Skip to content
  • About
  • Contact
  • Contribute
  • Book
  • Careers
  • Podcast
  • Recommended
  • Speaking
  • All
  • Physician
  • Practice
  • Policy
  • Finance
  • Conditions
  • .edu
  • Patient
  • Meds
  • Tech
  • Social
  • Video
    • All
    • Physician
    • Practice
    • Policy
    • Finance
    • Conditions
    • .edu
    • Patient
    • Meds
    • Tech
    • Social
    • Video
    • About
    • Contact
    • Contribute
    • Book
    • Careers
    • Podcast
    • Recommended
    • Speaking

Why AI is the perfect neutral arbiter for health care claims

Tim Wetherill, MD
Tech
February 7, 2025
Share
Tweet
Share

When Berkshire Hathaway executive Charlie Munger said, “Show me the incentives, and I’ll show you the outcome,” during a speech in 1995, he wasn’t talking about health care, but he might as well have been. Companies in any industry are influenced by how the norms and structures around them contribute to their success, and in health care, the incentives often aren’t set for the good of the end user—the patient.

Consider these incentives from the perspective of the health plan–provider relationship. While there are plenty of people in health care doing genuine work to serve patients, like in any industry, there are also bad actors. Because of the subjectivity that is baked into health care’s billing and coding policies, those bad actors are incentivized, and given latitude, to game the system. That ambiguity allows a doctor with less-than-pure intentions to, for instance, upcode a procedure they shouldn’t without pushback from the institution (or individual) paying out the claim.

The vendor stack

At the same time, the complexity that underlies these policies has created an environment where vendors can sell software and services that help health plans sort through claims and make sure they’re being paid out correctly. Theoretically, that’s a perfectly valid value proposition, except that the vendors that health plans hire to find errors aren’t incentivized to work in an efficient way.

Vendors typically are paid based on how many errors they find, so rather than addressing root causes that lead to bad billing practices, they’re motivated to maintain the status quo. That means they are often unwilling to do things like share the errors they find, since that would lead to fewer errors in the future, and thus lower payouts.

It’s the same inertia that has led to the claims administration process to rely on old systems for processing data because there aren’t strong enough levers motivating the organizations responsible for finding errors to maximize their chance of arriving at the right decision the first time. The loser in all of this is the health plan, which ends up paying for a vendor stack of six or seven companies using old technology to solve a problem poorly.

The need for change

These market inefficiencies are well-established, yet the norms have remained for a couple of reasons. For one, it’s nearly impossible for humans to legislate out all subjectivity and complexity from the system that allows for bad actors to benefit. Plus, it’s difficult to change incentives that have been in place for so long when they’re benefiting established players.

A new solution is needed—something or someone who can serve as a neutral third-party arbiter, one that’s not influenced by any incentive other than arriving at the truth efficiently. Humans, and the organizations they work for, will always be unable to achieve true neutrality. So, we need a better partner: AI.

AI as a neutral arbiter of truth

AI can be trained on rules. When those rules are clear, well-defined, and avoid introducing bias, it ensures that AI does not deviate from its mission to find the truth. This means that AI can ingest and interpret the complex policies that govern health care claims adjudication accurately, consistently, and quickly.

By creating standardization and removing subjectivity, bad actors aren’t able to skirt a rule for their own benefit, and there is less opportunity for perverse incentives to skew outcomes. Providers, for instance, will all code the same procedures in the same way, because there will be no ambiguity that allows for deviation. In this alternative reality, there’s also less of a need for a bevy of vendors to sort through claims and find errors, since the uniformity of process will lead to fewer errors in the first place.

It has been well demonstrated that the current system, built on manual processes, doesn’t lead to good outcomes for people or institutions who pay for care, and thus, is bad for the health care system as a whole. What’s needed is a neutral third party to help plans, providers, and vendors all simplify claim adjudication. AI can be that neutral arbiter, and everyone who touches the health care system will benefit.

Tim Wetherill is a physician executive.

Prev

Marijuana's hidden threat to fertility and family planning [PODCAST]

February 6, 2025 Kevin 0
…
Next

Rethinking residency: How to reshape graduate medical education

February 7, 2025 Kevin 0
…

ADVERTISEMENT

Tagged as: Health IT

Post navigation

< Previous Post
Marijuana's hidden threat to fertility and family planning [PODCAST]
Next Post >
Rethinking residency: How to reshape graduate medical education

ADVERTISEMENT

Related Posts

  • Why the health care industry must prioritize health equity

    George T. Mathew, MD, MBA
  • In the crosshairs: The False Claims Act’s new targets in health care

    Scott Ellner, DO, MPH
  • Proactive care is the linchpin for saving America’s health care system

    Ronald A. Paulus, MD, MBA
  • Health care workers should not be targets

    Lori E. Johnson
  • To “fix” health care delivery, turn to a value-based health care system

    David Bernstein, MD, MBA
  • Health care’s hidden problem: hospital primary care losses

    Christopher Habig, MBA

More in Tech

  • How digital tools are reshaping the doctor-patient relationship

    Vineet Vishwanath
  • The promise and perils of AI in health care: Why we need better testing standards

    Max Rollwage, PhD
  • 3 tips for using AI medical scribes to save time charting

    Erica Dorn, FNP
  • Would The Pitts’ Dr. Robby Robinavitch welcome a new colleague? Yes. Especially if their initials were AI.

    Gabe Jones, MBA
  • Generative AI 2025: a 20-minute cheat sheet for busy clinicians

    Harvey Castro, MD, MBA
  • Why public health must be included in AI development

    Laura E. Scudiere, RN, MPH
  • Most Popular

  • Past Week

    • Why are medical students turning away from primary care? [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • Why “do no harm” might be harming modern medicine

      Sabooh S. Mubbashar, MD | Physician
    • How New Mexico became a malpractice lawsuit hotspot

      Patrick Hudson, MD | Physician
    • Why doctors are reclaiming control from burnout culture

      Maureen Gibbons, MD | Physician
    • Why health care leaders fail at execution—and how to fix it

      Dave Cummings, RN | Policy
    • 5 blind spots that stall physician wealth

      Johnny Medina, MSc | Finance
  • Past 6 Months

    • Why tracking cognitive load could save doctors and patients

      Hiba Fatima Hamid | Education
    • Why are medical students turning away from primary care? [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • What the world must learn from the life and death of Hind Rajab

      Saba Qaiser, RN | Conditions
    • Why “do no harm” might be harming modern medicine

      Sabooh S. Mubbashar, MD | Physician
    • Here’s what providers really need in a modern EHR

      Laura Kohlhagen, MD, MBA | Tech
    • Why flashy AI tools won’t fix health care without real infrastructure

      David Carmouche, MD | Tech
  • Recent Posts

    • Why judgment is hurting doctors—and how mindfulness can heal

      Jessie Mahoney, MD | Physician
    • Why medical schools must ditch lectures and embrace active learning

      Arlen Meyers, MD, MBA | Education
    • Why helping people means more than getting an MD

      Vaishali Jha | Education
    • How digital tools are reshaping the doctor-patient relationship

      Vineet Vishwanath | Tech
    • Why evidence-based management may be an effective strategy for stronger health care leadership and equity

      Olumuyiwa Bamgbade, MD | Physician
    • Why health care leaders fail at execution—and how to fix it

      Dave Cummings, RN | Policy

Subscribe to KevinMD and never miss a story!

Get free updates delivered free to your inbox.


Find jobs at
Careers by KevinMD.com

Search thousands of physician, PA, NP, and CRNA jobs now.

Learn more

Leave a Comment

Founded in 2004 by Kevin Pho, MD, KevinMD.com is the web’s leading platform where physicians, advanced practitioners, nurses, medical students, and patients share their insight and tell their stories.

Social

  • Like on Facebook
  • Follow on Twitter
  • Connect on Linkedin
  • Subscribe on Youtube
  • Instagram

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Most Popular

  • Past Week

    • Why are medical students turning away from primary care? [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • Why “do no harm” might be harming modern medicine

      Sabooh S. Mubbashar, MD | Physician
    • How New Mexico became a malpractice lawsuit hotspot

      Patrick Hudson, MD | Physician
    • Why doctors are reclaiming control from burnout culture

      Maureen Gibbons, MD | Physician
    • Why health care leaders fail at execution—and how to fix it

      Dave Cummings, RN | Policy
    • 5 blind spots that stall physician wealth

      Johnny Medina, MSc | Finance
  • Past 6 Months

    • Why tracking cognitive load could save doctors and patients

      Hiba Fatima Hamid | Education
    • Why are medical students turning away from primary care? [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • What the world must learn from the life and death of Hind Rajab

      Saba Qaiser, RN | Conditions
    • Why “do no harm” might be harming modern medicine

      Sabooh S. Mubbashar, MD | Physician
    • Here’s what providers really need in a modern EHR

      Laura Kohlhagen, MD, MBA | Tech
    • Why flashy AI tools won’t fix health care without real infrastructure

      David Carmouche, MD | Tech
  • Recent Posts

    • Why judgment is hurting doctors—and how mindfulness can heal

      Jessie Mahoney, MD | Physician
    • Why medical schools must ditch lectures and embrace active learning

      Arlen Meyers, MD, MBA | Education
    • Why helping people means more than getting an MD

      Vaishali Jha | Education
    • How digital tools are reshaping the doctor-patient relationship

      Vineet Vishwanath | Tech
    • Why evidence-based management may be an effective strategy for stronger health care leadership and equity

      Olumuyiwa Bamgbade, MD | Physician
    • Why health care leaders fail at execution—and how to fix it

      Dave Cummings, RN | Policy

MedPage Today Professional

An Everyday Health Property Medpage Today
  • Terms of Use | Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • DMCA Policy
All Content © KevinMD, LLC
Site by Outthink Group

Leave a Comment

Comments are moderated before they are published. Please read the comment policy.

Loading Comments...