KevinMD.com: Social media’s leading physician voice
The KevinMD newsletterReal physician voices, twice a weekFree, and one click to unsubscribe.
Subscribe free →

Who will pick up the slack from resident work-hour restrictions?

I’ve always wondered how much more staff would be needed to compensate for restricting resident work-hours and mandating naps.

The NEJM provides the answer in their perspective piece on the issue.

Two researchers how studied that exact question, using models based on various work-hour restriction scenarios. They found that “nationally the health care system would need to create and fill new full-time–equivalent positions for 229 nursing aides, 45 laboratory technicians, 320 licensed vocational nurses, 5984 midlevel providers (nurse practitioners or physician’s assistants), and 5001 attending physicians; if hospitals were to increase the number of residents instead, an estimated 8247 additional residency positions would have to be created.”

That’s a lot of additional pressure to place on already short-staffed and budget-pressured hospitals.

Which is why lengthening residency training seems to be the only viable solution to satisfy both the patient safety and cost demands.

Share this articleLinkedInFacebookXEmail

Real physician voices, twice a week

Free, and one click to unsubscribe.

No spam. We never share your email.