Skip to content
  • About
  • Contact
  • Contribute
  • Book
  • Careers
  • Podcast
  • Recommended
  • Speaking
  • All
  • Physician
  • Practice
  • Policy
  • Finance
  • Conditions
  • .edu
  • Patient
  • Meds
  • Tech
  • Social
  • Video
    • All
    • Physician
    • Practice
    • Policy
    • Finance
    • Conditions
    • .edu
    • Patient
    • Meds
    • Tech
    • Social
    • Video
    • About
    • Contact
    • Contribute
    • Book
    • Careers
    • Podcast
    • Recommended
    • Speaking

MOC: When you play the game and they change the rules

Xrayvsn, MD
Physician
January 25, 2019
Share
Tweet
Share

I think one of the biggest frustrations I have as a doctor is being at the mercy of people who either have no medical training or are so detached from medicine that they have lost touch with those on the front line.

The American Board of Radiology (ABR) essentially governs over radiologists who typically need the important board-certified designation to find a place of employment.

I have always played by the rules dictated by the ABR and have toed the line with whatever rules/mandates have come from high above.

However, it seems like playing by the rules is indeed not enough as this particular board appears to continually change its stance on multiple issues.

Some of these wide-sweeping rule changes occurred while I was still training as a radiology resident.

When I went into the radiology residency program, graduating radiology residents would be granted a lifetime board certification upon completion of training (including taking three separate examinations).

I was in my 2nd year in radiology residency when the first significant impact hit.

The ABR at that point decided that there will no longer be lifetime board certification and made the change to 10-year time-limited board certification.

The class of graduating residents, two years above me, just made the cut and were allowed to obtain certification the old way and were “grandfathered” in.

Rather than allowing any resident currently training also to be grandfathered in (essentially three more years of trainees), the ABR said that the year above me would be the first to be subject to the new time-limited certification.

Alas as a group, residents typically have no voice and whatever protests were being made across the country were drowned out by the machine.

The financial ramifications of just missing the cut are not insignificant.

There are yearly fees paid to the ABR as well as other expenses associated with maintaining your board certification, all which are not carried by those that have unlimited certification.

ADVERTISEMENT

Despite all of this, I did make peace with the lot I was cast in and dutifully followed the outline provided by the ABR to maintain my board certification.

Essentially my year and the year above were the guinea pigs in the system.

We were told that there would be a cognitive exam we would have to take and pass before our initial ten-year certification lapsing.

For the longest time, there was no study materials available or even an idea of what would be covered in this exam as the exam had not even been created.

There were no review courses or asking colleagues what to expect as no one had ever done this.

On top of that issue, there was also minimal locations where you could take the exam.

I was eligible to take the exam in 2011 which I registered for and made plans in 2010.

Because of the limited examination locations across the country, I ended up having to make arrangements to take it in Chicago.

This required me to take time off work, book a hotel, and incur additional expenses, all under the pretense that this would allow me to have another decade of hassle-free practice as the cognitive exam reset the clock on the ten-year time limit certification.

I, fortunately, passed the MOC cognitive exam on the first attempt.

Technically my ABR certification was now set to expire in 2022, and this is how things remained until 2018 when once again the ABR in its infinite wisdom chose to change the rules.

You see, in 2018 the ABR started sending multiple email proclamations essentially rejoicing that they are doing the radiologists a considerable service and instead of taking a cognitive exam every ten years, diplomates in radiology would now essentially be subjected to weekly quizzes.

The ABR replacement for the Maintenance of Certification Cognitive exam was given the moniker Online Longitudinal Assessment (OLA).

Essentially each radiologist is subject to a weekly quiz answering one question a week from the two questions provided (essentially 52 questions a year).

When I first got the news, I assumed that, because I had already taken and passed the cognitive exam in 2011 and it was good for ten years after my initial certification expired, I would be exempt from these quizzes.

To be sure, I contacted the ABR to see if this was indeed the case.

To my dismay, l was informed I had to take the OLA like the rest of the time limited board-certified radiologists starting in January 2019.

Essentially I ended up only using 60 percent of my ten-year certification before the rules changed yet again and I am now forced to be a player in the latest game.

Rather than do the honorable thing and at least acknowledge the remaining time on the cognitive exam the ABR essentially did not care about the sacrifices (both in time and cost) that those individuals had to undertake.

And as bad as it felt for me, there were some who had it even worse.

I know of one radiologist who took the cognitive exam in 2016 and two months later was informed it was no longer going to be valid moving forward.

For my non-physician audience, it may seem that the premise behind ongoing maintenance of certification is a good thing as it forces doctors to take tests, etc. to prove their competency.

However, there is growing evidence that this is indeed not the case.

The American Board of Medicine has especially been put under the crosshairs as several diplomates of internal medicine have pursued legal recourse against it.

In essence, the board of each medical specialty has enjoyed a huge monopoly with an extremely captive target audience.

Several grassroots organizations have started to dot the medical landscape hoping to provide an alternative to the various specialty boards, one gaining early traction is the National Board of Physicians And Surgeons.

It has yet to be seen if hospitals and insurance companies will start recognizing certification from these alternative organizations, but I hope that they will.

If physicians start voting with their checkbooks as well as their memberships we may have a fighting chance in a system that has always treated us as an afterthought.

“Xrayvsn” is a radiologist and can be reached at his self-titled site, XRAYVSN.

Image credit: Shutterstock.com

Prev

How EMR alert fatigue overwhelms physicians

January 25, 2019 Kevin 0
…
Next

We have a shot at preventing cervical cancer

January 25, 2019 Kevin 1
…

Tagged as: Practice Management, Radiology

Post navigation

< Previous Post
How EMR alert fatigue overwhelms physicians
Next Post >
We have a shot at preventing cervical cancer

ADVERTISEMENT

More by Xrayvsn, MD

  • The white coat won’t protect you from financial ruin

    Xrayvsn, MD
  • Combat burnout one bite at a time

    Xrayvsn, MD
  • Does the patient come last in health care?

    Xrayvsn, MD

Related Posts

  • Physicians who don’t play the social media game may be left behind

    Xrayvsn, MD
  • We need to change the way we talk about climate change

    Jacob A. Fox
  • Think deeply about ways you can use your power as a physician to make change

    Danielle Plattenburg Arnold, MD
  • Why residency applications need to change

    Sean Kiesel, DO, MBA
  • Please change the culture of surgery

    Anonymous
  • Antibiotic resistance is the climate change of medicine

    Eric Beam, MD

More in Physician

  • How to handle chronically late patients in your medical practice

    Neil Baum, MD
  • How early meetings and after-hours events penalize physician-mothers

    Samira Jeimy, MD, PhD and Menaka Pai, MD
  • Why medicine must evolve to support modern physicians

    Ryan Nadelson, MD
  • Why listening to parents’ intuition can save lives in pediatric care

    Tokunbo Akande, MD, MPH
  • Finding balance and meaning in medical practice: a holistic approach to professional fulfillment

    Dr. Saad S. Alshohaib
  • How regulatory overreach is destroying innovation in U.S. health care

    Kayvan Haddadan, MD
  • Most Popular

  • Past Week

    • Forced voicemail and diagnosis codes are endangering patient access to medications

      Arthur Lazarus, MD, MBA | Meds
    • How President Biden’s cognitive health shapes political and legal trust

      Muhamad Aly Rifai, MD | Conditions
    • The One Big Beautiful Bill and the fragile heart of rural health care

      Holland Haynie, MD | Policy
    • Why timing, not surgery, determines patient survival

      Michael Karch, MD | Conditions
    • Why health care leaders fail at execution—and how to fix it

      Dave Cummings, RN | Policy
    • How digital tools are reshaping the doctor-patient relationship

      Vineet Vishwanath | Tech
  • Past 6 Months

    • Forced voicemail and diagnosis codes are endangering patient access to medications

      Arthur Lazarus, MD, MBA | Meds
    • How President Biden’s cognitive health shapes political and legal trust

      Muhamad Aly Rifai, MD | Conditions
    • Why are medical students turning away from primary care? [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • The One Big Beautiful Bill and the fragile heart of rural health care

      Holland Haynie, MD | Policy
    • Why “do no harm” might be harming modern medicine

      Sabooh S. Mubbashar, MD | Physician
    • The hidden health risks in the One Big Beautiful Bill Act

      Trevor Lyford, MPH | Policy
  • Recent Posts

    • Why point-of-care ultrasound belongs in every emergency department triage [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • Why PSA levels alone shouldn’t define your prostate cancer risk

      Martina Ambardjieva, MD, PhD | Conditions
    • How to handle chronically late patients in your medical practice

      Neil Baum, MD | Physician
    • Reframing chronic pain and dignity: What a pain clinic teaches us about MAiD and chronic suffering

      Olumuyiwa Bamgbade, MD | Conditions
    • How early meetings and after-hours events penalize physician-mothers

      Samira Jeimy, MD, PhD and Menaka Pai, MD | Physician
    • Why medicine must evolve to support modern physicians

      Ryan Nadelson, MD | Physician

Subscribe to KevinMD and never miss a story!

Get free updates delivered free to your inbox.


Find jobs at
Careers by KevinMD.com

Search thousands of physician, PA, NP, and CRNA jobs now.

Learn more

View 11 Comments >

Founded in 2004 by Kevin Pho, MD, KevinMD.com is the web’s leading platform where physicians, advanced practitioners, nurses, medical students, and patients share their insight and tell their stories.

Social

  • Like on Facebook
  • Follow on Twitter
  • Connect on Linkedin
  • Subscribe on Youtube
  • Instagram

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Most Popular

  • Past Week

    • Forced voicemail and diagnosis codes are endangering patient access to medications

      Arthur Lazarus, MD, MBA | Meds
    • How President Biden’s cognitive health shapes political and legal trust

      Muhamad Aly Rifai, MD | Conditions
    • The One Big Beautiful Bill and the fragile heart of rural health care

      Holland Haynie, MD | Policy
    • Why timing, not surgery, determines patient survival

      Michael Karch, MD | Conditions
    • Why health care leaders fail at execution—and how to fix it

      Dave Cummings, RN | Policy
    • How digital tools are reshaping the doctor-patient relationship

      Vineet Vishwanath | Tech
  • Past 6 Months

    • Forced voicemail and diagnosis codes are endangering patient access to medications

      Arthur Lazarus, MD, MBA | Meds
    • How President Biden’s cognitive health shapes political and legal trust

      Muhamad Aly Rifai, MD | Conditions
    • Why are medical students turning away from primary care? [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • The One Big Beautiful Bill and the fragile heart of rural health care

      Holland Haynie, MD | Policy
    • Why “do no harm” might be harming modern medicine

      Sabooh S. Mubbashar, MD | Physician
    • The hidden health risks in the One Big Beautiful Bill Act

      Trevor Lyford, MPH | Policy
  • Recent Posts

    • Why point-of-care ultrasound belongs in every emergency department triage [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • Why PSA levels alone shouldn’t define your prostate cancer risk

      Martina Ambardjieva, MD, PhD | Conditions
    • How to handle chronically late patients in your medical practice

      Neil Baum, MD | Physician
    • Reframing chronic pain and dignity: What a pain clinic teaches us about MAiD and chronic suffering

      Olumuyiwa Bamgbade, MD | Conditions
    • How early meetings and after-hours events penalize physician-mothers

      Samira Jeimy, MD, PhD and Menaka Pai, MD | Physician
    • Why medicine must evolve to support modern physicians

      Ryan Nadelson, MD | Physician

MedPage Today Professional

An Everyday Health Property Medpage Today
  • Terms of Use | Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • DMCA Policy
All Content © KevinMD, LLC
Site by Outthink Group

MOC: When you play the game and they change the rules
11 comments

Comments are moderated before they are published. Please read the comment policy.

Loading Comments...