Skip to content
  • About
  • Contact
  • Contribute
  • Book
  • Careers
  • Podcast
  • Recommended
  • Speaking
  • All
  • Physician
  • Practice
  • Policy
  • Finance
  • Conditions
  • .edu
  • Patient
  • Meds
  • Tech
  • Social
  • Video
    • All
    • Physician
    • Practice
    • Policy
    • Finance
    • Conditions
    • .edu
    • Patient
    • Meds
    • Tech
    • Social
    • Video
    • About
    • Contact
    • Contribute
    • Book
    • Careers
    • Podcast
    • Recommended
    • Speaking

How the medical home can spur academic research

Fred N. Pelzman, MD
Physician
December 15, 2013
Share
Tweet
Share

As we’ve gone through the process of building our patient-centered medical home, we have brought along a little bit of the scientific method.

As part of the medical home rollout, we developed an expanded quality improvement curriculum for our internal medicine residents. A series of talks on key topics of the patient-centered medical home has been developed, and several faculty experts have been delivering these to the residents. As a part of this curriculum, the residents are each doing a research project on quality improvement focused on the patient-centered medical home in outpatient medicine.

As the curriculum was developed, we decided to evaluate it, essentially to do research on the research. We thought about what we wanted to teach the residents, how we wanted to teach them, and how we wanted to learn whether they had learned.

We created a series of pretests, looking at their knowledge of the concepts of the patient-centered medical home, a series of (sort of) leading questions looking at whether they thought they already had the tools necessary to provide true patient-centered care before we taught them how to.

Now that we’ve delivered the curriculum, we are planning to give them a posttest, to see if they have learned what we wanted them to learn. Then we plan to compare the pre-tests and posttests, and see if our curriculum made a difference.

The question becomes, is this sort of research really necessary? What does it add to our knowledge?

We are already beginning to work on the abstract to be presented at a regional meeting to show that our curriculum led to a change in resident’s knowledge and ability to care for patients under a patient-centered medical home model. We have been having ongoing discussions about whether this data should be presented as a scatter plot, or variation from the mean, and how much of a change in knowledge should be considered significant.

Although it is clearly important to study whether what you’re teaching your learners really makes a difference, turning it all into research sometimes seems a bit excessive.

Yet, we live in the academic world, the world of publish or perish, and clearly there is a need for us to do scholarly work to validate that what we are doing really makes a difference, and perhaps share this knowledge with others.

And sharing is certainly important. A colleague of mine had a mentor in college who was a chemist; he suffered a devastating injury as a result of an experimental protocol he was trying, which he believed no one had ever attempted before. Years after his injury, he discovered that another group of scientists at a different institution had tried the same procedure with similar catastrophic results. They had never published this information, since it was considered a “negative finding.” I’ve always wondered if he harbored ill feelings towards that group.

It seems in academic medicine we can write up everything we do, every case we see, every initiative we try, every series of patients we follow, every new tweak to our electronic health record, every new system we put into place to improve care coordination.

But with the enormous amount of information flooding at us in multiple different formats — online, at local meetings, in journals — if we spend all of our time writing up the work we do, and reading about the work others do, do we end up not having the actual time we need to take care of our patients — to do the doing?

I’m not negating the benefits of doing rigorous academic research, and publishing well-done studies, and keeping up-to-date in the literature of your chosen field. But we already know that with the wealth of information out there, the explosion of information, the endless number of new medications being released every day, new protocols for every disease possible, that keeping 100% up-to-date is impossible.

ADVERTISEMENT

Now all of this may sound like I’m not interested in doing research in this field, or that I think it is not going to be useful, or may, in fact, be a waste of everyone’s time. This is not the case. Recently in several leading academic journals, including JAMA, there have been a number of articles about the patient-centered medical home, how it may be reinvigorating the field, and pointing to new ways of caring for our patients.

So research in the field is important. And the leadership of our hospital and medical center have offered their support to our doing it, from our efforts to create a research structure examining all of the work we are doing around the patient-centered medical home, to the resident research projects aimed at improving point-of-care testing timeliness, to retasking the registrars to build a more cohesive team structure.

And guess who they have put in charge?

Fred N. Pelzman is an associate professor of medicine, New York Presbyterian Hospital and associate director, Weill Cornell Internal Medicine Associates, New York City, NY. He blogs at Building the Patient-Centered Medical Home. 

Prev

What you should know about your primary care physician

December 15, 2013 Kevin 7
…
Next

Student-run free clinics: A pure form of medicine

December 15, 2013 Kevin 13
…

Tagged as: Primary Care

Post navigation

< Previous Post
What you should know about your primary care physician
Next Post >
Student-run free clinics: A pure form of medicine

ADVERTISEMENT

More by Fred N. Pelzman, MD

  • Why electronic medical records should be standardized

    Fred N. Pelzman, MD
  • Can answers to after hours calls be automated?

    Fred N. Pelzman, MD
  • We have to do better than DNR tattoos

    Fred N. Pelzman, MD

More in Physician

  • Why Canada is losing its skilled immigrant doctors

    Olumuyiwa Bamgbade, MD
  • Why doctors are reclaiming control from burnout culture

    Maureen Gibbons, MD
  • Why screening for diseases you might have can backfire

    Andy Lazris, MD and Alan Roth, DO
  • Why “do no harm” might be harming modern medicine

    Sabooh S. Mubbashar, MD
  • International doctors blocked by visa delays as U.S. faces physician shortage

    Arthur Lazarus, MD, MBA
  • How I redesigned my life as a physician without abandoning medicine

    Ben Reinking, MD
  • Most Popular

  • Past Week

    • Why are medical students turning away from primary care? [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • Here’s what providers really need in a modern EHR

      Laura Kohlhagen, MD, MBA | Tech
    • Why “do no harm” might be harming modern medicine

      Sabooh S. Mubbashar, MD | Physician
    • How community paramedicine impacts Indigenous elders

      Noah Weinberg | Conditions
    • Addressing U.S. vaccine inequities in vulnerable communities [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • How to speak the language of leadership to improve doctor wellness [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
  • Past 6 Months

    • Why tracking cognitive load could save doctors and patients

      Hiba Fatima Hamid | Education
    • Why are medical students turning away from primary care? [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • Why “do no harm” might be harming modern medicine

      Sabooh S. Mubbashar, MD | Physician
    • Here’s what providers really need in a modern EHR

      Laura Kohlhagen, MD, MBA | Tech
    • What the world must learn from the life and death of Hind Rajab

      Saba Qaiser, RN | Conditions
    • How medical culture hides burnout in plain sight

      Marco Benítez | Conditions
  • Recent Posts

    • Addressing U.S. vaccine inequities in vulnerable communities [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • Why Canada is losing its skilled immigrant doctors

      Olumuyiwa Bamgbade, MD | Physician
    • Why doctors are reclaiming control from burnout culture

      Maureen Gibbons, MD | Physician
    • Would The Pitts’ Dr. Robby Robinavitch welcome a new colleague? Yes. Especially if their initials were AI.

      Gabe Jones, MBA | Tech
    • Why medicine must stop worshipping burnout and start valuing humanity

      Sarah White, APRN | Conditions
    • Why screening for diseases you might have can backfire

      Andy Lazris, MD and Alan Roth, DO | Physician

Subscribe to KevinMD and never miss a story!

Get free updates delivered free to your inbox.


Find jobs at
Careers by KevinMD.com

Search thousands of physician, PA, NP, and CRNA jobs now.

Learn more

View 1 Comments >

Founded in 2004 by Kevin Pho, MD, KevinMD.com is the web’s leading platform where physicians, advanced practitioners, nurses, medical students, and patients share their insight and tell their stories.

Social

  • Like on Facebook
  • Follow on Twitter
  • Connect on Linkedin
  • Subscribe on Youtube
  • Instagram

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Most Popular

  • Past Week

    • Why are medical students turning away from primary care? [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • Here’s what providers really need in a modern EHR

      Laura Kohlhagen, MD, MBA | Tech
    • Why “do no harm” might be harming modern medicine

      Sabooh S. Mubbashar, MD | Physician
    • How community paramedicine impacts Indigenous elders

      Noah Weinberg | Conditions
    • Addressing U.S. vaccine inequities in vulnerable communities [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • How to speak the language of leadership to improve doctor wellness [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
  • Past 6 Months

    • Why tracking cognitive load could save doctors and patients

      Hiba Fatima Hamid | Education
    • Why are medical students turning away from primary care? [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • Why “do no harm” might be harming modern medicine

      Sabooh S. Mubbashar, MD | Physician
    • Here’s what providers really need in a modern EHR

      Laura Kohlhagen, MD, MBA | Tech
    • What the world must learn from the life and death of Hind Rajab

      Saba Qaiser, RN | Conditions
    • How medical culture hides burnout in plain sight

      Marco Benítez | Conditions
  • Recent Posts

    • Addressing U.S. vaccine inequities in vulnerable communities [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • Why Canada is losing its skilled immigrant doctors

      Olumuyiwa Bamgbade, MD | Physician
    • Why doctors are reclaiming control from burnout culture

      Maureen Gibbons, MD | Physician
    • Would The Pitts’ Dr. Robby Robinavitch welcome a new colleague? Yes. Especially if their initials were AI.

      Gabe Jones, MBA | Tech
    • Why medicine must stop worshipping burnout and start valuing humanity

      Sarah White, APRN | Conditions
    • Why screening for diseases you might have can backfire

      Andy Lazris, MD and Alan Roth, DO | Physician

MedPage Today Professional

An Everyday Health Property Medpage Today
  • Terms of Use | Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • DMCA Policy
All Content © KevinMD, LLC
Site by Outthink Group

How the medical home can spur academic research
1 comments

Comments are moderated before they are published. Please read the comment policy.

Loading Comments...