Skip to content
  • About
  • Contact
  • Contribute
  • Book
  • Careers
  • Podcast
  • Recommended
  • Speaking
  • All
  • Physician
  • Practice
  • Policy
  • Finance
  • Conditions
  • .edu
  • Patient
  • Meds
  • Tech
  • Social
  • Video
    • All
    • Physician
    • Practice
    • Policy
    • Finance
    • Conditions
    • .edu
    • Patient
    • Meds
    • Tech
    • Social
    • Video
    • About
    • Contact
    • Contribute
    • Book
    • Careers
    • Podcast
    • Recommended
    • Speaking

PCMH recognition process isn’t easy but it is becoming more relevant and less burdensome

Yul Ejnes, MD
Policy
February 27, 2017
Share
Tweet
Share

acp new logoA guest column by the American College of Physicians, exclusive to KevinMD.com.

When the American College of Physicians (ACP) and the other primary care societies introduced the Patient-Centered Medical Home (PCMH) over 10 years ago, the model was untested.  Here’s a look at how the PCMH recognition process has evolved and how my experience seeking recognition helped me in my role on the PCMH 2017 Advisory Committee that was established to guide the National Committee for Quality Assurance (NCQA) on the next update of the recognition program.

The Joint Principles of the Patient-Centered Medical Home adopted in 2007 served as an early blueprint, with one of the hallmarks of a PCMH being that “Practices go through a voluntary recognition process by an appropriate non-governmental entity to demonstrate that they have the capabilities to provide patient centered services consistent with the medical home model.”

This recognition process was important for a couple of reasons. In addition to guiding practices in the transformation process, recognition also served as assurance to health plans and others that were interested in testing the model that a practice was “ready and able” to provide this enhanced type of care.

NCQA was the first organization to develop a recognition program with the primary care specialty societies. Since then, other organizations have introduced additional recognition or accreditation programs for the PCMH.

Ten years ago, as a member of ACP’s Medical Service Committee, I had an opportunity to provide feedback on the recognition program’s proposed list of elements to ACP’s representatives who were working with NCQA. As we reviewed the draft, we tried to balance the need for practices to be able to demonstrate that they could deliver care consistent with the Joint Principles and the desire to avoid creating additional burdens for the physicians that we were trying to help.

My second encounter with NCQA PCMH was when my practice sought recognition in 2010. I’m convinced that going through the process made us a better practice. However, from my being on the “receiving end” of the program, I developed an appreciation for the amount of work involved in achieving recognition. I also started to question the relevance of some of the program’s elements, especially as my practice gained more experience with the PCMH model.

My group was fortunate enough to have staff members that could do most of the work involved in submitting data to NCQA. In contrast, smaller practices, such as my personal physician’s, were challenged by the sheer number of checklists, screenshots, and questions.

A little over a year ago, I was invited to chair the PCMH 2017 Advisory Committee. This revamping of PCMH recognition coincided with NCQA’s redesigning the way that it interacts with its “customers,” moving away from an every three-year process to a more continuous one, and tailoring the interaction to the needs and experience of the practice.

At our first Advisory Committee webinar, I commented that the existing recognition process, like many other activities that practicing physicians deal with, was analogous to holding track team tryouts and instead of qualifying runners based on their times, also requiring them to prove that they could walk and knew how to tie their shoes.

It’s the many “shoe tying” exercises that frustrate physicians and their staffs. For example, if a practice is successfully tracking chronic conditions, why does it need to document that it maintains problem lists in its records? Instead of requesting screenshots of schedules to document timely access, why not ask patients if they are satisfied with their access to appointments?

Our Advisory Committee included physicians from a variety of settings, including solo and rural practices, as well as non-physician clinicians, patients, and representatives of health plans and government agencies. In addition to the input of the Advisory Committee, NCQA solicited public comment on the proposed changes. ACP submitted suggestions for improvement during the comment period.

As a result of our efforts, the PCMH 2017 program that will be released in March has fewer elements than the current version and increases the ability to customize the process compared to previous versions. It also cuts down on paperwork and offers more options to submit information electronically.

ADVERTISEMENT

Instead of the current program’s elements, some of them “must pass,” PCMH 2017 has “core” and “elective” criteria. Core criteria are those that all PCMHs should be able to meet. While successful completion of a minimum number of elective criteria is required for recognition, the choice of electives can be adapted to the abilities and resources of the practice. For example, while providing basic behavioral health services is included in the core criteria, more advanced activities such as onsite or virtual integration with behavioral health providers are electives, since not all practices and their communities have the resources for this.

The elective criteria can also serve as ideas for more experienced practices to develop further as PCMHs. Also, to further simplify the program, the three levels of recognition were eliminated. Even with the streamlining and enhanced “live” support, the PCMH recognition process won’t be easy, but the work involved should be more relevant and less burdensome.

As a proponent of the PCMH model, it was not only educational to participate on the Advisory Committee, but also empowering because it enabled me to tell NCQA what my colleagues and I liked about the program and what could be improved. We often decline such opportunities to weigh in because it involves time away from our families and practices, but by participating, we can reclaim some of the control that we have lost over our day-to-day lives as physicians.

Yul Ejnes is an internal medicine physician and a past chair, board of regents, American College of Physicians. His statements do not necessarily reflect official policies of ACP.

Image credit: Shutterstock.com

Prev

Is breastfeeding as a working doctor an impossible task?

February 27, 2017 Kevin 3
…
Next

We have a vaccine for six cancers. Why are less than half of kids getting it?

February 27, 2017 Kevin 2
…

Tagged as: Primary Care

Post navigation

< Previous Post
Is breastfeeding as a working doctor an impossible task?
Next Post >
We have a vaccine for six cancers. Why are less than half of kids getting it?

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

More by Yul Ejnes, MD

  • Different perspectives but the same goal: providing the best possible care to patients

    Yul Ejnes, MD
  • Rising premiums, high deductibles, and gaps in coverage before the ACA

    Yul Ejnes, MD
  • Improving physician satisfaction by eliminating unnecessary practice burdens

    Yul Ejnes, MD

Related Posts

  • Trust the process of medical school admissions

    Paul Lee and Samuel Wu
  • The rewarding and grueling process of residency application

    Akhilesh Pathipati, MD
  • Are letters of recommendation effective or burdensome?

    Catherine Tawfik
  • Patient experience scores are being dragged down by process problems

    Trisha Swift, DNP, RN
  • Medical residents and academic due process: Know your rights

    Todd Rice, MD, MBA
  • Telemedicine should be easy. Here’s why it’s not.

    Dennis Wichern

More in Policy

  • U.S. health care leadership must prepare for policy-driven change

    Lee Scheinbart, MD
  • How locum tenens work helps physicians and APPs reclaim control

    Brian Sutter
  • Why Medicaid cuts should alarm every doctor

    Ilan Shapiro, MD
  • Why physician voices matter in the fight against anti-LGBTQ+ laws

    BJ Ferguson
  • The silent toll of ICE raids on U.S. patient care

    Carlin Lockwood
  • What Adam Smith would say about America’s for-profit health care

    M. Bennet Broner, PhD
  • Most Popular

  • Past Week

    • When did we start treating our lives like trauma?

      Maureen Gibbons, MD | Physician
    • When credibility is your only asset: the cautionary tale of DrKoop.com [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • Medicalizing burnout misses the real problem

      Jessie Mahoney, MD | Physician
    • How robotics are reshaping the future of vascular procedures

      David Fischel | Conditions
    • Why gambling addiction is America’s next health crisis

      Safina Adatia, MD | Conditions
    • The man in seat 11A survived, but why don’t our patients?

      Dr. Vivek Podder | Physician
  • Past 6 Months

    • Why tracking cognitive load could save doctors and patients

      Hiba Fatima Hamid | Education
    • The silent toll of ICE raids on U.S. patient care

      Carlin Lockwood | Policy
    • What the world must learn from the life and death of Hind Rajab

      Saba Qaiser, RN | Conditions
    • Why recovery after illness demands dignity, not suspicion

      Trisza Leann Ray, DO | Physician
    • Physician patriots: the forgotten founders who lit the torch of liberty

      Muhamad Aly Rifai, MD | Physician
    • Addressing the physician shortage: How AI can help, not replace

      Amelia Mercado | Tech
  • Recent Posts

    • When credibility is your only asset: the cautionary tale of DrKoop.com [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • Why sleep is the missing pillar in modern health care

      Carlos Nunez, MD | Conditions
    • How a family’s strength led to a successful kidney transplant

      C. Nicole Swiner, MD | Conditions
    • The food-drug interaction risks your doctor may be missing

      Frank Jumbe | Meds
    • Beyond the TikTok hype: Rebuilding trust in evidence-based weight loss medicine

      Sarah White, APRN | Conditions
    • The weaponization of rules: How regulatory overreach puts physicians and health care at risk

      Kayvan Haddadan, MD | Physician

Subscribe to KevinMD and never miss a story!

Get free updates delivered free to your inbox.


Find jobs at
Careers by KevinMD.com

Search thousands of physician, PA, NP, and CRNA jobs now.

Learn more

View 7 Comments >

Founded in 2004 by Kevin Pho, MD, KevinMD.com is the web’s leading platform where physicians, advanced practitioners, nurses, medical students, and patients share their insight and tell their stories.

Social

  • Like on Facebook
  • Follow on Twitter
  • Connect on Linkedin
  • Subscribe on Youtube
  • Instagram

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Most Popular

  • Past Week

    • When did we start treating our lives like trauma?

      Maureen Gibbons, MD | Physician
    • When credibility is your only asset: the cautionary tale of DrKoop.com [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • Medicalizing burnout misses the real problem

      Jessie Mahoney, MD | Physician
    • How robotics are reshaping the future of vascular procedures

      David Fischel | Conditions
    • Why gambling addiction is America’s next health crisis

      Safina Adatia, MD | Conditions
    • The man in seat 11A survived, but why don’t our patients?

      Dr. Vivek Podder | Physician
  • Past 6 Months

    • Why tracking cognitive load could save doctors and patients

      Hiba Fatima Hamid | Education
    • The silent toll of ICE raids on U.S. patient care

      Carlin Lockwood | Policy
    • What the world must learn from the life and death of Hind Rajab

      Saba Qaiser, RN | Conditions
    • Why recovery after illness demands dignity, not suspicion

      Trisza Leann Ray, DO | Physician
    • Physician patriots: the forgotten founders who lit the torch of liberty

      Muhamad Aly Rifai, MD | Physician
    • Addressing the physician shortage: How AI can help, not replace

      Amelia Mercado | Tech
  • Recent Posts

    • When credibility is your only asset: the cautionary tale of DrKoop.com [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • Why sleep is the missing pillar in modern health care

      Carlos Nunez, MD | Conditions
    • How a family’s strength led to a successful kidney transplant

      C. Nicole Swiner, MD | Conditions
    • The food-drug interaction risks your doctor may be missing

      Frank Jumbe | Meds
    • Beyond the TikTok hype: Rebuilding trust in evidence-based weight loss medicine

      Sarah White, APRN | Conditions
    • The weaponization of rules: How regulatory overreach puts physicians and health care at risk

      Kayvan Haddadan, MD | Physician

MedPage Today Professional

An Everyday Health Property Medpage Today
  • Terms of Use | Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • DMCA Policy
All Content © KevinMD, LLC
Site by Outthink Group

PCMH recognition process isn’t easy but it is becoming more relevant and less burdensome
7 comments

Comments are moderated before they are published. Please read the comment policy.

Loading Comments...