richard A. Lawhern, PhD | Conditions
    • L-theanine for stress and cognition

      Kamren Hall | Meds
    • The political selectivity of medical freedom: a double standard

      Arthur Lazarus, MD, MBA | Policy
    • The AI innovation-access gap in medicine

      Tiffiny Black, DM, MPA, MBA | Meds

MedPage Today Professional

An Everyday Health Property Medpage Today
  • Terms of Use | Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • DMCA Policy
All Content © KevinMD, LLC
Site by Outthink Group

Leave a Comment

Comments are moderated before they are published. Please read the comment policy.

Loading Comments...