Skip to content
  • About
  • Contact
  • Contribute
  • Book
  • Careers
  • Podcast
  • Recommended
  • Speaking
  • All
  • Physician
  • Practice
  • Policy
  • Finance
  • Conditions
  • .edu
  • Patient
  • Meds
  • Tech
  • Social
  • Video
    • All
    • Physician
    • Practice
    • Policy
    • Finance
    • Conditions
    • .edu
    • Patient
    • Meds
    • Tech
    • Social
    • Video
    • About
    • Contact
    • Contribute
    • Book
    • Careers
    • Podcast
    • Recommended
    • Speaking

Why full code should not be the default status for patients

Anonymous
Physician
March 30, 2012
Share
Tweet
Share

Full code is the universal default status for patients who haven’t chosen otherwise, but I suspect most physicians believe this policy is wrong. We know in our hearts we’re doing harm when we perform CPR on poor souls at the natural end of their lives, whose bodies can do nothing more than suffer.

Appropriately timed end-of-life discussions are the supposed answer, but for doctors, they are emotionally draining, interpersonally complex, and when done properly, overly time-consuming. For a busy and stressed physician caring for an acutely ill patient, it’s easiest to either avoid the discussion entirely or stick to concrete verbal formulations, putting the patient or the family on the spot with ridiculous questions like “Do you want us to do everything?” … “If your heart stops, should we restart it?” … “If he stops breathing, should we put him on a breathing machine?”

One major source of the complexity is the irreducible uncertainty in the prognosticating of survival after in-hospital cardiac arrest. As an example, a majority of patients suffering ventricular tachycardia/fibrillation in the medical ward may survive to discharge with good neurologic outcomes, while <2% of those with PEA arrests while on pressors in the ICU do. Hospitals’ response to this ambiguity has been to play it safe by maintaining the universal “full code” default, and the courts have avoided making any guiding rulings in the area, preferring to leave it to health professionals. The result is an excessive burden on physicians that demands we climb this difficult mountain with every new patient, family, and time. But the real burden falls on thousands of patients each year, who are “successfully resuscitated” but with brain injuries, they never would have wanted to survive.

So thank goodness that Craig Blinderman, Eric Krakauer, and Mildred Solomon of Harvard are talking sense about CPR in JAMA, arguing we should stop offering CPR as the default option for hospitalized patients — and should simply inform families we are withholding it in dying patients, without asking for their permission. (It astounds me that it’s taken this long for an editorial like this to make it to a major journal, but better late than never.)

They propose three scenarios:

  1. For the average chronically or acute-on-chronically ill patient (like someone with a heart failure exacerbation), doctors should discuss CPR as a possible (“plausible”) option — spending ample time on the low chance of survival to hospital discharge and the risk for brain injury.
  2. For patients with incurable advanced cancer, end-stage liver disease, or advanced dementia, doctors should recommend against CPR.
  3. We should withhold CPR as a futile, harmful therapy for imminently dying patients and simply inform the families of this. Authors advise, “Not offering CPR for imminently dying patients should be explicitly permitted by hospital policy.”

There’s a problem with option 3, though: Today, almost exclusively, it’s not hospital policy. Full code is. Hospitals sell out and undercut us physicians by not trusting us enough to let us make these judgment calls and promise to support us afterward — presumably because they fear lawsuits or being labeled as a “death panel hospital” — and the problem is perpetuated.

Kudos to these authors for calling for what’s simply right. Don’t expect a change in hospital or national policy, though. The inescapable reality that makes this issue so politically combustible is that though this approach is reasonable and caring, implementing it would nonetheless result in some people dying prematurely or unnecessarily. A handful of people with terminal diseases would have “V-fib” arrests that were quickly reversible with an electric shock or respiratory arrests from curable pneumonias. CPR or intubation with a ventilator would buy them a few more months or even years of life, but under this policy, those relatively uncommon patients would be allowed to die.

Of course, that would spare many times more people from undesired prolonged, uncomfortable, vegetative ends to their lives. But try putting all that into a sound bite and selling it on the Senate floor or on cable news.

The author is an anonymous physician.

Prev

Small opportunities to use mobile technology in medicine

March 30, 2012 Kevin 2
…
Next

Doubting the cost savings of health information technology

March 31, 2012 Kevin 11
…

Tagged as: Hospital-Based Medicine, Palliative Care

Post navigation

< Previous Post
Small opportunities to use mobile technology in medicine
Next Post >
Doubting the cost savings of health information technology

ADVERTISEMENT

More by Anonymous

  • When medicine surrenders to ideology

    Anonymous
  • Why patients and doctors are fleeing flagship hospitals

    Anonymous
  • What a childhood stroke taught me about the future of neurosurgery and the promise of vagus nerve stimulation

    Anonymous

Related Posts

  • Are patients using social media to attack physicians?

    David R. Stukus, MD
  • Hospital administrators thinking about no-cost treatment which really helps patients

    John Corsino, DPT
  • You are abandoning your patients if you are not active on social media

    Pat Rich
  • Don’t judge when trainees use dating apps in the hospital

    Austin Perlmutter, MD
  • Physician Suicide Awareness Day: Where are the patients? 

    Jennifer M. Sweeney
  • A physician’s addiction to social media

    Amanda Xi, MD

More in Physician

  • How restrictive opioid policies worsen the crisis

    Kayvan Haddadan, MD
  • The dying man who gave me flowers changed how I see care

    Augusta Uwah, MD
  • How market forces fracture millennial physicians’ careers

    Shannon Meron, MD
  • Unity in primary care: Why I believe physicians and NPs/PAs must work together toward the same goal

    Jerina Gani, MD, MPH
  • Guilty until proven innocent? My experience with a state medical board.

    Jeffrey Hatef, Jr., MD
  • How to balance clinical duties with building a startup

    Arlen Meyers, MD, MBA
  • Most Popular

  • Past Week

    • Why palliative care is more than just end-of-life support

      Dr. Vishal Parackal | Conditions
    • When life makes you depend on Depends

      Francisco M. Torres, MD | Physician
    • Guilty until proven innocent? My experience with a state medical board.

      Jeffrey Hatef, Jr., MD | Physician
    • Why medical notes have become billing scripts instead of patient stories

      Sriman Swarup, MD, MBA | Tech
    • How denial of hypertension endangers lives and what doctors can do

      Dr. Aminat O. Akintola | Conditions
    • A powerful story of addiction, strength, and redemption

      Ryan McCarthy, MD | Physician
  • Past 6 Months

    • Why transgender health care needs urgent reform and inclusive practices

      Angela Rodriguez, MD | Conditions
    • COVID-19 was real: a doctor’s frontline account

      Randall S. Fong, MD | Conditions
    • Why primary care doctors are drowning in debt despite saving lives

      John Wei, MD | Physician
    • New student loan caps could shut low-income students out of medicine

      Tom Phan, MD | Physician
    • Confessions of a lipidologist in recovery: the infection we’ve ignored for 40 years

      Larry Kaskel, MD | Conditions
    • mRNA post vaccination syndrome: Is it real?

      Harry Oken, MD | Conditions
  • Recent Posts

    • How restrictive opioid policies worsen the crisis

      Kayvan Haddadan, MD | Physician
    • Why doctors should rethink investing compared to the average U.S. investor [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • How chronic stress harms the heart in minority communities

      Monzur Morshed, MD and Kaysan Morshed | Conditions
    • Could antibiotics beat heart disease where statins failed?

      Larry Kaskel, MD | Conditions
    • The dying man who gave me flowers changed how I see care

      Augusta Uwah, MD | Physician
    • Universities must tap endowments to sustain biomedical research

      Adeel Khan, MD | Conditions

Subscribe to KevinMD and never miss a story!

Get free updates delivered free to your inbox.


Find jobs at
Careers by KevinMD.com

Search thousands of physician, PA, NP, and CRNA jobs now.

Learn more

View 11 Comments >

Founded in 2004 by Kevin Pho, MD, KevinMD.com is the web’s leading platform where physicians, advanced practitioners, nurses, medical students, and patients share their insight and tell their stories.

Social

  • Like on Facebook
  • Follow on Twitter
  • Connect on Linkedin
  • Subscribe on Youtube
  • Instagram

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Most Popular

  • Past Week

    • Why palliative care is more than just end-of-life support

      Dr. Vishal Parackal | Conditions
    • When life makes you depend on Depends

      Francisco M. Torres, MD | Physician
    • Guilty until proven innocent? My experience with a state medical board.

      Jeffrey Hatef, Jr., MD | Physician
    • Why medical notes have become billing scripts instead of patient stories

      Sriman Swarup, MD, MBA | Tech
    • How denial of hypertension endangers lives and what doctors can do

      Dr. Aminat O. Akintola | Conditions
    • A powerful story of addiction, strength, and redemption

      Ryan McCarthy, MD | Physician
  • Past 6 Months

    • Why transgender health care needs urgent reform and inclusive practices

      Angela Rodriguez, MD | Conditions
    • COVID-19 was real: a doctor’s frontline account

      Randall S. Fong, MD | Conditions
    • Why primary care doctors are drowning in debt despite saving lives

      John Wei, MD | Physician
    • New student loan caps could shut low-income students out of medicine

      Tom Phan, MD | Physician
    • Confessions of a lipidologist in recovery: the infection we’ve ignored for 40 years

      Larry Kaskel, MD | Conditions
    • mRNA post vaccination syndrome: Is it real?

      Harry Oken, MD | Conditions
  • Recent Posts

    • How restrictive opioid policies worsen the crisis

      Kayvan Haddadan, MD | Physician
    • Why doctors should rethink investing compared to the average U.S. investor [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • How chronic stress harms the heart in minority communities

      Monzur Morshed, MD and Kaysan Morshed | Conditions
    • Could antibiotics beat heart disease where statins failed?

      Larry Kaskel, MD | Conditions
    • The dying man who gave me flowers changed how I see care

      Augusta Uwah, MD | Physician
    • Universities must tap endowments to sustain biomedical research

      Adeel Khan, MD | Conditions

MedPage Today Professional

An Everyday Health Property Medpage Today
  • Terms of Use | Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • DMCA Policy
All Content © KevinMD, LLC
Site by Outthink Group

Why full code should not be the default status for patients
11 comments

Comments are moderated before they are published. Please read the comment policy.

Loading Comments...