Skip to content
  • About
  • Contact
  • Contribute
  • Book
  • Careers
  • Podcast
  • Recommended
  • Speaking
  • All
  • Physician
  • Practice
  • Policy
  • Finance
  • Conditions
  • .edu
  • Patient
  • Meds
  • Tech
  • Social
  • Video
    • All
    • Physician
    • Practice
    • Policy
    • Finance
    • Conditions
    • .edu
    • Patient
    • Meds
    • Tech
    • Social
    • Video
    • About
    • Contact
    • Contribute
    • Book
    • Careers
    • Podcast
    • Recommended
    • Speaking

Transparency in medicine can be misleading, but it’s necessary

Robert Wong, MD
Policy
October 27, 2015
Share
Tweet
Share

Transparency in medicine is a good thing

When the Center for Medicare and Medicaid services (CMS) publically disclosed the 2012 CMS reimbursements to physicians, the response was immediately felt throughout the medical community.  As a practicing physician, we were warned of this day.  Can’t say we prepared for it, but we sure did brace for it.

And sure enough, on April 9, 2014, the New York Times published on their website a sortable database where anyone (patients and media outlets alike) can look up their doctor or any doctor nationwide.  Within the next 24 hours, local newspapers published on their front pages the faces of the “highest paid” doctor in their region with some being reimbursed at the level of CEOs of Fortune 500 companies.

As a retina physician, my profession was one of the most reimbursed medical specialties by CMS largely due to our use of high cost, vision-saving, medications.  We’ll touch on that later.

Several months later the Physician Payments Sunshine Act disclosed payments to health care providers and hospitals they receive from industry during 2013.  These relationships with industry may include payments for participation on a speaker panel, advisory board, royalties or stock incentives, or reimbursements for resources used in clinical research.

Physicians weren’t the only entities where the light was shined upon. Some academic hospitals were exposed as to how much more they were charging patients for surgical services and comparing them to less costly outpatient surgery centers where patients may be charged a fraction of the cost for the same procedure.

Transparency in medicine officially made its mark.

Transparency can change physician behavior — often for the better

A recently published survey of family practice physicians showed that when physicians were aware of the exact cost of a prescription medication as well as the cost of a comparable therapeutic equivalent, the physician will more likely select the cheaper of the two medications assuming the safety and efficacy profiles were similar.  That simple act alone could reduce health care costs while improving patient medication compliance at the same time.

OK, so surveys are more theoretical and sometimes don’t necessarily translate to real-world clinical practice.  In my field as a retina specialist, we can treat patients who have a central vision blinding condition known as wet macular degeneration with either one of three different medications:  Avastin, Lucentis, or Eylea.  Lucentis and Eylea have been studied through the rigorous FDA process and were both found to be safe and extremely efficacious as injections directly into the eye to prevent blindness and improve vision.

They also cost ~$2,000 per injection, and patients often require treatment every 4 to 8 weeks indefinitely.  Avastin, which is biochemically similar to Lucentis, works just as effectively, but is compounded and used off-label at a cost of ~$60 per injection.  Most retina specialists use all three drugs at varying frequencies.

However, once CMS pulled the sheets and showed exactly how often we used each of these medications and identified those who were using the higher costing medication the most, doctors began using the less costly Avastin more frequently.

There was a noticeable shift in physician behavior.  It seems like physicians didn’t want to grace the front pages of the local newspaper a second time.

ADVERTISEMENT

Transparency in medicine can be misleading

The “CMS data dump of 2014” highlighted the total amount of payments physicians were reimbursed by Medicare and Medicaid.  News outlets more often than not interpreted this as how much doctors made as salary through payments from our hard earned tax dollars.

As a retina doctor whose specialty was portrayed as a high-cost outlier, I’d say that nothing could be further from the truth.  The bulk of the CMS payments to retina doctors covered the cost of these medications that we administer to our patients to treat them.  In fact, about 96 percent of the CMS payments for these medications go directly back to the pharmaceutical companies.  The treating physician may charge a 4 percent markup on the medication to cover storage, inventory software and handling of the medication as well as supplies related to the treatment procedure.

The rest goes to big pharma.  Now that wasn’t mentioned in any of the newspaper articles.

Transparency in medicine will only become more transparent. And doctors will need to adapt.

Furthermore, the government won’t stop making more and more physician metrics publically available.  In 2017, through the Affordable Care Act, the government will begin rating all physicians with regards to cost and quality measures through a value-based payment modifier system, and this will be made public for anyone to review.  Cost measures are already being calculated. The quality measures are tabulated by how often doctors comply with reporting “physician quality reporting system (PQRS)” measures.

For example, to satisfy the reporting requirement of these PQRS measures, I would need to address a patient’s blood pressure, counsel smoking cessation, add the patient to our online access patient portal system, and provide them with some pamphlets on diabetes management.  Those who forget to mention smoking at their annual prescription eyeglass refraction may be lumped into the “poor quality” pool.

Missing the PQRS reporting measures will cost you.

As calculated by the value-based payment modifier system, those who are high cost, but forget to send the patient home with some paperwork (low quality of care) may be subject to penalties by CMS upwards of 2 to 4 percent of their total annual Medicare reimbursement.  You have been warned!  On the flip side, become a low-cost physician and hit all of your PQRS marks, you may be rewarded with a bonus of up to 4 percent!  So at least mention to your patients that smoking is bad …

Transparency, when used responsibly, is a good thing.  To reign in the high cost of health care and eventually make doctors better health care providers, transparency is likely a necessary thing.

Robert Wong is a retina specialist who blogs at 36th and Hamilton.

Prev

A rotation in Uganda provides perspective to this medical student

October 27, 2015 Kevin 0
…
Next

Will your anesthesiologist leave the OR? Patients deserve to know.

October 27, 2015 Kevin 68
…

Tagged as: Medicare

Post navigation

< Previous Post
A rotation in Uganda provides perspective to this medical student
Next Post >
Will your anesthesiologist leave the OR? Patients deserve to know.

ADVERTISEMENT

More by Robert Wong, MD

  • 3 things that make doctors successful

    Robert Wong, MD
  • Doctors: Bring your practice website to the 21st-century

    Robert Wong, MD
  • What J. J. Abrams can teach us about the future of health care

    Robert Wong, MD

Related Posts

  • How social media can advance humanism in medicine

    Pooja Lakshmin, MD
  • The difference between learning medicine and doing medicine

    Steven Zhang, MD
  • Take politics out of science and medicine

    Anonymous
  • KevinMD at the Richmond Academy of Medicine

    Kevin Pho, MD
  • 5 reasons to get involved in organized medicine

    Frances Mei Hardin, MD
  • Medicine is failing rural Americans

    Michael McCarthy

More in Policy

  • The One Big Beautiful Bill and the fragile heart of rural health care

    Holland Haynie, MD
  • Why health care leaders fail at execution—and how to fix it

    Dave Cummings, RN
  • Healing the doctor-patient relationship by attacking administrative inefficiencies

    Allen Fredrickson
  • The hidden health risks in the One Big Beautiful Bill Act

    Trevor Lyford, MPH
  • The CDC’s restructuring: Where is the voice of health care in the room?

    Tarek Khrisat, MD
  • Choosing between care and country: a dual citizen’s Independence Day reflection

    Kathleen Muldoon, PhD
  • Most Popular

  • Past Week

    • Forced voicemail and diagnosis codes are endangering patient access to medications

      Arthur Lazarus, MD, MBA | Meds
    • How President Biden’s cognitive health shapes political and legal trust

      Muhamad Aly Rifai, MD | Conditions
    • The One Big Beautiful Bill and the fragile heart of rural health care

      Holland Haynie, MD | Policy
    • Why timing, not surgery, determines patient survival

      Michael Karch, MD | Conditions
    • Why health care leaders fail at execution—and how to fix it

      Dave Cummings, RN | Policy
    • How digital tools are reshaping the doctor-patient relationship

      Vineet Vishwanath | Tech
  • Past 6 Months

    • Forced voicemail and diagnosis codes are endangering patient access to medications

      Arthur Lazarus, MD, MBA | Meds
    • Why are medical students turning away from primary care? [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • How President Biden’s cognitive health shapes political and legal trust

      Muhamad Aly Rifai, MD | Conditions
    • The One Big Beautiful Bill and the fragile heart of rural health care

      Holland Haynie, MD | Policy
    • Why “do no harm” might be harming modern medicine

      Sabooh S. Mubbashar, MD | Physician
    • The hidden health risks in the One Big Beautiful Bill Act

      Trevor Lyford, MPH | Policy
  • Recent Posts

    • Why point-of-care ultrasound belongs in every emergency department triage [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • Why PSA levels alone shouldn’t define your prostate cancer risk

      Martina Ambardjieva, MD, PhD | Conditions
    • How to handle chronically late patients in your medical practice

      Neil Baum, MD | Physician
    • Reframing chronic pain and dignity: What a pain clinic teaches us about MAiD and chronic suffering

      Olumuyiwa Bamgbade, MD | Conditions
    • How early meetings and after-hours events penalize physician-mothers

      Samira Jeimy, MD, PhD and Menaka Pai, MD | Physician
    • Why medicine must evolve to support modern physicians

      Ryan Nadelson, MD | Physician

Subscribe to KevinMD and never miss a story!

Get free updates delivered free to your inbox.


Find jobs at
Careers by KevinMD.com

Search thousands of physician, PA, NP, and CRNA jobs now.

Learn more

View 6 Comments >

Founded in 2004 by Kevin Pho, MD, KevinMD.com is the web’s leading platform where physicians, advanced practitioners, nurses, medical students, and patients share their insight and tell their stories.

Social

  • Like on Facebook
  • Follow on Twitter
  • Connect on Linkedin
  • Subscribe on Youtube
  • Instagram

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Most Popular

  • Past Week

    • Forced voicemail and diagnosis codes are endangering patient access to medications

      Arthur Lazarus, MD, MBA | Meds
    • How President Biden’s cognitive health shapes political and legal trust

      Muhamad Aly Rifai, MD | Conditions
    • The One Big Beautiful Bill and the fragile heart of rural health care

      Holland Haynie, MD | Policy
    • Why timing, not surgery, determines patient survival

      Michael Karch, MD | Conditions
    • Why health care leaders fail at execution—and how to fix it

      Dave Cummings, RN | Policy
    • How digital tools are reshaping the doctor-patient relationship

      Vineet Vishwanath | Tech
  • Past 6 Months

    • Forced voicemail and diagnosis codes are endangering patient access to medications

      Arthur Lazarus, MD, MBA | Meds
    • Why are medical students turning away from primary care? [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • How President Biden’s cognitive health shapes political and legal trust

      Muhamad Aly Rifai, MD | Conditions
    • The One Big Beautiful Bill and the fragile heart of rural health care

      Holland Haynie, MD | Policy
    • Why “do no harm” might be harming modern medicine

      Sabooh S. Mubbashar, MD | Physician
    • The hidden health risks in the One Big Beautiful Bill Act

      Trevor Lyford, MPH | Policy
  • Recent Posts

    • Why point-of-care ultrasound belongs in every emergency department triage [PODCAST]

      The Podcast by KevinMD | Podcast
    • Why PSA levels alone shouldn’t define your prostate cancer risk

      Martina Ambardjieva, MD, PhD | Conditions
    • How to handle chronically late patients in your medical practice

      Neil Baum, MD | Physician
    • Reframing chronic pain and dignity: What a pain clinic teaches us about MAiD and chronic suffering

      Olumuyiwa Bamgbade, MD | Conditions
    • How early meetings and after-hours events penalize physician-mothers

      Samira Jeimy, MD, PhD and Menaka Pai, MD | Physician
    • Why medicine must evolve to support modern physicians

      Ryan Nadelson, MD | Physician

MedPage Today Professional

An Everyday Health Property Medpage Today
  • Terms of Use | Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • DMCA Policy
All Content © KevinMD, LLC
Site by Outthink Group

Transparency in medicine can be misleading, but it’s necessary
6 comments

Comments are moderated before they are published. Please read the comment policy.

Loading Comments...