Skip to content
  • About
  • Contact
  • Contribute
  • Book
  • Careers
  • Podcast
  • Recommended
  • Speaking
  • All
  • Physician
  • Practice
  • Policy
  • Finance
  • Conditions
  • .edu
  • Patient
  • Meds
  • Tech
  • Social
  • Video
    • All
    • Physician
    • Practice
    • Policy
    • Finance
    • Conditions
    • .edu
    • Patient
    • Meds
    • Tech
    • Social
    • Video
    • About
    • Contact
    • Contribute
    • Book
    • Careers
    • Podcast
    • Recommended
    • Speaking

CT scans for lung cancer screening: Look closely at the statistics

Kenneth Lin, MD
Conditions
September 16, 2012
Share
Tweet
Share

Enthusiasm for lung cancer screening has never been higher, following last year’s report from the National Lung Screening Trial (NLST) that heavy smokers who underwent 3 rounds of low-dose computed tomography (CT) screening were 20 percent less likely to die from lung cancer compared to a similar group that was screened with chest x-rays (a “placebo” intervention that another study found to be ineffective). My own institution, Georgetown University Hospital, was one of the study sites for the NLST, and has been advertising its lung cancer screening services to physicians and the general public.

In a previous post, I offered a few reasons for eligible patients to consider not getting screened for lung cancer: 1) the risk of developing cancer from the CT scan itself; 2) high rates of false positive tests; 3) overdiagnosis and overtreatment; 4) incidental findings that could lead to additional, likely unnecessary, diagnostic procedures. I concede, however, that reasonable people might conclude that these potential harms are outweighed by the benefit of reducing one’s risk of dying from lung cancer by one-fifth, especially if the patient in question has already quit smoking.

The next critical question that needs to be asked is: one-fifth of what?

The more you smoke, the longer you smoke, and the older you are, the greater your risk of dying from lung cancer. Men are also slightly more likely to die from lung cancer than women. The “average” participant in the NLST was a 62 year-old man who had smoked one and a half packs of cigarettes per day for 35 years. In the absence of screening, 20 out of 1000 men like this would die from lung cancer over the next 6 years. Taking away 20 percent of that risk with screening (20 minus 4) reduces his risk of lung cancer death to 16 out of 1000. Stated another way, about 250 people would need to be screened to prevent 1 death from lung cancer over 6 years, which, compared to other screening tests, is a pretty impressive figure. (In contrast, nearly 2000 women in their 40s need to be screened with mammograms to prevent one breast cancer death over a similar time period.)

As Drs. Peter Bach and Michael Gould point out in the Annals of Internal Medicine, however, few people currently being offered lung cancer screening have a risk of lung cancer death that resembles the average NLST participant. A 55 year-old woman who just kicked her 1 pack-per-day, 30-year smoking habit has only a 4 in 1000 risk of death from lung cancer in the next 6 years. Taking away 20 percent of that risk (4 – 0.8) drops it to about 3 in 1000. More than 1200 patients like this woman would need to be screened to prevent 1 death from lung cancer. And some hospitals across the U.S. are offering lung cancer screening to younger smokers at even lower risk, translating to numbers needed to screen of 35,000 or more to prevent one lung cancer death – a benefit that could easily be outweighed by all of the potential harms of screening.

Their conclusion: “The underlying chance that a person will benefit from CT screening should be considered when counseling patients about the potential benefits of being screening.” Too often when physicians offer a screening test or other intervention, we tend to quote the impressive-sounding reduction in relative risk without providing patients with information about their baseline risk, or what their risk would be without it. This isn’t likely to change any time soon. To make a fully informed medical decision, whenever a doctor says, “Test X will reduce your risk of disease X (or death from disease X) by 20 percent,” patients should always ask, “20 percent of what”?

Kenneth Lin is a family physician who blogs at Common Sense Family Doctor.

Prev

Is there a role for the laxative free virtual colonoscopy?

September 16, 2012 Kevin 5
…
Next

Can I still have a bladder infection with a negative urine culture?

September 16, 2012 Kevin 1
…

Tagged as: Oncology/Hematology

Post navigation

< Previous Post
Is there a role for the laxative free virtual colonoscopy?
Next Post >
Can I still have a bladder infection with a negative urine culture?

ADVERTISEMENT

More by Kenneth Lin, MD

  • How to recruit more students into family medicine

    Kenneth Lin, MD
  • When should you prescribe statins for older adults?

    Kenneth Lin, MD
  • Clinical practice guidelines have problems, but they’re not broken

    Kenneth Lin, MD

More in Conditions

  • Why health self-advocacy is an essential life skill

    Alan P. Feren, MD & Joyce Griggs
  • Are doctors’ emotions fueling the opioid crisis?

    Brian Lynch, MD
  • Focal therapy for prostate cancer: a new option

    Louis S. Liou, MD, PhD
  • Why a 500-calorie meal isn’t always fit

    Larry Kaskel, MD
  • How physician obesity affects patient care

    June Pomeroy, RN
  • When culture has the final word in cancer care

    Dr. Bhavin P. Vadodariya
  • Most Popular

  • Past Week

    • The mental health workforce is collapsing

      Ronke Lawal | Conditions
    • A doctor’s struggle with burnout and boundaries

      Humeira Badsha, MD | Physician
    • The stoic cure for modern anxiety

      Osmund Agbo, MD | Physician
    • The hypocrisy of insurance referral mandates

      Ryan Nadelson, MD | Physician
    • Why physicians with ADHD are struggling with burnout despite success [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • Unhooking from the ego in medicine

      Tammie Chang, MD | Physician
  • Past 6 Months

    • Rethinking the JUPITER trial and statin safety

      Larry Kaskel, MD | Conditions
    • The ignored clinical trials on statins and mortality

      Larry Kaskel, MD | Conditions
    • How one physician redesigned her practice to find joy in primary care again [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • I passed my medical boards at 63. And no, I was not having a midlife crisis.

      Rajeev Khanna, MD | Physician
    • Why doctors must fight for a just health care system

      Alankrita Olson, MD, MPH & Ashley Duhon, MD & Toby Terwilliger, MD | Policy
    • The human case for preserving the nipple after mastectomy

      Thomas Amburn, MD | Conditions
  • Recent Posts

    • Innovations and barriers in colorectal cancer screening strategies [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • Global surgery needs advocates, not just evidence

      Shirley Sarah Dadson | Education
    • The hypocrisy of insurance referral mandates

      Ryan Nadelson, MD | Physician
    • The timeless art of diagnostic reasoning

      Sandip Pandey | Physician
    • Why health self-advocacy is an essential life skill

      Alan P. Feren, MD & Joyce Griggs | Conditions
    • How functional medicine helps where conventional care falls short [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast

Subscribe to KevinMD and never miss a story!

Get free updates delivered free to your inbox.


Find jobs at
Careers by KevinMD.com

Search thousands of physician, PA, NP, and CRNA jobs now.

Learn more

View 2 Comments >

Founded in 2004 by Kevin Pho, MD, KevinMD.com is the web’s leading platform where physicians, advanced practitioners, nurses, medical students, and patients share their insight and tell their stories.

Social

  • Like on Facebook
  • Follow on Twitter
  • Connect on Linkedin
  • Subscribe on Youtube
  • Instagram

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Most Popular

  • Past Week

    • The mental health workforce is collapsing

      Ronke Lawal | Conditions
    • A doctor’s struggle with burnout and boundaries

      Humeira Badsha, MD | Physician
    • The stoic cure for modern anxiety

      Osmund Agbo, MD | Physician
    • The hypocrisy of insurance referral mandates

      Ryan Nadelson, MD | Physician
    • Why physicians with ADHD are struggling with burnout despite success [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • Unhooking from the ego in medicine

      Tammie Chang, MD | Physician
  • Past 6 Months

    • Rethinking the JUPITER trial and statin safety

      Larry Kaskel, MD | Conditions
    • The ignored clinical trials on statins and mortality

      Larry Kaskel, MD | Conditions
    • How one physician redesigned her practice to find joy in primary care again [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • I passed my medical boards at 63. And no, I was not having a midlife crisis.

      Rajeev Khanna, MD | Physician
    • Why doctors must fight for a just health care system

      Alankrita Olson, MD, MPH & Ashley Duhon, MD & Toby Terwilliger, MD | Policy
    • The human case for preserving the nipple after mastectomy

      Thomas Amburn, MD | Conditions
  • Recent Posts

    • Innovations and barriers in colorectal cancer screening strategies [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • Global surgery needs advocates, not just evidence

      Shirley Sarah Dadson | Education
    • The hypocrisy of insurance referral mandates

      Ryan Nadelson, MD | Physician
    • The timeless art of diagnostic reasoning

      Sandip Pandey | Physician
    • Why health self-advocacy is an essential life skill

      Alan P. Feren, MD & Joyce Griggs | Conditions
    • How functional medicine helps where conventional care falls short [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast

MedPage Today Professional

An Everyday Health Property Medpage Today
  • Terms of Use | Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • DMCA Policy
All Content © KevinMD, LLC
Site by Outthink Group

CT scans for lung cancer screening: Look closely at the statistics
2 comments

Comments are moderated before they are published. Please read the comment policy.

Loading Comments...