Skip to content
  • About
  • Contact
  • Contribute
  • Book
  • Careers
  • Podcast
  • Recommended
  • Speaking
  • All
  • Physician
  • Practice
  • Policy
  • Finance
  • Conditions
  • .edu
  • Patient
  • Meds
  • Tech
  • Social
  • Video
    • All
    • Physician
    • Practice
    • Policy
    • Finance
    • Conditions
    • .edu
    • Patient
    • Meds
    • Tech
    • Social
    • Video
    • About
    • Contact
    • Contribute
    • Book
    • Careers
    • Podcast
    • Recommended
    • Speaking

Our fascination with Ebola exposes a double standard

Robert Pearl, MD
Conditions
December 29, 2014
Share
Tweet
Share

Since Ebola was first discovered in 1976, there have been an estimated 16 to 22 recorded outbreaks. In August, the World Health Organization designated the most recent outbreak a global emergency.

Ebola is a deadly infection and the scope of the current epidemic in West Africa is unprecedented. More than 17,000 people have contracted Ebola virus disease (EVD) with more than 6,000 estimated deaths.

Many in the health care field have criticized the response of world leaders and health officials. Yet so far, the risk of contracting the disease in the U.S. appears minimal. Only 10 cases and 2 deaths have been reported in this country. That fact hasn’t tempered fears much. In November, nearly half the participants in an online poll considered Ebola a “moderate” or “major”  public health threat to Americans.

Ebola is a terrible disease and we need to do everything we can to protect people from it. But as a doctor and CEO, I can’t help but notice a double standard relative to the Ebola response. U.S. health officials have spared no expense and health care workers have, appropriately, insisted no preventive measure is too extreme. Meanwhile, another infectious disease has been killing thousands of Americans each year with very little media fanfare or public outcry.

Media coverage of infectious diseases

Much of what people in the United States know about Ebola surfaced through media coverage. And to the media’s credit, Americans now have a clearer understanding of how Ebola is transmitted and how to stop this disease from spreading.

Over the past three months, the volume of media coverage has been extraordinary. In fact, a Google News search for “Ebola” returned (at press time) nearly 8 million results since September 30, when the first confirmed case of Ebola was diagnosed in the U.S. And although interest among readers and viewers accounts for much of the expanded coverage, part of the media frenzy has been driven by health care leaders focused on risks to the medical staff caring for these patients.

But the same individuals who demand all-out efforts to protect caregivers from Ebola have remained relatively quiet about this other infectious disease that kills thousands of patients annually.

This other disease — Clostridium difficile (C. diff) — is linked to more than 400,000 infections and 14,000 deaths each year in the U.S. alone. And yet, most Americans have never heard of it.

C. diff is a common cause of diarrhea and death for hospitalized patients in this country. It is 25 times more prevalent in the U.S. than Ebola is worldwide. However, a Google News search for “C. diff” returned just 1,370 results since late September, less than 0.1 percent of the Ebola coverage.

This disparity in coverage can be partly explained by the newness of Ebola in the U.S., combined with the high mortality rate overseas. But there’s much more to this disparity than meets the eye.

Ebola And C. diff: One important difference  

Ebola and C. diff share some similarities. Both are transmitted through direct contact — Ebola through blood and bodily fluids, C. diff through skin-to-skin contact.

ADVERTISEMENT

In the U.S., early experience tells us the risk of dying from Ebola is around 20 percent. And although the average patient who contracts C. diff faces a fairly low risk of dying, C. diff mortality rates can climb as high as that of Ebola once patients require intensive care.

Both are extremely dangerous and deadly diseases. But there is one major difference: Who is at risk.

Ebola infects otherwise healthy individuals while C. diff is confined to relatively sick people, particularly those on powerful antibiotics in hospital settings. Health care workers risk their lives caring for individuals with Ebola. But statistically, they’re more likely to spread C. diff to their patients than they are to contract it. That’s because the most common way C. diff is spread is on the hands of health care workers who fail to wash up between patients.

As hard as it is to believe, studies show that nearly one-third of hospital workers fail to wash their hands when moving from patient to patient. More than a decade ago, the Institute of Medicine published a report claiming up to 98,000 people a year die because of medical errors, equal to a 747 aircraft crashing each day.

Cynics quickly pointed out that when a 747 plane crashes, the pilot goes down with the plane. When hospitalized patients die as a result of health care workers not washing their hands, the “pilot” survives.

The Ebola double standard

Caring for patients with Ebola is complex. It requires extensive training and elaborate equipment. The CDC is now traveling the country and has confirmed that 35 destination hospitals in the U.S. are doing everything possible to protect health care workers and patients alike.

But that same level of caution and concern does not exist when it comes to preventing the spread of C. diff and other hospital-acquired infections. In fact, CDC figures from 2011 reported 722,000 U.S. hospital-acquired infections that year, resulting in approximately 75,000 unnecessary deaths.

Given these staggering statistics, how is it possible for caregivers not to wash their hands when they go in and out of a patient’s room? Excuses abound. Health care workers tell themselves it is not essential to wash if a patient seems healthy. They may rationalize that it’s too much trouble or that they don’t have the time. But make no mistake, if improper hand hygiene put 14,000 caregivers at risk of dying, the culture and rules of health care would change rapidly.

Some of the same leaders who demand hazmat suits to protect health care workers from Ebola have done little to address the risks involved when health care workers don’t wash their hands. Ending this double standard will save lives.

Of course, we need to do everything we can to protect the population at large from Ebola, especially those dedicated individuals caring for its victims. As TIME’s Nancy Gibbs writes, “Anyone willing to treat Ebola victims (runs) the risk of becoming one.” We owe a debt of gratitude to these Ebola fighters who have risked their lives providing care to the African communities so severely impacted by this disease. Through their efforts, we are making real progress toward stopping the outbreak. After all, preventing the spread of Ebola in West Africa is the best way to protect people in the U.S.

But we as a health care community must also invest the same level of passion and concern to stop the spread of C. diff and other hospital-acquired infections. No health care worker wants to hurt patients, but it happens. And all too often, the health care double standard is to blame.

Robert Pearl is a physician and CEO, The Permanente Medical Group. This article originally appeared on Forbes.com. 

Prev

A New Year's resolution for physicians: Listen to your inner voice

December 29, 2014 Kevin 3
…
Next

How medical students can change the culture of medicine

December 29, 2014 Kevin 53
…

Tagged as: Infectious Disease

Post navigation

< Previous Post
A New Year's resolution for physicians: Listen to your inner voice
Next Post >
How medical students can change the culture of medicine

ADVERTISEMENT

More by Robert Pearl, MD

  • The emotional toll of a broken health care system

    Robert Pearl, MD
  • Medicare’s cobra effect: How a well-intentioned policy spiraled into a health care crisis

    Robert Pearl, MD
  • Empowering patients: Navigating medical information with AI

    Robert Pearl, MD

More in Conditions

  • Facing terminal cancer as a doctor and mother

    Kelly Curtin-Hallinan, DO
  • Why doctors must stop ignoring unintentional weight loss in patients with obesity

    Samantha Malley, FNP-C
  • Why hospitals are quietly capping top doctors’ pay

    Dennis Hursh, Esq
  • Why point-of-care ultrasound belongs in emergency department triage

    Resa E. Lewiss, MD and Courtney M. Smalley, MD
  • Why PSA levels alone shouldn’t define your prostate cancer risk

    Martina Ambardjieva, MD, PhD
  • Reframing chronic pain and dignity: What a pain clinic teaches us about MAiD and chronic suffering

    Olumuyiwa Bamgbade, MD
  • Most Popular

  • Past Week

    • Forced voicemail and diagnosis codes are endangering patient access to medications

      Arthur Lazarus, MD, MBA | Meds
    • How President Biden’s cognitive health shapes political and legal trust

      Muhamad Aly Rifai, MD | Conditions
    • The One Big Beautiful Bill and the fragile heart of rural health care

      Holland Haynie, MD | Policy
    • America’s ER crisis: Why the system is collapsing from within

      Kristen Cline, BSN, RN | Conditions
    • Why timing, not surgery, determines patient survival

      Michael Karch, MD | Conditions
    • How early meetings and after-hours events penalize physician-mothers

      Samira Jeimy, MD, PhD and Menaka Pai, MD | Physician
  • Past 6 Months

    • Forced voicemail and diagnosis codes are endangering patient access to medications

      Arthur Lazarus, MD, MBA | Meds
    • How President Biden’s cognitive health shapes political and legal trust

      Muhamad Aly Rifai, MD | Conditions
    • Why are medical students turning away from primary care? [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • The One Big Beautiful Bill and the fragile heart of rural health care

      Holland Haynie, MD | Policy
    • Why “do no harm” might be harming modern medicine

      Sabooh S. Mubbashar, MD | Physician
    • The hidden health risks in the One Big Beautiful Bill Act

      Trevor Lyford, MPH | Policy
  • Recent Posts

    • Beyond burnout: Understanding the triangle of exhaustion [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • Facing terminal cancer as a doctor and mother

      Kelly Curtin-Hallinan, DO | Conditions
    • Online eye exams spark legal battle over health care access

      Joshua Windham, JD and Daryl James | Policy
    • FDA delays could end vital treatment for rare disease patients

      G. van Londen, MD | Meds
    • Pharmacists are key to expanding Medicaid access to digital therapeutics

      Amanda Matter | Meds
    • Why ADHD in women requires a new approach [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast

Subscribe to KevinMD and never miss a story!

Get free updates delivered free to your inbox.


Find jobs at
Careers by KevinMD.com

Search thousands of physician, PA, NP, and CRNA jobs now.

Learn more

View 2 Comments >

Founded in 2004 by Kevin Pho, MD, KevinMD.com is the web’s leading platform where physicians, advanced practitioners, nurses, medical students, and patients share their insight and tell their stories.

Social

  • Like on Facebook
  • Follow on Twitter
  • Connect on Linkedin
  • Subscribe on Youtube
  • Instagram

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Most Popular

  • Past Week

    • Forced voicemail and diagnosis codes are endangering patient access to medications

      Arthur Lazarus, MD, MBA | Meds
    • How President Biden’s cognitive health shapes political and legal trust

      Muhamad Aly Rifai, MD | Conditions
    • The One Big Beautiful Bill and the fragile heart of rural health care

      Holland Haynie, MD | Policy
    • America’s ER crisis: Why the system is collapsing from within

      Kristen Cline, BSN, RN | Conditions
    • Why timing, not surgery, determines patient survival

      Michael Karch, MD | Conditions
    • How early meetings and after-hours events penalize physician-mothers

      Samira Jeimy, MD, PhD and Menaka Pai, MD | Physician
  • Past 6 Months

    • Forced voicemail and diagnosis codes are endangering patient access to medications

      Arthur Lazarus, MD, MBA | Meds
    • How President Biden’s cognitive health shapes political and legal trust

      Muhamad Aly Rifai, MD | Conditions
    • Why are medical students turning away from primary care? [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • The One Big Beautiful Bill and the fragile heart of rural health care

      Holland Haynie, MD | Policy
    • Why “do no harm” might be harming modern medicine

      Sabooh S. Mubbashar, MD | Physician
    • The hidden health risks in the One Big Beautiful Bill Act

      Trevor Lyford, MPH | Policy
  • Recent Posts

    • Beyond burnout: Understanding the triangle of exhaustion [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • Facing terminal cancer as a doctor and mother

      Kelly Curtin-Hallinan, DO | Conditions
    • Online eye exams spark legal battle over health care access

      Joshua Windham, JD and Daryl James | Policy
    • FDA delays could end vital treatment for rare disease patients

      G. van Londen, MD | Meds
    • Pharmacists are key to expanding Medicaid access to digital therapeutics

      Amanda Matter | Meds
    • Why ADHD in women requires a new approach [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast

MedPage Today Professional

An Everyday Health Property Medpage Today
  • Terms of Use | Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • DMCA Policy
All Content © KevinMD, LLC
Site by Outthink Group

Our fascination with Ebola exposes a double standard
2 comments

Comments are moderated before they are published. Please read the comment policy.

Loading Comments...