Skip to content
  • About
  • Contact
  • Contribute
  • Book
  • Careers
  • Podcast
  • Recommended
  • Speaking
  • All
  • Physician
  • Practice
  • Policy
  • Finance
  • Conditions
  • .edu
  • Patient
  • Meds
  • Tech
  • Social
  • Video
    • All
    • Physician
    • Practice
    • Policy
    • Finance
    • Conditions
    • .edu
    • Patient
    • Meds
    • Tech
    • Social
    • Video
    • About
    • Contact
    • Contribute
    • Book
    • Careers
    • Podcast
    • Recommended
    • Speaking

Healthcare reform ethical questions

Jeffrey Hall Dobken, MD, MPH
Policy
August 20, 2010
Share
Tweet
Share

Hard choices and healthcare reform are here.  Donald Berwick, M.D., has been installed as the administrator for the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid services as a “recess appointment” by President Obama.

Dr. Berwick is an academician, a pediatrician who has spent the bulk of his professional existence as the CEO of the Institute for Healthcare Improvement of Cambridge, MA.  He is an outspoken advocate for the single-payer system, admires Britain’s National Health Service, and advances that all health care be linked to “quality metrics.”  In effect, that care is permissible only if and when it conforms to consensus guidelines written by experts.  A “pay-for-performance” program derived from these “best practices” will, in the view of Dr. Berwick, “bend down the cost curve.”

Deviation from the guidelines will be viewed as an insurance fraud, perpetrated by medical professionals and criminalizing their behavior.  In Massachusetts, the purported healthcare model of Obamacare, there are carrots but also sticks: physicians who fail to comply with quality guidelines established by state insurance administrators are publicly discredited and their patients are required to pay three times as much out of pocket to see them.

Be ready for this narrative.  This will be the politically correct language and manner to describe 21st century American Healthcare.  And it will impact you, your family, your friends and your neighbors.  But what about your children?

According to lead articles in the New England Journal of Medicine and JAMA end-of-life expenditures are under scrutiny as a potential means to help reduce “waste” in healthcare.  This will be amongst the first issues addressed by Berwick.

Medically futile care is defined by the absence of clinical benefit despite multiple interventions. At present, the all too familiar end-of-life sequence of the life-supported elderly Alzheimer patient in multisystems failure dominates healthcare bioethical discussions.   But it’s not just the elderly who will arrive at these crossroads or for whom health care resources are likely needed.

Let’s focus on pediatric issues for a moment, for a minor cannot participate in medical decision making (except in rare circumstances).  Children (under age 18) are not consent partners.  Children “assent” to treatment.

What is the value of a child’s life?  How is this determined?  By whom?

Up until the 20th century, most societies accepted childhood death as the way of the world.  The custom of referring to a baby as “it,” a term never applied to adults even when gender is ambiguous, betrays this attitude.  Limitations on the legal rights and status of children grew in part from these circumstances and realities.  The notion of concentrating medical resources on society’s productive members, namely, adults, also stems from this tradition.

In ancient Rome, human life in the biological sense was considered to begin with the first breath.  Yet, it was not until the person reached young adulthood that he became a person in the moral sense, with the full protection of the moral rule against homicide.

In ancient Greece, an entire literature of recognition of a defective child was created that allowed for the destruction of the newborn for the betterment of society.  Aristotle in his Politics and Plato in his Republic advanced that the best interests of society were served by infanticide when a variety of conditions were met.  These included rape, incest, adultery, parental age, defective births, etc.

Today we seem hopelessly locked in debate over motherhood versus womanhood, with little if any insight or flexibility from any of the strident political voices involved.  What should be, if any, the role of government?  Humanism and cultural consensus are ill served by these debates, and positioning and posturing.  But it does extend to our definition of the value of human life at its onset for this society.

The twentieth century brought improvement to the lot of our children.  Child labor laws begin in 1916.  Education began to be considered to be every child’s right.  Medical and surgical care for children was shockingly primitive as late as 1941, when Harvard Medical School established the first chair in child’s surgery.  Up to that point in time, and even for a period thereinafter, children were in general regarded as too weak for most surgical interventions.  The fact, again, that children could not speak for themselves left this surgical dogma unchallenged.

ADVERTISEMENT

And children are still not a recognized voice in the healthcare debate other than via “interest groups.”

The remarkable advances in pediatrics from immunizations to advanced life support in 24 week old fetuses to intra‑uterine fetal cardiac procedures to separation of conjoined (formerly “Siamese”) twins to organ transplantation have carried hefty price tags.

Who has demanded this technology?  Why have we willingly paid the prices for this care?  Is there any value to advanced rehab in a post‑trauma quadriplegic child or advanced life support in an HIV positive infant?  What about the autistic child, or the multiply genetically defective (“impaired”) newborn?

Are limited or sparse assets or available resources to become the only basis for therapeutic decisions?

Arthur Kohrman states that “Preserving the lives of children attached for long periods of time to technological devices extends not only the lives of human beings but also the definition of being human …”  Technologically dependent people are difficult to construct ethical systems for.  Is the child‑machine combination a being in its own right, or just a stage in a medical metamorphosis?  Would the children of the Iron Lung Age survive in the twenty-first century?

The definition of medical futility as a concrete concept deserves to be utilized carefully and not automatically.

At issue is not whether or not futility is definable, but rather is it good and sensible public policy to admit a legalized and narrow standard?  Criminalizing healthcare delivery, developing punitive consequences for failure to adhere to a fictionalized consensus guideline will be arbitrary, fraught with inequity, and bureaucratize the medical profession beyond any reasonable threshold.

This is not healthcare reform.  It places the system’s needs beyond the individual’s.

“If you don’t know where you’re going,” Casey Stengel liked to say, “you will probably wind up someplace else.”

Jeffrey Hall Dobken is an assistant clinical professor of pediatric immunology and allergy, and certified bioethicist at Weill Cornell School of Medicine in New York City.

Submit a guest post and be heard.

Prev

Health care reform needs cooperation and compromise

August 20, 2010 Kevin 2
…
Next

International medical graduates and their patient outcomes

August 20, 2010 Kevin 29
…

Tagged as: Public Health & Policy

Post navigation

< Previous Post
Health care reform needs cooperation and compromise
Next Post >
International medical graduates and their patient outcomes

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

More by Jeffrey Hall Dobken, MD, MPH

  • COVID-19 coronavirus needs apolitical truth-telling

    Jeffrey Hall Dobken, MD, MPH
  • It is time for us to succeed by being the best that we can be

    Jeffrey Hall Dobken, MD, MPH
  • a desk with keyboard and ipad with the kevinmd logo

    Implementing the Affordable Care Act will increase physician tension

    Jeffrey Hall Dobken, MD, MPH

More in Policy

  • Why physician voices matter in the fight against anti-LGBTQ+ laws

    BJ Ferguson
  • The silent toll of ICE raids on U.S. patient care

    Carlin Lockwood
  • What Adam Smith would say about America’s for-profit health care

    M. Bennet Broner, PhD
  • The lab behind the lens: Equity begins with diagnosis

    Michael Misialek, MD
  • Conflicts of interest are eroding trust in U.S. health agencies

    Martha Rosenberg
  • When America sneezes, the world catches a cold: Trump’s freeze on HIV/AIDS funding

    Koketso Masenya
  • Most Popular

  • Past Week

    • Physician patriots: the forgotten founders who lit the torch of liberty

      Muhamad Aly Rifai, MD | Physician
    • Why medical students are trading empathy for publications

      Vijay Rajput, MD | Education
    • The hidden cost of becoming a doctor: a South Asian perspective

      Momeina Aslam | Education
    • Why fixing health care’s data quality is crucial for AI success [PODCAST]

      Jay Anders, MD | Podcast
    • Navigating fair market value as an independent or locum tenens physician [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • When errors of nature are treated as medical negligence

      Howard Smith, MD | Physician
  • Past 6 Months

    • What’s driving medical students away from primary care?

      ​​Vineeth Amba, MPH, Archita Goyal, and Wayne Altman, MD | Education
    • A faster path to becoming a doctor is possible—here’s how

      Ankit Jain | Education
    • How dismantling DEI endangers the future of medical care

      Shashank Madhu and Christian Tallo | Education
    • Make cognitive testing as routine as a blood pressure check

      Joshua Baker and James Jackson, PsyD | Conditions
    • How scales of justice saved a doctor-patient relationship

      Neil Baum, MD | Physician
    • The broken health care system doesn’t have to break you

      Jessie Mahoney, MD | Physician
  • Recent Posts

    • Navigating fair market value as an independent or locum tenens physician [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • Gaslighting and professional licensing: a call for reform

      Donald J. Murphy, MD | Physician
    • How self-improving AI systems are redefining intelligence and what it means for health care

      Harvey Castro, MD, MBA | Tech
    • How blockchain could rescue nursing home patients from deadly miscommunication

      Adwait Chafale | Tech
    • When service doesn’t mean another certification

      Maureen Gibbons, MD | Physician
    • Financing cancer or fighting it: the real cost of tobacco

      Dr. Bhavin P. Vadodariya | Conditions

Subscribe to KevinMD and never miss a story!

Get free updates delivered free to your inbox.


Find jobs at
Careers by KevinMD.com

Search thousands of physician, PA, NP, and CRNA jobs now.

Learn more

View 29 Comments >

Founded in 2004 by Kevin Pho, MD, KevinMD.com is the web’s leading platform where physicians, advanced practitioners, nurses, medical students, and patients share their insight and tell their stories.

Social

  • Like on Facebook
  • Follow on Twitter
  • Connect on Linkedin
  • Subscribe on Youtube
  • Instagram

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Most Popular

  • Past Week

    • Physician patriots: the forgotten founders who lit the torch of liberty

      Muhamad Aly Rifai, MD | Physician
    • Why medical students are trading empathy for publications

      Vijay Rajput, MD | Education
    • The hidden cost of becoming a doctor: a South Asian perspective

      Momeina Aslam | Education
    • Why fixing health care’s data quality is crucial for AI success [PODCAST]

      Jay Anders, MD | Podcast
    • Navigating fair market value as an independent or locum tenens physician [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • When errors of nature are treated as medical negligence

      Howard Smith, MD | Physician
  • Past 6 Months

    • What’s driving medical students away from primary care?

      ​​Vineeth Amba, MPH, Archita Goyal, and Wayne Altman, MD | Education
    • A faster path to becoming a doctor is possible—here’s how

      Ankit Jain | Education
    • How dismantling DEI endangers the future of medical care

      Shashank Madhu and Christian Tallo | Education
    • Make cognitive testing as routine as a blood pressure check

      Joshua Baker and James Jackson, PsyD | Conditions
    • How scales of justice saved a doctor-patient relationship

      Neil Baum, MD | Physician
    • The broken health care system doesn’t have to break you

      Jessie Mahoney, MD | Physician
  • Recent Posts

    • Navigating fair market value as an independent or locum tenens physician [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • Gaslighting and professional licensing: a call for reform

      Donald J. Murphy, MD | Physician
    • How self-improving AI systems are redefining intelligence and what it means for health care

      Harvey Castro, MD, MBA | Tech
    • How blockchain could rescue nursing home patients from deadly miscommunication

      Adwait Chafale | Tech
    • When service doesn’t mean another certification

      Maureen Gibbons, MD | Physician
    • Financing cancer or fighting it: the real cost of tobacco

      Dr. Bhavin P. Vadodariya | Conditions

MedPage Today Professional

An Everyday Health Property Medpage Today
  • Terms of Use | Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • DMCA Policy
All Content © KevinMD, LLC
Site by Outthink Group

Healthcare reform ethical questions
29 comments

Comments are moderated before they are published. Please read the comment policy.

Loading Comments...