Skip to content
  • About
  • Contact
  • Contribute
  • Book
  • Careers
  • Podcast
  • Recommended
  • Speaking
  • All
  • Physician
  • Practice
  • Policy
  • Finance
  • Conditions
  • .edu
  • Patient
  • Meds
  • Tech
  • Social
  • Video
    • All
    • Physician
    • Practice
    • Policy
    • Finance
    • Conditions
    • .edu
    • Patient
    • Meds
    • Tech
    • Social
    • Video
    • About
    • Contact
    • Contribute
    • Book
    • Careers
    • Podcast
    • Recommended
    • Speaking

On being a doctor and an advocate

Gene Uzawa Dorio, MD
Physician
April 27, 2024
Share
Tweet
Share

I opened my internal medicine practice almost four decades ago to serve a growing urban community. I gravitated toward the underserved geriatric population as they were vulnerable patients and eventually moved into the bygone realm of house calls for home-bound seniors.

This enhanced my learning curve, as house calls are not taught in medical school or residency yet bridge the continuity gap between hospitalization and patients returning home after an acute illness. I spent many hours at our local hospital admitting older patients and managing their care once they were discharged home.

From this perspective, I saw the growing takeover of medical decision-making by doctors, which was then relinquished to hospital administrators.

As an outspoken medical staff member, I was urged to participate in the physician medical executive committee. My peers elected me for five years, and I served as chairman of the department of medicine for three years. I also chaired many hospital committees.

I clung to the hope of working within the hospital system to improve care. This did not happen. Several of my doctor colleagues were continually under siege from the hospital administration for speaking out against aberrant care. Immediately after my election, I became a target with false allegations of “corrective action” and code of conduct violations.

Questionable policies and procedures developed by the hospital administration raised concern. I reported them multiple times to oversight agencies, resulting in financial and operational sanctions.

Consequently, I was forced to jump through many hoops to remain on staff. For instance, most doctors know one must re-apply for staff privileges, usually every two years. The hospital administration made me re-apply every four months.

The hospital had a financial stranglehold on many doctor groups, with administrative tactics dangling contracts swaying them to vote to enrich profits augmenting administrative salaries, bonuses, and retirement packages.

In line with this, the hospital board of director members were awarded construction work, bank deposits, hospital building real estate leases, and medical office space for doctors appointed to the board. In exchange, the hospital administration also obtained their vote.

Quality health care was only a public relations illusion and was compromised at the hospital.

Functioning under duress made it challenging to work within the system, not only with aggressive and derisive tactics against doctors but with legal issues as well.

A prime example of this came when I was chairperson of the ethics committee.

The hospital administration notified me that the committee would convene for an emergency meeting concerning a critically ill ICU patient.

ADVERTISEMENT

This 50-year-old gentleman had arrived unconscious, did not have an advance directive for health care, and was intubated.

His family, including his wife and three adult children, was present, as were two lawyers, one from the hospital and the other from the patient’s HMO. Three physicians and two community members whom I had appointed were also included on the committee. One was a member of the city planning commission, and the other was a local attorney.

Since the patient did not have an advance directive and could not verbally state his wishes, the lawyers contended that by law, the HMO and hospital administration could assume responsibility for making medical decisions.

The family passionately objected, requesting that care be continued, as they were told the hospital intended to “pull the plug” after a two-week stay as medical care was “futile.”

The local attorney quickly looked up California law and found that the hospital and HMO attorney were correct. We informed the family that the hospital and HMO could make medical decisions. Their frustrated statement, “There oughta be a law!” flowed tears.

Other ethics committee members were also disheartened, but before adjournment as chair, I warned the hospital legal team that if the community somehow finds out about this outrageous takeover of medical decision-making, it could negatively reflect on the hospital’s health care.

More appalling was the realization the hospital and HMO found a loophole in state law and wanted to use it against their patients and the community.

My wife and I have been senior advocates for decades and even organized a picket of the hospital when they decided to close the transitional care unit, which served as a stepping stone for older adults from acute care to home.

Subsequently, we were elected to a governmental group known as the California Senior Legislature, which helped us submit a proposal to the legislature.

In our research, 46 out of 50 states had hierarchy laws allowing family members to be placed at the top of the list should a patient be admitted to a hospital without an advance directive and could not consciously make medical decisions. California was one of those states that had a loophole.

We worked with state assembly member Mike Gibson from Los Angeles and his staff, presenting live testimony online and in Sacramento to the legislative assembly and senate committees to support our proposal, AB 2338 2022.

It passed unanimously and was signed into law by the governor of California.

It is common to hear about the grief family members experience at the hands of hospital administrators, insurance companies, and other health care roadblocks they face. Removing medical decision-making from doctors and placing it into the hands of profiteering hospital administrators is detrimental to our nation’s health care.

One hopeful reward doctors can receive serving the public is a monumental effort to take back medical decision-making from hospital administrators. As well, sometimes doctors can be better advocates for their patients and even make a law to close a legal loophole.

Yet, the greatest reward came when the hospital decided to heed the warning and not “pull the plug” on the 50-year-old unconscious ICU patient.

Eventually, he walked out of the hospital and returned home to his family.

Gene Uzawa Dorio is an internal medicine physician who blogs at SCV Physician Report.

Prev

Physician autonomy with self-employment [PODCAST]

April 26, 2024 Kevin 0
…
Next

Revitalize your medical practice: Embrace creativity!

April 27, 2024 Kevin 0
…

Tagged as: Palliative Care

Post navigation

< Previous Post
Physician autonomy with self-employment [PODCAST]
Next Post >
Revitalize your medical practice: Embrace creativity!

ADVERTISEMENT

More by Gene Uzawa Dorio, MD

  • How doctors took back control from hospital executives

    Gene Uzawa Dorio, MD
  • Pope Francis dies at 88. What his care reveals about America’s failing hospitals.

    Gene Uzawa Dorio, MD
  • When saving lives leads to losing your own

    Gene Uzawa Dorio, MD

Related Posts

  • More physician responsibility for patient care

    Michael R. McGuire
  • Osler and the doctor-patient relationship

    Leonard Wang
  • The health care system will cause its own physician shortage

    Advait Suvarnakar and Aashka Suvarnakar
  • How non-physician practitioners are pawns of large health care organizations

    Anonymous
  • The triad of health care: patient, nurse, physician

    Michele Luckenbaugh
  • Female physician burnout and its impact on patient care

    Raya Iqbal

More in Physician

  • Why more doctors are choosing direct care over traditional health care

    Grace Torres-Hodges, DPM, MBA
  • How to handle chronically late patients in your medical practice

    Neil Baum, MD
  • How early meetings and after-hours events penalize physician-mothers

    Samira Jeimy, MD, PhD and Menaka Pai, MD
  • Why medicine must evolve to support modern physicians

    Ryan Nadelson, MD
  • Why listening to parents’ intuition can save lives in pediatric care

    Tokunbo Akande, MD, MPH
  • Finding balance and meaning in medical practice: a holistic approach to professional fulfillment

    Dr. Saad S. Alshohaib
  • Most Popular

  • Past Week

    • Forced voicemail and diagnosis codes are endangering patient access to medications

      Arthur Lazarus, MD, MBA | Meds
    • How President Biden’s cognitive health shapes political and legal trust

      Muhamad Aly Rifai, MD | Conditions
    • The One Big Beautiful Bill and the fragile heart of rural health care

      Holland Haynie, MD | Policy
    • America’s ER crisis: Why the system is collapsing from within

      Kristen Cline, BSN, RN | Conditions
    • Why timing, not surgery, determines patient survival

      Michael Karch, MD | Conditions
    • How early meetings and after-hours events penalize physician-mothers

      Samira Jeimy, MD, PhD and Menaka Pai, MD | Physician
  • Past 6 Months

    • Forced voicemail and diagnosis codes are endangering patient access to medications

      Arthur Lazarus, MD, MBA | Meds
    • How President Biden’s cognitive health shapes political and legal trust

      Muhamad Aly Rifai, MD | Conditions
    • Why are medical students turning away from primary care? [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • The One Big Beautiful Bill and the fragile heart of rural health care

      Holland Haynie, MD | Policy
    • Why “do no harm” might be harming modern medicine

      Sabooh S. Mubbashar, MD | Physician
    • The hidden health risks in the One Big Beautiful Bill Act

      Trevor Lyford, MPH | Policy
  • Recent Posts

    • Beyond burnout: Understanding the triangle of exhaustion [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • Facing terminal cancer as a doctor and mother

      Kelly Curtin-Hallinan, DO | Conditions
    • Online eye exams spark legal battle over health care access

      Joshua Windham, JD and Daryl James | Policy
    • FDA delays could end vital treatment for rare disease patients

      G. van Londen, MD | Meds
    • Pharmacists are key to expanding Medicaid access to digital therapeutics

      Amanda Matter | Meds
    • Why ADHD in women requires a new approach [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast

Subscribe to KevinMD and never miss a story!

Get free updates delivered free to your inbox.


Find jobs at
Careers by KevinMD.com

Search thousands of physician, PA, NP, and CRNA jobs now.

Learn more

Leave a Comment

Founded in 2004 by Kevin Pho, MD, KevinMD.com is the web’s leading platform where physicians, advanced practitioners, nurses, medical students, and patients share their insight and tell their stories.

Social

  • Like on Facebook
  • Follow on Twitter
  • Connect on Linkedin
  • Subscribe on Youtube
  • Instagram

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Most Popular

  • Past Week

    • Forced voicemail and diagnosis codes are endangering patient access to medications

      Arthur Lazarus, MD, MBA | Meds
    • How President Biden’s cognitive health shapes political and legal trust

      Muhamad Aly Rifai, MD | Conditions
    • The One Big Beautiful Bill and the fragile heart of rural health care

      Holland Haynie, MD | Policy
    • America’s ER crisis: Why the system is collapsing from within

      Kristen Cline, BSN, RN | Conditions
    • Why timing, not surgery, determines patient survival

      Michael Karch, MD | Conditions
    • How early meetings and after-hours events penalize physician-mothers

      Samira Jeimy, MD, PhD and Menaka Pai, MD | Physician
  • Past 6 Months

    • Forced voicemail and diagnosis codes are endangering patient access to medications

      Arthur Lazarus, MD, MBA | Meds
    • How President Biden’s cognitive health shapes political and legal trust

      Muhamad Aly Rifai, MD | Conditions
    • Why are medical students turning away from primary care? [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • The One Big Beautiful Bill and the fragile heart of rural health care

      Holland Haynie, MD | Policy
    • Why “do no harm” might be harming modern medicine

      Sabooh S. Mubbashar, MD | Physician
    • The hidden health risks in the One Big Beautiful Bill Act

      Trevor Lyford, MPH | Policy
  • Recent Posts

    • Beyond burnout: Understanding the triangle of exhaustion [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • Facing terminal cancer as a doctor and mother

      Kelly Curtin-Hallinan, DO | Conditions
    • Online eye exams spark legal battle over health care access

      Joshua Windham, JD and Daryl James | Policy
    • FDA delays could end vital treatment for rare disease patients

      G. van Londen, MD | Meds
    • Pharmacists are key to expanding Medicaid access to digital therapeutics

      Amanda Matter | Meds
    • Why ADHD in women requires a new approach [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast

MedPage Today Professional

An Everyday Health Property Medpage Today
  • Terms of Use | Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • DMCA Policy
All Content © KevinMD, LLC
Site by Outthink Group

Leave a Comment

Comments are moderated before they are published. Please read the comment policy.

Loading Comments...