Skip to content
  • About
  • Contact
  • Contribute
  • Book
  • Careers
  • Podcast
  • Recommended
  • Speaking
  • All
  • Physician
  • Practice
  • Policy
  • Finance
  • Conditions
  • .edu
  • Patient
  • Meds
  • Tech
  • Social
  • Video
    • All
    • Physician
    • Practice
    • Policy
    • Finance
    • Conditions
    • .edu
    • Patient
    • Meds
    • Tech
    • Social
    • Video
    • About
    • Contact
    • Contribute
    • Book
    • Careers
    • Podcast
    • Recommended
    • Speaking

The case of Purvi Patel: Scoring anti-choice political points

Jennifer Gunter, MD
Physician
April 1, 2015
Share
Tweet
Share

Purvi Patel was found guilty of both feticide and child neglect in Indiana in February and now faces 70 years in jail. A jury deliberated for about 5 hours, even though there are no facts supporting either the feticide claim or the neglect, never mind the travesty that child neglect and feticide are incompatible charges. It’s hard to neglect a baby you have already been found guilty of killing as a fetus. Truly a bizarre version of double jeopardy. While every other crime has an attempted category this is apparently not the case with feticide in Indiana, trying and failing to commit feticide (now matter how ineffective your attempt) is the same as feticide.

I wrote about this case last year. Ms. Patel delivered a very premature baby alone at home. By all reports around 23 to 25 weeks gestation. She reported having pain, not knowing how far along she was and then “it just all fell out … gushing blood on the floor.” I have delivered many premature babies and had a very premature baby myself. That is exactly how it happens. A 1 to 1.5 lb baby delivers very quickly. They often fall in toilets as women don’t realize they are in labor.

Ms. Patel presented to the hospital after her delivery, and the placenta was still in utero. A police investigation (which involved an overly zealous doctor) led to the discovery of the fetus in a dumpster.

Ms. Patel claimed she did not know how far along she was in the pregnancy. She did not seek prenatal care so she couldn’t have know for sure. In addition, she was hiding the pregnancy and in my experience this leads many women to ignore the early signs of pregnancy. It is very common to tell someone with an unplanned pregnancy that they are actually 18 weeks, not ten weeks. Even women with wanted pregnancies can be woefully off on their dates. In fact, I have delivered many women with wanted pregnancies who had no idea they were pregnant until they found themselves pushing in the emergency department with me between their legs saying, “No this isn’t gallstones, I’m really sure.” Denial is a powerful force.

Ms. Patel claims she did not take any abortifacients and that the delivery was spontaneous, and the baby was born dead. The pathology report indicates the fetus hemorrhaged significantly (likely from a torn umbilical cord) during birth or immediately afterwards. Ms. Patel was afraid, confused, and as being pregnant and unmarried was shameful to her and believing the fetus was born dead she hid it.

The prosecution provided no evidence that Ms. Patel actually took abortifacients. She texted a friend when she was about 8 to 12 weeks pregnant (about one month before she delivered) about taking a medication to end the pregnancy. I found conflicting information about whether or not she actually bought what she thought was an abortifacient online. RU-486 would not cause an abortion past 12 weeks so even if she did buy that it’s moot, so the only drug that could have brought on her premature labor would be misoprostol, but her toxicology report was negative for that drug. Even if she did buy what she believed was misoprostol there is a good likelihood that what she received was counterfeit.  This fact has been detailed extensively. There is no government official to complain to if you buy placebo illegal abortifacients online.

The prosecution presented an expert who used a widely discredited method (floating the fetal lungs in water) to see if the baby was born alive. According to my copy of Medicolegal Investigations of Death, 4th Edition floating the lungs “must not be regarded as absolute proof of a live birth.” There are several factors and events that can contribute to false positives and false negatives. Therefore, this test can’t be used if the standard is beyond a reasonable doubt. The state’s pathologist testified there were other signs the baby was born alive, but the science is by no means exact. There isn’t a 100 percent yes or no test. The expert for Patel countered the fetus was not likely viable.

The only facts are Ms. Patel went into labor prematurely and hid the body of the fetus. She had no way of knowing how far along she was in the pregnancy and the likely cause of her premature delivery was lack of prenatal care (that is, after all, the #1 cause of prematurity in the United States). She was found guilty because she didn’t know she was as far along she was in the pregnancy and didn’t call an ambulance (or was too ill/confused to call an ambulance) and then panicked because she didn’t know what to do.

There is no evidence Ms. Patel took an abortifacient, so how she can be guilty to feticide is beyond comprehension unless wishing you were not pregnant is now considered feticide in Indiana. There appears to be little convincing evidence (beyond a reasonable doubt) that the fetus was born alive, so the neglect charges are equally disturbing.

These cases can only be an attempt to score anti-choice political points and punish women, because if the state of Indiana really cared about preventing fetal demise they would ban cigarettes and if prosecuting feticide were really the point they would be looking at stillbirths due to cigarette smoking and obesity. (I’m not suggesting anyone be prosecuted for a stillbirth, rather pointing out the irony that in Indiana it’s OK to smoke and have a stillbirth, but not to have an unplanned premature delivery at home and then panic about what to do.)  Then there is the whole concept that of instead of wasting tax payer dollars on this kind of prosecution that the money would be far better invested if it were channeled into prenatal care.

In the meantime, if you live in Indiana and are pregnant, don’t ever tell or text anyone that you are ambivalent about being pregnant or are thinking about an abortion because if you have a fetal demise the fact that at one point you might have contemplated an abortion means you had something to do with it, medical evidence proving otherwise be damned. And if you have a precipitous premature delivery at home the first thing you must do is not cry or grieve or freak out because you didn’t realize you were that far along or pass out from blood loss, you must immediately call 911 because not being able to triage your own emergency home delivery is also a crime in Indiana.

Update: Ms. Patel was sentenced to 20 years in prison on March 31, 2015.

Jennifer Gunter is an obstetrician-gynecologist and author of The Preemie Primer. She blogs at her self-titled site, Dr. Jen Gunter.

ADVERTISEMENT

Prev

ADHD and early death: We often miss the story

April 1, 2015 Kevin 2
…
Next

Why primary care is like Jeopardy

April 1, 2015 Kevin 2
…

Tagged as: OB/GYN

Post navigation

< Previous Post
ADHD and early death: We often miss the story
Next Post >
Why primary care is like Jeopardy

ADVERTISEMENT

More by Jennifer Gunter, MD

  • The Ellen Show broadcasts potentially harmful information about ovarian cancer screening

    Jennifer Gunter, MD
  • Dear science: an appreciation

    Jennifer Gunter, MD
  • Are there too many female OB/GYNs?

    Jennifer Gunter, MD

More in Physician

  • How relationships predict physician burnout risk

    Tomi Mitchell, MD
  • Preserving your sense of self as a doctor

    Camille C. Imbo, MD
  • The geometry of communication in medicine

    Patrick Hudson, MD
  • Why I became a pediatrician: a doctor’s story

    Jamie S. Hutton, MD
  • Is trauma surgery a dying field?

    Farshad Farnejad, MD
  • Why we fund unproven autism therapies

    Ronald L. Lindsay, MD
  • Most Popular

  • Past Week

    • Direct primary care in low-income markets

      Dana Y. Lujan, MBA | Policy
    • Female athlete urine leakage: A urologist explains

      Martina Ambardjieva, MD, PhD | Conditions
    • AI in medical imaging: When algorithms block the view

      Gerald Kuo | Tech
    • Are you neurodivergent or just bored?

      Martha Rosenberg | Meds
    • The danger of dismantling DEI in medicine

      Jacquelyne Gaddy, MD | Physician
    • Why the 4 a.m. wake-up call isn’t for everyone

      Laura Suttin, MD, MBA | Physician
  • Past 6 Months

    • Why you should get your Lp(a) tested

      Monzur Morshed, MD and Kaysan Morshed | Conditions
    • Rebuilding the backbone of health care [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • The dismantling of public health infrastructure

      Ronald L. Lindsay, MD | Physician
    • The flaw in the ACA’s physician ownership ban

      Luis Tumialán, MD | Policy
    • Systematic neglect of mental health

      Ronke Lawal | Tech
    • Silicon Valley’s primary care doctor shortage

      George F. Smith, MD | Physician
  • Recent Posts

    • Transforming patient fear into understanding through clear communication [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • How movement improves pelvic floor function

      Martina Ambardjieva, MD, PhD | Conditions
    • How immigrant physicians solved a U.S. crisis

      Eram Alam, PhD | Conditions
    • Pediatric leadership silence on FDA ADHD recall

      Ronald L. Lindsay, MD | Conditions
    • How relationships predict physician burnout risk

      Tomi Mitchell, MD | Physician
    • The ethical conflict of the Charlie Gard case

      Timothy Lesaca, MD | Conditions

Subscribe to KevinMD and never miss a story!

Get free updates delivered free to your inbox.


Find jobs at
Careers by KevinMD.com

Search thousands of physician, PA, NP, and CRNA jobs now.

Learn more

View 8 Comments >

Founded in 2004 by Kevin Pho, MD, KevinMD.com is the web’s leading platform where physicians, advanced practitioners, nurses, medical students, and patients share their insight and tell their stories.

Social

  • Like on Facebook
  • Follow on Twitter
  • Connect on Linkedin
  • Subscribe on Youtube
  • Instagram

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Most Popular

  • Past Week

    • Direct primary care in low-income markets

      Dana Y. Lujan, MBA | Policy
    • Female athlete urine leakage: A urologist explains

      Martina Ambardjieva, MD, PhD | Conditions
    • AI in medical imaging: When algorithms block the view

      Gerald Kuo | Tech
    • Are you neurodivergent or just bored?

      Martha Rosenberg | Meds
    • The danger of dismantling DEI in medicine

      Jacquelyne Gaddy, MD | Physician
    • Why the 4 a.m. wake-up call isn’t for everyone

      Laura Suttin, MD, MBA | Physician
  • Past 6 Months

    • Why you should get your Lp(a) tested

      Monzur Morshed, MD and Kaysan Morshed | Conditions
    • Rebuilding the backbone of health care [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • The dismantling of public health infrastructure

      Ronald L. Lindsay, MD | Physician
    • The flaw in the ACA’s physician ownership ban

      Luis Tumialán, MD | Policy
    • Systematic neglect of mental health

      Ronke Lawal | Tech
    • Silicon Valley’s primary care doctor shortage

      George F. Smith, MD | Physician
  • Recent Posts

    • Transforming patient fear into understanding through clear communication [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • How movement improves pelvic floor function

      Martina Ambardjieva, MD, PhD | Conditions
    • How immigrant physicians solved a U.S. crisis

      Eram Alam, PhD | Conditions
    • Pediatric leadership silence on FDA ADHD recall

      Ronald L. Lindsay, MD | Conditions
    • How relationships predict physician burnout risk

      Tomi Mitchell, MD | Physician
    • The ethical conflict of the Charlie Gard case

      Timothy Lesaca, MD | Conditions

MedPage Today Professional

An Everyday Health Property Medpage Today
  • Terms of Use | Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • DMCA Policy
All Content © KevinMD, LLC
Site by Outthink Group

The case of Purvi Patel: Scoring anti-choice political points
8 comments

Comments are moderated before they are published. Please read the comment policy.

Loading Comments...