Skip to content
  • About
  • Contact
  • Contribute
  • Book
  • Careers
  • Podcast
  • Recommended
  • Speaking
  • All
  • Physician
  • Practice
  • Policy
  • Finance
  • Conditions
  • .edu
  • Patient
  • Meds
  • Tech
  • Social
  • Video
    • All
    • Physician
    • Practice
    • Policy
    • Finance
    • Conditions
    • .edu
    • Patient
    • Meds
    • Tech
    • Social
    • Video
    • About
    • Contact
    • Contribute
    • Book
    • Careers
    • Podcast
    • Recommended
    • Speaking

Pay-for-performance is here to stay. Hospitals better pay attention.

Peter Ubel, MD
Policy
December 26, 2016
Share
Tweet
Share

It used to be that hospitals billed Medicare for the services they provided, and Medicare — I know this is crazy! – simply paid the bills.

Those days are rapidly receding into history. Soon, a significant chunk of hospital revenue will be at risk, under a series of Medicare pay-for-performance programs. The idea behind P4P (as the cool kids call it) is simple. Third-party payers, like insurance companies or the Medicare program, will monitor the quality of care offered by health care providers like hospitals. High-quality providers will receive more money than low-quality ones, thereby giving providers an incentive to improve the quality of care they provide.

Medicare has created several P4P programs which, unless they are halted by the Trump administration, are slowly coming into effect. By 2017, as I will show in a bit, these programs could put a sixth of Medicare payment at risk.

What are these programs?

One is the Hospital Value-Based Purchasing Program, or (and you have to give Medicare folks kudos for their marketing prowess) VBP. Under VBP, Medicare monitors a bunch of quality measures, like the rate of hospital-acquired infections, the number of patients falling while in the hospital and even the risk-adjusted mortality of hospitalized patients. Medicare scores each hospital based on how well it performs compared to other hospitals, and compared to its previous performance. This score determines part of a reward or punishment at the end of the year. By 2017, 2 percent of Medicare hospital payments will be redistributed according to VBP results, with money transferred from low- to high-performing hospitals.

Medicare has created another acronymically-challenged program, HRRP, which stands for Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program. The program measures how often patients with diagnoses like heart attacks, congestive heart failure, and pneumonia are readmitted to hospitals after an initial stay. The program will financially penalize hospitals that have excessive readmission rates.

Finally, under its HAC program (not named after the sound made by someone with bronchitis), Medicare is tracking how well hospitals reduce the rate of hospital-acquired conditions, like catheter-related bacterial infections. Some of these measures overlap with the VBP measures, amounting to a double counting. That’s a problem I’ll talk about in a minute.

These programs are beginning to have a real impact on hospital finances. Here’s an illustration from Charles Kahn and colleagues from the Federation of American Hospitals:

watch-out-hospitals-300x176

Some people might think these programs should be abandoned, for being too flawed for prime time. For example, the programs hit a small percent of hospitals pretty hard. According to Kahn, “10 percent of hospitals accounted for nearly half of the HRRP penalties.” Moreover, the penalties have so far landed hard on teaching hospitals. Teaching hospitals are generally recognized for offering high-quality care, so there disproportionate penalties raise questions about the accuracy of Medicare’s measures. The penalties have also landed hard on hospitals caring for low-income populations. It’s not at all clear how much of the low-quality scores these hospitals have accumulated represent poor care versus poor statistical adjustment for the underlying health and social milieu of the patients admitted to these hospitals.

But it is too soon to abandon Medicare’s pay-for-performance programs. As Kahn points out: “hospital performance on the various programs’ metrics is improving.” In other words, P4P seems to be doing what it expected–it’s motivating hospitals to improve the quality of care they provide. Rather than abandon these programs, we should improve them. Medicare needs to revise these programs, to reduce unnecessary overlap between them, to simplify hospital reporting requirements and, most importantly, to better account for the underlying characteristics of hospital populations. I don’t expect or even want Medicare to go back to the old days, when it paid hospital bills without any effort to assess the quality of hospital services.

Pay-for-performance is here to stay. Hospitals better pay attention.

Peter Ubel is a physician and behavioral scientist who blogs at his self-titled site, Peter Ubel and can be reached on Twitter @PeterUbel. He is the author of Critical Decisions: How You and Your Doctor Can Make the Right Medical Choices Together. This article originally appeared in Forbes.

Image credit: Shutterstock.com

Prev

Are surgical residents really doing the cases they scrub on?

December 25, 2016 Kevin 0
…
Next

The communication revolution in health care may be doing more harm than good

December 26, 2016 Kevin 1
…

ADVERTISEMENT

Tagged as: Hospital-Based Medicine, Medicare

Post navigation

< Previous Post
Are surgical residents really doing the cases they scrub on?
Next Post >
The communication revolution in health care may be doing more harm than good

ADVERTISEMENT

More by Peter Ubel, MD

  • Clinicians shouldn’t be punished for taking care of needy populations

    Peter Ubel, MD
  • Patients alone cannot combat high health care prices

    Peter Ubel, MD
  • Is the FDA too slow to handle the pandemic?

    Peter Ubel, MD

Related Posts

  • Pay for performance: Have we gotten what we’ve paid for?

    Joshua Liao, MD
  • If we don’t pay now to vaccinate our children, they will pay later

    Peter Ubel, MD
  • Close the gender pay gap in medicine

    Linda Girgis, MD
  • It is time to make the unvaccinated pay their fair share

    Hayward Zwerling, MD
  • How to pay for long-term care

    Kevin Tolliver, MD, MBA
  • When it comes to pay cuts, it’s time to look beyond physicians

    J. DeWayne Tooson, MD

More in Policy

  • How American medicine profits from despair

    Jenny Shields, PhD
  • What I learned about health care by watching who gets left behind

    Maanyata Mantri
  • How the One Big Beautiful Bill could reshape your medical career

    Kara Pepper, MD
  • Why the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force is essential to saving lives

    J. Leonard Lichtenfeld, MD
  • Brooklyn hepatitis C cluster reveals hidden dangers in outpatient clinics

    Don Weiss, MD, MPH
  • Why nearly 800 U.S. hospitals are at risk of shutting down

    Harry Severance, MD
  • Most Popular

  • Past Week

    • Why palliative care is more than just end-of-life support

      Dr. Vishal Parackal | Conditions
    • When life makes you depend on Depends

      Francisco M. Torres, MD | Physician
    • Guilty until proven innocent? My experience with a state medical board.

      Jeffrey Hatef, Jr., MD | Physician
    • Why medical notes have become billing scripts instead of patient stories

      Sriman Swarup, MD, MBA | Tech
    • How denial of hypertension endangers lives and what doctors can do

      Dr. Aminat O. Akintola | Conditions
    • A powerful story of addiction, strength, and redemption

      Ryan McCarthy, MD | Physician
  • Past 6 Months

    • Why transgender health care needs urgent reform and inclusive practices

      Angela Rodriguez, MD | Conditions
    • COVID-19 was real: a doctor’s frontline account

      Randall S. Fong, MD | Conditions
    • Why primary care doctors are drowning in debt despite saving lives

      John Wei, MD | Physician
    • New student loan caps could shut low-income students out of medicine

      Tom Phan, MD | Physician
    • Confessions of a lipidologist in recovery: the infection we’ve ignored for 40 years

      Larry Kaskel, MD | Conditions
    • mRNA post vaccination syndrome: Is it real?

      Harry Oken, MD | Conditions
  • Recent Posts

    • Why doctors should rethink investing compared to the average U.S. investor [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • How chronic stress harms the heart in minority communities

      Monzur Morshed, MD and Kaysan Morshed | Conditions
    • Could antibiotics beat heart disease where statins failed?

      Larry Kaskel, MD | Conditions
    • The dying man who gave me flowers changed how I see care

      Augusta Uwah, MD | Physician
    • Universities must tap endowments to sustain biomedical research

      Adeel Khan, MD | Conditions
    • Exploring the science behind burnout [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast

Subscribe to KevinMD and never miss a story!

Get free updates delivered free to your inbox.


Find jobs at
Careers by KevinMD.com

Search thousands of physician, PA, NP, and CRNA jobs now.

Learn more

View 3 Comments >

Founded in 2004 by Kevin Pho, MD, KevinMD.com is the web’s leading platform where physicians, advanced practitioners, nurses, medical students, and patients share their insight and tell their stories.

Social

  • Like on Facebook
  • Follow on Twitter
  • Connect on Linkedin
  • Subscribe on Youtube
  • Instagram

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Most Popular

  • Past Week

    • Why palliative care is more than just end-of-life support

      Dr. Vishal Parackal | Conditions
    • When life makes you depend on Depends

      Francisco M. Torres, MD | Physician
    • Guilty until proven innocent? My experience with a state medical board.

      Jeffrey Hatef, Jr., MD | Physician
    • Why medical notes have become billing scripts instead of patient stories

      Sriman Swarup, MD, MBA | Tech
    • How denial of hypertension endangers lives and what doctors can do

      Dr. Aminat O. Akintola | Conditions
    • A powerful story of addiction, strength, and redemption

      Ryan McCarthy, MD | Physician
  • Past 6 Months

    • Why transgender health care needs urgent reform and inclusive practices

      Angela Rodriguez, MD | Conditions
    • COVID-19 was real: a doctor’s frontline account

      Randall S. Fong, MD | Conditions
    • Why primary care doctors are drowning in debt despite saving lives

      John Wei, MD | Physician
    • New student loan caps could shut low-income students out of medicine

      Tom Phan, MD | Physician
    • Confessions of a lipidologist in recovery: the infection we’ve ignored for 40 years

      Larry Kaskel, MD | Conditions
    • mRNA post vaccination syndrome: Is it real?

      Harry Oken, MD | Conditions
  • Recent Posts

    • Why doctors should rethink investing compared to the average U.S. investor [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • How chronic stress harms the heart in minority communities

      Monzur Morshed, MD and Kaysan Morshed | Conditions
    • Could antibiotics beat heart disease where statins failed?

      Larry Kaskel, MD | Conditions
    • The dying man who gave me flowers changed how I see care

      Augusta Uwah, MD | Physician
    • Universities must tap endowments to sustain biomedical research

      Adeel Khan, MD | Conditions
    • Exploring the science behind burnout [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast

MedPage Today Professional

An Everyday Health Property Medpage Today
  • Terms of Use | Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • DMCA Policy
All Content © KevinMD, LLC
Site by Outthink Group

Pay-for-performance is here to stay. Hospitals better pay attention.
3 comments

Comments are moderated before they are published. Please read the comment policy.

Loading Comments...