A patient with diabetes, hypertension, and obesity comes in for her annual wellness visit. The physician has already spent 20 minutes on chronic disease management and lifestyle guidance. As the visit wraps up, the patient mentions daily heart palpitations that started a month ago.
The exam was benign. The physician has two choices: spend another 20 minutes performing an EKG, discussing differential diagnoses, and developing a workup plan; or refer to cardiology.
The physician refers to cardiology.
Six months later, the patient returns. The cardiologist ordered extensive testing, all negative, started a beta blocker, and scheduled follow-up. The palpitations persist. The patient is frustrated by the cost, the wait, and new medication-related fatigue.
The physician realizes what could have been addressed initially: The palpitations correlate with her afternoon coffee habit. A simple history, an EKG, and discussion about caffeine might have solved everything. Instead: six months, hundreds of dollars, and an unnecessary medication.
This isn’t the cardiologist’s fault. The cardiologist did excellent work with limited information. The failure happened when a system without time for comprehensive primary care forced an unnecessary referral.
This scenario repeats daily in primary care offices across America. Not because cardiologists are incompetent. They’re excellent at what they do. But because we’ve created a system where PCPs don’t have time to be primary care physicians, don’t maintain the ongoing education to confidently manage complexity, and have learned to defer to specialists even when we shouldn’t.
How we got here
Primary care physicians have been systematically stripped of the time, knowledge, and confidence to do comprehensive work. Three forces created this dysfunction:
The time constraint crisis
Primary care visits have been compressed to 15 minutes. In that time, physicians must address multiple chronic conditions, review medications, order screening, document for billing, and build rapport. Complex issues requiring thoughtful management are neglected, and the path of least resistance is referral.
That specialist will see a 15-minute snapshot. The primary care physician has seen five years of this patient’s life: medication adherence patterns, family stressors, health literacy, previous intolerances. The specialist’s note will be thorough and organ-focused. The primary care physician’s knowledge of the whole patient becomes invisible.
And now, a new assault on that limited time. Value-based care models promise to reward outcomes over volume, but in practice, they’re fundamentally about data collection and standardization. Physicians are now expected to document risk stratification scores, close care gaps for metrics that may or may not be clinically relevant, and bring patients back for quarterly visits simply to meet documentation requirements, not because patients need that frequency of care. These programs claim to improve quality while systematically destroying the time physicians need to deliver it.
The knowledge gap problem
Medical knowledge expands exponentially. Specialists focus on narrow domains. Primary care physicians must be competent in everything from dermatology to psychiatry to geriatrics.
Many PCPs don’t pursue aggressive continuing education not because they’re lazy, but because they’re drowning. Between patient care, administrative tasks, prior authorizations, and inbox management, there’s little time for deep learning. The system doesn’t reward it.
Physicians develop learned helplessness: “That’s complicated, better send them to cardiology.” When physicians can’t use the skills they spent years developing, when they’re reduced to referral coordinators rather than diagnosticians, burnout follows. Job dissatisfaction isn’t just about time pressure. It’s about loss of intellectual engagement and inability to practice comprehensive medicine.
The learned deference to specialists
We’ve developed a culture of reflexive referral. Insurance creates administrative barriers: PCSK9 inhibitors require cardiology sign-off even for straightforward indications.
But the deeper problem is these barriers have taught PCPs to stop trying. Why learn intensive lipid management when insurance denies the prescription anyway? We’ve created physicians who’ve learned that comprehensive management is futile. The system punishes initiative and rewards deferment.
The patient in the opening example didn’t need a cardiologist. She needed a PCP with time for a thoughtful history. Instead: six months, hundreds of dollars, unnecessary medication. The failure wasn’t in cardiology. It was in a system that doesn’t allow PCPs time to practice primary care.
The hidden costs of specialist-dependent care
Delayed treatment
Specialist wait times range from months to over half a year. The specialist visit takes 20 minutes. The delay takes six months.
The silo effect
Guidelines are written for populations, not individuals. Think about how consultation works in other fields: When a general contractor consults a structural engineer about foundation issues, the engineer doesn’t take over the entire project. They provide analysis and recommendations. The contractor implements them. Medicine should work the same way.
But it doesn’t. A cardiologist sees heart failure and follows guidelines: ACE inhibitor, beta blocker, SGLT2 inhibitor. What they miss in 20 minutes: This 78-year-old lives alone, takes eight medications, and the complex regimen means she takes the wrong pills. She’s homebound from the management, not the disease.
When PCPs have time to quarterback care, they adapt specialist recommendations to patient reality. Without that time, patients get guideline-concordant care that may worsen their lives.
What we’re losing
The original vision of primary care: a physician who knows the whole patient, coordinates all care, handles 80 percent of issues independently, and knows when to consult specialists for the remaining 20 percent.
We’ve inverted this. PCPs now handle maybe 50 percent independently, only routine stuff. Anything complex gets sent out. “Primary care physician” is becoming a misnomer. We are becoming triage coordinators whose judgment is trusted just enough to recognize when someone else should be involved, but not to solve problems.
Worse, primary care physicians have become scribes for insurance companies. Annual wellness visits are box-checking exercises for payment. More time documenting “chronic stable condition without change” for five conditions than addressing patient concerns or providing actionable guidance. Administrative compliance theater dressed up as medical care.
A personal reflection
I’m transitioning away from traditional primary care toward a preventive lifestyle-based medicine practice in the direct primary care space. Partially because I’m passionate about that work, but partially because I’m tired of fighting a system that won’t let me be the physician my training prepared me to be, doesn’t invite curiosity, and does not leave time for compassion.
We need to decide: Do we want primary care physicians, or do we want referral coordinators?
Jordan Cantor is an internal medicine physician.





![Silence is a survival mechanism that costs women their joy [PODCAST]](https://kevinmd.com/wp-content/uploads/Design-4-190x100.jpg)

