Skip to content
  • About
  • Contact
  • Contribute
  • Book
  • Careers
  • Podcast
  • Recommended
  • Speaking
  • All
  • Physician
  • Practice
  • Policy
  • Finance
  • Conditions
  • .edu
  • Patient
  • Meds
  • Tech
  • Social
  • Video
    • All
    • Physician
    • Practice
    • Policy
    • Finance
    • Conditions
    • .edu
    • Patient
    • Meds
    • Tech
    • Social
    • Video
    • About
    • Contact
    • Contribute
    • Book
    • Careers
    • Podcast
    • Recommended
    • Speaking

How to do risk-adjusted diagnosis coding the right way

Betsy Nicoletti, MS
Policy
April 3, 2018
Share
Tweet
Share

Medical practices with risk-adjusted contracts must sharpen their diagnosis coding. Practices that are part of accountable care organizations (ACOs) or that have risk-adjusted contracts with commercial payers have an economic incentive to accurately report the disease burden of their patients. In fee-for-service medicine, physicians are paid based on the fee schedule associated with a CPT code, and any modifier attached to that code. The diagnosis code establishes the medical necessity for the service. Under a risk-based contract, the payment for an individual claim is still based on the CPT code.

However, the end-of-year adjustment can bring a bonus or a decrease in future reimbursement rates. The insurance company bases its assessment of the disease burden of an individual patient or a panel of patients on the diagnosis codes submitted on a claim form in a calendar year. The most well known risk-adjusted model is Hierarchical Condition Categories (HCCs) developed by Medicare to predict future costs in Medicare Advantage plans.

Demographics

Risk models have two things in common. They are based on demographics and diagnosis. The demographics calculation includes the age and gender of the patient, whether the patient is living at home or in institution, if the patient is dually eligible for both Medicare and Medicaid, and if the patient has end-stage renal disease (ESRD).

Diagnosis

Certain ICD-10-CM codes are assigned a risk-adjusted score. The HCC model assigns a risk score to about 9,000 diagnosis codes of the 70,000 ICD-10 codes. The assigned weight varies by the severity of the condition. A clinician does not need to have a list of these codes if he or she understands the key principles of risk-adjusted diagnosis coding.

The diagnosis codes that are counted in the risk calculation are those submitted for inpatient admissions, outpatient hospital services, and by medical practices and certain other professional claims. Diagnosis codes that are submitted on diagnostic tests are not included in the risk calculation. The payer calculates the risk score for each patient annually. Only diagnosis codes that were submitted on a claim form in a calendar year are counted in an individual patients risk score.

The ICD-10 rule

Medical practices must follow ICD-10 rules when reporting claims. ICD-10 says, “Code all documented conditions, which coexist at the time of the visit that require or affect patient care or treatment.” This is particularly important for medical practices that have risk-based contracts. When seeing the patient include conditions in the assessment and on the claim form, which are either treated at that visit or which affect patient care or treatment. And orthopedist who sends the patient to their cardiologist or family physician for a pre-surgical evaluation of heart disease should add the diagnosis code for the heart condition to the assessment. The heart disease affects the care of the orthopedist and should be added to the claim form when following ICD-10 rules.

Medical groups may be reluctant to ask physicians to learn another coding model. However, there are a few key principles that medical conditions need to remember. First, report all serious chronic and acute conditions that are treated or that affect treatment annually. The risk calculation is made for each patient each year based on the codes submitted on claim forms during that year. Second, if the patient has a manifestation or complication of a condition, report that specifically. These types of descriptions in a code are “with ulcer,” “with spasm,” “with bleeding.” Be specific. And finally, review and report the few status codes that risk-adjust. If a patient is hospitalized, the coders at the hospital will submit a claim that includes the acute condition. For patients who are seen in the office, following these principles will provide an accurate picture of their disease burden.

Primary care clinicians

Many primary care providers use the annual health assessment visit as an opportunity to review the patient’s chronic conditions. Others address wellness issues at the health assessment visit and schedule provide care for the patient’s chronic conditions at other visits. Whenever the patient is seen, document the patient’s serious chronic conditions once in a calendar year, and add those conditions to the claim form. Use specific codes whenever possible.

Acute visits also provide an opportunity to report underlying conditions, if they affect the decision making of the acute problem. Consider a diabetic patient who needs a short-term course of oral steroids. If the physician documents consideration of the effects of the steroids on blood sugars, also report diabetes in the claim form.

Specialists

While our goal is to bill all conditions to the highest degree of specificity, it is especially important that physicians use specific codes for conditions they are treating. The cardiologist knows the type of heart failure, the psychiatrist the severity of the depression, and the surgeon the location of the Crohn’s disease and complications.

Status codes

The final chapter of the ICD-10-CM book is called “Factors influencing health status and contact with health service,” or status codes. There are many codes in this chapter from Z00—Z99, but only a few of them are assigned a risk-adjusted score.

These include:

  • Attention to/or status of artificial opening status, such as colostomy, ileostomy
  • Acquired, non-traumatic absence of toes or feet
  • Aftercare for/or status of heart, lung or liver transplant or bone marrow transplant
  • BMI ≥ 40, or BMI ≥ 35 with two significant chronic conditions, in which the obesity complicates the conditions
  • Renal dialysis status
  • Dependence on ventilator status
  • HIV positive
  • Long term, current use of insulin

Accurate and specific diagnosis coding of serious acute and chronic conditions provides insurers with a complete picture of the disease burden of individual patients and the panel of patients being cared for. No physician ever said, “My patients aren’t as sick as everyone else’s patients.” Communicate that to payers by the diagnosis codes submitted on claim forms.

Betsy Nicoletti is president, Medical Practice Consulting and author of Auditing Physician Services. She blogs at Nicoletti Notes.

ADVERTISEMENT

Image credit: Shutterstock.com

Prev

A reimbursement structure that can benefit primary care

April 3, 2018 Kevin 4
…
Next

Should we encourage people to go into medicine?

April 3, 2018 Kevin 31
…

Tagged as: Practice Management, Primary Care

Post navigation

< Previous Post
A reimbursement structure that can benefit primary care
Next Post >
Should we encourage people to go into medicine?

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

More by Betsy Nicoletti, MS

  • 5 urban legends about risk-adjusted diagnosis coding

    Betsy Nicoletti, MS
  • How to perform services that increase primary care revenue

    Betsy Nicoletti, MS
  • a desk with keyboard and ipad with the kevinmd logo

    The ICD-10 emperor has no clothes

    Betsy Nicoletti, MS

Related Posts

  • 5 urban legends about risk-adjusted diagnosis coding

    Betsy Nicoletti, MS
  • The risk physicians take when going on social media

    Anonymous
  • Relative risk reduction is a troublesome way to convey the benefits of treatments

    Peter Ubel, MD
  • Uninsured medical students are at risk

    Zannah Herridge-Meyer, Melanie Langa, and Kelly Stewart
  • When records are wrong, patients are at risk

    Denise Reich
  • An important health care safety net is at risk

    Mark Pappadakis, DO

More in Policy

  • The lab behind the lens: Equity begins with diagnosis

    Michael Misialek, MD
  • Conflicts of interest are eroding trust in U.S. health agencies

    Martha Rosenberg
  • When America sneezes, the world catches a cold: Trump’s freeze on HIV/AIDS funding

    Koketso Masenya
  • A surgeon’s late-night crisis reveals the cost confusion in health care

    Christine Ward, MD
  • The school cafeteria could save American medicine

    Scarlett Saitta
  • Native communities deserve better: the truth about Pine Ridge health care

    Kaitlin E. Kelly
  • Most Popular

  • Past Week

    • The broken health care system doesn’t have to break you

      Jessie Mahoney, MD | Physician
    • How dismantling DEI endangers the future of medical care

      Shashank Madhu and Christian Tallo | Education
    • How scales of justice saved a doctor-patient relationship

      Neil Baum, MD | Physician
    • “Think twice, heal once”: Why medical decision-making needs a second opinion from your slower brain (and AI)

      Harvey Castro, MD, MBA | Tech
    • The hidden cost of delaying back surgery

      Gbolahan Okubadejo, MD | Conditions
    • Rethinking medical education for a technology-driven era in health care [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
  • Past 6 Months

    • What’s driving medical students away from primary care?

      ​​Vineeth Amba, MPH, Archita Goyal, and Wayne Altman, MD | Education
    • Internal Medicine 2025: inspiration at the annual meeting

      American College of Physicians | Physician
    • Residency as rehearsal: the new pediatric hospitalist fellowship requirement scam

      Anonymous | Physician
    • A faster path to becoming a doctor is possible—here’s how

      Ankit Jain | Education
    • The hidden bias in how we treat chronic pain

      Richard A. Lawhern, PhD | Meds
    • Are quotas a solution to physician shortages?

      Jacob Murphy | Education
  • Recent Posts

    • Rethinking medical education for a technology-driven era in health care [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • From basketball to bedside: Finding connection through March Madness

      Caitlin J. McCarthy, MD | Physician
    • In medicine and law, professions that society relies upon for accuracy

      Muhamad Aly Rifai, MD | Tech
    • Diabetes and Alzheimer’s: What your blood sugar might be doing to your brain

      Marc Arginteanu, MD | Conditions
    • How motherhood reshaped my identity as a scientist and teacher

      Kathleen Muldoon, PhD | Conditions
    • Jumpstarting African health care with the beats of innovation

      Princess Benson | Conditions

Subscribe to KevinMD and never miss a story!

Get free updates delivered free to your inbox.


Find jobs at
Careers by KevinMD.com

Search thousands of physician, PA, NP, and CRNA jobs now.

Learn more

View 1 Comments >

Founded in 2004 by Kevin Pho, MD, KevinMD.com is the web’s leading platform where physicians, advanced practitioners, nurses, medical students, and patients share their insight and tell their stories.

Social

  • Like on Facebook
  • Follow on Twitter
  • Connect on Linkedin
  • Subscribe on Youtube
  • Instagram

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Most Popular

  • Past Week

    • The broken health care system doesn’t have to break you

      Jessie Mahoney, MD | Physician
    • How dismantling DEI endangers the future of medical care

      Shashank Madhu and Christian Tallo | Education
    • How scales of justice saved a doctor-patient relationship

      Neil Baum, MD | Physician
    • “Think twice, heal once”: Why medical decision-making needs a second opinion from your slower brain (and AI)

      Harvey Castro, MD, MBA | Tech
    • The hidden cost of delaying back surgery

      Gbolahan Okubadejo, MD | Conditions
    • Rethinking medical education for a technology-driven era in health care [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
  • Past 6 Months

    • What’s driving medical students away from primary care?

      ​​Vineeth Amba, MPH, Archita Goyal, and Wayne Altman, MD | Education
    • Internal Medicine 2025: inspiration at the annual meeting

      American College of Physicians | Physician
    • Residency as rehearsal: the new pediatric hospitalist fellowship requirement scam

      Anonymous | Physician
    • A faster path to becoming a doctor is possible—here’s how

      Ankit Jain | Education
    • The hidden bias in how we treat chronic pain

      Richard A. Lawhern, PhD | Meds
    • Are quotas a solution to physician shortages?

      Jacob Murphy | Education
  • Recent Posts

    • Rethinking medical education for a technology-driven era in health care [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • From basketball to bedside: Finding connection through March Madness

      Caitlin J. McCarthy, MD | Physician
    • In medicine and law, professions that society relies upon for accuracy

      Muhamad Aly Rifai, MD | Tech
    • Diabetes and Alzheimer’s: What your blood sugar might be doing to your brain

      Marc Arginteanu, MD | Conditions
    • How motherhood reshaped my identity as a scientist and teacher

      Kathleen Muldoon, PhD | Conditions
    • Jumpstarting African health care with the beats of innovation

      Princess Benson | Conditions

MedPage Today Professional

An Everyday Health Property Medpage Today
  • Terms of Use | Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • DMCA Policy
All Content © KevinMD, LLC
Site by Outthink Group

How to do risk-adjusted diagnosis coding the right way
1 comments

Comments are moderated before they are published. Please read the comment policy.

Loading Comments...