Skip to content
  • About
  • Contact
  • Contribute
  • Book
  • Careers
  • Podcast
  • Recommended
  • Speaking
  • All
  • Physician
  • Practice
  • Policy
  • Finance
  • Conditions
  • .edu
  • Patient
  • Meds
  • Tech
  • Social
  • Video
    • All
    • Physician
    • Practice
    • Policy
    • Finance
    • Conditions
    • .edu
    • Patient
    • Meds
    • Tech
    • Social
    • Video
    • About
    • Contact
    • Contribute
    • Book
    • Careers
    • Podcast
    • Recommended
    • Speaking

Solving a hidden challenge: 10 tips to reduce diagnostic error in the emergency department

Susan L. Montminy, EdD, MPA, RN and Marlene Icenhower, JD, RN
Conditions
February 17, 2025
Share
Tweet
Share

Diagnostic error is a difficult issue to track in the emergency department (ED). For a good reason, too: The patient population is so transient it’s difficult to detect a “missed” diagnosis. It’s less readily apparent than medication errors, falls, and other commonly reported incidents.

But that’s precisely what makes diagnostic error such an insidious problem.

Recent research into malpractice claims over a five-year period suggests that 28 percent of all diagnostic error occurs in the ED, with 67 percent of incidents involving elements of clinical decision-making. Moreover, the consequences are significant: Data indicates that 52 percent of diagnostic errors in the ED result in death (36 percent) or a high-severity injury (16 percent).

There’s no escaping the fact that EDs are high-pressure, whirlwind environments uniquely fraught with the risk of diagnostic error. Providers must draw conclusions quickly, with limited (or non-existent) patient histories. Patient acuity is typically high. Priorities must constantly shift.

Although a degree of chaos is unavoidable, it makes decision-making difficult—and clinical decision-making is the foundation of the diagnostic process. Therefore, we must create an environment of controlled chaos—i.e., enabling fast-paced but orderly team-based processes for gathering, synthesizing, and communicating all the information necessary to arrive at an accurate diagnosis.

Build a culture to support diagnostic accuracy.

Relying on intuitive thinking and experience is an essential part of the “art” of medicine. It’s what leads us to say, “I’ve seen this presentation a million times; I know what it is.”

However, ED providers accustomed to making quick diagnosis and treatment decisions under intense pressure sometimes develop an over-reliance on intuitive thinking. In ED settings, it can cause providers to jump from points A to B without thoroughly examining what lies in between—thus inadvertently introducing biases or shortcuts that can set the stage for diagnostic error.

Therefore, giving providers the tools to move away from relying solely on intuitive thinking is crucial. Organizations should nurture a culture that acknowledges—and normalizes—diagnostic uncertainty.

That includes eliminating the idea that diagnosis is an ED physician’s individual responsibility. While the treating/attending physician is ultimately responsible for the diagnosis, in truth, the entire care team contributes. Diagnostic accuracy should be considered as much a “team sport” as all other aspects of health care. That means encouraging physicians’ introspection and creating a safe environment for others to speak up with questions or opposing views.

How?

Tip 1: Embolden ED providers to admit and communicate when diagnostic uncertainty exists. For example, they could use the term “working diagnosis” when documenting or discussing their diagnostic thought process. Such transparency typically delivers more benefits than risks because it bolsters:

  • Patient/family engagement. A patient’s condition can change rapidly during their ED stay. Discussing the “working diagnosis” is a strategy to engage the patient and their family to become part of their own care team.
  • Subsequent care. Transparency in the medical record—including the fact that a diagnosis is only a working diagnosis—helps other providers better understand the original provider’s thought processes and conclusions.
  • Diagnostic accuracy through time-outs. Communicating diagnostic uncertainty can be used to trigger a diagnostic time-out process, which allows ED providers to assemble a small team to gut-check their thinking and guard against any intuitive thinking or potential biases that may have skewed their reasoning. Similar to a surgical time-out, a diagnostic time-out enables a moment of reflective thought in a team setting.

The key is to foster a collaborative, high-performance culture in which providers feel comfortable with diagnostic uncertainty, curiosity, and others’ ability to question diagnostic determinations.

9 additional tips to build a culture of diagnostic accuracy

ADVERTISEMENT

  1. Educate everyone on the ED team about the many kinds of cognitive biases, how they relate to diagnostic error, and how to minimize them.
  2. Empower ED teams to examine their own thinking patterns and challenge others if they believe inadvertent cognitive bias may be at play. Ensure staff are comfortable escalating any concerns through a good chain-of-command policy.
  3. Encourage ED physicians to acknowledge that diagnosis is a team sport and that accuracy improves when they actively engage others to resolve uncertainties.
  4. Foster respectful communication among ED team members that promotes questioning (e.g., “I’m curious about your thoughts…” instead of “That can’t be right!”).
  5. Create strategies to minimize interruptions for ED physicians—such as implementing huddles to streamline communication. Studies show that minimizing interruptions reduces medication errors; perhaps it could likewise mitigate diagnostic error.
  6. Ensure electronic health record (EHR) and other technology systems support the diagnostic process. Shadow providers as they use the systems, then work with technology vendors to address any issues and ensure pertinent patient information needed to arrive at a diagnosis is easy to find for the user.
  7. Recognize diagnostic error as an “event” worthy of being reported in an event system—just like medication errors, pressure ulcers, or patient falls—and used as part of learning in a high-performing organization.
  8. Track, trend, and dig into metrics that may subtly indicate diagnostic error, such as when ED patients request medication refills, when they call back with unresolved symptoms, or when final imaging or test results differ from the original.
  9. Develop strong handoff processes to ensure vital clinical information isn’t dropped when providers’ shifts end.

Collaborate, question, and reduce errors

ED providers seldom have the benefit of rich patient clinical histories, so ED teams must be alert to subtle indicators that a diagnosis might not be correct, such as:

  • Test results that don’t seem to fit the case.
  • Symptoms that don’t improve.
  • Patient transfers to a higher level of care.

Reducing diagnostic error requires ED providers to reassess their conclusions periodically. It requires organizations to cultivate a culture where it’s OK to question, “Have we anchored on a common diagnosis (anchoring bias)? Have we focused too narrowly on test results that support our hypothesis (confirmatory bias)? Is the patient’s treatment response going in the expected direction?”

With a better understanding of contributing risk factors and mitigation strategies, organizations can reduce the prevalence of diagnostic error in the ED.

Susan L. Montminy and Marlene Icenhower are health care executives.

Prev

Wisdom for new nurses: lessons from a 30-year ICU veteran

February 17, 2025 Kevin 0
…
Next

Are you protecting your career? 5 essential questions about your NP liability insurance

February 17, 2025 Kevin 0
…

Tagged as: Emergency Medicine

Post navigation

< Previous Post
Wisdom for new nurses: lessons from a 30-year ICU veteran
Next Post >
Are you protecting your career? 5 essential questions about your NP liability insurance

ADVERTISEMENT

Related Posts

  • Solving the low-acuity emergency department problem

    Dillon Mercado
  • The work of an emergency department nurse through the eyes of a medical student

    Jennifer Geller
  • The climate crisis as viewed by an emergency physician

    Elizabeth M. Barreras-Rivest, MD
  • Emergency departments need to claim their role in the social safety net

    Caitlin Ryus, MD, MPH
  • Voting from the hospital: How emergency ballots give patients a voice

    Claire Abramoff, MD
  • The cost of exhaustion: Resident fatigue is a public health emergency

    Medha Venigalla

More in Conditions

  • Facing terminal cancer as a doctor and mother

    Kelly Curtin-Hallinan, DO
  • Why doctors must stop ignoring unintentional weight loss in patients with obesity

    Samantha Malley, FNP-C
  • Why hospitals are quietly capping top doctors’ pay

    Dennis Hursh, Esq
  • Why point-of-care ultrasound belongs in emergency department triage

    Resa E. Lewiss, MD and Courtney M. Smalley, MD
  • Why PSA levels alone shouldn’t define your prostate cancer risk

    Martina Ambardjieva, MD, PhD
  • Reframing chronic pain and dignity: What a pain clinic teaches us about MAiD and chronic suffering

    Olumuyiwa Bamgbade, MD
  • Most Popular

  • Past Week

    • Forced voicemail and diagnosis codes are endangering patient access to medications

      Arthur Lazarus, MD, MBA | Meds
    • How President Biden’s cognitive health shapes political and legal trust

      Muhamad Aly Rifai, MD | Conditions
    • The One Big Beautiful Bill and the fragile heart of rural health care

      Holland Haynie, MD | Policy
    • America’s ER crisis: Why the system is collapsing from within

      Kristen Cline, BSN, RN | Conditions
    • Why timing, not surgery, determines patient survival

      Michael Karch, MD | Conditions
    • How early meetings and after-hours events penalize physician-mothers

      Samira Jeimy, MD, PhD and Menaka Pai, MD | Physician
  • Past 6 Months

    • Forced voicemail and diagnosis codes are endangering patient access to medications

      Arthur Lazarus, MD, MBA | Meds
    • How President Biden’s cognitive health shapes political and legal trust

      Muhamad Aly Rifai, MD | Conditions
    • Why are medical students turning away from primary care? [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • The One Big Beautiful Bill and the fragile heart of rural health care

      Holland Haynie, MD | Policy
    • Why “do no harm” might be harming modern medicine

      Sabooh S. Mubbashar, MD | Physician
    • The hidden health risks in the One Big Beautiful Bill Act

      Trevor Lyford, MPH | Policy
  • Recent Posts

    • Beyond burnout: Understanding the triangle of exhaustion [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • Facing terminal cancer as a doctor and mother

      Kelly Curtin-Hallinan, DO | Conditions
    • Online eye exams spark legal battle over health care access

      Joshua Windham, JD and Daryl James | Policy
    • FDA delays could end vital treatment for rare disease patients

      G. van Londen, MD | Meds
    • Pharmacists are key to expanding Medicaid access to digital therapeutics

      Amanda Matter | Meds
    • Why ADHD in women requires a new approach [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast

Subscribe to KevinMD and never miss a story!

Get free updates delivered free to your inbox.


Find jobs at
Careers by KevinMD.com

Search thousands of physician, PA, NP, and CRNA jobs now.

Learn more

Leave a Comment

Founded in 2004 by Kevin Pho, MD, KevinMD.com is the web’s leading platform where physicians, advanced practitioners, nurses, medical students, and patients share their insight and tell their stories.

Social

  • Like on Facebook
  • Follow on Twitter
  • Connect on Linkedin
  • Subscribe on Youtube
  • Instagram

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Most Popular

  • Past Week

    • Forced voicemail and diagnosis codes are endangering patient access to medications

      Arthur Lazarus, MD, MBA | Meds
    • How President Biden’s cognitive health shapes political and legal trust

      Muhamad Aly Rifai, MD | Conditions
    • The One Big Beautiful Bill and the fragile heart of rural health care

      Holland Haynie, MD | Policy
    • America’s ER crisis: Why the system is collapsing from within

      Kristen Cline, BSN, RN | Conditions
    • Why timing, not surgery, determines patient survival

      Michael Karch, MD | Conditions
    • How early meetings and after-hours events penalize physician-mothers

      Samira Jeimy, MD, PhD and Menaka Pai, MD | Physician
  • Past 6 Months

    • Forced voicemail and diagnosis codes are endangering patient access to medications

      Arthur Lazarus, MD, MBA | Meds
    • How President Biden’s cognitive health shapes political and legal trust

      Muhamad Aly Rifai, MD | Conditions
    • Why are medical students turning away from primary care? [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • The One Big Beautiful Bill and the fragile heart of rural health care

      Holland Haynie, MD | Policy
    • Why “do no harm” might be harming modern medicine

      Sabooh S. Mubbashar, MD | Physician
    • The hidden health risks in the One Big Beautiful Bill Act

      Trevor Lyford, MPH | Policy
  • Recent Posts

    • Beyond burnout: Understanding the triangle of exhaustion [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • Facing terminal cancer as a doctor and mother

      Kelly Curtin-Hallinan, DO | Conditions
    • Online eye exams spark legal battle over health care access

      Joshua Windham, JD and Daryl James | Policy
    • FDA delays could end vital treatment for rare disease patients

      G. van Londen, MD | Meds
    • Pharmacists are key to expanding Medicaid access to digital therapeutics

      Amanda Matter | Meds
    • Why ADHD in women requires a new approach [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast

MedPage Today Professional

An Everyday Health Property Medpage Today
  • Terms of Use | Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • DMCA Policy
All Content © KevinMD, LLC
Site by Outthink Group

Leave a Comment

Comments are moderated before they are published. Please read the comment policy.

Loading Comments...