Skip to content
  • About
  • Contact
  • Contribute
  • Book
  • Careers
  • Podcast
  • Recommended
  • Speaking
  • All
  • Physician
  • Practice
  • Policy
  • Finance
  • Conditions
  • .edu
  • Patient
  • Meds
  • Tech
  • Social
  • Video
    • All
    • Physician
    • Practice
    • Policy
    • Finance
    • Conditions
    • .edu
    • Patient
    • Meds
    • Tech
    • Social
    • Video
    • About
    • Contact
    • Contribute
    • Book
    • Careers
    • Podcast
    • Recommended
    • Speaking

The hidden costs of “free” medical interpretation

Victoria Johnson, MD, MPH and Maria Isabel Angulo, MD
Physician
December 22, 2023
Share
Tweet
Share

He is a typical patient of our academic primary care internal medicine practice: elderly, frail, and with several complex conditions, including a history of a liver transplant requiring chronic immunosuppression, recurrent venous thrombosis requiring treatment with blood thinners, and type 2 diabetes. But in one very important way, he is different: our doctors don’t speak his language.

It is his fourth visit in the past six months, and, as usual, the allotted time is 20 minutes, the amount of time we are given for follow-ups. The last few months have been difficult for him. He was hospitalized for a respiratory illness, then later he had a fall requiring an emergency room visit. Today, his most pressing concern is worsening osteoarthritic knee pain, which is now limiting his ability to walk.

It is not uncommon for us to end up going substantially over the allotted time for his visits. Despite this, we can’t get to one of our main jobs: addressing his poorly controlled diabetes. We have spent all of our recent visits “putting out fires,” and, after our entire conversation gets translated, we just don’t have enough time for anything else. It’s hard not to wonder if he were an English-speaking patient, would this be the case?

Research demonstrates that language barriers impact multiple aspects of care quality. Federal law requires that the approximately 25 million patients in the U.S. with limited English proficiency (LEP), who do not speak English as their primary language, have “meaningful access” to programs and services receiving federal funding.

In the best scenario, patients with LEP are provided, free of charge, with a qualified interpreter for all health care interactions, as mandated but incompletely enforced. However, this does not go far enough to ensure equitable care for patients with LEP. For medical interpretation to be effective and result in meaningful access to high-quality care, more time is required to accommodate the need for interpretation. Unsurprisingly, 85 percent of community health centers reported that visits for patients with LEP require more time.

When everything must be said twice, it takes, roughly, twice as long to communicate with a patient through an interpreter. Additional preparation time is also needed to arrange for an interpreter, and often, extra time is needed to reconnect with a remote interpreter when a connection is lost. Time allotted for clinical encounters should reflect the additional needs of patients with LEP who require an interpreter to communicate with a language-discordant clinician.

However, extra time is not always allowed, likely due to a lack of adequate reimbursement for medical interpreter services, as well as health care financing structures that disincentivize longer office visit times. There is no legislation mandating extra time for interpretation during clinical encounters, and so it is up to the health system or independent practitioner to determine appointment length for visits requiring an interpreter.

Due to interpreter expenses, health care providers may be operating at a loss by seeing patients with LEP. As such, it might not be fiscally responsible to allow for the extra time needed for these visits, especially for providers seeing higher volumes of patients with LEP. Patients with LEP pay the same insurance co-pay for a primary care visit as an English-speaking patient with the same coverage, but they may very well be receiving essentially half the care, assuming doctors spend the amount of time allotted.

Clinicians are between a rock and a hard place; they can either provide equitable care by extending the visit time required for communicating with a patient via an interpreter, or they can stay on schedule and provide less care. Many times, clinicians will go above and beyond to make sure patients get the same care as English-speaking patients, but this is difficult to sustain. Such a system is inherently inequitable, as it does not foster the conditions necessary for the consistent delivery of high-quality care to everyone.

Meaningful access to health care services for patients with LEP requires not just the availability of a professional interpreter but also time for interpretation. As long as there is inadequate reimbursement for interpreter services and a lack of protection for the extra time medical interpretation takes, the care of patients with LEP will likely continue to be negatively impacted. Our nation of immigrants should do better to ensure equitable care for all.

Victoria Johnson and Maria Isabel Angulo are internal medicine physicians.

Prev

The doctor's guide to dividend wealth: Building a resilient portfolio with smart investments

December 22, 2023 Kevin 0
…
Next

Breaking down weight management: insights from a bariatric expert [PODCAST]

December 22, 2023 Kevin 0
…

Tagged as: Primary Care

Post navigation

< Previous Post
The doctor's guide to dividend wealth: Building a resilient portfolio with smart investments
Next Post >
Breaking down weight management: insights from a bariatric expert [PODCAST]

ADVERTISEMENT

Related Posts

  • Health care’s hidden problem: hospital primary care losses

    Christopher Habig, MBA
  • The solution to a crumbling primary care foundation is direct primary care

    Sara Pastoor, MD
  • Primary Care First: CMS develops a value-based primary care program for independent practices

    Robert Colton, MD
  • Digital advances in the medical aid in dying movement

    Jennifer Lynn
  • Why medical students need more continuity of care training

    Nathaniel Fleming
  • Does socialized medical care provide higher quality than private care?

    Peter Ubel, MD

More in Physician

  • How subjective likability practices undermine Canada’s health workforce recruitment and retention

    Olumuyiwa Bamgbade, MD
  • Why judgment is hurting doctors—and how mindfulness can heal

    Jessie Mahoney, MD
  • Why evidence-based management may be an effective strategy for stronger health care leadership and equity

    Olumuyiwa Bamgbade, MD
  • The gift we keep giving: How medicine demands everything—even our holidays

    Tomi Mitchell, MD
  • From burnout to balance: a neurosurgeon’s bold career redesign

    Jessie Mahoney, MD
  • Why working in Hawai’i health care isn’t all paradise

    Clayton Foster, MD
  • Most Popular

  • Past Week

    • The hidden health risks in the One Big Beautiful Bill Act

      Trevor Lyford, MPH | Policy
    • How New Mexico became a malpractice lawsuit hotspot

      Patrick Hudson, MD | Physician
    • Why doctors are reclaiming control from burnout culture

      Maureen Gibbons, MD | Physician
    • Why health care leaders fail at execution—and how to fix it

      Dave Cummings, RN | Policy
    • How digital tools are reshaping the doctor-patient relationship

      Vineet Vishwanath | Tech
    • How President Biden’s cognitive health shapes political and legal trust

      Muhamad Aly Rifai, MD | Conditions
  • Past 6 Months

    • Why are medical students turning away from primary care? [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • What the world must learn from the life and death of Hind Rajab

      Saba Qaiser, RN | Conditions
    • Why “do no harm” might be harming modern medicine

      Sabooh S. Mubbashar, MD | Physician
    • Here’s what providers really need in a modern EHR

      Laura Kohlhagen, MD, MBA | Tech
    • The hidden health risks in the One Big Beautiful Bill Act

      Trevor Lyford, MPH | Policy
    • Why Medicaid cuts should alarm every doctor

      Ilan Shapiro, MD | Policy
  • Recent Posts

    • How President Biden’s cognitive health shapes political and legal trust

      Muhamad Aly Rifai, MD | Conditions
    • Decoding your medical bill: What those charges really mean

      Cheryl Spang | Finance
    • The emotional first responders of aesthetic medicine

      Sarah White, APRN | Conditions
    • Why testosterone matters more than you think in women’s health

      Andrea Caamano, MD | Conditions
    • A mind to guide the machine: Why physicians must help shape artificial intelligence in medicine

      Shanice Spence-Miller, MD | Tech
    • How subjective likability practices undermine Canada’s health workforce recruitment and retention

      Olumuyiwa Bamgbade, MD | Physician

Subscribe to KevinMD and never miss a story!

Get free updates delivered free to your inbox.


Find jobs at
Careers by KevinMD.com

Search thousands of physician, PA, NP, and CRNA jobs now.

Learn more

Leave a Comment

Founded in 2004 by Kevin Pho, MD, KevinMD.com is the web’s leading platform where physicians, advanced practitioners, nurses, medical students, and patients share their insight and tell their stories.

Social

  • Like on Facebook
  • Follow on Twitter
  • Connect on Linkedin
  • Subscribe on Youtube
  • Instagram

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Most Popular

  • Past Week

    • The hidden health risks in the One Big Beautiful Bill Act

      Trevor Lyford, MPH | Policy
    • How New Mexico became a malpractice lawsuit hotspot

      Patrick Hudson, MD | Physician
    • Why doctors are reclaiming control from burnout culture

      Maureen Gibbons, MD | Physician
    • Why health care leaders fail at execution—and how to fix it

      Dave Cummings, RN | Policy
    • How digital tools are reshaping the doctor-patient relationship

      Vineet Vishwanath | Tech
    • How President Biden’s cognitive health shapes political and legal trust

      Muhamad Aly Rifai, MD | Conditions
  • Past 6 Months

    • Why are medical students turning away from primary care? [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • What the world must learn from the life and death of Hind Rajab

      Saba Qaiser, RN | Conditions
    • Why “do no harm” might be harming modern medicine

      Sabooh S. Mubbashar, MD | Physician
    • Here’s what providers really need in a modern EHR

      Laura Kohlhagen, MD, MBA | Tech
    • The hidden health risks in the One Big Beautiful Bill Act

      Trevor Lyford, MPH | Policy
    • Why Medicaid cuts should alarm every doctor

      Ilan Shapiro, MD | Policy
  • Recent Posts

    • How President Biden’s cognitive health shapes political and legal trust

      Muhamad Aly Rifai, MD | Conditions
    • Decoding your medical bill: What those charges really mean

      Cheryl Spang | Finance
    • The emotional first responders of aesthetic medicine

      Sarah White, APRN | Conditions
    • Why testosterone matters more than you think in women’s health

      Andrea Caamano, MD | Conditions
    • A mind to guide the machine: Why physicians must help shape artificial intelligence in medicine

      Shanice Spence-Miller, MD | Tech
    • How subjective likability practices undermine Canada’s health workforce recruitment and retention

      Olumuyiwa Bamgbade, MD | Physician

MedPage Today Professional

An Everyday Health Property Medpage Today
  • Terms of Use | Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • DMCA Policy
All Content © KevinMD, LLC
Site by Outthink Group

Leave a Comment

Comments are moderated before they are published. Please read the comment policy.

Loading Comments...