Skip to content
  • About
  • Contact
  • Contribute
  • Book
  • Careers
  • Podcast
  • Recommended
  • Speaking
  • All
  • Physician
  • Practice
  • Policy
  • Finance
  • Conditions
  • .edu
  • Patient
  • Meds
  • Tech
  • Social
  • Video
    • All
    • Physician
    • Practice
    • Policy
    • Finance
    • Conditions
    • .edu
    • Patient
    • Meds
    • Tech
    • Social
    • Video
    • About
    • Contact
    • Contribute
    • Book
    • Careers
    • Podcast
    • Recommended
    • Speaking

The destructive health consequences of political polarization

Philip A. Masters, MD
Physician
February 3, 2021
Share
Tweet
Share

acp new logo

A guest column by the American College of Physicians, exclusive to KevinMD.

Political divisiveness has always been part of the fabric of America.  Even as our Founders laid the groundwork for the United States, they understood the challenges of seeking to assemble a unified and functional country from such a wide geographic and culturally diverse landscape.  In establishing a country based on the central principles of freedom, liberty, and a shared common good, they also recognized that in a free society there would always be an attraction to personal and tribal instincts that, if not tempered, could threaten the function and even the existence of the fragile construct of a democracy.  In fact, George Washington called partisanship in its most extreme form a potentially fatal tendency inherent to democratic systems.  This is why our country’s operational principles are enshrined in a constitution with mechanisms to moderate partisan impulses, such as the separation of power and multiple checks and balances on how it is manifest.

Although our country has managed to survive and ultimately thrive since its founding, our history has been punctuated by periods of extreme political upheaval, including one that led to a devastatingly traumatic civil war.  And it now seems that we again find ourselves in the depths of another period of significant political divisiveness as seen in the rhetorical vitriol present in the public square, an inability to work from a set of accepted basic facts, or agreement on what actually constitutes the common good.  This politically polarized climate is seemingly permeating nearly every aspect of our society, including our culture and even sports, both of which have traditionally been safe retreats for many from daily life stressors.  And the politicization of medically-related issues has had a markedly negative impact on the health of our nation, society, and individual patients.

This current level of divisiveness has compromised the ability for us to collectively address our most urgent public health needs, which has in turn exacerbated the suffering and death toll we have experienced during the concurrent pandemic.  And we have also not been able to effectively confront and rectify the other economic and social determinants of health that have been so dramatically exposed during the global health crisis.

This divisiveness has also extended into the patient-physician relationship.  Effective medical care requires that we frequently engage with patients around potentially politically salient health issues such as sexual behavior, drug use, or firearm safety.  And in the time of a pandemic, we are obligated to discuss personal and public safety measures such as mask-wearing and immunization.  However, in my own practice, I sense a markedly increased level of wariness, suspicion, and at times downright anger by patients when even broaching these important topics.  I’ve even had patients, some of whom I have followed for many years, seek to provoke interchanges around those things they feel strongly about from a political perspective.  This has clearly damaged the ability to establish and sustain meaningful therapeutic relationships and mutual commitments to working alongside many of our patients in seeking to maintain and improve their health.

So as physicians, how do we begin to bridge this political divide and work toward developing a less divisive culture and restoring a genuinely collaborative approach toward optimizing our society and patients’ health?

Although there is no easy or perfect answer, we can start by remembering that health care has always been a primary human issue long before it became a political one, and will certainly remain so once we are able to move beyond our current level of divisiveness and polarization.

As a profession, it’s critical that we continue to provide consistent, scientifically-based, and unbiased information regarding health-related issues devoid of, but not being insensitive to, the potential social or political meaning that it may have for many.  But perhaps more importantly, we need to identify and seek to build consensus around those health outcomes that we share and mutually value as humans, regardless of our political viewpoints, as a way of transcending our divided culture and enabling us to work together to find practical solutions to achieve them.

And at the individual patient level, it requires that we similarly seek to find common ground around health issues that are most important to them, and do so in a compassionate, empathic, and non-judgmental way.  Only then can we connect with them in the truly human-to-human way based on mutual interest and respect that is central to the patient-physician relationship.  In this way, we can hopefully develop a sense of trust with each other and rise above the reflexive, emotional responses that result in the divisiveness and polarization that has been so damaging in the current environment.

In the end, we need to understand that the same deep passions that are the foundation of our divisiveness are much the same as those that brought us together as a society and country in the first place.  The challenge is for each of us to understand that what unites us far exceeds those things that divide us, and that the health of our patients and nation will be better if we can recognize this.

Philip A. Masters is vice-president, Membership and International Programs, American College of Physicians. His statements do not necessarily reflect official policies of ACP.

Image credit: Shutterstock.com

Prev

COVID-19 vaccines are safe for people with severe allergies

February 3, 2021 Kevin 2
…
Next

Caregiving for COVID at home: a physician story

February 3, 2021 Kevin 0
…

ADVERTISEMENT

Tagged as: American College of Physicians, COVID, Primary Care

Post navigation

< Previous Post
COVID-19 vaccines are safe for people with severe allergies
Next Post >
Caregiving for COVID at home: a physician story

ADVERTISEMENT

More by Philip A. Masters, MD

  • Reflections on caring for parents with dementia

    Philip A. Masters, MD
  • Reflections of an aging physician

    Philip A. Masters, MD
  • Doctors can get angry, too

    Philip A. Masters, MD

Related Posts

  • Political polarization is harming America’s health

    Kunal Sindhu, MD
  • The unintended consequences of population health algorithms

    Betty Rabinowitz, MD
  • Are negative news cycles and social media injurious to our health?

    Rabia Jalal, MD
  • How social media can help or hurt your health care career

    Health eCareers
  • Sharing mental health issues on social media

    Tarena Lofton
  • Political games are destroying our national state of health

    Kurt R. Bravata, MD

More in Physician

  • EMR cognitive burden: the hidden cost of documentation

    Matthew Ryan, MD, PhD
  • The Dr. Google debate: Building a doctor-patient partnership

    Santina Wheat, MD, MPH
  • Physician coaching: a path to sustainable medicine

    Ben Reinking, MD
  • Physician investment in patients: ethical risks and rewards

    Francisco M. Torres, MD
  • How physician coaching helps restore energy reserves

    Diane W. Shannon, MD, MPH
  • Why physician wellness programs must evolve beyond institutions

    Jessie Mahoney, MD
  • Most Popular

  • Past Week

    • Why doctors struggle with treating friends and family

      Rebecca Margolis, DO and Alyson Axelrod, DO | Physician
    • When racism findings challenge institutional narratives

      Anonymous | Physician
    • GLP-1 psychological side effects: a psychiatrist’s view

      Farid Sabet-Sharghi, MD | Conditions
    • Why lab monkey escapes demand transparency

      Mikalah Singer, JD | Policy
    • Student loan cuts for health professionals

      Naa Asheley Ashitey | Policy
    • Artificial intelligence offers a lifeline to overwhelmed clinicians [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
  • Past 6 Months

    • Why patient trust in physicians is declining

      Mansi Kotwal, MD, MPH | Physician
    • The blind men and the elephant: a parable for modern pain management

      Richard A. Lawhern, PhD | Conditions
    • Is primary care becoming a triage station?

      J. Leonard Lichtenfeld, MD | Physician
    • Psychiatrists are physicians: a key distinction

      Farid Sabet-Sharghi, MD | Physician
    • Why feeling unlike yourself is a sign of physician emotional overload

      Stephanie Wellington, MD | Physician
    • The loss of community pharmacy expertise

      Muhammad Abdullah Khan | Conditions
  • Recent Posts

    • Artificial intelligence offers a lifeline to overwhelmed clinicians [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • The most venomous sea creatures to avoid

      Ashely Alker, MD | Conditions
    • Adult autism assessment: ADOS-4 vs. narrative interviewing

      Carrie Friedman, NP | Conditions
    • AI in medicine risks: the new Oracle of Delphi?

      Harvey Castro, MD, MBA | Tech
    • Geography as destiny: the truth about U.S. life expectancy disparities

      Arthur Lazarus, MD, MBA | Policy
    • EMR cognitive burden: the hidden cost of documentation

      Matthew Ryan, MD, PhD | Physician

Subscribe to KevinMD and never miss a story!

Get free updates delivered free to your inbox.


Find jobs at
Careers by KevinMD.com

Search thousands of physician, PA, NP, and CRNA jobs now.

Learn more

View 2 Comments >

Founded in 2004 by Kevin Pho, MD, KevinMD.com is the web’s leading platform where physicians, advanced practitioners, nurses, medical students, and patients share their insight and tell their stories.

Social

  • Like on Facebook
  • Follow on Twitter
  • Connect on Linkedin
  • Subscribe on Youtube
  • Instagram

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Most Popular

  • Past Week

    • Why doctors struggle with treating friends and family

      Rebecca Margolis, DO and Alyson Axelrod, DO | Physician
    • When racism findings challenge institutional narratives

      Anonymous | Physician
    • GLP-1 psychological side effects: a psychiatrist’s view

      Farid Sabet-Sharghi, MD | Conditions
    • Why lab monkey escapes demand transparency

      Mikalah Singer, JD | Policy
    • Student loan cuts for health professionals

      Naa Asheley Ashitey | Policy
    • Artificial intelligence offers a lifeline to overwhelmed clinicians [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
  • Past 6 Months

    • Why patient trust in physicians is declining

      Mansi Kotwal, MD, MPH | Physician
    • The blind men and the elephant: a parable for modern pain management

      Richard A. Lawhern, PhD | Conditions
    • Is primary care becoming a triage station?

      J. Leonard Lichtenfeld, MD | Physician
    • Psychiatrists are physicians: a key distinction

      Farid Sabet-Sharghi, MD | Physician
    • Why feeling unlike yourself is a sign of physician emotional overload

      Stephanie Wellington, MD | Physician
    • The loss of community pharmacy expertise

      Muhammad Abdullah Khan | Conditions
  • Recent Posts

    • Artificial intelligence offers a lifeline to overwhelmed clinicians [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • The most venomous sea creatures to avoid

      Ashely Alker, MD | Conditions
    • Adult autism assessment: ADOS-4 vs. narrative interviewing

      Carrie Friedman, NP | Conditions
    • AI in medicine risks: the new Oracle of Delphi?

      Harvey Castro, MD, MBA | Tech
    • Geography as destiny: the truth about U.S. life expectancy disparities

      Arthur Lazarus, MD, MBA | Policy
    • EMR cognitive burden: the hidden cost of documentation

      Matthew Ryan, MD, PhD | Physician

MedPage Today Professional

An Everyday Health Property Medpage Today
  • Terms of Use | Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • DMCA Policy
All Content © KevinMD, LLC
Site by Outthink Group

The destructive health consequences of political polarization
2 comments

Comments are moderated before they are published. Please read the comment policy.

Loading Comments...