Skip to content
  • About
  • Contact
  • Contribute
  • Book
  • Careers
  • Podcast
  • Recommended
  • Speaking
  • All
  • Physician
  • Practice
  • Policy
  • Finance
  • Conditions
  • .edu
  • Patient
  • Meds
  • Tech
  • Social
  • Video
    • All
    • Physician
    • Practice
    • Policy
    • Finance
    • Conditions
    • .edu
    • Patient
    • Meds
    • Tech
    • Social
    • Video
    • About
    • Contact
    • Contribute
    • Book
    • Careers
    • Podcast
    • Recommended
    • Speaking

Why do never events occur? It’s because of the human factor.

Cornelius Thiels, DO
Physician
October 26, 2015
Share
Tweet
Share

Wrong procedure, wrong side/site, wrong implant, retained foreign object: big problem.  No patient should ever have to undergo these types of events, and they are therefore called never events. However, these events do occur and when they do they not only jeopardize patient safety but they also breach the trust between patient and practitioner, have financial implications, and reflect negatively on the entire health care system.

The good news is never events are rare. But when you consider that, in theory, the rate of never events should be one in infinitely, the nationally reported rate of 1 in every 12,000 procedures is still too many. So why do these events still happen after decades of work to prevent them? Well, it turns out while there isn’t usually one human to blame; the causes are very, well, human.

Over the last few decades, researchers have identified that things such as system breakdowns, technical errors, communication failures, and most commonly a combination of all these things (Swiss cheese anyone?) contribute to why never events occur. But despite this research and the subsequent implementation of OR checklists, briefings, barcode systems, and safety counts, these events continue to occur. While the current systems and processes are moving us in the right direction, it is important that we take a closer look into why these events continue to occur.

In an article recently published in Surgery, we set out to better understand what factors were contributing to never events. Using a model initially developed to study aviation disasters, we set out to identify the environmental, organizational and individual characteristics that play a role. It turns out that there was not one person, machine, or system to blame. In fact, while it took us 22,000 procedures to identify an event we did identify 69 events and 628 human factors that contributed to these errors. This means that approximately nine human factors contributed to each event.

To better understand this very human problem, we grouped these factors into 4 categories: unsafe actions (Did a team member not complete a required checklist?), preconditions for actions (Was the surgeon tired?), oversight/supervisory factors (Was their inadequate supervision?) and organizational influences (Is there an unsafe culture?).

As it turns out, oversight/supervisory factors and organizational influences rarely played a role in these events. Unsafe actions (also known as the error itself) played an important role in most of the events. However, the unsafe act rarely involved breaking or bending a rule (not following a required checklist) and usually involved things like a confirmation bias. (“There can’t be a sponge left behind because I checked.”) While the unsafe actions are important to recognize they often are more difficult to fix. This is where preconditions to actions come into play.

Preconditions are the conditions that lead up to the error. When we looked into the preconditions, we found, to our surprise, that these never events often occur in very minor non-emergent procedures. In addition, patient factors like obesity were rarely cited as contributing. What was often cited was channeled attention on a single issue, overconfidence, and inadequate communication or what we collectively call, cognitive factors. One’s cognitive capacity on any given day can be altered by fatigue, time constraints, and team composition. To prevent these preconditions from becoming errors, we must not only identify them but also prevent them. One way to do this is to decrease cognitive workload is by engaging other team members (or even computer systems) to share the load. Preventing these preconditions from occurring is the real key to preventing an error and improving patient safety.

So, how do we eliminate never events from our health care system? Well, there is no magic bullet (or pill). But what we do know is that in addition to systems approaches and efforts to improve communication, we need to better utilize the teams and technology so that never events will occur, well, never.

Cornelius Thiels is a general surgery resident who blogs at MBlog Mayo Clinic.

Image credit: Shutterstock.com

Prev

How the almighty norm can dilute advice we give and receive

October 26, 2015 Kevin 0
…
Next

A rotation in Uganda provides perspective to this medical student

October 27, 2015 Kevin 0
…

Tagged as: Surgery

Post navigation

< Previous Post
How the almighty norm can dilute advice we give and receive
Next Post >
A rotation in Uganda provides perspective to this medical student

ADVERTISEMENT

More by Cornelius Thiels, DO

  • Drones in medicine: What are the possibilities?

    Cornelius Thiels, DO

Related Posts

  • The medical student who had a genuine human profile

    DrizzleMD
  • Be a human first and a doctor second

    Sarah Murad
  • We are human and all in this together

    Hannah Todd, MPH
  • A physician’s addiction to social media

    Amanda Xi, MD
  • Is health care just legal human trafficking?

    Debra Blaine, MD
  • This patient interaction is a reminder of the power of being human

    Johnathan Yao, MD, MPH

More in Physician

  • Why every physician needs a sabbatical (and how to take one)

    Christie Mulholland, MD
  • The moral injury of “not medically necessary” denials

    Arthur Lazarus, MD, MBA
  • Is physician unionization the answer to a broken health care system?

    Allan Dobzyniak, MD
  • The decline of professionalism in medicine: a structural diagnosis

    Patrick Hudson, MD
  • The patchwork era of medical board certification

    Brian Hudes, MD
  • How neurodiversity in relationships shapes communication

    Farid Sabet-Sharghi, MD
  • Most Popular

  • Past Week

    • How environmental justice and health disparities connect to climate change

      Kaitlynn Esemaya, Alexis Thompson, Annique McLune, and Anamaria Ancheta | Policy
    • A physician father on the Dobbs decision and reproductive rights

      Travis Walker, MD, MPH | Physician
    • Examining the rural divide in pediatric health care

      James Bianchi | Policy
    • Will AI replace primary care physicians?

      P. Dileep Kumar, MD, MBA | Tech
    • Why pediatricians are key to postpartum depression screening

      Mikenna Reiser | Conditions
    • How CAR-NK cancer therapy could be safer than CAR-T

      Cliff Dominy, PhD | Meds
  • Past 6 Months

    • Why patient trust in physicians is declining

      Mansi Kotwal, MD, MPH | Physician
    • Is primary care becoming a triage station?

      J. Leonard Lichtenfeld, MD | Physician
    • How environmental justice and health disparities connect to climate change

      Kaitlynn Esemaya, Alexis Thompson, Annique McLune, and Anamaria Ancheta | Policy
    • The blind men and the elephant: a parable for modern pain management

      Richard A. Lawhern, PhD | Conditions
    • Is tramadol really ineffective and risky?

      John A. Bumpus, PhD | Meds
    • Psychiatrists are physicians: a key distinction

      Farid Sabet-Sharghi, MD | Physician
  • Recent Posts

    • Why pediatricians are key to postpartum depression screening

      Mikenna Reiser | Conditions
    • Prostate cancer genomic testing: a physician-patient’s perspective

      Francisco M. Torres, MD | Conditions
    • Why every physician needs a sabbatical (and how to take one)

      Christie Mulholland, MD | Physician
    • Retail health care vs. employer DPC: Preparing for 2026 policy shifts

      Dana Y. Lujan, MBA | Policy
    • Taiwan’s “Yi-Dong-Yang”: a preventive aging model for super-aged societies

      Gerald Kuo | Conditions
    • The moral injury of “not medically necessary” denials

      Arthur Lazarus, MD, MBA | Physician

Subscribe to KevinMD and never miss a story!

Get free updates delivered free to your inbox.


Find jobs at
Careers by KevinMD.com

Search thousands of physician, PA, NP, and CRNA jobs now.

Learn more

View 2 Comments >

Founded in 2004 by Kevin Pho, MD, KevinMD.com is the web’s leading platform where physicians, advanced practitioners, nurses, medical students, and patients share their insight and tell their stories.

Social

  • Like on Facebook
  • Follow on Twitter
  • Connect on Linkedin
  • Subscribe on Youtube
  • Instagram

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Most Popular

  • Past Week

    • How environmental justice and health disparities connect to climate change

      Kaitlynn Esemaya, Alexis Thompson, Annique McLune, and Anamaria Ancheta | Policy
    • A physician father on the Dobbs decision and reproductive rights

      Travis Walker, MD, MPH | Physician
    • Examining the rural divide in pediatric health care

      James Bianchi | Policy
    • Will AI replace primary care physicians?

      P. Dileep Kumar, MD, MBA | Tech
    • Why pediatricians are key to postpartum depression screening

      Mikenna Reiser | Conditions
    • How CAR-NK cancer therapy could be safer than CAR-T

      Cliff Dominy, PhD | Meds
  • Past 6 Months

    • Why patient trust in physicians is declining

      Mansi Kotwal, MD, MPH | Physician
    • Is primary care becoming a triage station?

      J. Leonard Lichtenfeld, MD | Physician
    • How environmental justice and health disparities connect to climate change

      Kaitlynn Esemaya, Alexis Thompson, Annique McLune, and Anamaria Ancheta | Policy
    • The blind men and the elephant: a parable for modern pain management

      Richard A. Lawhern, PhD | Conditions
    • Is tramadol really ineffective and risky?

      John A. Bumpus, PhD | Meds
    • Psychiatrists are physicians: a key distinction

      Farid Sabet-Sharghi, MD | Physician
  • Recent Posts

    • Why pediatricians are key to postpartum depression screening

      Mikenna Reiser | Conditions
    • Prostate cancer genomic testing: a physician-patient’s perspective

      Francisco M. Torres, MD | Conditions
    • Why every physician needs a sabbatical (and how to take one)

      Christie Mulholland, MD | Physician
    • Retail health care vs. employer DPC: Preparing for 2026 policy shifts

      Dana Y. Lujan, MBA | Policy
    • Taiwan’s “Yi-Dong-Yang”: a preventive aging model for super-aged societies

      Gerald Kuo | Conditions
    • The moral injury of “not medically necessary” denials

      Arthur Lazarus, MD, MBA | Physician

MedPage Today Professional

An Everyday Health Property Medpage Today
  • Terms of Use | Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • DMCA Policy
All Content © KevinMD, LLC
Site by Outthink Group

Why do never events occur? It’s because of the human factor.
2 comments

Comments are moderated before they are published. Please read the comment policy.

Loading Comments...