Skip to content
  • About
  • Contact
  • Contribute
  • Book
  • Careers
  • Podcast
  • Recommended
  • Speaking
  • All
  • Physician
  • Practice
  • Policy
  • Finance
  • Conditions
  • .edu
  • Patient
  • Meds
  • Tech
  • Social
  • Video
    • All
    • Physician
    • Practice
    • Policy
    • Finance
    • Conditions
    • .edu
    • Patient
    • Meds
    • Tech
    • Social
    • Video
    • About
    • Contact
    • Contribute
    • Book
    • Careers
    • Podcast
    • Recommended
    • Speaking

A blood test to detect melanoma? Not so fast.

J. Leonard Lichtenfeld, MD
Conditions
July 31, 2018
Share
Tweet
Share

The headline scrolling across the bottom of an evening news show certainly grabbed my attention: a new blood test had the possibility of detecting early melanoma and saving thousands of lives. And then there were more reports elevating this early research report to a point that I became quite interested — and frankly concerned.

News flash: The research is far from being shown to have proven value in the early diagnosis of melanoma, a less common but certainly potentially deadly form of skin cancer. I am not certain the various media headlines and articles appropriately reflected that fact, once again offering hype over inconvenient reality.

The researchers who wrote the report are from Australia, a country with a particularly high incidence of melanoma and a long history of trying to increase public awareness to prevent melanoma and alternatively find it early, when it is most effectively treated.

Basically, and in very simple terms, the researchers compared blood samples from a group of 104 early-stage melanoma patients and 105 healthy volunteers, then validated their results among a smaller group of 20 early stage patients and 16 healthy volunteers. They then analyzed these blood samples against a panel of 1627 protein markers in the blood, and eventually settled on a panel of 10 of these markers which — when taken together as a group — appeared to signal the presence of a melanoma when comparing the samples from the patients known to have melanoma to the patients who did not have the cancer.

The “scores” for the melanoma patients were higher than for the healthy controls, as noted by the authors. These 10 markers in combination were correctly “positive” (called “sensitivity,” that is finding a disease when it is present) in close to 8 out of 10 melanoma patients. That means it would miss 2 out of 10 melanomas). The test also correctly identified 85 percent of the healthy participants as not having melanoma (called “specificity“), which — importantly — means 15 percent of the patients who did not have melanoma were tagged as having the disease present when it wasn’t there).

That’s actually a pretty good showing for a new test that has not been rigorously evaluated. And that’s where the somewhat misleading news reports come in. This is not a test ready for general use. There is a lot more research to be done on much larger groups of patients to see if it really works as an “early detection” test. I guess it could work, but it’s a long way from what the headline implied when it blared, “Experimental blood test could detect melanoma skin cancer early, study finds.” My friends, I assure you that journey is one that will take probably years to travel to find out whether this test is the real deal and most important makes a real difference in the outcomes for the people who do develop melanoma.

To be honest, what I find so interesting is that this test was “positive” in patients who had very early melanomas, some I assume that were so small they would be hard to identify as melanoma. The actual surface measurements of the cancers weren’t provided (which would give some idea of how large they were), although there was some data regarding basic features of the melanomas studied: three quarters of the patients had melanomas that were less than 1 mm deep into the skin; 43 percent were “in situ” melanomas, which were not invasive and theoretically not at risk of spreading.

You may not be a melanoma expert, however, if you happen to know one they may well tell you those are early melanomas. And yet these early melanomas were apparently able to generate a complex antibody response that could be detected with a fairly high degree of accuracy according to the research.

Let’s just say that’s something I need to learn more about, namely how a very small lesion can produce enough antibody protein in the blood such that it would distinguish one person with a very small, early melanoma from another who did not have melanoma. I find that very intriguing. I am not aware of any commonly used blood-based protein test that is comparable that can make a claim to detect such a small amount of cancer with such a high degree accuracy to discriminate it from people who don’t have cancer. We are talking about millimeters here, not inches or ounces of tumor. I am not saying it can’t happen, just that I find it fascinating that it does.

It’s also important to note these blood tests were done in patients whose melanomas had already been diagnosed through routine diagnosis and excision, within one month after that diagnosis and in some cases as long as three months later — after the tumor was removed. And no patients with other cancers were tested to see how specific these results were to melanoma vs. possibly other cancers as well.  As noted below, the authors also make that point: at this juncture, it’s not certain these test results are necessarily specific to melanoma or even other illnesses.

Let me be clear here: I am not critical of the scientists’ methods or reports. I accept them at face value. However, I am critical of some in the media promoting this research as something that will in short order revolutionize the early detection of melanoma. That may happen one day, but not today and not tomorrow. And there is certainly no guarantee that it will happen, as history has shown us time and again.

I would like to close with some comments taken directly from the authors’ manuscript because I think they say exactly what needed to be said and should be shared with the public:

“Most importantly, the panel identified here must be validated using larger cohorts of melanoma patients and should include patients with other types of cancer or autoimmune diseases to ascertain whether the combination is melanoma-specific.”

ADVERTISEMENT

The problem, of course, is that level of caution doesn’t make for catchy headlines and doesn’t engender false optimism.

Time and again, we have seen the promise of early detection in some cancers crash on the shores of evidence. It’s time we learned that these “breakthroughs” require painstaking research both in the lab and the clinic before we really know whether they make a difference. And this test is no exception.

J. Leonard Lichtenfeld is deputy chief medical officer, American Cancer Society. He blogs at Dr. Len’s Cancer Blog.

Image credit: Shutterstock.com 

Prev

The misguided expectation of eliminating pain

July 31, 2018 Kevin 4
…
Next

Doctors need to lead the way on divestment from fossil fuels

July 31, 2018 Kevin 15
…

Tagged as: Dermatology, Oncology/Hematology

Post navigation

< Previous Post
The misguided expectation of eliminating pain
Next Post >
Doctors need to lead the way on divestment from fossil fuels

ADVERTISEMENT

More by J. Leonard Lichtenfeld, MD

  • Removing vaccine advisers could jeopardize lives

    J. Leonard Lichtenfeld, MD
  • Why won’t unproven COVID treatments go away?

    J. Leonard Lichtenfeld, MD
  • How can we improve the quality of medications?

    J. Leonard Lichtenfeld, MD

Related Posts

  • Medicine, fast and slow

    Claire Brown
  • The blood of patients is not a rhetorical device

    Andrew J. L. Smith
  • Health care professionals who fast and celebrate the month of Ramadan

    Nasir Malim, MD, MPH
  • Doctors ignore politics? Not so fast.

    Farzon A. Nahvi, MD
  • Qualifying conditions for medical marijuana

    Patricia Frye
  • Settlements in the opioid cases need these non-negotiable conditions

    Rosanne Aulino, RN

More in Conditions

  • Why medicine must stop worshipping burnout and start valuing humanity

    Sarah White, APRN
  • Why perinatal mental health is the top cause of maternal death in the U.S.

    Sheila Noon
  • A world without vaccines: What history teaches us about public health

    Drew Remignanti, MD, MPH
  • Unraveling the mystery behind one of the most dangerous pregnancy complications: preeclampsia

    Thomas McElrath, MD, PhD and Kara Rood, MD
  • How community paramedicine impacts Indigenous elders

    Noah Weinberg
  • Pain is more than physical: the story your body is trying to tell

    Katie Hatt, DO
  • Most Popular

  • Past Week

    • Why are medical students turning away from primary care? [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • Here’s what providers really need in a modern EHR

      Laura Kohlhagen, MD, MBA | Tech
    • Why “do no harm” might be harming modern medicine

      Sabooh S. Mubbashar, MD | Physician
    • How community paramedicine impacts Indigenous elders

      Noah Weinberg | Conditions
    • Why doctors are reclaiming control from burnout culture

      Maureen Gibbons, MD | Physician
    • Addressing U.S. vaccine inequities in vulnerable communities [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
  • Past 6 Months

    • Why tracking cognitive load could save doctors and patients

      Hiba Fatima Hamid | Education
    • Why are medical students turning away from primary care? [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • Why “do no harm” might be harming modern medicine

      Sabooh S. Mubbashar, MD | Physician
    • Here’s what providers really need in a modern EHR

      Laura Kohlhagen, MD, MBA | Tech
    • What the world must learn from the life and death of Hind Rajab

      Saba Qaiser, RN | Conditions
    • How medical culture hides burnout in plain sight

      Marco Benítez | Conditions
  • Recent Posts

    • Addressing U.S. vaccine inequities in vulnerable communities [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • Why Canada is losing its skilled immigrant doctors

      Olumuyiwa Bamgbade, MD | Physician
    • Why doctors are reclaiming control from burnout culture

      Maureen Gibbons, MD | Physician
    • Would The Pitts’ Dr. Robby Robinavitch welcome a new colleague? Yes. Especially if their initials were AI.

      Gabe Jones, MBA | Tech
    • Why medicine must stop worshipping burnout and start valuing humanity

      Sarah White, APRN | Conditions
    • Why screening for diseases you might have can backfire

      Andy Lazris, MD and Alan Roth, DO | Physician

Subscribe to KevinMD and never miss a story!

Get free updates delivered free to your inbox.


Find jobs at
Careers by KevinMD.com

Search thousands of physician, PA, NP, and CRNA jobs now.

Learn more

Leave a Comment

Founded in 2004 by Kevin Pho, MD, KevinMD.com is the web’s leading platform where physicians, advanced practitioners, nurses, medical students, and patients share their insight and tell their stories.

Social

  • Like on Facebook
  • Follow on Twitter
  • Connect on Linkedin
  • Subscribe on Youtube
  • Instagram

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Most Popular

  • Past Week

    • Why are medical students turning away from primary care? [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • Here’s what providers really need in a modern EHR

      Laura Kohlhagen, MD, MBA | Tech
    • Why “do no harm” might be harming modern medicine

      Sabooh S. Mubbashar, MD | Physician
    • How community paramedicine impacts Indigenous elders

      Noah Weinberg | Conditions
    • Why doctors are reclaiming control from burnout culture

      Maureen Gibbons, MD | Physician
    • Addressing U.S. vaccine inequities in vulnerable communities [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
  • Past 6 Months

    • Why tracking cognitive load could save doctors and patients

      Hiba Fatima Hamid | Education
    • Why are medical students turning away from primary care? [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • Why “do no harm” might be harming modern medicine

      Sabooh S. Mubbashar, MD | Physician
    • Here’s what providers really need in a modern EHR

      Laura Kohlhagen, MD, MBA | Tech
    • What the world must learn from the life and death of Hind Rajab

      Saba Qaiser, RN | Conditions
    • How medical culture hides burnout in plain sight

      Marco Benítez | Conditions
  • Recent Posts

    • Addressing U.S. vaccine inequities in vulnerable communities [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • Why Canada is losing its skilled immigrant doctors

      Olumuyiwa Bamgbade, MD | Physician
    • Why doctors are reclaiming control from burnout culture

      Maureen Gibbons, MD | Physician
    • Would The Pitts’ Dr. Robby Robinavitch welcome a new colleague? Yes. Especially if their initials were AI.

      Gabe Jones, MBA | Tech
    • Why medicine must stop worshipping burnout and start valuing humanity

      Sarah White, APRN | Conditions
    • Why screening for diseases you might have can backfire

      Andy Lazris, MD and Alan Roth, DO | Physician

MedPage Today Professional

An Everyday Health Property Medpage Today
  • Terms of Use | Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • DMCA Policy
All Content © KevinMD, LLC
Site by Outthink Group

Leave a Comment

Comments are moderated before they are published. Please read the comment policy.

Loading Comments...