Skip to content
  • About
  • Contact
  • Contribute
  • Book
  • Careers
  • Podcast
  • Recommended
  • Speaking
  • All
  • Physician
  • Practice
  • Policy
  • Finance
  • Conditions
  • .edu
  • Patient
  • Meds
  • Tech
  • Social
  • Video
    • All
    • Physician
    • Practice
    • Policy
    • Finance
    • Conditions
    • .edu
    • Patient
    • Meds
    • Tech
    • Social
    • Video
    • About
    • Contact
    • Contribute
    • Book
    • Careers
    • Podcast
    • Recommended
    • Speaking

How will ObamaCare affect prostate cancer screening?

Paul Hsieh, MD
Policy
July 11, 2012
Share
Tweet
Share

When President Obama turned 50 last year, he made an “informed patient request” for a PSA (prostate specific antigen) test. This is the blood test routinely used to screen men over 50 for possible prostate cancer. The President received his PSA test. But under ObamaCare, you may not be able to.

Now that ObamaCare has been upheld by the Supreme Court, all of its major provisions will be in force, not just the controversial “individual mandate.” This includes government medical practice guidelines that will affect millions of Americans.

ObamaCare empowers the government U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) to determine which preventive health services are medically appropriate. This is the same agency that aroused enormous controversy in 2009 when it proposed restricting screening mammograms to women over age 50 (and only every 2 years), despite the proven benefits of annual mammograms beginning at age 40. (Under pressure, Secretary of Health Sebelius later backpedalled from those guidelines, declaring them non-binding.)

This year, the USPSTF aroused similar controversy by giving a “D” grade (“not recommended”) to routine PSA prostate cancer screening.

Prostate cancer is the most common cancer affecting American men and the second leading cause of cancer deaths. Thousands of American men have benefited from early detection and treatment of prostate cancer made possible by PSA testing.

However, there are legitimate scientific debates regarding PSA screening. PSA testing, like all screening tests, is not 100% accurate. Some patients who initially test positive will undergo further biopsy or surgery that show it was a false alarm. Others who test positive will have slow-growing cancers that do not require treatment — i.e., they will die from unrelated conditions before their prostate cancers pose a threat. Some patients who test positive will suffer unavoidable complications from subsequent “downstream” biopsies or surgeries that in retrospect weren’t necessary. PSA testing can thus cause some patients more harm than good.

For these reasons, the American Cancer Society does not issue a hard-and-fast rule about PSA screening. Instead, they recommend that men over 50 make an “informed decision” following a discussion with their doctor on the “uncertainties, risks, and potential benefits of prostate cancer screening.”

Medicine cannot be reduced to cookbook procedures. A 50-year old African-American man whose father and brother both died of prostate cancer might legitimately prefer PSA screening, whereas a 50-year old Caucasian man without risk factors might legitimately choose to skip it. Patients should decide based on their overall health, family history, and the benefits of detecting a treatable cancer vs. the risks of unnecessary downstream procedures. The physician’s job is to honestly advise the patient of his best medical interests. This is the heart of the doctor-patient relationship.

However, the USPSTF guidelines will undermine this doctor-patient relationship because of their enhanced role under ObamaCare.

ObamaCare links insurance coverage of preventive medical services to their USPSTF rating. Medicare must cover all “A” or “B” services, such as cholesterol testing or colonoscopies. For now, Medicare still covers PSA screening despite the USPSTF “D” rating. But under ObamaCare, Medicare payment decisions will become increasingly controlled by the new Independent Payment Advisory Board, explicitly created to reduce Medicare spending. Given Medicare’s skyrocketing costs, it’s only a matter of time before the government stops paying for services that its own scientific panel has given a “D” rating.

Similarly, private health insurance companies must cover for “free” all USPSTF “A” or “B” rated services, while abiding by government price controls. To reduce costs, many private insurers will likely drop coverage for “C” and “D” rated services. Hence under ObamaCare, the USPSTF guidelines will likely become the de facto standards for both government and private health insurance coverage.

But suppose a patient wishes to pay for PSA testing with his own money, rather than through insurance? Even then, ObamaCare will make that more difficult.

ObamaCare includes various financial carrots and sticks to pressure doctors into joining large “Accountable Care Organizations” (ACOs). These ACOs will use mandatory electronic medical records to track how closely physicians adhere to government practice guidelines. Doctors who obey government practice guidelines will be rewarded. Those who order more tests or procedures than the government deems necessary will be penalized.

ADVERTISEMENT

ACO physicians may thus be reluctant to recommend PSA screening even when the patient is willing to pay for it himself. Patients who test positive will require further downstream procedures such as prostate ultrasounds, MRI scans, or biopsies, which may count against the doctor’s ACO practice statistics. USPSTF guidelines could slowly erode many doctors’ willingness to offer their best honest advice to their patients. If your doctor recommends against a PSA test, can you be sure he’s offering his best medical opinion, without being biased by the bonus he’ll receive for reducing the number of procedures performed by the ACO?

Urologists — who regularly treat patients with prostate cancer — are overwhelmingly opposed to the USPSTF guidelines. Dr. Ian Thompson, a urologist at the University of Texas, notes that the USPSTF guidelines will prevent his patients from making properly informed decisions about their own health. Instead, they amount to a bureaucrat telling patients, “Follow my priorities instead of your own.”

When President Obama had his routine physical last year, he enjoyed the freedom to consult with his doctors, weigh the pros and cons of PSA testing, and decide for himself what was in his best medical interest. But under ObamaCare, the President will not allow you that same freedom. Instead, the federal government will decide for you.

Is that fair? Is President Obama’s prostate gland more important than yours?

Paul Hsieh is a radiologist and co-founder of Freedom and Individual Rights in Medicine.  This article originally appeared in Forbes.

Prev

How to recognize positional orthostatic tachycardic syndrome (POTS)

July 11, 2012 Kevin 6
…
Next

Dear Patient, great things are happening in health care

July 11, 2012 Kevin 8
…

Tagged as: Oncology/Hematology, Primary Care

Post navigation

< Previous Post
How to recognize positional orthostatic tachycardic syndrome (POTS)
Next Post >
Dear Patient, great things are happening in health care

ADVERTISEMENT

More by Paul Hsieh, MD

  • Why doctors should not ask patients about guns: A conservative case

    Paul Hsieh, MD
  • a desk with keyboard and ipad with the kevinmd logo

    My iPad and my hip fracture

    Paul Hsieh, MD
  • a desk with keyboard and ipad with the kevinmd logo

    Government-controlled health insurance may politicize health

    Paul Hsieh, MD

More in Policy

  • Ideology, not evidence, fuels the anti-trans agenda

    Shawn E. Parra, LCSW, MSW and Andie Riffer, PhD
  • Health equity in Inland Southern California requires urgent action

    Vishruth Nagam
  • How American medicine profits from despair

    Jenny Shields, PhD
  • What I learned about health care by watching who gets left behind

    Maanyata Mantri
  • How the One Big Beautiful Bill could reshape your medical career

    Kara Pepper, MD
  • Why the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force is essential to saving lives

    J. Leonard Lichtenfeld, MD
  • Most Popular

  • Past Week

    • Health equity in Inland Southern California requires urgent action

      Vishruth Nagam | Policy
    • Could antibiotics beat heart disease where statins failed?

      Larry Kaskel, MD | Conditions
    • How restrictive opioid policies worsen the crisis

      Kayvan Haddadan, MD | Physician
    • Why palliative care is more than just end-of-life support

      Dr. Vishal Parackal | Conditions
    • My improbable survival of stage 4 cancer

      Kelly Curtin-Hallinan, DO | Conditions
    • Ideology, not evidence, fuels the anti-trans agenda

      Shawn E. Parra, LCSW, MSW and Andie Riffer, PhD | Policy
  • Past 6 Months

    • Why transgender health care needs urgent reform and inclusive practices

      Angela Rodriguez, MD | Conditions
    • COVID-19 was real: a doctor’s frontline account

      Randall S. Fong, MD | Conditions
    • Why primary care doctors are drowning in debt despite saving lives

      John Wei, MD | Physician
    • New student loan caps could shut low-income students out of medicine

      Tom Phan, MD | Physician
    • Why pain doctors face unfair scrutiny and harsh penalties in California

      Kayvan Haddadan, MD | Physician
    • mRNA post vaccination syndrome: Is it real?

      Harry Oken, MD | Conditions
  • Recent Posts

    • Ideology, not evidence, fuels the anti-trans agenda

      Shawn E. Parra, LCSW, MSW and Andie Riffer, PhD | Policy
    • How Ukrainian doctors sustained diabetes care during the war [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • The backbone of health care is breaking

      Grace Yu, MD | Physician
    • Why doctors must ask for help before burnout escalates

      Diane W. Shannon, MD, MPH | Physician
    • Why medicine is like a jazz solo

      Arthur Lazarus, MD, MBA | Physician
    • Why so many patients ask for drips—and what doctors wish they knew

      Dr. Akintola Aminat Olayinka | Physician

Subscribe to KevinMD and never miss a story!

Get free updates delivered free to your inbox.


Find jobs at
Careers by KevinMD.com

Search thousands of physician, PA, NP, and CRNA jobs now.

Learn more

View 12 Comments >

Founded in 2004 by Kevin Pho, MD, KevinMD.com is the web’s leading platform where physicians, advanced practitioners, nurses, medical students, and patients share their insight and tell their stories.

Social

  • Like on Facebook
  • Follow on Twitter
  • Connect on Linkedin
  • Subscribe on Youtube
  • Instagram

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Most Popular

  • Past Week

    • Health equity in Inland Southern California requires urgent action

      Vishruth Nagam | Policy
    • Could antibiotics beat heart disease where statins failed?

      Larry Kaskel, MD | Conditions
    • How restrictive opioid policies worsen the crisis

      Kayvan Haddadan, MD | Physician
    • Why palliative care is more than just end-of-life support

      Dr. Vishal Parackal | Conditions
    • My improbable survival of stage 4 cancer

      Kelly Curtin-Hallinan, DO | Conditions
    • Ideology, not evidence, fuels the anti-trans agenda

      Shawn E. Parra, LCSW, MSW and Andie Riffer, PhD | Policy
  • Past 6 Months

    • Why transgender health care needs urgent reform and inclusive practices

      Angela Rodriguez, MD | Conditions
    • COVID-19 was real: a doctor’s frontline account

      Randall S. Fong, MD | Conditions
    • Why primary care doctors are drowning in debt despite saving lives

      John Wei, MD | Physician
    • New student loan caps could shut low-income students out of medicine

      Tom Phan, MD | Physician
    • Why pain doctors face unfair scrutiny and harsh penalties in California

      Kayvan Haddadan, MD | Physician
    • mRNA post vaccination syndrome: Is it real?

      Harry Oken, MD | Conditions
  • Recent Posts

    • Ideology, not evidence, fuels the anti-trans agenda

      Shawn E. Parra, LCSW, MSW and Andie Riffer, PhD | Policy
    • How Ukrainian doctors sustained diabetes care during the war [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • The backbone of health care is breaking

      Grace Yu, MD | Physician
    • Why doctors must ask for help before burnout escalates

      Diane W. Shannon, MD, MPH | Physician
    • Why medicine is like a jazz solo

      Arthur Lazarus, MD, MBA | Physician
    • Why so many patients ask for drips—and what doctors wish they knew

      Dr. Akintola Aminat Olayinka | Physician

MedPage Today Professional

An Everyday Health Property Medpage Today
  • Terms of Use | Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • DMCA Policy
All Content © KevinMD, LLC
Site by Outthink Group

How will ObamaCare affect prostate cancer screening?
12 comments

Comments are moderated before they are published. Please read the comment policy.

Loading Comments...